Can 500 law professors be wrong?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Judge Kavanaugh is an uninspiring offering for the Supreme Court.
And by "uninspiring" you mean he will not interpret the constitution to make it mean something it doesn't in a fraudulent circumvention of the amendment process, which we have endured as a nation for decades?
no it means he's a hit man for trump ,,,saving trumps ass because asshole doesn't believe you can indict a sitting president


You're aware there will be 8 other judges voting, right? He can't do a damn thing single handedly.:right:

.
And you know Roberts,Alito,Thomas, and Gorsuch will vote however it benefits Trump

The only one of that bunch with an ounce of anything remotely looking like respect for the Constitution is Roberts...and that's only barely
They will vote according to rule of law.

Leftists do not care about the law, Leftists want Judges who rule according to The Leftist Agenda, Leftists care so little about the rule of law that THEY have now decided that someone is guilty until they can show they are innocent, that someone can be condemned as guilty without ANY SOLID evidence and if THAT isn't crapping on the rule of law then I do not know what is.
 
FB_IMG_1538593670196.jpg
 
Refute what? Refute ANYTHING from ANYONE in this thread, again we have a thread where the Unhinged Left cannot refute anything that any Conservative has posted, so they go to the default position of Trolling another thread and adding zero of anything else to the thread. What are unhinged rantings is that Brett Kavanaugh is a gang rapist and a paedophile which also is a Conspiracy Theory.

A conservative would never post the hate that you do, so your claim of being one is a damn lie. You're a hater, and there is no defense for someone like you, only one ideology that you can claim, and that was put down by real Americans in 1945.


What a mealy mouth piece of shit you are, putting people down because they disagree with you, all the while you call them Nazis. You're nothing but a two faced hypocrite.

.

You described yourself and Lucy.

You must have Bedwetted and Reported on OK Texas comment because it's disappeared, do you need a tissue and some Play Doh now?

:auiqs.jpg: You must need a diaper, because you're spewing toxic shit all over the thread.
I notice that's how most of you shill trolls reply when you don't like what people are saying about the clearly illegal antics of liberals today. These 500 "professors" must all by liberal turds is alI can say.
 
500 radical LIB 'professors'.
All Trump haters.
Scared shitless that a strict Constitutionalist will be a SCJ.
Wait until Ruth croaks and Trump is still President.
We will witness the largest LIB/MSM temper tantrum in US history.
Trump should start floating the idea of nominating Ted Cruz for SCJ.

500 whiney twats are against him, no path to 270 now...…….
 
Judge Kavanaugh is an uninspiring offering for the Supreme Court.
And by "uninspiring" you mean he will not interpret the constitution to make it mean something it doesn't in a fraudulent circumvention of the amendment process, which we have endured as a nation for decades?
no it means he's a hit man for trump ,,,saving trumps ass because asshole doesn't believe you can indict a sitting president


You're aware there will be 8 other judges voting, right? He can't do a damn thing single handedly.:right:

.
And you know Roberts,Alito,Thomas, and Gorsuch will vote however it benefits Trump

The only one of that bunch with an ounce of anything remotely looking like respect for the Constitution is Roberts...and that's only barely


Oh a majority opinion, is that something that is totally unheard of? What you little commie bitches fear is losing your super legislature, so you can't force your immoral social bullshit on the rest of the county.

.
 
no it means he's a hit man for trump ,,,saving trumps ass because asshole doesn't believe you can indict a sitting president


You're aware there will be 8 other judges voting, right? He can't do a damn thing single handedly.:right:

.
And you know Roberts,Alito,Thomas, and Gorsuch will vote however it benefits Trump

The only one of that bunch with an ounce of anything remotely looking like respect for the Constitution is Roberts...and that's only barely


Oh a majority opinion, is that something that is totally unheard of? What you little commie bitches fear is losing your super legislature, so you can't force your immoral social bullshit on the rest of the county.

.
the biggest commie in the world is dumps pal Look over there before accusing anyone here


Did you get all the way through third grade? You might want to learn a bit about capitalization and punctuation before your try to preach anyone else.

.

Thanks so much for sharing, you've proved to be an embarrassment to conservatism, and to all Americans who understand your foolish remarks can be read worldwide.
 
POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner
5bb40310220000bb01dbfd21.jpeg

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd
Kind of telling when all these law professors and the American Bar Association walk back their support of a SC candidate.
 
POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner
5bb40310220000bb01dbfd21.jpeg

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd
Kind of telling when all these law professors and the American Bar Association walk back their support of a SC candidate.

It is telling to those who listen and aren't trumpanzees.
 
500 radical LIB 'professors'.
All Trump haters.
Scared shitless that a strict Constitutionalist will be a SCJ.
Wait until Ruth croaks and Trump is still President.
We will witness the largest LIB/MSM temper tantrum in US history.
Trump should start floating the idea of nominating Ted Cruz for SCJ.

500 whiney twats are against him, no path to 270 now...…….
Its now more than 650 whiny twats.

What do these law professors know about law anyways.
 
The Conspiracy Theory is that Brett Kavanaugh is a gang rapist and a paedophile. That he is the VICTIM of heinous accusations from the Unhinged Left is not a Conspiracy Theory, this is a political hit job. The other thing is that Brett Kavanaugh is a very Moderate Conservative he's not a Right-Winger, he is more Anthony Kennedy than Antonin Scalia but that the Unhinged Left don't care they want a Leftist Leftist and if they cannot have one they are happy to destroy a man's entire life.

He sited conspiracy theories along with crying and lying at his confirmation hearing. That's not even mentioning his lies from his previous confirmation hearings that only recently came to light. Just admit that you want a hard core right winger on the court, and things like integrity and honesty don't count.

Brett Kavanaugh is a Moderate Conservative, the only Conspiracy Theories are from the Unhinged Left that he is a gang rapist and a paedophile.

I suppose by your far far right leanings he is moderate, to you. Moderate conservatives lie and lie; the far far right are damn liars and prodigious hypocrites.

Hmmmm, it seems Kavanaugh is far to the right. He should be impeached and removed from the court of appeals. Bigots with the biases he expressed do not deserve to don the robe.

"He should be impeached and removed from the court of appeals. Bigots with the biases he expressed do not deserve to don the robe."

Brett Kavanaugh is a bigot how exactly? Post links to illustrate anything bigoted Brett Kavanaugh has ever commented. Or to you one of the Unhinged Left is he a bigot because he's a WHITE CHRISTIAN, we know that the Unhinged Left thinks that WHITE CHRISTIAN = Bigot.
conservative is worth death to them. just know that. their behavior was because they have absolutely no respect for our lives.

What a childishly stupid remark. You claim I believe conservatives deserve death. What an idiot you are.
 
POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner
5bb40310220000bb01dbfd21.jpeg

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd
Kind of telling when all these law professors and the American Bar Association walk back their support of a SC candidate.

It is telling to those who listen and aren't trumpanzees.

Kind of telling when all these law professors and the American Bar Association walk back their support of a SC candidate.
The ABA still supports Kavanaugh

Wry, keep up what you think is good Leftist work, but your side is screwed, lol.

We have the testimony from the friend in Delaware; which was given AFTER the Ford Testimony ands before Ford knew it, and your toast, lol.

And, guess what! If you manage (which chances are more than slim) to vote him down, Trump is going to make it a midterm campaign issue by re-nominating him. WOOSH, there goes Indiana, Montana, Missouri, Dakota, and Florida instantly, hehehehehehehehehehehehe.

You are screwed! Cya, wouldn't want to be ya!
 
In a strongly worded letter obtained by CNN Thursday, the organization said it is making the extraordinary request "because of the ABA's respect for the rule of law and due process under law," siding with concerns voiced by Senate Democrats since Christine Blasey Ford's decades-old allegations became public.
"The basic principles that underscore the Senate's constitutional duty of advice and consent on federal judicial nominees require nothing less than a careful examination of the accusations and facts by the FBI," said Robert Carlson, president of the organization, in a Thursday night letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein.


"Each appointment to our nation's Highest Court (as with all others) is simply too important to rush to a vote," Carlson wrote. "Deciding to proceed without conducting additional investigation would not only have a lasting impact on the Senate's reputation, but it will also negatively affect the great trust necessary for the American people to have in the Supreme Court."

American Bar Association tells Senate: Delay Kavanaugh until FBI investigates assault allegations - CNNPolitics
 
You're aware there will be 8 other judges voting, right? He can't do a damn thing single handedly.:right:

.
And you know Roberts,Alito,Thomas, and Gorsuch will vote however it benefits Trump

The only one of that bunch with an ounce of anything remotely looking like respect for the Constitution is Roberts...and that's only barely


Oh a majority opinion, is that something that is totally unheard of? What you little commie bitches fear is losing your super legislature, so you can't force your immoral social bullshit on the rest of the county.

.
the biggest commie in the world is dumps pal Look over there before accusing anyone here


Did you get all the way through third grade? You might want to learn a bit about capitalization and punctuation before your try to preach anyone else.

.

Thanks so much for sharing, you've proved to be an embarrassment to conservatism, and to all Americans who understand your foolish remarks can be read worldwide.


Great, coming from you, I'll take that as a compliment.

OH, and say hello world, American commie assholes are still trying to destroy our country. Watch how easily they are defeated when our Constitution and laws are upheld by honest judges without an agenda. BTW you can ignore all the leftist projection on this site, they just can't help themselves. ROFLMFAO

.
 
POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner
5bb40310220000bb01dbfd21.jpeg

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd
Kind of telling when all these law professors and the American Bar Association walk back their support of a SC candidate.


The ABA walked back nothing, one asshole wrote an OP/ED with no authorization to speak for the organization. And the law profs were Trump hates from the get.

.
 
POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner
5bb40310220000bb01dbfd21.jpeg

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd
Kind of telling when all these law professors and the American Bar Association walk back their support of a SC candidate.

Kind of telling when all these law professors and the American Bar Association walk back their support of a SC candidate.

Kind of funny that you think these 500 twats previously supported him.
 
500 radical LIB 'professors'.
All Trump haters.
Scared shitless that a strict Constitutionalist will be a SCJ.
Wait until Ruth croaks and Trump is still President.
We will witness the largest LIB/MSM temper tantrum in US history.
Trump should start floating the idea of nominating Ted Cruz for SCJ.

500 whiney twats are against him, no path to 270 now...…….
Its now more than 650 whiny twats.

What do these law professors know about law anyways.

Liberal law professors don't like him.
What's the downside?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top