Steve_McGarrett
Gold Member
- Jul 11, 2013
- 19,272
- 4,486
- 280
Breaking: WH rewriting Trump's EO on Travel Ban after 9th Circuit failed to Cite Statute In Ruling
- Thread starter Steve_McGarrett
- Start date
L.K.Eder
unbannable non-troll
if true, then the wh recognized that it failed with the first eo, and now attempts to do better. it is a good decision. presidentin is hard if you are not a dictator. you need to know what you are doing. you need to prepare, listen to experts, and work hard.
brummelben
Gold Member
- Sep 29, 2016
- 6,514
- 651
- 200
- Banned
- #43
Why these countries, no one from any of them has committed a violent act in the US
ptbw forever
Gold Member
- May 9, 2015
- 16,522
- 1,787
- 290
- Banned
- #44
You apparently didn't read the decision.
Steve_McGarrett
Gold Member
- Jul 11, 2013
- 19,272
- 4,486
- 280
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #45
Yet!!!
brummelben
Gold Member
- Sep 29, 2016
- 6,514
- 651
- 200
- Banned
- #46
Iranians are among the most pro american people you can find
sartre play
Gold Member
- May 4, 2015
- 13,290
- 4,438
- 210
If your for or against the ban, It needed to be written with clear terms. that may change the out come. PS the 6th court has moved into 1st or even with the 9th. judges should vote there take on the constitution, if they get reversed oh well, they did there job? or not, how can we know.
bendog
Diamond Member
roadmap? Hell, I hope they read it to him. LOL
basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,171
- 2,220
- Banned
- #50
Look, President Trump doesn't just have a RIGHT to ban certain immigration.
He has a DUTY to keep America safe.
He has a DUTY to keep America safe.
Steve_McGarrett
Gold Member
- Jul 11, 2013
- 19,272
- 4,486
- 280
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #51
bendog
Diamond Member
Remember this gem?
Virginia Rep. Bob Goodlatte said his staffers were discussing immigration policies with Trump officials during the transition period. In a closed-door meeting of House Republicans, he said that their involvement ended January 20 and was on volunteer basis, according to a source in the meeting.
Goodlatte later released a statement Tuesday saying that while he supported the order and his staff working with the transition, they were not decision-makers on its contents.
"My staff on the House Judiciary Committee are some of the best on Capitol Hill. They are experts in their respective fields and I proudly allowed them to provide their expertise to the Trump transition team on immigration law," Goodlatte said. "To be clear, while they gave advice to the new administration, they did not have decision making authority on the policy. The final decision was made at the highest levels of the Trump Administration, and I support the President's executive order. My staff had no control of the language contained in the President's executive order, the timing of the announcement, the rollout and subsequent implementation, and the coordination with Congress."
Multiple sources confirmed to CNN before Goodlatte's statement that Judiciary staffers had aided the transition and worked on the order, but that the chairman was not aware of the content of their work with the administration.
Read More
The executive order signed by Trump on Friday that barred entry to the US to individuals originating from seven countries of concern for terrorism.
The order immediately caused confusion and protests at airports as even legal permanent residents of the US, who held green cards, were detained and denied entry at ports of entry. The result sparked public outcry and global protests before the administration made clear it would not enforce the order against green card holders, after initially saying it would, and there would be other case-by-case exceptions.
House Republican defends staffers working on travel ban executive order - CNNPolitics.com
Virginia Rep. Bob Goodlatte said his staffers were discussing immigration policies with Trump officials during the transition period. In a closed-door meeting of House Republicans, he said that their involvement ended January 20 and was on volunteer basis, according to a source in the meeting.
Goodlatte later released a statement Tuesday saying that while he supported the order and his staff working with the transition, they were not decision-makers on its contents.
"My staff on the House Judiciary Committee are some of the best on Capitol Hill. They are experts in their respective fields and I proudly allowed them to provide their expertise to the Trump transition team on immigration law," Goodlatte said. "To be clear, while they gave advice to the new administration, they did not have decision making authority on the policy. The final decision was made at the highest levels of the Trump Administration, and I support the President's executive order. My staff had no control of the language contained in the President's executive order, the timing of the announcement, the rollout and subsequent implementation, and the coordination with Congress."
Multiple sources confirmed to CNN before Goodlatte's statement that Judiciary staffers had aided the transition and worked on the order, but that the chairman was not aware of the content of their work with the administration.
Read More
The executive order signed by Trump on Friday that barred entry to the US to individuals originating from seven countries of concern for terrorism.
The order immediately caused confusion and protests at airports as even legal permanent residents of the US, who held green cards, were detained and denied entry at ports of entry. The result sparked public outcry and global protests before the administration made clear it would not enforce the order against green card holders, after initially saying it would, and there would be other case-by-case exceptions.
House Republican defends staffers working on travel ban executive order - CNNPolitics.com
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 73,012
- 18,699
- 2,190
3-0 federal judges say you are wrong. I'll take their word over yours
Boss
Take a Memo:
DHS says it.
Boss
Take a Memo:
LOL... Look, you can call it a failure if you like... that's fine. You guys really need to score a point... so far this guy has been just cleaning your ******* clocks for the past 18 months. So that's fine... get your rocks off thinking Trump failed and you won some sort of victory here.
Meanwhile, Trump will roll out a new EO and the restrictions on travel will still apply with a few exceptions. We're going to secure the country, you're not going to prevent that.
- Moderator
- #56
And what makes me laugh is the fact it will be pretty much the same, with the loose ends tied up.
You'll be bitching about it soon enough.
- Banned
- #57
You are confused Moon Bat. Those Libtard idiot judges did create law from the bench.
The President very clearly has the authority granted by Congress to ban via by countries that deems necessary for the security of the US. That is a fact, Jack.
No ******* asshole foreigners has any Constitutional right to be granted entry into this country. That is why we have a via system. That is another fact, Jack.
Those Libtard Moon Bat judges that were never elected by anybody ignored the facts and decided they would circumvent both of those restrictions and impose their stupid ideas on who should be allowed into the country over an elected President. Bad judges, bad!
It was Liberal dumbshit judges being jackasses. We have seen a lot of that since the election. Everything from butt hurt Moon Bat assholes marching in the streets with their silly pink ***** hats, to attacks on Trump supporters to riots at Berkeley to judges behaving like imbeciles.
owebo
Gold Member
No, but you America hating liberals are a total fuckup.....
Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 36,038
- 9,459
- 1,340
That's all he needed to do.
Instead, he made a shitstorm where none was necessary. Amateur hour.
owebo
Gold Member
It is democrat amateur hour.....
New Topics
-
Repub Sessions says marines on Kharg Island would not be “ boots on the ground”- Started by JimH52
- Replies: 1
-
Good riddance Joe Kent - reaction. (US/Israel no one dies "for" others)
- Started by Thethingsz
- Replies: 2
-
-
Brazil Launches Mandatory Age Verification Law for Online Platforms
- Started by MayorQuimby
- Replies: 0
-
