Breyer to Retire: Anita Hill Should Take His Place

That would be interesting....LOL
Nominating Anita Hill for a SCOTUS position might also throw a white-hot spotlight on Thomas and his corrupt wife and raise the impeachment issue in time for Biden to get a second appointment before 2024.
0948e5b3e09268b310350590b1ba27a25486c97f.jpeg

"The Supreme Court justice refuses to recuse himself from cases in which his right-wing activist wife, Ginni, has a clear interest. The Democrats should punish him for it."

The Case for Impeaching Clarence Thomas
 
I guarantee you if Potatohead nominated the bitch she is a hateful confused affirmative action dumbass Negro that never understood the Constitution.
Do you think her understanding of the Constitution rivals Trump's or your own?:auiqs.jpg:
440px-Ketanji_Brown_Jackson_2020_%28cropped%29.jpeg

"Born in Washington, D.C., and raised in Miami, Florida, Jackson attended Harvard University for college and law school, where she served as an editor on the Harvard Law Review.

"She began her legal career with three clerkships, including one with U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer."

Ketanji Brown Jackson - Wikipedia
 
If a President stated, "I will only consider a white male for a USSC judge", all you pieces of shit Libtards would be crying that he was racist
January 26, 2022
"University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck noted that representation on the Supreme Court has been wildly skewed. Of the 115 Supreme Court justices we have had in our history, we have had 108 white men, 2 Black men, and 5 women (4 white; 1 Latina)."
You Are Being Replaced.
 
thomas-hill-resize.jpg

Hill is at least as qualified as Thomas (not to mention Lewis Powell). and her nomination would give Corporate Joe a chance to redeem himself for one of his many past blunders:

Anita Hill - Wikipedia

"In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a federal circuit judge, to succeed retiring Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Senate hearings on his confirmation were initially completed[13] with Thomas's good character being presented as a primary qualification for the high court because he had only been a judge for slightly more than one year..."

"According to Hill, Thomas asked her out socially many times during her two years of employment as his assistant,[7] and, after she declined his requests, he used work situations to discuss sexual subjects.[4][7]

"'He spoke about ... such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,' she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described 'his own sexual prowess' and the details of his anatomy..."

"Four female witnesses reportedly waited in the wings to support Hill's credibility, but they were not called,[15][18] due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary Committee chair, Democrat Joe Biden."

This is silly.

Rachel Dolezal is the favorite.

Bidens top nominee.
 
The bottom line is qualifications. One must have extensive constitutional law credentials as well experience sitting on the bench in Federal Court. One must also remember after the dog and pony show the Dim’s delivered during the past two GOP nomination proceedings it should be expected the GOP has not forgotten.
 
There were many details of Thomas's misogyny that were never aired thirty years ago, and there are far more instances of corruption by Clarence and his Tea-Party wife since that time that could result in impeaching "Long Dong" and giving Biden a second pick before next November.
This is absolute nonsense and defamation of character. George go back to your Parents basement until you have real evidence.
 
Nice in theory, in reality, you are always going to have some legislating from the bench. And frankly, Sotomayor and Kagan aren't nearly as fanatical as Uncle Thomas and Serena Joy.
In reality, if a justice SAYS policy should be made from the bench and must catch herself, then she is definitely radical… she can’t contain it. Based on your logic, we should just accept legislating from the bench even though that corrupts interpretation of the Law. So, we should accept things based on reality no matter what? That’s a slope.
 
If over a third of the Black population is undereducated due to primal sexual morals and 70% in single parent families why would you feel the way you do? And this costing the taxpayers massive amounts of resources. Just a few nukes.
How much of the white population is undereducated? What would you say if I told you the reason many of those families are put in that % is because the mother and father are not married, but the father lives in the household? How much is it costing the taxpayers for the nonproductive whites that live in this society?
 
You dumbsht Moon Bats don't even know that Potatohead is violating the 1964 Civil Rights Acts by using race and gender as a criteria for a Federal employee hire, do you? LOL!
Hey dumbass, he can pick anyone he wants to.


  1. The president nominates an individual to the Supreme Courtwhen an opening occurs.
    1. Typically, the president picks someone from his or her own party.
    2. The president usually picks someone with a shared judicial philosophy of either judicial restraint or judicial activism.
    3. The president might also choose someone of a varied background in order to bring a greater degree of balance to the court.
Show us how he is violating the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Actually you know but being hatefilled Negro ass kissing pieces of shit you don't care. You little asshole are always hypocritical.
One thing about it. This Negro bitch will never be taken seriously by anybody being Potatohead's Affirmative Action Ho.
Ah Flush and you expect us to believe that your wife rec'd an award from Mr Peanut for working with minority kids when she is married to a racist POS like you. Sorry, not buying it.

Was Amy Comey Barrett and affirmative action ho?
 
"Hill then became an assistant professor at the Evangelical Christian O. W. Coburn School of Law at Oral Roberts University where she taught from 1983 to 1986.[9]

"In 1986, she joined the faculty at the University of Oklahoma College of Law where she taught commercial law and contracts.[10][11]

"In 1989 she became the first tenured African American professor at OU.

"She left the university in 1996 due to ongoing calls for her resignation that began after her 1992 testimony.

"In 1998 she became a visiting scholar at Brandeis University and, in 2015, a university professor at the school."

Proven the age-old adage, "Those who can do, and those who can't teach." So this woman had been an attorney for something like 40 years, and as near as I can tell, has never argued a case in court.

In understand why you question her credibility.
She claims she followed Thomas because his abuse had stopped at that point.
Biden prevented four other women from testifying at Thomas's confirmation, so I guess we'll never know for sure?

One of them was Angela Wright, who had credibility problems from the get-go. Biden cut the thing short because it was making the Senate look bad, with Democrats attacking Thomas and Republicans attacking Hill.

Sorry, man, I just can't buy that she decided to switch with him because the "abuse had stopped". Unless there is some kind of serious co-dependent thing going on there, most people do not follow bosses they don't really like. Of all the bosses I've had in the 30 years since I left the Army, I can think of maybe TWO I would follow to another company.

Now, I have no use for Thomas, who I consider to be a bit dim.... but I have more contempt for Hill, who was just an opportunist.

But as they said in "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance", "Print the Legend". The legend became this brave woman who spoke truth to a bunch of out of touch male senators, and if we just had more women on the Senate, it would have been different.
 
Hey dumbass, he can pick anyone he wants to.


  1. The president nominates an individual to the Supreme Courtwhen an opening occurs.
    1. Typically, the president picks someone from his or her own party.
    2. The president usually picks someone with a shared judicial philosophy of either judicial restraint or judicial activism.
    3. The president might also choose someone of a varied background in order to bring a greater degree of balance to the court.
Show us how he is violating the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Ah Flush and you expect us to believe that your wife rec'd an award from Mr Peanut for working with minority kids when she is married to a racist POS like you. Sorry, not buying it.

Was Amy Comey Barrett and affirmative action ho?


You can't use Negro ghetto bullshit to justify Potatohead using race as a criteria for a Federal hire, which is in violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Acts.

Of course you Jungle Bunnies only think you can't discriminate against fellow Jungle Bunnies and that does not include discrimination against other races.

You are that stupid, aren't you?
 
thomas-hill-resize.jpg

Hill is at least as qualified as Thomas (not to mention Lewis Powell). and her nomination would give Corporate Joe a chance to redeem himself for one of his many past blunders:

Anita Hill - Wikipedia

"In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a federal circuit judge, to succeed retiring Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Senate hearings on his confirmation were initially completed[13] with Thomas's good character being presented as a primary qualification for the high court because he had only been a judge for slightly more than one year..."

"According to Hill, Thomas asked her out socially many times during her two years of employment as his assistant,[7] and, after she declined his requests, he used work situations to discuss sexual subjects.[4][7]

"'He spoke about ... such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,' she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described 'his own sexual prowess' and the details of his anatomy..."

"Four female witnesses reportedly waited in the wings to support Hill's credibility, but they were not called,[15][18] due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary Committee chair, Democrat Joe Biden."

1643334604907.png
 
thomas-hill-resize.jpg

Hill is at least as qualified as Thomas (not to mention Lewis Powell). and her nomination would give Corporate Joe a chance to redeem himself for one of his many past blunders:

Anita Hill - Wikipedia

"In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a federal circuit judge, to succeed retiring Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Senate hearings on his confirmation were initially completed[13] with Thomas's good character being presented as a primary qualification for the high court because he had only been a judge for slightly more than one year..."

"According to Hill, Thomas asked her out socially many times during her two years of employment as his assistant,[7] and, after she declined his requests, he used work situations to discuss sexual subjects.[4][7]

"'He spoke about ... such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,' she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described 'his own sexual prowess' and the details of his anatomy..."

"Four female witnesses reportedly waited in the wings to support Hill's credibility, but they were not called,[15][18] due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary Committee chair, Democrat Joe Biden."
You should take his place. You would be the first bitch on the SC.
 

Forum List

Back
Top