Obama's Anti-Business policies are part and parcel of his Centralized Command & Control approach to government. Successful business know their markets, cost structure, customers, competition, etc...and are able to maneuver through an ever changing environment. Centralized Control ignores market dynamics and invests small groups of (generally clueless) acacademics/policy hacks to conducts experiments without being personally accountable for the results.
Having to make payroll adds a lot of clarity to business decisions. Government bureaucrats NEVER feel that urgency.
And that's complete bullshit.
Businesses by the way have never, ever started a country.
No government..no business.
Simple as that.
"No government..no business."
That's it.
I demand that you move out of New York.....you're giving us a bad name.
This lap-dog relationship you have with government is based on total ignorance.....you must have gone to government schools.
All sorts of things that folks like you believe that only government can supply ......aren't.
1.
Education?
"You didn't build that!" Obama's smug insistence that American businessmen haven't succeeded without help from the government is simply false as a matter of history.
American businesses were successful and growing long before government did much of anything.
As an example, there was little public education in many states until about 1870, yet the literacy rates averaged 93%.
"The1860 U.S. Census shows that in states of the original 13 colonies, the white literacy rate in those states with public schooling was 99 percent compared with 93 percent in those states without it. This difference of only 6 percentage points may, however, be partly explained by the more rural nature of the states without public schools."
http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1987/11/cj7n2-14.pdf
2. Are there services that only government can provide?Really?
From 1750 to around 1900,
fire departments were either owned or paid for by insurance companies.
3.
The subways in NYC were originally privately built and operated, until the city forced the companies into bankruptcy by imposing a five-cent limit on fares in 1904...the Progressive Era.
".... the construction of the New York Subway was a business proposition carried to a successful fruition by business men whose reputations were at stake and who would never allow the taint of dishonesty to enter any work ... the banking firm of August Belmont & Company, to take up the work. The then masters of the transit situation in New York, led by the late William C. Whitney, declined to undertake the contract except on the basis of a franchise in perpetuity."
http://www.nycsubway.org/wiki/New_York's_New_Underground_World_(1904)
a. "Mayor La Guardia has said that the city will use all means within its power to prevent an increase in fare."
Elevated Seeks Loan From RFC To Pay Taxes and Run Own Lines - Manhattan Company Is Asking $12,000,000-Looks to Higher Fare-Plan Would Give U. S. Lien and Complicate Unification - Front Page - NYTimes.com
The private transit companies were all out of business by the following year, 1939, with the city taking over operations. Fares quickly doubled.
Lott, "At The Brink," p. 161.
The one thing that you're good for is revealing what the Left has programmed into you folks.
Throttle it back a little PoliChic geez 
You shoulda' cut 'n run when you had the chance back on the other page.
Prolly has a copy of Atlas Farted on the coffee table like Paul Ryan (R) does. Amiright?
