- Thread starter
- #261
We here in the islands of Lee county say fuck you...
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Can Anyone Stop Hillary?
- Thread starter American_Jihad
- Start date
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,638
- 65,075
- 2,635
Lee county??We here in the islands of Lee county say fuck you...This is how we do it in South Florida...Once November comes `round...
... Trump gonna give Hillary...
... a royal fanny fannin'...
... an' den sit her back down...
... in her place...
... where she belongs.
(Dat's Kentucky Backwoods Haiku)
There once was a candidate named Trump
Whose rhetoric made him sound drunk
Hillary came along
Trump got shlonged
And Hillary put Trump on his rump.
24 arrested during online predator sting in Lee County
- Thread starter
- #263
No I'M not going to play your grade school libtart game I don't have time to post all the devious headlines in South Florida...Lee county??We here in the islands of Lee county say fuck you...This is how we do it in South Florida...Once November comes `round...
... Trump gonna give Hillary...
... a royal fanny fannin'...
... an' den sit her back down...
... in her place...
... where she belongs.
(Dat's Kentucky Backwoods Haiku)
There once was a candidate named Trump
Whose rhetoric made him sound drunk
Hillary came along
Trump got shlonged
And Hillary put Trump on his rump.
24 arrested during online predator sting in Lee County
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,638
- 65,075
- 2,635
Yeah, there's a reason Lee county is heavily conservative which is why it was so easy to catch wannabe pedophiles. Here, checkout the short list...No I'M not going to play your grade school libtart game I don't have time to post all the devious headlines in South Florida...Lee county??We here in the islands of Lee county say fuck you...This is how we do it in South Florida...Once November comes `round...
... Trump gonna give Hillary...
... a royal fanny fannin'...
... an' den sit her back down...
... in her place...
... where she belongs.
(Dat's Kentucky Backwoods Haiku)
There once was a candidate named Trump
Whose rhetoric made him sound drunk
Hillary came along
Trump got shlonged
And Hillary put Trump on his rump.
24 arrested during online predator sting in Lee County
Republican Pedophiles
- Thread starter
- #265
Libtart, you do know everyone knows how to google, right. If they want to know about your kind they'll just google it...Yeah, there's a reason Lee county is heavily conservative which is why it was so easy to catch wannabe pedophiles. Here, checkout the short list...No I'M not going to play your grade school libtart game I don't have time to post all the devious headlines in South Florida...Lee county??We here in the islands of Lee county say fuck you...This is how we do it in South Florida...Once November comes `round...
... Trump gonna give Hillary...
... a royal fanny fannin'...
... an' den sit her back down...
... in her place...
... where she belongs.
(Dat's Kentucky Backwoods Haiku)
There once was a candidate named Trump
Whose rhetoric made him sound drunk
Hillary came along
Trump got shlonged
And Hillary put Trump on his rump.
24 arrested during online predator sting in Lee County
Republican Pedophiles
- Thread starter
- #266
Hillary, Deleter of the Free World
Will a Justice Department -- whose employees think she's a rock star -- take Hillary's possible prosecution seriously?
May 12, 2016
Matthew Vadum
Employees of the U.S. Department of Justice have given so much money to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign this time around that critics justifiably doubt the agency can handle her private email server case fairly and impartially.
In what appears to be a super-sized potential conflict of interest, Clinton, a pathological, self-serving liar who doesn't mind if Americans die to further her political ambitions, has accepted almost $75,000 in campaign contributions in the current election cycle from employees at the Justice Department, the cabinet bureau that will eventually decide whether to prosecute the Benghazi bungler for her use of a hacker-friendly home-brew email server while top U.S. diplomat.
The server is at the heart of the scandal over Clinton's mishandling of an Islamic terrorist attack in militant-infested Benghazi, Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 that left four Americans, including U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens, dead. Even now, almost four years after the assault, the Obama administration has failed to provide an autopsy report about Stevens who was initially reported to have been ritualistically sodomized before being murdered by Muslim terrorists.
The fact that Mrs. Clinton destroyed email evidence -- evidence subject to a congressional subpoena, no less -- is already evidence in itself that she obstructed justice through spoliation of evidence. Spoliation means you can take as evidence the fact that evidence has been destroyed. Courts are entitled to draw spoliation inferences and convict an accused person on that basis alone.
...
Hillary, Deleter of the Free World
Will a Justice Department -- whose employees think she's a rock star -- take Hillary's possible prosecution seriously?
May 12, 2016
Matthew Vadum
Employees of the U.S. Department of Justice have given so much money to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign this time around that critics justifiably doubt the agency can handle her private email server case fairly and impartially.
In what appears to be a super-sized potential conflict of interest, Clinton, a pathological, self-serving liar who doesn't mind if Americans die to further her political ambitions, has accepted almost $75,000 in campaign contributions in the current election cycle from employees at the Justice Department, the cabinet bureau that will eventually decide whether to prosecute the Benghazi bungler for her use of a hacker-friendly home-brew email server while top U.S. diplomat.
The server is at the heart of the scandal over Clinton's mishandling of an Islamic terrorist attack in militant-infested Benghazi, Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 that left four Americans, including U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens, dead. Even now, almost four years after the assault, the Obama administration has failed to provide an autopsy report about Stevens who was initially reported to have been ritualistically sodomized before being murdered by Muslim terrorists.
The fact that Mrs. Clinton destroyed email evidence -- evidence subject to a congressional subpoena, no less -- is already evidence in itself that she obstructed justice through spoliation of evidence. Spoliation means you can take as evidence the fact that evidence has been destroyed. Courts are entitled to draw spoliation inferences and convict an accused person on that basis alone.
...
Hillary, Deleter of the Free World
no. She's got it won already.
- Thread starter
- #268
- Thread starter
- #269
Hillary and the FBI
Yet another milestone on the road to tyranny.
May 20, 2016
Bruce Thornton
Beneath the drama of the primaries the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s home-brew server keeps humming along, though one wouldn’t know it from the cursory coverage by the mainstream media. It’s not that there isn’t anything new to report. Romanian hacker Guccifer claims he got into Clinton’s server with ease, and the Kremlin asserts it’s in possession of 20,000 of her emails. Hillary’s standard verbal brush-off––“it’s a routine security inquiry” ––was exploded by FBI Director James Comey’s laconic “I don’t even know what that means . . . We’re conducting an investigation. That’s what we do.” But these new developments are dismissed by Democrats with increasingly desperate rationalizations and lies, and Republicans haven’t yet worked through the seven stages of grief over Donald Trump’s ascendancy, leaving little time to mine this scandal for electoral gold.
The Republicans need to get on with it. Sometime soon the FBI will release its report, and just based on what’s leaked so far, Clinton should be indicted for mishandling classified material. But “should ain’t is,” as my old man used to say. There are several scenarios that can follow the report, and most will reveal just how we have fallen from the fundamental principle of representative government going back to ancient Athens: equality before the law.
...
Hillary and the FBI
Yet another milestone on the road to tyranny.
May 20, 2016
Bruce Thornton
Beneath the drama of the primaries the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s home-brew server keeps humming along, though one wouldn’t know it from the cursory coverage by the mainstream media. It’s not that there isn’t anything new to report. Romanian hacker Guccifer claims he got into Clinton’s server with ease, and the Kremlin asserts it’s in possession of 20,000 of her emails. Hillary’s standard verbal brush-off––“it’s a routine security inquiry” ––was exploded by FBI Director James Comey’s laconic “I don’t even know what that means . . . We’re conducting an investigation. That’s what we do.” But these new developments are dismissed by Democrats with increasingly desperate rationalizations and lies, and Republicans haven’t yet worked through the seven stages of grief over Donald Trump’s ascendancy, leaving little time to mine this scandal for electoral gold.
The Republicans need to get on with it. Sometime soon the FBI will release its report, and just based on what’s leaked so far, Clinton should be indicted for mishandling classified material. But “should ain’t is,” as my old man used to say. There are several scenarios that can follow the report, and most will reveal just how we have fallen from the fundamental principle of representative government going back to ancient Athens: equality before the law.
...
Hillary and the FBI
- Thread starter
- #270
Here are the most critical parts of the State Department inspector general report on Clinton’s email use
5 / 24
The Washington Post
Carol Morello, Jia Lynn Yang
9 hrs ago
The State Department’s independent watchdog released an 83-page report Wednesday to lawmakers concluding that Hillary Clinton’s email practices did not comply with department policies.
Below are some of the most revealing parts of the findings:
1. The report concludes that Clinton’s use of a personal email account was “not an appropriate method.” This knocks down a key argument made in Clinton’s defense — that because she had emailed State Department officials on their government accounts, records of her communications were preserved.
© Provided by WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post
2. In June 2011, there were two hacking attempts on the Clinton email system in one day. An adviser to President Bill Clinton tried to shut down the server each time.
...
Here are the most critical parts of the State Department inspector general report on Clinton’s email use
5 / 24
The Washington Post
Carol Morello, Jia Lynn Yang
9 hrs ago
The State Department’s independent watchdog released an 83-page report Wednesday to lawmakers concluding that Hillary Clinton’s email practices did not comply with department policies.
Below are some of the most revealing parts of the findings:
1. The report concludes that Clinton’s use of a personal email account was “not an appropriate method.” This knocks down a key argument made in Clinton’s defense — that because she had emailed State Department officials on their government accounts, records of her communications were preserved.
2. In June 2011, there were two hacking attempts on the Clinton email system in one day. An adviser to President Bill Clinton tried to shut down the server each time.
...
Here are the most critical parts of the State Department inspector general report on Clinton’s email use
no. She's got it won already.
Hillary Clinton is now toast.
The State Department report today is catastrophic for her campaign. The FBI investigation will come out before the Democrat convention.
Joe Biden will be the nominee and the Democrat Party will be in tatters with riots inside and outside the convention.
- Thread starter
- #272
That will be fun to watch...no. She's got it won already.
Hillary Clinton is now toast.
The State Department report today is catastrophic for her campaign. The FBI investigation will come out before the Democrat convention.
Joe Biden will be the nominee and the Democrat Party will be in tatters with riots inside and outside the convention.
Check out this pic, looks like the kids of today stay at home with mommy till age 26...
Last edited:
no. She's got it won already.
Hillary Clinton is now toast.
The State Department report today is catastrophic for her campaign. The FBI investigation will come out before the Democrat convention.
Joe Biden will be the nominee and the Democrat Party will be in tatters with riots inside and outside the convention.
Not certain about what is more humorous; that you said it or that you actually may be silly enough to believe that.
HRC will win the Democratic Party nomination.
Then she will win the Presidency by over 60 EVs.
- Thread starter
- #274
No Retreat from Hillary’s Village
Clinton's dream of sending federal agents into American homes.
May 26, 2016
Mary Grabar
A campaign ad that Hillary Clinton used against Barack Obama in 2008 featured images of sleeping children, with a voice asking who would answer the phone ringing in the White House at 3 a.m., “someone who already knows the world leaders . . . the military,” someone “tested and ready to lead”—or (by implication) a first-term U.S. Senator/community organizer?
Hillary Clinton is running for president again, and of course is ignoring her failure as secretary of state to answer the late-night phone call coming from Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Instead, she is advertising how she wants to send federal emissaries into the homes of parents with newborn infants to teach them how to handle 3 a.m. feedings and baby talk. It’s an extension of her agenda as first lady in the Arkansas governor’s mansion and in the White House. Her political career, after graduating and having written a thesis on friend Saul Alinsky, was launched with the Children’s Defense Fund under the direction of Marian Wright Edelman, agitator for increased welfare “for the children,” including federally funded childcare workers.
As president, Hillary Clinton would implement the Edelman/Alinsky domestic vision she put forward, in more palatable terms, in her 1996 book, It Takes a Village to Raise a Child. Of course, it takes someone like Clinton to see the federal government as a “village.”
In that book Clinton wrote, “government is not something outside us—something irrelevant or even alien to us—but is us. To acknowledge this is to acknowledge that government has a responsibility not only to provide essential services but to bring individuals and communities together.” This is the backwards notion of the community organizer.
Recently, in a May 21, 2016, Washington Post op-ed, Clinton revealed her totalizing domestic plans by reiterating her commitment to paid family leave legislation and to the “big idea” of “increasing federal investments and incentivizing states so that no family ever has to pay more than 10 percent of its income for child care.”
...
Trump expressed traditional sentiments and said he believed in supplying “funds,” but not changing diapers or pushing a stroller through Central Park. In contrast, I am reminded of one of many absurd helpful hints about fatherhood coming from the Obama administration. Early on, a Father’s Day campaign that encouraged fathers’ involvement showed a picture of a burly father with his young daughter. They were both painting their fingernails.
Voters should be asking themselves if they want the Big-Nanny-in-Chief sending government agents into homes. Or do they want to become breadwinners again?
No Retreat from Hillary’s Village
Clinton's dream of sending federal agents into American homes.
May 26, 2016
Mary Grabar
A campaign ad that Hillary Clinton used against Barack Obama in 2008 featured images of sleeping children, with a voice asking who would answer the phone ringing in the White House at 3 a.m., “someone who already knows the world leaders . . . the military,” someone “tested and ready to lead”—or (by implication) a first-term U.S. Senator/community organizer?
Hillary Clinton is running for president again, and of course is ignoring her failure as secretary of state to answer the late-night phone call coming from Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Instead, she is advertising how she wants to send federal emissaries into the homes of parents with newborn infants to teach them how to handle 3 a.m. feedings and baby talk. It’s an extension of her agenda as first lady in the Arkansas governor’s mansion and in the White House. Her political career, after graduating and having written a thesis on friend Saul Alinsky, was launched with the Children’s Defense Fund under the direction of Marian Wright Edelman, agitator for increased welfare “for the children,” including federally funded childcare workers.
As president, Hillary Clinton would implement the Edelman/Alinsky domestic vision she put forward, in more palatable terms, in her 1996 book, It Takes a Village to Raise a Child. Of course, it takes someone like Clinton to see the federal government as a “village.”
In that book Clinton wrote, “government is not something outside us—something irrelevant or even alien to us—but is us. To acknowledge this is to acknowledge that government has a responsibility not only to provide essential services but to bring individuals and communities together.” This is the backwards notion of the community organizer.
Recently, in a May 21, 2016, Washington Post op-ed, Clinton revealed her totalizing domestic plans by reiterating her commitment to paid family leave legislation and to the “big idea” of “increasing federal investments and incentivizing states so that no family ever has to pay more than 10 percent of its income for child care.”
...
Trump expressed traditional sentiments and said he believed in supplying “funds,” but not changing diapers or pushing a stroller through Central Park. In contrast, I am reminded of one of many absurd helpful hints about fatherhood coming from the Obama administration. Early on, a Father’s Day campaign that encouraged fathers’ involvement showed a picture of a burly father with his young daughter. They were both painting their fingernails.
Voters should be asking themselves if they want the Big-Nanny-in-Chief sending government agents into homes. Or do they want to become breadwinners again?
No Retreat from Hillary’s Village
Still no.
Dot Com
Nullius in verba
True, her 55% DISapproval is holding strong and her untrustworthiness exceeds Trump'sShe, Hillary, is doing a good job of stopping herself.
Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk
still no.
Still no....
Similar threads
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 55
- Replies
- 33
- Views
- 492
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 143
- Views
- 651
- Replies
- 153
- Views
- 416
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 12
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 42
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8029
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-