California Dreaming: Republicans

Maybe the people of California/New El Salvador are getting tired of the scandals, ineptness and booming homeless problems of the state. I don't see them taking the state, but that they are making inroads (finally).

They’re too dumb to realize the general wasn’t yesterday. And democrats will now have only one choice.
1780512180379.gif
 
Looks like we arent getting an answer to the thread. California has one of the worst approval rates in the country for republicans and Trump but... meathead here thinks this thread is a banger. He just cant explain it.

View attachment 1264695

They’re too dumb to realize the general wasn’t yesterday. And democrats will now have only one choice.
View attachment 1264705
WTF did I say general? God you're sleazy.
 
Here is one.....
View attachment 1264699

So you dont know? You all are constantly asking what a woman is and you never can define a marxist either.

I asked my right wing nut buddy once, while debating and he used the 'marxist' label on NYC if he could define a Marxist".

His answer: "Uh, no, but it doesnt sound good".

You guys are clones of each other. Nothing is particularly interesting about you or well thought out by you.
 
So you dont know? You all are constantly asking what a woman is and you never can define a marxist either.

I asked my right wing nut buddy once, while debating and he used the 'marxist' label on NYC if he could define a Marxist".

His answer: "Uh, no, but it doesnt sound good".

You guys are clones of each other. Nothing is particularly interesting about you or well thought out by you.

Marxism: “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”George Orwell, 1984
 
WTF did I say general? God you're sleazy.
You implied it. We’re you dreaming about a Republican primary first place?
WTF did I say general? God you're sleazy.
your premise was that Republicans are making in roads. You just came here to talk about making indoors in primaries? What kind of narrow irrelevant bullshit is that?

The truth is that you meant Republicans are making enrolls in general. You don’t want to admit it, because Republicans have won in California recently and for them to lose this year is no “inroads”.
Sit down.
 
So you dont know? You all are constantly asking what a woman is and you never can define a marxist either.

I asked my right wing nut buddy once, while debating and he used the 'marxist' label on NYC if he could define a Marxist".

His answer: "Uh, no, but it doesnt sound good".

You guys are clones of each other. Nothing is particularly interesting about you or well thought out by you.
I gave you an example complete with a link to school you. All you have is denial.
 
You implied it. We’re you dreaming about a Republican primary first place?

your premise was that Republicans are making in roads. You just came here to talk about making indoors in primaries? What kind of narrow irrelevant bullshit is that?

The truth is that you meant Republicans are making enrolls in general. You don’t want to admit it, because Republicans have won in California recently and for them to lose this year is no “inroads”.
Sit down.
You may have inferred it because you're both an idiot and a sleazebag. "in roads and then enrolls"? It's inroads, one word moron.
 
I gave you an example complete with a link to school you. All you have is denial.
No you didnt. But feel free to define it for me. Its like porn I guess... where you cant define it but "know it when you see it?"

You guys are full of uninformed nonsense. I love that you are stuck on not knowing what marxism is when you've used the term over 50 times on this site.
 
No you didnt. But feel free to define it for me. Its like porn I guess... where you cant define it but "know it when you see it?"

You guys are full of uninformed nonsense. I love that you are stuck on not knowing what marxism is when you've used the term over 50 times on this site.
No country today has true Marxism that's why you can't give an example. What they call Marxism has devolved into either a dictatorship or a one party system.
 
Last edited:
No country today has true Marxism that's why you can't give an example. What they call Marxism has devolved into either a dictatorship or a one party system.
So you cant define it but you know it when you see it. Got it. You guys kill me. Im trying here.
 
So you cant define it but you know it when you see it. Got it. You guys kill me. Im trying here.
You can read Carl Marx's definition but there is no populace successfully governed by it. If there is, provide an example.
 
You can read Carl Marx's definition but there is no populace successfully governed by it. If there is, provide an example.
Carl Marx was 100% correct in his diagnosis but 100% wrong in his cure.

Marx correctly pointed out that capitalism is doomed to be abused by owners who will exploit the laborers up to the point that it creates unrest.

Marx missed that the solution to that is a highly regulated capital society that protects competition and treats labor fairly. We are on the back end of the Marx theory that capitalism is doomed. You can tell by the consolidation of wealth into the hands of the few and the corruption of politics to money.

So the lesson is not “Marx was right, therefore communism.”

The lesson is:
Capitalism works best when democracy is strong enough to discipline capital.

We did that up until the 1990's.
 
Carl Marx was 100% correct in his diagnosis but 100% wrong in his cure.

Marx correctly pointed out that capitalism is doomed to be abused by owners who will exploit the laborers up to the point that it creates unrest.

Marx missed that the solution to that is a highly regulated capital society that protects competition and treats labor fairly. We are on the back end of the Marx theory that capitalism is doomed. You can tell by the consolidation of wealth into the hands of the few and the corruption of politics to money.

So the lesson is not “Marx was right, therefore communism.”

The lesson is:
Capitalism works best when democracy is strong enough to discipline capital.

We did that up until the 1990's.
Capitalism is an anathema to Marxism. Capitalism is not about equal outcomes it is about bolstering the successful. In America, capitalism is held at bay by guaranteeing equal opportunity, not equal outcome. Our constitution guarantees that. Only in America can we see people rising from essentially nothing to great success. That's why people flooded our border when Biden stopped enforcing it. You are correct in that capitalism requires boundaries, that is what our Constitution does. It's not perfect but it's way better than any Marxist alternative.
 
Capitalism is an anathema to Marxism. Capitalism is not about equal outcomes it is about bolstering the successful. In America, capitalism is held at bay by guaranteeing equal opportunity, not equal outcome. Our constitution guarantees that. Only in America can we see people rising from essentially nothing to great success. That's why people flooded our border when Biden stopped enforcing it. You are correct in that capitalism requires boundaries, that is what our Constitution does. It's not perfect but it's way better than any Marxist alternative.
Marxism says if 1% of the people have everything the 99% will kick their ass and take it from them and divide it up. That is 100% accurate. If capitalism isnt regulated to spread the wealth to the people in a way that they can earn wealth, then it is doomed.

This experiment will unravel just like Marx predicted without better outcomes for the masses. You’ll see.

i have a lot of wealth which is why I am ok paying taxes that help the poor cuz I want them happy enough not to band together to take my shit. You dumbasses with nothing act like you are doing me a favor by creating a large class of poor people. You are not.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom