That’s excellent. It also gave him the money to get out on bail.
I wish I had his address. I’d send him a nice note with a personal check. Also, my niece would love to meet such a brave patriot who steps up to protect people. (That he’s a cutie doesn’t hurt.)
You wouldn't know the truth if it hit you in the face. Like now you're trying to convince me that you ever listened or watched Bongino. Contract negotiations breaking down is not poison, it's a business disagreement.
The screaming savages know that demonstrating in front of the homes of USSC judges, without consequence, means the left will excuse criminal behavior of their minions.
The standard is "imminent threat of the application of unlawful force".
From Link...
New York has a "justification" statute that allows you to use physical force against another person to protect yourself from imminent harm. This means that if the reason that you injured the other person is because you were protecting yourself from him or her, then you may have a valid defense to an assault charge.
Free Consultation - Our New York criminal lawyers have a combined 100+ years of legal and law enforcement experience. Our team includes former prosecutors from the District Attorney’s offices in New York City and Long Island, as well as law enforcement professionals. Stephen Bilkis & Associates...
criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com
That means a physical attack is not required. Only the imminent threat of harm.
Now that I've answered your question...would you please answer mine...because it is important.
Would Sgt. Penny have been arrested had Mr. Neely not died?
Should one have to wait until he does? What if he was armed with a knife or a gun? He would be much easier to subdue before he pulled one out.
I'd be willing to bet that if this Marine waited until he did attack somebody before taking action, and it ended up with the same results, the commies would have still charged him with manslaughter. Just look at what they tried to do with that bodega worker.
The standard is "imminent threat of the application of unlawful force".
From Link...
New York has a "justification" statute that allows you to use physical force against another person to protect yourself from imminent harm. This means that if the reason that you injured the other person is because you were protecting yourself from him or her, then you may have a valid defense to an assault charge.
Free Consultation - Our New York criminal lawyers have a combined 100+ years of legal and law enforcement experience. Our team includes former prosecutors from the District Attorney’s offices in New York City and Long Island, as well as law enforcement professionals. Stephen Bilkis & Associates...
criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com
That means a physical attack is not required. Only the imminent threat of harm.
Now that I've answered your question...would you please answer mine...because it is important.
Would Sgt. Penny have been arrested had Mr. Neely not died?
Article 35 of the New York Penal Law outlines when an individual is justified in using physical force in self-defense, or in the defense of others. Under the statute, a person can use the amount of physical force they reasonably believe is necessary to defend themselves or others from what they reasonably believe to be the illegal imminent use of force or the illegal use of force.
There are only certain circumstances under which a person can assert the justification of self-defense in cases involving deadly force. Since New York imposes a duty to retreat,
it is only permissible to use deadly physical force when there is no other option.
Situations where deadly force can be used in self-defense include circumstances involving:
Kidnapping
Forcible rape
Robbery
Arson
Burglary
This guy fucked up and needs to be punished.
Yes, of course he should have been arrested. Brought in, questioned, just like any other incident like this.
Should one have to wait until he does? What if he was armed with a knife or a gun? He would be much easier to subdue before he pulled one out.
I'd be willing to bet that if this Marine waited until he did attack somebody before taking action, and it ended up with the same results, the commies would have still charged him with manslaughter. Just look at what they tried to do with that bodega worker.
Article 35 of the New York Penal Law outlines when an individual is justified in using physical force in self-defense, or in the defense of others. Under the statute, a person can use the amount of physical force they reasonably believe is necessary to defend themselves or others from what they reasonably believe to be the illegal imminent use of force or the illegal use of force.
There are only certain circumstances under which a person can assert the justification of self-defense in cases involving deadly force. Since New York imposes a duty to retreat,
it is only permissible to use deadly physical force when there is no other option.
Situations where deadly force can be used in self-defense include circumstances involving:
Kidnapping
Forcible rape
Robbery
Arson
Burglary
This guy fucked up and needs to be punished.
Yes, of course he should have been arrested. Brought in, questioned, just like any other incident like this.
Just days after taking office, Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg released a memo detailing new charging, bail, plea and sentencing policies that he said he believes will make the city safer and the criminal justice system more fair, yet the plan faces criticism from police union leaders.
www.cnn.com
Wait for it.... here it comes....
''Focus is on reducing recidivism, Bragg says.''
Was it 42 prior arrests and an active warrant that dogged Neely?