Yea because that has never done in America.Leave it to segregationist democrats stipulating race and gender over merit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yea because that has never done in America.Leave it to segregationist democrats stipulating race and gender over merit.
Yep and how many of them agreed there was voter fraud?Hey IDIOT, he will maybe get one pick and he is replacing a libatard, so the makeup of the court is not changing AT ALL. Remember Trump got 3 young picks, you lose, loser.
That is what has been done in this country for how many years.If a President stated, "I will only consider a white male for a USSC judge", all you pieces of shit Libtards would be crying that he was racist.
Let the hate go Flush, this is 2022 not 1922. You need to rally up the Good God Fearin Klan in your town and protest this outrage.If they hire a dumbass affrimative action Negro Ho to the Supreme Court do you think that they will need to have Barbara Billingsly standing by at the hearings to translate?
I appreciate your assessment about Hill. Biden can pick whomever he wants. Elections have consequences and privileges. That said, I have yet to see a judge nominated from either party that did not have a partisan component.
That's just where the party is right now. He's perfectly comfortable being that way. He won't get any pushback, so why worry? Let 'er rip!Let the hate go Flush, this is 2022 not 1922. You need to rally up the Good God Fearin Klan in your town and protest this outrage.
it wouldn’t be the first time the dems picked someone unqualified with no judicial experience
Hill is at least as qualified as Thomas (not to mention Lewis Powell). and her nomination would give Corporate Joe a chance to redeem himself for one of his many past blunders:
Anita Hill - Wikipedia
"In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a federal circuit judge, to succeed retiring Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Senate hearings on his confirmation were initially completed[13] with Thomas's good character being presented as a primary qualification for the high court because he had only been a judge for slightly more than one year..."
"According to Hill, Thomas asked her out socially many times during her two years of employment as his assistant,[7] and, after she declined his requests, he used work situations to discuss sexual subjects.[4][7]
"'He spoke about ... such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,' she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described 'his own sexual prowess' and the details of his anatomy..."
"Four female witnesses reportedly waited in the wings to support Hill's credibility, but they were not called,[15][18] due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary Committee chair, Democrat Joe Biden."
If over a third of the Black population is undereducated due to primal sexual morals and 70% in single parent families why would you feel the way you do? And this costing the taxpayers massive amounts of resources. Just a few nukes.That is what has been done in this country for how many years.
What a disgusting thing to say, cockroach!!We already have one boot licker on the Bench, we don't need another one.
We all know you are a stupid uneducated low information Moon Bat with an inflated ego.Once again proving how ignorant you Trumpsters are of my politics.
All for it. She's got a couple of years left.
Hill is at least as qualified as Thomas (not to mention Lewis Powell). and her nomination would give Corporate Joe a chance to redeem himself for one of his many past blunders:
Anita Hill - Wikipedia
"In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a federal circuit judge, to succeed retiring Associate Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. Senate hearings on his confirmation were initially completed[13] with Thomas's good character being presented as a primary qualification for the high court because he had only been a judge for slightly more than one year..."
"According to Hill, Thomas asked her out socially many times during her two years of employment as his assistant,[7] and, after she declined his requests, he used work situations to discuss sexual subjects.[4][7]
"'He spoke about ... such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,' she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described 'his own sexual prowess' and the details of his anatomy..."
"Four female witnesses reportedly waited in the wings to support Hill's credibility, but they were not called,[15][18] due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary Committee chair, Democrat Joe Biden."
Let the hate go Flush, this is 2022 not 1922. You need to rally up the Good God Fearin Klan in your town and protest this outrage.
Then you have Kagan and Sotomayor who are ideologues from the Left. Sotomayor even had to catch herself about making policy. Judges don’t legislate or make policy. They interpret.I kind of disagree with that. Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter and even to a degree Roberts were conservatives, but they aren't ideologues. You could reason with them.
Trump stacked the court with nutbars, and that's why we are at the point we are at.
Did I hear Biden right when he said he intends to nominate a black woman?
I wonder what the Dimocrat non-binary wing has to say about that?
Maybe he should have said he intends to nominate a black birthing person to the court.
Who told you that?A much overturned leftoid hack.
Then you have Kagan and Sotomayor who are ideologues from the Left. Sotomayor even had to catch herself about making policy. Judges don’t legislate or make policy. They interpret.
Anita is 65, so even if Bernie was in the White House, she probably would not get the nod?All for it. She's got a couple of years left.
She's over the hill. (pun intended)Anita is 65, so even if Bernie was in the White House, she probably would not get the nod?
Hill's legal qualifications seem at least as credible as the tobacco lobbyist's, Lewis Powell, that Nixon put on the court:Qualified to do what?
You see, here's the thing. I really never believed Anita Hill at the time... and even though I am a lot more liberal than I was when I was in 1991, I still don't believe her now.