California Bans SINGING During ON-LINE Church Services

[Bob Blaylock]

@Pogo really looks stupid now. Must be a day that ends in "Y".

And in other news, water is wet.

Seriously, have you ever known Pogo to not look stupid, to not be caught in one lie after another after another?

 

[BlindBoo]

Hahahahaha, that's funny. A county in California tries to protects it's people in the time of an emergency and redwing propagandists want to expand it to all of California. Do you think the virus might be spread further when singing or playing a wind instrument, or no?

 

[iceberg]

Hahahahaha, that's funny. A county in California tries to protects it's people in the time of an emergency and redwing propagandists want to expand it to all of California. Do you think the virus might be spread further when singing or playing a wind instrument, or no?

yea, lord knows a left wing propagandists would NEVER resort to such shit.

you ever stop and see you're 100% like those you mock?

 

[easyt65]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

i read the order. it doesn't call out *any* of the below stuff. so we're mixing up this bit of whatever from where ever with the original post about the city order.

the city order does not call out churches. it states guidelines for everyone to follow; like it or not for now. there are businesses here in dallas that still host local bands and simply stream the event. if they do it with less than 10 total people in the building and stay enough apart, i don't see an issue.

now if the church wants to stream their services out, simply do so under the guidelines we all follow and there shouldn't be an issue. but trying to pretend none of this is happening and go MY RELIGIOUS FEELZ as a reason to not have to at least try to work with the system, to me, is bullshit.

i'm all for questioning what we're being told. but there are better ways to do it than to strap yourself to a cross and claim "they" are coming after you.

now granted i didn't read the entire ordinance but i did go out and read a lot of it. if i missed how they called out church services, simply tell me which part and i'll be glad to go back and look. if the church is mad they doing this in >10 people or whatever the # is, i simply don't care. rules, stupid or otherwise, are for us all to follow or challenge. challenge however isn't ignoring them and saying it's your right to do so.

iii.
For the purposes of this Order, “Minimum Basic Operations” include the following, provided
that employees comply with Social Distancing Requirements as defined in this Section, to the extent possible, while carrying out such operations:

c.
No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19.

so this does not target churches then does it? my point.

and like i also said, there are better ways to challenge the rules, to me, than to disobey them and cry foul. but if this is how this church chooses to do so, fine. people are making this up as they go and perhaps the challenging is better than old school processes.

my point being is still - this doesn't ban CHURCHES from doing it - it says NO ONE can do it. the article is written, as usual, for max drama value. please feel free to tell me how the headline putting ALLOWS ABORTIONS in there is relevant to this ordinance?

it's not. it's to get people riled up. russian type trolling.

'my point being is still - this doesn't ban CHURCHES from doing it - it says NO ONE can do it.'

Soooo......church members can or can not ignore this decree in order in their Constitutional Right to exercise their freedom of religion?

 

[BlindBoo]

View attachment 323821

And the progressives press their boot down further on your neck.

*****SMILE*****

And the right wing propaganda twist reality in such a way that you believe it is all about the Church.

 

[Pogo]

It's bizarre because it's a Jim The **** Hoft link. First thing to check. This is the asshat who the other day tried to claim the Governor of Michigan was banning the sales of flags. He's got a dicey relationship with facts.

Sure didn't stop the OP from using him as a source though, did it.

Followed it right to its source, to a document on Mendocino County's official web site.

https://www.mendocinocounty.org/home/showdocument?id=33692

It's on page eight.

c. No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that​

could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless​

the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the​

members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of​

transmission of COVID-19.​

Thanks. So now I can highlight the crucial qualifier that the OP and Jim The **** Hoft eliminated to sell clickbait.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

Don't you just love when "liberals" are so illiberal?

 

[iceberg]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

i read the order. it doesn't call out *any* of the below stuff. so we're mixing up this bit of whatever from where ever with the original post about the city order.

the city order does not call out churches. it states guidelines for everyone to follow; like it or not for now. there are businesses here in dallas that still host local bands and simply stream the event. if they do it with less than 10 total people in the building and stay enough apart, i don't see an issue.

now if the church wants to stream their services out, simply do so under the guidelines we all follow and there shouldn't be an issue. but trying to pretend none of this is happening and go MY RELIGIOUS FEELZ as a reason to not have to at least try to work with the system, to me, is bullshit.

i'm all for questioning what we're being told. but there are better ways to do it than to strap yourself to a cross and claim "they" are coming after you.

now granted i didn't read the entire ordinance but i did go out and read a lot of it. if i missed how they called out church services, simply tell me which part and i'll be glad to go back and look. if the church is mad they doing this in >10 people or whatever the # is, i simply don't care. rules, stupid or otherwise, are for us all to follow or challenge. challenge however isn't ignoring them and saying it's your right to do so.

iii.
For the purposes of this Order, “Minimum Basic Operations” include the following, provided
that employees comply with Social Distancing Requirements as defined in this Section, to the extent possible, while carrying out such operations:

c.
No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19.

so this does not target churches then does it? my point.

and like i also said, there are better ways to challenge the rules, to me, than to disobey them and cry foul. but if this is how this church chooses to do so, fine. people are making this up as they go and perhaps the challenging is better than old school processes.

my point being is still - this doesn't ban CHURCHES from doing it - it says NO ONE can do it. the article is written, as usual, for max drama value. please feel free to tell me how the headline putting ALLOWS ABORTIONS in there is relevant to this ordinance?

it's not. it's to get people riled up. russian type trolling.

'my point being is still - this doesn't ban CHURCHES from doing it - it says NO ONE can do it.'

Soooo......church members can or can not ignore this decree in order in their Constitutional Right to exercise their freedom of religion?

sure they can. and doing so will get them whatever the penalty would be for doing so. up to them if worth it. civil disobedience isn't new and has a place if done properly.

getting emotional and making it personal seldom achieves the *stated desired* outcome. it just gets others emotional and people react. not think.

here in dallas, we have a venue that brings in a band. the band gets up on a pretty big stage that's well lit and has multiple cameras and people can watch via facebook or youtube live. now if an ordinance is passed saying they can't sing in public like this i will think it's stupid but i won't expect people to cry religious freedom at a rule not even aimed at religion. the pomp and circumstance of this article (gateway pundit, go figure) is 100% to get you emotionally invested into whatever they're about to say.

the story isn't about the ordinance. the story is the church taking on this stupid rule put in place against them and by the way ABORTION. what in THE **** does abortion have to do with this ordinance? NOTHING but it gets you emotional, doesn't it? do you *think* when emotional?

do you not see that's just trolling for emotions?

now the church can find other groups impacted by this and show leadership to get it stopped. or they can whine like a ***** these times suck and they are impacted by it too. i know which one i'd have more respect for.

 

[iceberg]

View attachment 323821

And the progressives press their boot down further on your neck.

*****SMILE*****

And the right wing propaganda twist reality in such a way that you believe it is all about the Church.

and the left wing propaganda twists reality in such a way to make you believe ORANGE MAN BAD.

the stupidest thing i see is when someone puts human attributes to only one side and gets that WHAT ME look when busted for the same.

 

[BlindBoo]

Hahahahaha, that's funny. A county in California tries to protects it's people in the time of an emergency and redwing propagandists want to expand it to all of California. Do you think the virus might be spread further when singing or playing a wind instrument, or no?

yea, lord knows a left wing propagandists would NEVER resort to such shit.

you ever stop and see you're 100% like those you mock?

Well I'm not going to deny there are leftwing propagandist who tilt the field, but they're not that stupid. IF they were stupid enough to make that mistake I would most assuredly point it out to them, perhaps not in the same mocking way I poke EasyPeasyRed here........

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberal control freaks love to ban things so not surprising.

 

[Pogo]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

That is bizarre. Glad I never considered moving there.

It's bizarre because it's a Jim The **** Hoft link. First thing to check. This is the asshat who the other day tried to claim the Governor of Michigan was banning the sales of flags. He's got a dicey relationship with facts.

Sure didn't stop the OP from using him as a source though, did it.

Thanks. Was not familiar with Jim Hoft, until you posted. Have seen Gateway Pundit. Should they be on my list of "If they said it, it's got to be bullshit" list?

Definitely.

They're also on the list of partisan hack sites who will ban you from their comment section if you call them on that bullshit. Proud to be a member thereof.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

One man's music is another man's noise.

 

[BluesLegend]

This is a violation of the 1st Amendment. Sing away. And when they come for you, sue the shit out if 'em.

The left routinely ignore our Constitutional rights.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

View attachment 323821

And the progressives press their boot down further on your neck.

*****SMILE*****

And the right wing propaganda twist reality in such a way that you believe it is all about the Church.

Where did I mention church in my post?

It appears your response is about your belief in your superiority.

Shall I retrieve the flag now?

*****SMILE*****

 

[iceberg]

Hahahahaha, that's funny. A county in California tries to protects it's people in the time of an emergency and redwing propagandists want to expand it to all of California. Do you think the virus might be spread further when singing or playing a wind instrument, or no?

yea, lord knows a left wing propagandists would NEVER resort to such shit.

you ever stop and see you're 100% like those you mock?

Well I'm not going to deny there are leftwing propagandist who tilt the field, but they're not that stupid. IF they were stupid enough to make that mistake I would most assuredly point it out to them, perhaps not in the same mocking way I poke EasyPeasyRed here........

shit dude. hit occupy democrats for awhile and come back to me.

 

[depotoo]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

i read the order. it doesn't call out *any* of the below stuff. so we're mixing up this bit of whatever from where ever with the original post about the city order.

the city order does not call out churches. it states guidelines for everyone to follow; like it or not for now. there are businesses here in dallas that still host local bands and simply stream the event. if they do it with less than 10 total people in the building and stay enough apart, i don't see an issue.

now if the church wants to stream their services out, simply do so under the guidelines we all follow and there shouldn't be an issue. but trying to pretend none of this is happening and go MY RELIGIOUS FEELZ as a reason to not have to at least try to work with the system, to me, is bullshit.

i'm all for questioning what we're being told. but there are better ways to do it than to strap yourself to a cross and claim "they" are coming after you.

now granted i didn't read the entire ordinance but i did go out and read a lot of it. if i missed how they called out church services, simply tell me which part and i'll be glad to go back and look. if the church is mad they doing this in >10 people or whatever the # is, i simply don't care. rules, stupid or otherwise, are for us all to follow or challenge. challenge however isn't ignoring them and saying it's your right to do so.

iii.
For the purposes of this Order, “Minimum Basic Operations” include the following, provided
that employees comply with Social Distancing Requirements as defined in this Section, to the extent possible, while carrying out such operations:

c.
No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19.

so this does not target churches then does it? my point.

and like i also said, there are better ways to challenge the rules, to me, than to disobey them and cry foul. but if this is how this church chooses to do so, fine. people are making this up as they go and perhaps the challenging is better than old school processes.

my point being is still - this doesn't ban CHURCHES from doing it - it says NO ONE can do it. the article is written, as usual, for max drama value. please feel free to tell me how the headline putting ALLOWS ABORTIONS in there is relevant to this ordinance?

it's not. it's to get people riled up. russian type trolling.

I corrected my post. It does point to churches, temples, concert halls, auditoriums and playhouses-


Those operations necessary for venues, such as concert halls, auditoriums, churches, temples, and playhouses, to enable a recorded and/or live-streamed event to be shared virtually with the public, with the following limitations:


You are right in once sense, being lumped with auditoriums and playhouses.

 

[iceberg]

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, ‘Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe’

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home

4 people....looks to be about 6 feet apart....what's the deal?

"Per the order, there can only be four people recording from one place and “no singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence.”

California County Bans Singing During Online Church Services, 'Abortions Are Essential, But Singing in a Streamed Worship Service is Just Too Unsafe' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Mendocino County in California is being criticized for banning singing while churches are recording their online services, unless the people are singing from home.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

California is reportedly considering a whole list of other actions to outlaw due to COVID-19:

Blowing Bubbles
- Gum or sudsy child entertainment devices

Whistling

Blowing out birthday or other celebratory candles

Laughing 'boisterously'
- Chuckles, guffaws, snickers, and 'golf claps' are encouraged

Emojis or Emotes that might cause 'boisterous' laughter

Farting
- Especially in Public

.
.
.

i read the order. it doesn't call out *any* of the below stuff. so we're mixing up this bit of whatever from where ever with the original post about the city order.

the city order does not call out churches. it states guidelines for everyone to follow; like it or not for now. there are businesses here in dallas that still host local bands and simply stream the event. if they do it with less than 10 total people in the building and stay enough apart, i don't see an issue.

now if the church wants to stream their services out, simply do so under the guidelines we all follow and there shouldn't be an issue. but trying to pretend none of this is happening and go MY RELIGIOUS FEELZ as a reason to not have to at least try to work with the system, to me, is bullshit.

i'm all for questioning what we're being told. but there are better ways to do it than to strap yourself to a cross and claim "they" are coming after you.

now granted i didn't read the entire ordinance but i did go out and read a lot of it. if i missed how they called out church services, simply tell me which part and i'll be glad to go back and look. if the church is mad they doing this in >10 people or whatever the # is, i simply don't care. rules, stupid or otherwise, are for us all to follow or challenge. challenge however isn't ignoring them and saying it's your right to do so.

iii.
For the purposes of this Order, “Minimum Basic Operations” include the following, provided
that employees comply with Social Distancing Requirements as defined in this Section, to the extent possible, while carrying out such operations:

c.
No singing or use of wind instruments, harmonicas, or other instruments that could spread COVID-19 through projected droplets shall be permitted unless the recording of the event is done at one’s residence, and involving only the members of one’s household or living unit, because of the increased risk of transmission of COVID-19.

so this does not target churches then does it? my point.

and like i also said, there are better ways to challenge the rules, to me, than to disobey them and cry foul. but if this is how this church chooses to do so, fine. people are making this up as they go and perhaps the challenging is better than old school processes.

my point being is still - this doesn't ban CHURCHES from doing it - it says NO ONE can do it. the article is written, as usual, for max drama value. please feel free to tell me how the headline putting ALLOWS ABORTIONS in there is relevant to this ordinance?

it's not. it's to get people riled up. russian type trolling.

I corrected my post. It does point to churches, temples, concert halls, auditoriums and playhouses-

Those operations necessary for venues, such as concert halls, auditoriums, churches, temples, and playhouses, to enable a recorded and/or live-streamed event to be shared virtually with the public, with the following limitations:

You are right in once sense, being lumped with auditoriums and playhouses.

ok - but my main point isn't churches isn't mentioned, but more it's not singled out to attack churches.

this article is written to get you riled up as if church goers are under persecution and about the only real points i'm making are the article is a piece of shit emo-drive-by one and shouldn't be taken seriously and if the church wants to fight this, i encourage it but do so with the rest of those listed and show a community, not personal, impact.

 

[easyt65]

Again, not a 'partisan' slant / question / challenge, one about the legal justification for all the Constitutional Right-impacting COVID-19 mandates being put out by local, state, and federal governments:

The assertion that local / state / federal authorities can simply issue mandates that eliminate established and protected Constitutional Rights must be backed by appropriate legal justification.....I am just asking anyone to provide the specific legal basis /document / law for governments to do so.

Challenge accepted? Link anyone?

If you actually can answer by providing such a link that would be awesome because I do not specifically know by what specific official legal authority / justification states this can be done.....

 

[BlindBoo]

View attachment 323821

And the progressives press their boot down further on your neck.

*****SMILE*****

And the right wing propaganda twist reality in such a way that you believe it is all about the Church.

and the left wing propaganda twists reality in such a way to make you believe ORANGE MAN BAD.

the stupidest thing i see is when someone puts human attributes to only one side and gets that WHAT ME look when busted for the same.

Feeling a little persecuted today. The rules should apply to everyone, or are you saying the so called 'progressive boot' is only being pressed down on the church going necks?

Who said anything about the "Deadly Donnie"? Beside you that is!