- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,410
- 67,404
- 2,635
Prove it’s a certainty......I agree that his focus is in determining Russia’s involvement in the election. But of course he has to investigate for criminality, if there is any evidence leading him in that direction. He can’t just tell Congress I think Trump conspired with Russia to hack the election, now go ahead and impeach him. He has to present evidence, otherwise the Senate will absolutely acquit Trump. And to present evidence, Mueller has to investigate. Not to mention, any findings from such an investigation could also be used against Trump once he’s out of office. And it’s also not a certainty trump can’t be indicted if it can be proven he was involved with Russia. Though it was a civil case and not a criminal case, Paula Jones was allowed to file suit against a sitting president. Constitutional scholars and lawyers offer mixed opinions on that question.We’ll find out eventually. It’s also possible Mueller is lying when he says trump is not under investigation, so trump is less defensive. My feeling is he will eventually produce something more along the lines of a process crime committed during the investigation; then he will from proving a direct connection between Trump and the Kremlin from before the investigation.That’s also nothing but speculation on your part. We don’t know what Mueller’s evidence is or how advanced his investigation is. It’s possible he has something on trump but is not yet ready to inform Congress; since as we all know, the moment he sends anything to Congress, we all learn what it is since few in Congress can keep their mouth shut.
It’s also entirely possible, maybe even probable, he has nothing on Trump, and can show nothing more than some around Trump had connections with Russians. After all, Mueller did say he wasn’t investigating Trump.
Well, according to Adam Schiff and Eric Swallwell , Mueller showed them information that directly incriminates Trump over 2 years ago.
My feeling is that Bob is honest and he's not gonna be a bird dog for Democrats who want to impeach Trump, meaning he's following current Justice Dept policy and since the POTUS can't be indicted, there is no reason to investigate criminal activity. All this "Mueller is investigating Trump for this crime or that crime" is bullshit. Bob is investigating Russia and what they did in terms of our 2016 election, and any crimes he uncovers while conducting that investigation.
As I"ve said, Democrats are going to be sorely disappointed when he wraps up his investigation. And in fact, Democrats in Congress already know this, that is why they are moving on to "Congress MUST investigate this" which of course Congressional investigations are the most useless waste of time in the history of mankind. I"ve testified before Congress several times and those people are idiots.
It is an absolute certainty that he can't be indicted while in office. There is NO chance that the Justice Department reverses course on that Faun
As for impeachment. Bob wasn't hired to investigate Trump for impeachment and in fact that isn't the Justice Department's job AT ALL.
Congress has their own investigative abilities and they can do what they want, without the Justice Department.