They were at his tacky mansion you idiot.How would you know?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They were at his tacky mansion you idiot.How would you know?
What makes you think Trump "stole" anything much less refused to give it back? Why do you insist in swallowing the tripe excuses and stories of an agency which has been lying ever since Trump got in office now just lying again?At least two glaring mysteries remain. Why did Trump steal that stuff and why did he resist giving it back. Aren't you even a little curious?
I think if you read the law, the President and Vice-President are exempt.
Trump was entitled to the informationWhat makes you think Trump "stole" anything much less refused to give it back? Why do you insist in swallowing the tripe excuses and stories of an agency which has been lying ever since Trump got in office now just lying again?
They've really gone too far this time and heads must role or they must prove the justification for the raid, otherwise it is obvious that any agency which has so much power to no longer be accountable to neither the government nor public must be disbanded.
If Trump had anything, I'd wager that it was evidence either proving his innocence in something or the FBI's guilt and they simply deemed they could not afford to let Trump expose the extent of their true crimes.
That's because you seem to guzzle Trump's semen 24/7. A loyal member of the magaturd tribe.What makes you think Trump "stole" anything much less refused to give it back? Why do you insist in swallowing the tripe excuses and stories of an agency which has been lying ever since Trump got in office now just lying again?
They've really gone too far this time and heads must role or they must prove the justification for the raid, otherwise it is obvious that any agency which has so much power to no longer be accountable to neither the government nor public must be disbanded.
If Trump had anything, I'd wager that it was evidence either proving his innocence in something or the FBI's guilt and they simply deemed they could not afford to let Trump expose the extent of their true crimes.
It is the law as written.
Exempt from the laws of the land!
That's because you seem to guzzle Trump's semen 24/7.
Question: What does any of your meandering sexually repressed bullshit have to do with with the current political discussion?Ah yes, a virile and capable president. That must really torque you. Bet he lives in your dreams. Wonder how many decades it's been since Joe was able to fill even a thimble?
Now we know why Jill still calls him her "little squirt."
"Then release the affidavit. Unredacted."
Question: What does any of your meandering sexually repressed bullshit have to do with with the current political discussion?
Exempt from the laws of the land!
He had lots of lawyers who would stall for years. A real scumbag and a bad businessman to boot. I didn't mind until he became a dictator wannabe .It was obviously handled legally or he would have been charged.
I knew how much you liked semen. I'm a giver.You're the one obsessed with bringing up semen!
"Unredacted".
Think about that one.
It's a silly assertion. We all know that.
Just for a nano-second let's think why:
1. If there really was a secret whistleblower......that cover is blown. And that sends a message that chills that particular snitch from providing new stuff. And more broadly it chills future whistleblowers in ----say, the IRS, or a hospital, a meat-packer, a baby-forumula plant, a drug maker, etc. etc. WE....as a society ......have benefitted by whistleblowers. And by protecting them.
2. Details of the contents may be Top Secret information ....at least the scope and scale of it, perhaps a named spy in North Korea, Venzuala, China......well, we don't need to know that...... nor want that.
So, I'm somewhat content to leave it up to the judge and the arguing DOJ attorneys to determine what....if anything.....can be released. And what must be protected -- for the sake of the investigation, and the wider equities that we cannot know at our level at this time.
Remember this was, and is, an 'investigation'. And per FBI communiques an ongoing one.
It is NOT an arrest warrant or an indictment. Investigations need to progress in the manner that best ensures that what is being investigated is done thoroughly. Duh!
If an indictment ensues, or an arrest.....well, we can expect to learn more about what the DOJ knows and thinks.
Giving the subject of an investigation a road-map on what law enforcement knows ain't exactly prudent law enforcement. Or prudent investigating.
I know y'all know that.
Of course.Rand Paul is right about a lot of things. This is one of them.
“You know, I think the burden is on the FBI to justify this raid. This is extraordinary,” Paul outlined. “This is also the same FBI that used a foreign intelligence warrant to snoop on and spy on the Trump campaign, to investigate them for over two years. So, I think the burden really is on the FBI. They’ve been wrong in the past. They’ve broken the law in using these foreign intelligence warrants; now, they use a domestic warrant. But I do think they need to release the justification for this because this is extraordinary.”
Rand Paul: 'Burden Is on the FBI to Justify' Mar-a-Lago Raid, Prove It Wasn't 'Politically Motivated Witch Hunt'
During a Thursday interview with FNC's "Fox & Friends," Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) called on the FBI to "prove" its raid of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home was "not a politically motivated witch hunt." | Clipswww.breitbart.com
Magaturds support corruption at the highest level of our government. They do this willingly, and even tithe to their leaders to continue being corrupt.The lying and corrupt Democrats have turned the DOJ and the FBI away from fighting crime to crime committing.
The Democrat Party is a dangerous political cult.
"Unredacted".
Think about that one.
It's a silly assertion. We all know that.
Just for a nano-second let's think why:
1. If there really was a secret whistleblower......that cover is blown. And that sends a message that chills that particular snitch from providing new stuff. And more broadly it chills future whistleblowers in ----say, the IRS, or a hospital, a meat-packer, a baby-forumula plant, a drug maker, etc. etc. WE....as a society ......have benefitted by whistleblowers. And by protecting them.
2. Details of the contents may be Top Secret information ....at least the scope and scale of it, perhaps a named spy in North Korea, Venzuala, China......well, we don't need to know that...... nor want that.
So, I'm somewhat content to leave it up to the judge and the arguing DOJ attorneys to determine what....if anything.....can be released. And what must be protected -- for the sake of the investigation, and the wider equities that we cannot know at our level at this time.
Remember this was, and is, an 'investigation'. And per FBI communiques an ongoing one.
It is NOT an arrest warrant or an indictment. Investigations need to progress in the manner that best ensures that what is being investigated is done thoroughly. Duh!
If an indictment ensues, or an arrest.....well, we can expect to learn more about what the DOJ knows and thinks.
Giving the subject of an investigation a road-map on what law enforcement knows ain't exactly prudent law enforcement. Or prudent investigating.
I know y'all know that.