Cain Should Take a Lie Detector Test

[California Girl]

Cain wont take it because he said he needs a good reason to do so. There isnt and will never be a "good reason" to take it to Cain.

I imagine Cain probably did it, I mean, every single one of the 5 women, the Republican pollster and the Conservative radio host cant ALL be lying.

I imagine that Obama is probably a crack addict. I mean, people have said that he's taken coke and shit. So, they can't all be lying.

This is what happens when you have a media that is driven by partisan politics rather than a genuine interest in truth. Idiots believe it, repeat it, and suddenly it's 'fact'. It is not fact, never has been, probably never will be. Right now, it is 'he said, she said'. Of course, people will believe whatever version best suits their ideology. Personally, I like Cain and I have no solid evidence on which to change that opinion.

 

[Warrior102]

Cain should sue the ever loving shit out of those four idiots who alleged sexual harrassment. Hopefully his lawyers are on it.

******* idiots....

 

[Si modo]

And so shouldn't his accusors, what say you guys?

My personal opinion is that they should both take a lie detector....why? Well Cain can't prove he didn't do these things he is accused of and she can't prove he did do the things he is accused of.

A lie detector can put an end to the circus real fast.

If cain is found to fail it he is done
If the woman is found to fail it he is ok.
If both fail it he is screwed.
If neither fail then cain continues to be guilty until proven innocent which is impossible to prove.

I don't think it's a good idea.

If Cain passes, it will be irrelevant to those who want it to be.

If any of the women pass, it will be irrelevant to those who want it to be.

So, nothing would change at all. And this still feeds into this idiotic voyeuristic need of the lower end of the media demographic.

Just investigate and see what there is. If it remains a she said/he said, as it is now, nothing really changes.

 

[Warrior102]

Cain wont take it because he said he needs a good reason to do so. There isnt and will never be a "good reason" to take it to Cain.

I imagine Cain probably did it, I mean, every single one of the 5 women, the Republican pollster and the Conservative radio host cant ALL be lying.

So all it takes is five posters on here to label you a pedophile and we'll all be good with that?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

lie detectors are flawed sceince and can be fooled by a sociopath.

Your inabilty to refuse to accept the fact that Cain has an obvious problem with blonde women is not reason to resort to bullshit means of trying to shame his victims.

Who said I'm refusing anything. I think I said we can't physically prove one way or the other if Cain is innocent or guilty hence my lie detector idea and this thread.

Please don't make false attacks against me TM, its lame.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Lie Detector and Polygraph Tests: Are They Reliable? | Nolo.com


from another source:

Do the tests work? Depends how you define work. Probably the most comprehensive look at polygraph accuracy is a 2003 report from the National Academy of Sciences. After examining 57 polygraph studies the NAS concluded: "In populations of examinees such as those represented in the polygraph research literature, untrained in countermeasures, specific-incident polygraph tests can discriminate lying from truth telling at rates well above chance, though well below perfection." Their analysis of the 30 most recent polygraph data sets showed an overall accuracy of 85 percent, and an analysis of seven field studies involving specific incidents showed a median accuracy of 89 percent.

The Straight Dope: How accurate are lie-detector tests?

Good information bones. 85% isn't perfect but, for me, its good enough and I would be willing to toss Cain under the proverbial bus if he failed the test.

 

[Montrovant]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bScv6kfxRyE]Penn & Teller Bullshit Season 7 Episode 5 Lie Detectors PART 2 - YouTube[/ame]

Starting at about 6:30 you can see how squeezing your anus fools a lie detector!

 

[Si modo]

Cain wont take it because he said he needs a good reason to do so. There isnt and will never be a "good reason" to take it to Cain.

I imagine Cain probably did it, I mean, every single one of the 5 women, the Republican pollster and the Conservative radio host cant ALL be lying.

So all it takes is five posters on here to label you a pedophile and we'll all be good with that?

That's all it took for daycare workers to be named a lot of things, none of which were true.

Thankfully, we have rules of evidence to prevent such hysteria. Too bad so many folks haven't been taught any critical thought skills. Personally, I believe that to be by design. Useful Idiots.

Consider it? Yes. Get out the torches and pitchforks for the mob? No.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

I voted none.. It won't prove anything but the other side claiming it was a faulty test. Only God and the parties involved know the truth.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Cain should sue the ever loving shit out of those four idiots who alleged sexual harassment. Hopefully his lawyers are on it.

******* idiots....

I actually stated this on "The Ed Lambert" show this morning. My exact words were "If Cain truly did not do this and it knocks him out of the race he should sue for defamation of character. However, if it doesn't knock him out of the race and he sues the lawsuit will end his campaign"

 

[Luissa]

If he was smart he wouldn't

 

[Truthmatters]

he cant sue the ladies who already settled their cases with him.

He is the one who broke the confidentiallity parts of the agreement by claiming they lied in Public.


he screwed the pooch.

He can sue the lady who never filed on him but she has witnesses who will testify she told them of the assault at the time.

 

[Si modo]

he cant sue the ladies who already settled their cases with him.

He is the one who broke the confidentiallity parts of the agreement by claiming they lied in Public.


he screwed the pooch.

He can sue the lady who never filed on him but she has witnesses who will testify she told them of the assault at the time.

He certainly can sue for slander and defamation, if he is damaged.

Idiot.

 

[Warrior102]

he cant sue the ladies who already settled their cases with him.

He is the one who broke the confidentiallity parts of the agreement by claiming they lied in Public.


he screwed the pooch.

He can sue the lady who never filed on him but she has witnesses who will testify she told them of the assault at the time.

Hey dipshit.
He said none of it happened.
Prove otherwise with evidence, or shut your dumb ******* racist piehole.

 

[bitterlyclingin]

This is going to be the dirtiest Presidential campaign ever. We already know one of the campaigners is one of the dirtiest campaigners to have ever held the office of president, representing the party reknown for its legendary ballot box chicanery.
Let's rehash Barry Obama's political career, for a second. His first electoral opponent was stricken from the ballot by the Obama campaign's having all the signatures on his oponents ballot petition disqualified. His next two opponents withdrew after both their supposedly permanently sealed divorce records were somehow unsealed and made publicly available. He essentially ran unopposed the first three times at bat. The last time up against John McCain, a mysterious consortium of investors, after watching the price of a barrel of oil rise to $150/barrel in the early part of the year then fall back to $30/barrel, made a run on the US banking system in September that nearly caused the collapse of the American Banking System, plunged the US into a depression which it still finds itself in today, thirty eight months later. These are a series of events that could never occur together by chance. Even FDR, magnificent politician that he was, lost an election or two during his career.
The Obama campaign must maintain its status as the Socialist's Wet Dream. They cannot take a chance and allow a Herman Cain candidacy in opposition. A serial sexual harrasment complainer living in David Axelrod's building? Another who works in the Obama Administration? This is Chicago dirty politics as its always been practiced. You don't need to see an irish bar blown up on St Patrick's day to know what's going on here. The spirit of Al Capone is alive and apparently doing well at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Most of his constituents were expecting to see the Socialist People's Republic of the United States firmly in place. They're finding today he needs four more years. If you believe the BS politico and the LeftMedia is feeding you about Herman Cain you're liable to give it to him. After four more years of Obama, you won't recognize your country.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

he cant sue the ladies who already settled their cases with him.

He is the one who broke the confidentiallity parts of the agreement by claiming they lied in Public.


he screwed the pooch.

He can sue the lady who never filed on him but she has witnesses who will testify she told them of the assault at the time.

He certainly can sue for slander and defamation, if he is damaged.

Idiot.

Si modo is right about him having the ability to sue under defamtion of character if the claims can be proven to have damaged him (and its pretty obvious they are).

Also, the lawyer for the anonymous women broke the confidentiality agreement also by even bringing up the settled cases.

 

[Truthmatters]

he cant sue the ladies who already settled their cases with him.

He is the one who broke the confidentiallity parts of the agreement by claiming they lied in Public.


he screwed the pooch.

He can sue the lady who never filed on him but she has witnesses who will testify she told them of the assault at the time.

Hey dipshit.
He said none of it happened.
Prove otherwise with evidence, or shut your dumb ******* racist piehole.

there are legal documents that he broke the agreements of publicly.


Its Cain who is without evidence to support his claims

 

[Si modo]

he cant sue the ladies who already settled their cases with him.

He is the one who broke the confidentiallity parts of the agreement by claiming they lied in Public.


he screwed the pooch.

He can sue the lady who never filed on him but she has witnesses who will testify she told them of the assault at the time.

Hey dipshit.
He said none of it happened.
Prove otherwise with evidence, or shut your dumb ******* racist piehole.

there are legal documents that he broke the agreements of publicly.


Its Cain who is without evidence to support his claims

Cain has as much evidence that he didn't do it as they have that he did. And, Cain has no burden.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

he cant sue the ladies who already settled their cases with him.

He is the one who broke the confidentiallity parts of the agreement by claiming they lied in Public.


he screwed the pooch.

He can sue the lady who never filed on him but she has witnesses who will testify she told them of the assault at the time.

Hey dipshit.
He said none of it happened.
Prove otherwise with evidence, or shut your dumb ******* racist piehole.

there are legal documents that he broke the agreements of publicly.


Its Cain who is without evidence to support his claims

Neither Cain nor the Accusors have any actual evidence that has been released into the media.

The burden of legal proof is on the accusors, not the accused.....the burden of media proof is on the accused, not the accusors.

 

[edthecynic]

jerry springer would be proud

Actually it's Maury Povich who gives the lie detector tests results on TV. AQUILA Cain "The Groper" would probably make out with the decoys in the green room!