California "Yes means Yes" law now being enacted.

[jillian]

California adopts yes means yes law

A man now needs to obtain continuous verbal consent throughout a sexual encounter in California. Failure to do so will enable a woman to charge him with rape at her convenience.

This won't work. Even after a woman says yes she will deny it later. Either mske a recording or get it in writing.

yes, women all lie about giving consent. no doesn't mean no. and they'll lie after so must.... protect.... rapists.....

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

October 28, 2014


California has always been a laboratory for liberal thought. Now one of the state's latest experiments is dividing top liberal thinkers.

 

[NLT]

Bodey what if in the middle of coitus the women then says no, do you think that is right?

 

[bodecea]

California adopts yes means yes law

A man now needs to obtain continuous verbal consent throughout a sexual encounter in California. Failure to do so will enable a woman to charge him with rape at her convenience.

Of course, this new system will not reduce reported rapes, but the newly expanded boundaries of rape will now add more counts of "rape" to the political institutions. They will then say propose even more legislation to combat the newly inflated "rape culture."

Woman have more rights than men do. The left has been working to make that so for a long time.

It's fucked.

Right. That's why we control the government, the economy, and make so much more than men do and have a lot fewer on welfare or homeless. Not to mention how poor men are much more likely to be victims of sexual or physical abuse by women.

 

[jillian]

8:35 a.m. EDT September 29, 2014

That's when it was passed. Not when it was enacted. I know that liberals can't tell the difference though.

I think you mean to say when it is effective. enacted means the process of passing a law. are you confused?

 

[jillian]

Bodey what if in the middle of coitus the women then says no, do you think that is right?

then you stop.

whether you are unhappy about it or not is not the issue.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

8:35 a.m. EDT September 29, 2014

That's when it was passed. Not when it was enacted. I know that liberals can't tell the difference though.

enacted does NOT mean when a bill takes effect.

just so you can stop making a complete fool of yourself

 

[bodecea]

Bodey what if in the middle of coitus the women then says no, do you think that is right?

Stop at that point. Period. No means no. Pull out, young man, pull out. And make sure to not put yourself into that position again with that woman. What's attractive about someone who is that flighty anyways.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

8:35 a.m. EDT September 29, 2014

That's when it was passed. Not when it was enacted. I know that liberals can't tell the difference though.

I think you mean to say when it is effective. enacted means the process of passing a law. are you confused?

yes, The2ndAmendment is confused and stupid

 

[NLT]

What a shame that any man would keep going even tho a woman tells him "no". That message doesn't change.....ever.

The law isn't called "No means No," which is respected by all law abiding men.

The law is called "Yes means Yes," and requires a man to obtain VERBAL consent for each progression of a single sexual encounter.

And what is wrong with getting permission beforehand? Explain that to me.

I mean in the middle of heavy petting, its kind of awkward to stop and say" do I have your consent to stick this in you?

 

[NLT]

Does a woman have to get consent to give a guy a blow job?

 

[jillian]

8:35 a.m. EDT September 29, 2014

That's when it was passed. Not when it was enacted. I know that liberals can't tell the difference though.

I think you mean to say when it is effective. enacted means the process of passing a law. are you confused?

yes, The2ndAmendment is confused and stupid

shocking.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

California adopts yes means yes law

A man now needs to obtain continuous verbal consent throughout a sexual encounter in California. Failure to do so will enable a woman to charge him with rape at her convenience.

Of course, this new system will not reduce reported rapes, but the newly expanded boundaries of rape will now add more counts of "rape" to the political institutions. They will then say propose even more legislation to combat the newly inflated "rape culture."

Why do you lie and misrepresent the law? It is about College Campuses and investigations of accusations of rape on campuses.

I personally think it is bad law, but why lie and misrepresent it like you do? Maybe it's time for a legal discussion in place of this silly political and ideological bullshiy

Where did I lie? It's a California law that requires a man to obtain continuous verbal consent for each part of a sexual act.

besides lying about what the term 'enact' means, you've lied here:

"A man now needs to obtain continuous verbal consent throughout a sexual encounter in California."

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a new law mandating California universities that receive public funding to require students to get "affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity." Not Californians, but students on California college campuses

 

[jillian]

Does a woman have to get consent to give a guy a blow job?

is forced oral sex a big problem that needs legislation? if so, feel free to write your congress person.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Socialist AG Kamala Harris has mandated chastity belts on all males between 18 and 30 - no exceptions.

Gov. Jerry Brown when asked if this was not a throw back to Victorian morality laws remarked "Those laws were good, but not nearly strict enough, Any boy who tries to hold the hand of girl without a notarized court document will face far worse than a few nights in the stocks."

Gov. Brown denied that plans were on the table to add castration as a prerequisite for acceptance to the UC System, though Harris was observed sharpening a pair of rose clippers in the background...

 

[The2ndAmendment]

8:35 a.m. EDT September 29, 2014

That's when it was passed. Not when it was enacted. I know that liberals can't tell the difference though.

I think you mean to say when it is effective. enacted means the process of passing a law. are you confused?

yes, The2ndAmendment is confused and stupid

What is an Enactment Clause?

This clause is a part of the statute which indicates the legislative authority by which the statute is made and its effective date. [/quote

Enacting Clause Law Legal Definition

K thx bai

 

[bodecea]

What a shame that any man would keep going even tho a woman tells him "no". That message doesn't change.....ever.

The law isn't called "No means No," which is respected by all law abiding men.

The law is called "Yes means Yes," and requires a man to obtain VERBAL consent for each progression of a single sexual encounter.

And what is wrong with getting permission beforehand? Explain that to me.

I mean in the middle of heavy petting, its kind of awkward to stop and say" do I have your consent to stick this in you?

"Awkward"? You're gonna go with "awkward"? Too bad. No means no.

 

[bodecea]

Does a woman have to get consent to give a guy a blow job?

I would hope so.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Either mske a recording or get it in writing.

A man can't record, since it would be pornography without consent.

What he needs to do is record her signing a piece of paper to prove she was not forced to sign the paper. Each progression of the sexual dance must be agreed to before it happens. It would look like this:

"Do you agree to me kissing your neck?
Do you permit me to then suck your nipples.
Do you agree to then suck my dick?
Do you then agree to take my dick deeper into your throat?
....
Do you agree for me to put my penis inside your vagina?
Do you agree for me to turn you over and pull your hair and ram your pussy from behind so we can both cum?"

She doesnt cum. Rape!

 

[Uncensored2008]

And that's a Win/Win.

And you claimed that the party wasn't going to outlaw heterosexuality.....

Gee, do you think the SCOTUS will uphold shoving a red hot poker up the anus of a male who lets eyes linger too long on the breasts of a female?

The dark ages were over, until democrats got one party rule...