Gun owners will adamantly deny it but.........
The Marxist Left is slowly but surely winning the push to diarm Americans. Step by Step.
This fails as a hasty generalization fallacy and confirmation bias fallacy.This guy was shot in the head, losing an eye, and he still managed to draw and return fire on a mass shooter at a party....
As Hunt and other partiers had a bite to eat in the kitchen, the suspect pulled out a gun and began firing on the crowd, sending everyone fleeing, Mendez recounted.
Mendez was shot in the head in front of his wife, who rushed to his side and believed he was dead due to the amount of blood covering his face. She then grabbed their two daughters and put them into a room deeper in the house, barricading them and other children inside.
"She barricaded the door with the dresser. There were three other children in there, not including my two daughters. A total of five kids. She … throws them in the closet, throws clothes over them. Tells them, ‘Be quiet. Do not make a peep if you hear loud noises in this room,’" Mendez said of his wife's actions.
As Hunt continued his alleged rampage, two other women began fighting back against the suspect and screamed for Mendez, knowing he had a concealed carry weapon, Mendez said.
"By the glory of God or the adrenaline and just everything, just the will to live and the will to protect my family, I was able to hear those pleas, those yells for help. I heard my name. And I was able to get up," he said.
He was able to pull out his firearm and shoot the suspect four times in the chest.
"Detectives have determined the individual who shot Jason, and others who fought against Jason, were acting in self-defense and defense of other innocent parties," Sgt. Tommy Hale said in a press release days after the incident, KTAR reported at the time.
Arizona man shot in the head at family party credits his concealed carry for saving lives: ‘would have died’
Arizona man Raul Mendez is speaking out after he thwarted a shooter at a Fourth of July party with his concealed carry despite being shot in the head and losing his left eye.www.foxnews.com
He has since purchased two additional handguns for his family to train with, saying they are "more ready to confront [evil] with equal force now than ever."
Mendez family appears in NRA video on the importance of legal gun ownership and protecting yourself. (NRA )
NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre highlighted in comments to Fox News Digital that the Mendez family’s story "must be told because they are just one example of why the NRA fights hard to improve self-defense laws all across our country."
No. But unlike you I actually know how analyses and data processing works so I tend to understand what I'm reading a bit better.
At some point you folks on the opposing side will have to come up with a better strategy than just screaming about your "Riiiights" as if people will look up from the bleeding dead corpse that was their child and say "Well, I guess this is the price of a strong Second Amendment!"
At some point, you folks on the opposing side with have to explain why people should accept the unnecessary and ineffective restrictions you want to lay on the right to keep and bear arms.At some point you folks on the opposing side will have to come up with a better strategy than just screaming about your "Riiiights" ...
Rational, reasoned people are not swayed by fallacious appeals to emotion - why are you?as if people will look up from the bleeding dead corpse that was their child and say "Well, I guess this is the price of a strong Second Amendment!"
At some point, you folks on the opposing side with have to explain why people should accept the unnecessary and ineffective restrictions you want to lay on the right to keep and bear arms.
Rational, reasoned people are not swayed by fallacious appeals to emotion - why are you?
I know of zero instances where a law abiding gun owner killed a child.
I also know of zero criminals who give a damn what laws you pass or who you took guns from (they will still have them)
I fully understand itIf you are unable to understand this point ...
Says he who knows the only way he can advance his agenda is to sell dead kids.You do seem overly emotional about your guns.
I know of zero instances where a law-abiding ANYONE killed a child.
So your point isn't really all that meaningful.
Are you of the opinion that we should get rid of all laws? Your reasoning leads to that position.
While the 2A side is busy bawling over the rights they lost yesterday......
The Marxist are already busy taking more gun "rights" away today.
I fully understand it
You want to try to remove the "rights "
Says he who knows the only way he can advance his agenda is to sell dead kids.
Nothing in his statement leads to this conclusion.Are you of the opinion that we should get rid of all laws? Your reasoning leads to that position.
Just a reminder what happened just 21 years ago, and was asked for tolerance. Yeah, sure.No....I don't like agenda driven research.......like all of the anti-gun research coming from you guys...
You guys take a community filled with criminals, drug users, alcoholics and domestic abusers, then say those are normal gun owners...while ignoring the owners of the millions of guns in stable, normal homes........
You are vile.....and, by the way....are you Brain357? Did you change your name? You post just like that idiot did...
Rational, reasoned adults do not advance their agenda through fallacious appeals to emotion.If you are unable to act like an adult/...
Your irrational fears are not my problem and do nothing to negate points I made.You scare those of us who have seen equally obsessed angry people do things that we all were saddened by.
Rational, reasoned adults do not advance their agenda through fallacious appeals to emotion.
Why do you ?
Your irrational fears
are not my problem and do nothing to negate points I made.
Tell us: Why should we accept the unnecessary and ineffective restrictions you seek to lay on the exercise of the right to keep and bear arms?
Please read more carefully.What "emotions" am I appealing to that you find unacceptable?
This does not make your fear any less irrational, any less irrelevamt, or any more my problem.To be fair, I'm not the one who is sitting here with a bunch of guns around me because I'm terrified of every other American.
You know you cannot demonstrate this to be true.You do that for yourself.
OK then - please demonstrate that the unnecessary and ineffective restrictions you seek will "work".Because nothing is working right now.
He has -all- the MSDNC talking points down.Keep yapping. I am trying to figure out whose sock puppet you are.
Please read more carefully.
Rational, reasoned adults do not advance their agenda through fallacious appeals to emotion.
Appeal to emotion - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This does not make your fear any less irrational, any less irrelevamt, or any more my problem.
You know you cannot demonstrate this to be true.
OK then - please demonstrate that the unnecessary and ineffective restrictions you seek will "work".
He has -all- the MSDNC talking points down.
Nothing I have posted could, with any degree of intellectual honesty, be described as emotional, in any way.I wish you weren't so hyper emotional about all this.
