Can Atheists be Moral?

[G.T.]

You never answered my question. How do you define sin?

Sin is disobedience to the law of God. But since the words of the law are figurative and the subjects are hidden, as Jesus revealed, many people are walking around feeling guilty for doing what is not sin and defiantly sinning without any awareness of their guilt.

Some people lie in the name of God as if its a religious duty and defy his commands as if death is the way to life.

There are even buildings all around the world where believers openly practice idolatry every Sunday believing that they are saved.


Imagine that!

Where is this law that you speak of? How many laws are there? How was the law conveyed to us?

Great questions! Looks like you have a lot of work to do. Maybe you should stop playing lets pretend, put your thinking cap on, and hit the books. At the very least, put your pants on.

I heard somewhere that time is running out.

I just proved you are full of shit.

You are an idolator. You worship a triune mangod that does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence and eat the lifeless work of human hands for spiritual life.

And you actually you think that you have won something by ignoring your sin which is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field. lol....

Congratulations!

You have your reward already!

You've said that you think the God of the Bible is a fairy tale.

But you never seem to state your epistemology, for cross examination -

So, what is it? Specifically, your views on origins...

 

[hobelim]

Sin is disobedience to the law of God. But since the words of the law are figurative and the subjects are hidden, as Jesus revealed, many people are walking around feeling guilty for doing what is not sin and defiantly sinning without any awareness of their guilt.

Some people lie in the name of God as if its a religious duty and defy his commands as if death is the way to life.

There are even buildings all around the world where believers openly practice idolatry every Sunday believing that they are saved.


Imagine that!

Where is this law that you speak of? How many laws are there? How was the law conveyed to us?

Great questions! Looks like you have a lot of work to do. Maybe you should stop playing lets pretend, put your thinking cap on, and hit the books. At the very least, put your pants on.

I heard somewhere that time is running out.

I just proved you are full of shit.

You are an idolator. You worship a triune mangod that does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence and eat the lifeless work of human hands for spiritual life.

And you actually you think that you have won something by ignoring your sin which is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field. lol....

Congratulations!

You have your reward already!

You've said that you think the God of the Bible is a fairy tale.

But you never seem to state your epistemology, for cross examination -

So, what is it? Specifically, your views on origins...

origins of what?

 

[G.T.]

Where is this law that you speak of? How many laws are there? How was the law conveyed to us?

Great questions! Looks like you have a lot of work to do. Maybe you should stop playing lets pretend, put your thinking cap on, and hit the books. At the very least, put your pants on.

I heard somewhere that time is running out.

I just proved you are full of shit.

You are an idolator. You worship a triune mangod that does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence and eat the lifeless work of human hands for spiritual life.

And you actually you think that you have won something by ignoring your sin which is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field. lol....

Congratulations!

You have your reward already!

You've said that you think the God of the Bible is a fairy tale.

But you never seem to state your epistemology, for cross examination -

So, what is it? Specifically, your views on origins...

origins of what?

I'd love to know if you do or do not engage in earnest, but each time I ask you about your epistemology you deflect...so - I'll try it out again...

I'm asking you for your theory/belief on how the Universe got here, or if you think it's eternal, or if you hold the position of being agnostic about it... and what's your take on whether or not there's a "being" or consciousness, that's got anything to do with its creation...

Try to be straight forward, and not metaphorical or allegorical.

 

[hobelim]

Great questions! Looks like you have a lot of work to do. Maybe you should stop playing lets pretend, put your thinking cap on, and hit the books. At the very least, put your pants on.

I heard somewhere that time is running out.

I just proved you are full of shit.

You are an idolator. You worship a triune mangod that does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence and eat the lifeless work of human hands for spiritual life.

And you actually you think that you have won something by ignoring your sin which is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field. lol....

Congratulations!

You have your reward already!

You've said that you think the God of the Bible is a fairy tale.

But you never seem to state your epistemology, for cross examination -

So, what is it? Specifically, your views on origins...

origins of what?

I'd love to know if you do or do not engage in earnest, but each time I ask you about your epistemology you deflect...so - I'll try it out again...

I'm asking you for your theory/belief on how the Universe got here, or if you think it's eternal, or if you hold the position of being agnostic about it... and what's your take on whether or not there's a "being" or consciousness, that's got anything to do with its creation...

Try to be straight forward, and not metaphorical or allegorical.

I see. I have no belief or interest in how the universe got here. I leave that question for scientists to answer. Its here and so am I is enough for me to go on.

As far as the fairy tale, I know that the story of Genesis is not about the beginning of the universe, the solar system, the earth, or the first plants, animals and human beings.

This is not a belief. Its a fact.

 

[G.T.]

I just proved you are full of shit.

You are an idolator. You worship a triune mangod that does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence and eat the lifeless work of human hands for spiritual life.

And you actually you think that you have won something by ignoring your sin which is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field. lol....

Congratulations!

You have your reward already!

You've said that you think the God of the Bible is a fairy tale.

But you never seem to state your epistemology, for cross examination -

So, what is it? Specifically, your views on origins...

origins of what?

I'd love to know if you do or do not engage in earnest, but each time I ask you about your epistemology you deflect...so - I'll try it out again...

I'm asking you for your theory/belief on how the Universe got here, or if you think it's eternal, or if you hold the position of being agnostic about it... and what's your take on whether or not there's a "being" or consciousness, that's got anything to do with its creation...

Try to be straight forward, and not metaphorical or allegorical.

I see. I have no belief or interest in how the universe got here. I leave that question for scientists to answer. Its here and so am I is enough for me to deal with.

As far as the fairy tale, I know that the story of Genesis is not about the beginning of the universe, the solar system, the earth, or the first plants, animals and human beings.

This is not a belief. Its a fact.

So you're agnostic in terms of how the Universe got here -

How about a deity - are you agnostic on that or do you hold a belief?

 

[danielpalos]

Can persons who resort to fallacy instead of sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation, be moral?

 

[hobelim]

You are an idolator. You worship a triune mangod that does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence and eat the lifeless work of human hands for spiritual life.

And you actually you think that you have won something by ignoring your sin which is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field. lol....

Congratulations!

You have your reward already!

You've said that you think the God of the Bible is a fairy tale.

But you never seem to state your epistemology, for cross examination -

So, what is it? Specifically, your views on origins...

origins of what?

I'd love to know if you do or do not engage in earnest, but each time I ask you about your epistemology you deflect...so - I'll try it out again...

I'm asking you for your theory/belief on how the Universe got here, or if you think it's eternal, or if you hold the position of being agnostic about it... and what's your take on whether or not there's a "being" or consciousness, that's got anything to do with its creation...

Try to be straight forward, and not metaphorical or allegorical.

I see. I have no belief or interest in how the universe got here. I leave that question for scientists to answer. Its here and so am I is enough for me to deal with.

As far as the fairy tale, I know that the story of Genesis is not about the beginning of the universe, the solar system, the earth, or the first plants, animals and human beings.

This is not a belief. Its a fact.

So you're agnostic in terms of how the Universe got here -

How about a deity - are you agnostic on that or do you hold a belief?

I hold a belief that conforms to reality about an unknown God whose existence has been confirmed by reality.


An unknown God who doesn't care about what you eat or what you wear or if your weenie was snipped. An unknown God that never diddled a virgin to father himself so that he could become fully human and die so that people could eat him. An unknown God that never chose a deranged child rapist to be his last and greatest prophet.

 

[G.T.]

You've said that you think the God of the Bible is a fairy tale.

But you never seem to state your epistemology, for cross examination -

So, what is it? Specifically, your views on origins...

origins of what?

I'd love to know if you do or do not engage in earnest, but each time I ask you about your epistemology you deflect...so - I'll try it out again...

I'm asking you for your theory/belief on how the Universe got here, or if you think it's eternal, or if you hold the position of being agnostic about it... and what's your take on whether or not there's a "being" or consciousness, that's got anything to do with its creation...

Try to be straight forward, and not metaphorical or allegorical.

I see. I have no belief or interest in how the universe got here. I leave that question for scientists to answer. Its here and so am I is enough for me to deal with.

As far as the fairy tale, I know that the story of Genesis is not about the beginning of the universe, the solar system, the earth, or the first plants, animals and human beings.

This is not a belief. Its a fact.

So you're agnostic in terms of how the Universe got here -

How about a deity - are you agnostic on that or do you hold a belief?

I hold a belief that conforms to reality about an unknown God whose existence has been confirmed by reality.


An unknown God who doesn't care about what you eat or what you wear or if your weenie was snipped. An unknown God that never diddled a virgin to father himself so that he could become fully human and die so that people could eat him. An unknown God that never chose a deranged child rapist to be his last and greatest prophet.

And do you have a proposition to justify that God, rationally/empirically, or is it in part a faith claim?

 

[hobelim]

origins of what?

I'd love to know if you do or do not engage in earnest, but each time I ask you about your epistemology you deflect...so - I'll try it out again...

I'm asking you for your theory/belief on how the Universe got here, or if you think it's eternal, or if you hold the position of being agnostic about it... and what's your take on whether or not there's a "being" or consciousness, that's got anything to do with its creation...

Try to be straight forward, and not metaphorical or allegorical.

I see. I have no belief or interest in how the universe got here. I leave that question for scientists to answer. Its here and so am I is enough for me to deal with.

As far as the fairy tale, I know that the story of Genesis is not about the beginning of the universe, the solar system, the earth, or the first plants, animals and human beings.

This is not a belief. Its a fact.

So you're agnostic in terms of how the Universe got here -

How about a deity - are you agnostic on that or do you hold a belief?

I hold a belief that conforms to reality about an unknown God whose existence has been confirmed by reality.


An unknown God who doesn't care about what you eat or what you wear or if your weenie was snipped. An unknown God that never diddled a virgin to father himself so that he could become fully human and die so that people could eat him. An unknown God that never chose a deranged child rapist to be his last and greatest prophet.

And do you have a proposition to justify that God, rationally/empirically, or is it in part a faith claim?

What proposition? I have facts.

 

[G.T.]

I'd love to know if you do or do not engage in earnest, but each time I ask you about your epistemology you deflect...so - I'll try it out again...

I'm asking you for your theory/belief on how the Universe got here, or if you think it's eternal, or if you hold the position of being agnostic about it... and what's your take on whether or not there's a "being" or consciousness, that's got anything to do with its creation...

Try to be straight forward, and not metaphorical or allegorical.

I see. I have no belief or interest in how the universe got here. I leave that question for scientists to answer. Its here and so am I is enough for me to deal with.

As far as the fairy tale, I know that the story of Genesis is not about the beginning of the universe, the solar system, the earth, or the first plants, animals and human beings.

This is not a belief. Its a fact.

So you're agnostic in terms of how the Universe got here -

How about a deity - are you agnostic on that or do you hold a belief?

I hold a belief that conforms to reality about an unknown God whose existence has been confirmed by reality.


An unknown God who doesn't care about what you eat or what you wear or if your weenie was snipped. An unknown God that never diddled a virgin to father himself so that he could become fully human and die so that people could eat him. An unknown God that never chose a deranged child rapist to be his last and greatest prophet.

And do you have a proposition to justify that God, rationally/empirically, or is it in part a faith claim?

What proposition? I have facts.

You have the fact that reality exists, that's "evidence" of a creator of ANY sort, but it's not compelling enough to rationally believe that there aren't other explanations or that an "unknown" God exists.

You can offer more facts than that, and I can evaluate them, but existence itself is not compelling enough evidence as to what or how existence got here...and it doesn't magically make an "unknown God," a "known" one.

 

[hobelim]

I see. I have no belief or interest in how the universe got here. I leave that question for scientists to answer. Its here and so am I is enough for me to deal with.

As far as the fairy tale, I know that the story of Genesis is not about the beginning of the universe, the solar system, the earth, or the first plants, animals and human beings.

This is not a belief. Its a fact.

So you're agnostic in terms of how the Universe got here -

How about a deity - are you agnostic on that or do you hold a belief?

I hold a belief that conforms to reality about an unknown God whose existence has been confirmed by reality.


An unknown God who doesn't care about what you eat or what you wear or if your weenie was snipped. An unknown God that never diddled a virgin to father himself so that he could become fully human and die so that people could eat him. An unknown God that never chose a deranged child rapist to be his last and greatest prophet.

And do you have a proposition to justify that God, rationally/empirically, or is it in part a faith claim?

What proposition? I have facts.

You have the fact that reality exists, that's "evidence" of a creator of ANY sort, but it's not compelling enough to rationally believe that there aren't other explanations or that an "unknown" God exists.

You can offer more facts than that, and I can evaluate them, but existence itself is not compelling enough evidence as to what or how existence got here...and it doesn't magically make an "unknown God," a "known" one.

I wasn't suggesting that reality is evidence of anything other than reality and yes, I could offer more facts than that, what are now historical facts, but this is not the time or place.

There is nothing I can say that would convince you better than you having an actual experience.

If you want to stand in the presence of the living God to either see him from a distance or close enough to hear his words, you must do what I did.

Purify your mind and be refined according to the detailed instruction in kosher law.

If you do, my unknown God will make himself known to you.

 

[G.T.]

So you're agnostic in terms of how the Universe got here -

How about a deity - are you agnostic on that or do you hold a belief?

I hold a belief that conforms to reality about an unknown God whose existence has been confirmed by reality.


An unknown God who doesn't care about what you eat or what you wear or if your weenie was snipped. An unknown God that never diddled a virgin to father himself so that he could become fully human and die so that people could eat him. An unknown God that never chose a deranged child rapist to be his last and greatest prophet.

And do you have a proposition to justify that God, rationally/empirically, or is it in part a faith claim?

What proposition? I have facts.

You have the fact that reality exists, that's "evidence" of a creator of ANY sort, but it's not compelling enough to rationally believe that there aren't other explanations or that an "unknown" God exists.

You can offer more facts than that, and I can evaluate them, but existence itself is not compelling enough evidence as to what or how existence got here...and it doesn't magically make an "unknown God," a "known" one.

I wasn't suggesting that reality is evidence of anything other than reality and yes, I could offer more facts than that, what are now historical facts, but this is not the time or place.

There is nothing I can say that would convince you better than you having an actual experience.

If you want to stand in the presence of the living God to either see him from a distance or close enough to hear his words, you must do what I did.

Purify your mind and be refined according to the detailed instruction in kosher law.

Then my unknown God will make himself known to you.

Ahh, so you ARE fulla shit. I see.

And I've seen the detailed instruction in kosher law - it's disturbingly simple-minded and not better, ritualistically, than any other dopey ritual.



So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

 

[hobelim]

I hold a belief that conforms to reality about an unknown God whose existence has been confirmed by reality.


An unknown God who doesn't care about what you eat or what you wear or if your weenie was snipped. An unknown God that never diddled a virgin to father himself so that he could become fully human and die so that people could eat him. An unknown God that never chose a deranged child rapist to be his last and greatest prophet.

And do you have a proposition to justify that God, rationally/empirically, or is it in part a faith claim?

What proposition? I have facts.

You have the fact that reality exists, that's "evidence" of a creator of ANY sort, but it's not compelling enough to rationally believe that there aren't other explanations or that an "unknown" God exists.

You can offer more facts than that, and I can evaluate them, but existence itself is not compelling enough evidence as to what or how existence got here...and it doesn't magically make an "unknown God," a "known" one.

I wasn't suggesting that reality is evidence of anything other than reality and yes, I could offer more facts than that, what are now historical facts, but this is not the time or place.

There is nothing I can say that would convince you better than you having an actual experience.

If you want to stand in the presence of the living God to either see him from a distance or close enough to hear his words, you must do what I did.

Purify your mind and be refined according to the detailed instruction in kosher law.

Then my unknown God will make himself known to you.

Ahh, so you ARE fulla shit. I see.

And I've seen the detailed instruction in kosher law - it's disturbingly simple-minded and not better, ritualistically, than any other dopey ritual.



So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

right. You think that I was suggesting to dick around over food. lol.


Right there is some proof that your mind is bogged down with malware and junk files. Bound to crash..

Don't purify and refine your mind as if that was a ridiculous suggestion. see if I give a shit.

moron.

 

[G.T.]

And do you have a proposition to justify that God, rationally/empirically, or is it in part a faith claim?

What proposition? I have facts.

You have the fact that reality exists, that's "evidence" of a creator of ANY sort, but it's not compelling enough to rationally believe that there aren't other explanations or that an "unknown" God exists.

You can offer more facts than that, and I can evaluate them, but existence itself is not compelling enough evidence as to what or how existence got here...and it doesn't magically make an "unknown God," a "known" one.

I wasn't suggesting that reality is evidence of anything other than reality and yes, I could offer more facts than that, what are now historical facts, but this is not the time or place.

There is nothing I can say that would convince you better than you having an actual experience.

If you want to stand in the presence of the living God to either see him from a distance or close enough to hear his words, you must do what I did.

Purify your mind and be refined according to the detailed instruction in kosher law.

Then my unknown God will make himself known to you.

Ahh, so you ARE fulla shit. I see.

And I've seen the detailed instruction in kosher law - it's disturbingly simple-minded and not better, ritualistically, than any other dopey ritual.



So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

right. You think that I was suggesting to dick around over food. lol.


Right there is some proof that your mind is bogged down with malware and junk files. Bound to crash..

Don't purify and refine your mind as if that was a ridiculous suggestion. see if I give a shit.

moron.

I understand the triggerdom when your beliefs are challenged - but the facts on the field are what they are ---you are as fulla shit as any other sky pixy believer that has no rational justification and if you weren't, it would be empirically evident.

Sorry that bugs ya out, but the hypocrisy on the christ cracker is yours.

 

[hobelim]

What proposition? I have facts.

You have the fact that reality exists, that's "evidence" of a creator of ANY sort, but it's not compelling enough to rationally believe that there aren't other explanations or that an "unknown" God exists.

You can offer more facts than that, and I can evaluate them, but existence itself is not compelling enough evidence as to what or how existence got here...and it doesn't magically make an "unknown God," a "known" one.

I wasn't suggesting that reality is evidence of anything other than reality and yes, I could offer more facts than that, what are now historical facts, but this is not the time or place.

There is nothing I can say that would convince you better than you having an actual experience.

If you want to stand in the presence of the living God to either see him from a distance or close enough to hear his words, you must do what I did.

Purify your mind and be refined according to the detailed instruction in kosher law.

Then my unknown God will make himself known to you.

Ahh, so you ARE fulla shit. I see.

And I've seen the detailed instruction in kosher law - it's disturbingly simple-minded and not better, ritualistically, than any other dopey ritual.



So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

right. You think that I was suggesting to dick around over food. lol.


Right there is some proof that your mind is bogged down with malware and junk files. Bound to crash..

Don't purify and refine your mind as if that was a ridiculous suggestion. see if I give a shit.

moron.

I understand the triggerdom when your beliefs are challenged - but the facts on the field are what they are ---you are as fulla shit as any other sky pixy believer that has no rational justification and if you weren't, it would be empirically evident.

Sorry that bugs ya out, but the hypocrisy on the christ cracker is yours.

lol... you haven't challenged any beliefs. You don't even know what they are.

**** the **** you.

 

[G.T.]

So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

BTW, why the **** would I share the details of a personal experience with you? You want to be my friend? lol.... You are a ******* idiot.

You missed the point, pinhead. I didn't ask for your personal experience, I said that personal experiences are shitty evidence to convince anyone of anything so you'd still be lacking a rational justification to believe in your fairy. The triggered-ness is something I understand - I know why you're lashing out and it doesn't move me. Having your short-sighted beliefs challenged is a hard pill to swallow for a person that thinks they've got it all figured out and like I said, if you had a rational justification, it would be evident. You don't, and you believe that kosher law is teh assum but it's simple minded dumb-shit that serves to micro-manage the way you behave.

Humans are gullible.

 

[hobelim]

So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

BTW, why the **** would I share the details of a personal experience with you? You want to be my friend? lol.... You are a ******* idiot.

You missed the point, pinhead. I didn't ask for your personal experience, I said that personal experiences are shitty evidence to convince anyone of anything so you'd still be lacking a rational justification to believe in your fairy. The triggered-ness is something I understand - I know why you're lashing out and it doesn't move me. Having your short-sighted beliefs challenged is a hard pill to swallow for a person that thinks they've got it all figured out and like I said, if you had a rational justification, it would be evident. You don't, and you believe that kosher law is teh assum but it's simple minded dumb-shit that serves to micro-manage the way you behave.

Humans are gullible.

I didn't use a personal experience as evidence of anything. and again I never suggested anything about food even though I mentioned kosher law.

you are providing the rational justification for the belief in the consequences for failing to stand guard over the purity of your own mind as instructed by kosher law.

Thank you and well done!

 

[G.T.]

So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

BTW, why the **** would I share the details of a personal experience with you? You want to be my friend? lol.... You are a ******* idiot.

You missed the point, pinhead. I didn't ask for your personal experience, I said that personal experiences are shitty evidence to convince anyone of anything so you'd still be lacking a rational justification to believe in your fairy. The triggered-ness is something I understand - I know why you're lashing out and it doesn't move me. Having your short-sighted beliefs challenged is a hard pill to swallow for a person that thinks they've got it all figured out and like I said, if you had a rational justification, it would be evident. You don't, and you believe that kosher law is teh assum but it's simple minded dumb-shit that serves to micro-manage the way you behave.

Humans are gullible.

I didn't use a personal experience as evidence of anything. and again I never suggested anything about food even though I mentioned kosher law.

you are providing the rational justification for the belief in the consequences for failing to stand guard over the purity of your own mind as instructed by kosher law.

Thank you and well done!

I didn't mention food either, except the christ cracker which wasnt referring to you or kosher law dummy.

It's not some secret knowledge that kosher law symbolically represents your ethics, idiot...it's that many of those ethics are as asinine and un-empirical as the christ cracker, and you're in no position to prove otherwise. You can't.

 

[G.T.]

& not only are many of the kosher ethics asinine, but also food IS indeed involved...

they eat a certain way to symbolically represent the ethic behind each food law, and to learn discipline and be reminded of the ethic... and hobelim can be as coy or dopey as he wants about that ...but it's actually self-evident that it's done.

 

[hobelim]

So - until you're ready to put up more than "he revealed himself to me" (personal testimony - the worst empirical evidence), you'll be as fruity and giggled at by rationality than the christ cracker believers because your story isn't any more compelling than theirs.

BTW, why the **** would I share the details of a personal experience with you? You want to be my friend? lol.... You are a ******* idiot.

You missed the point, pinhead. I didn't ask for your personal experience, I said that personal experiences are shitty evidence to convince anyone of anything so you'd still be lacking a rational justification to believe in your fairy. The triggered-ness is something I understand - I know why you're lashing out and it doesn't move me. Having your short-sighted beliefs challenged is a hard pill to swallow for a person that thinks they've got it all figured out and like I said, if you had a rational justification, it would be evident. You don't, and you believe that kosher law is teh assum but it's simple minded dumb-shit that serves to micro-manage the way you behave.

Humans are gullible.

I didn't use a personal experience as evidence of anything. and again I never suggested anything about food even though I mentioned kosher law.

you are providing the rational justification for the belief in the consequences for failing to stand guard over the purity of your own mind as instructed by kosher law.

Thank you and well done!

I didn't mention food either, except the christ cracker which wasnt referring to you or kosher law dummy.

It's not some secret knowledge that kosher law symbolically represents your ethics, idiot...it's that many of those ethics are as asinine and un-empirical as the christ cracker, and you're in no position to prove otherwise. You can't.

The deeper implications of kosher law are not about ethics dummy.

I didn't need to prove anything.

You have provided the evidence for my belief in the deeply disturbing death consequent for setting aside divine instruction to stand guard over the sanctity of your own mind.

Thats my belief being confirmed by reality right there by you.

See? No?

Thats a shame.