Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 31,612
- 24,440
- 2,915
A woman that doesn't know what a woman is should have never competed much less be confirmed.They compete with dozens of other interests. The GOP wouldn't allow such dissent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A woman that doesn't know what a woman is should have never competed much less be confirmed.They compete with dozens of other interests. The GOP wouldn't allow such dissent.
The GOP is one party in what is essentially a two party system, Stann. The very fact that they're not in power at the moment belies your claim that they are totalitarian. Totalitarians don't give up political power yet the Democrats now hold political power.Not much is true, the GOP is a totalitarian regime.
If only there were words for how much my eyes rolledA woman that doesn't know what a woman is should have never competed much less be confirmed.
This was barely into the former 1-term president's only term.You on the left always claim that Justices nominated by GOP Presidents are "extreme" and yet if you look at the Justices nominated by both sides? None of the Democratic nominees are moderates. Many of the GOP nominees turn out to be just that! Yet you STILL want to claim that they are "unqualified"?
What law did she break?Well let's start with her lies to Congressional investigators that she'd turned over all materials related to the deaths in Benghazi, Otto!
Under the United States Code, title 18, section 1001, a person who knowingly or willingly makes a material statement that is false, or fraudulent, to the feds, is guilty of a crime. What comes as a surprise to many is that unlike section 1621, section 1001 does not require that a person be under oath.What law did she break?
What lie did she knowingly or willingly tell to break the law.Under the United States Code, title 18, section 1001, a person who knowingly or willingly makes a material statement that is false, or fraudulent, to the feds, is guilty of a crime. What comes as a surprise to many is that unlike section 1621, section 1001 does not require that a person be under oath.
What false cases?Whatever, you still don't win, trump never had any evidence to prove his false cases.
You’re a hack.He should have been charged for wasting the Court's time.
She told Congressional investigators that she had turned over all materials related to Benghazi when in fact she had not done so. She had materials on her private servers that she KNEW were related to Benghazi which she then paid to have professionally "bleached" in an attempt to hide what she'd been doing. She also had someone take hammers and smash multiple Blackberries for the same reason. Some of those materials that were later uncovered by Congressional investigators turned out to be highly classified yet were on unsecured servers another violation of law.What lie did she knowingly or willingly tell to break the law.
Should be easy since she testified for 11 hours over time.
The GOP is one party in what is essentially a two party system, Stann. The very fact that they're not in power at the moment belies your claim that they are totalitarian. Totalitarians don't give up political power yet the Democrats now hold political power.
Lie's, lies, and more lie's by you Dimocrats. Give it up already, you all have enraged the American people against you now. Just sit back and watch it all go downhill for you, because that's exactly where it's all going as far as these midterm's go. Watch in example of how you don't piss off America without political retaliation coming back to you.Trump was blackmailed into his SC nominations by the Federalist Society, a purely ideological partisan group. The court's credibility rating among Americans has never been lower, at least in my lifetime. It's a purely political entity that doesn't give a damn about the Constitution.
Uh huh... Like every other attack you dimwits tried over a 5 year span? Not a single charge has stuck. No legal consequences because for now at least, convictions actually still require PROOF.Trump NOT winning
Okay now your just making shit up.She told Congressional investigators that she had turned over all materials related to Benghazi when in fact she had not done so. She had materials on her private servers that she KNEW were related to Benghazi which she then paid to have professionally "bleached" in an attempt to hide what she'd been doing. She also had someone take hammers and smash multiple Blackberries for the same reason. Some of those materials that were later uncovered by Congressional investigators turned out to be highly classified yet were on unsecured servers another violation of law.
Hey taliban, go fuck yourselfLie's, lies, and more lie's by you Dimocrats. Give it up already, you all have enraged the American people against you now. Just sit back and watch it all go downhill for you, because that's exactly where it's all going as far as these midterm's go. Watch in example of how you don't piss off America without political retaliation coming back to you.
Think about what you all have done in your parties name, and then scratch your head's on why you will lose big time in the coming election.
You're amusing, Otto! You actually BELIEVE Hillary Clinton! It's blatantly obvious that Clinton lied to Congressional investigators and then did her best to destroy the evidence of what she'd done...bleaching thousands of emails and smashing her Blackberries with hammers before investigators could subpoena them! She can "claim" what she wants but the facts don't support her claims. Common sense tells any rational person that if there were classified emails in the ones that she didn't destroy that there were more in the ones that she deliberately DID destroy!Okay now your just making shit up.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...laim-that-zero-emails-were-marked-classified/
Poor little Otto. I seriously try to limit my sarcastic comments on these threads, but that little Otto provides all of the material lol Every time I read his screen name I think of this guy:You're amusing, Otto! You actually BELIEVE Hillary Clinton! It's blatantly obvious that Clinton lied to Congressional investigators and then did her best to destroy the evidence of what she'd done...bleaching thousands of emails and smashing her Blackberries with hammers before investigators could subpoena them! She can "claim" what she wants but the facts don't support her claims. Common sense tells any rational person that if there were classified emails in the ones that she didn't destroy that there were more in the ones that she deliberately DID destroy!
Still making shit up?You're amusing, Otto! You actually BELIEVE Hillary Clinton! It's blatantly obvious that Clinton lied to Congressional investigators and then did her best to destroy the evidence of what she'd done...bleaching thousands of emails and smashing her Blackberries with hammers before investigators could subpoena them! She can "claim" what she wants but the facts don't support her claims. Common sense tells any rational person that if there were classified emails in the ones that she didn't destroy that there were more in the ones that she deliberately DID destroy!
Boi, they after 8 Benghazi investigations never laid a glove on her.You're amusing, Otto! You actually BELIEVE Hillary Clinton! It's blatantly obvious that Clinton lied to Congressional investigators and then did her best to destroy the evidence of what she'd done...bleaching thousands of emails and smashing her Blackberries with hammers before investigators could subpoena them! She can "claim" what she wants but the facts don't support her claims. Common sense tells any rational person that if there were classified emails in the ones that she didn't destroy that there were more in the ones that she deliberately DID destroy!
Why were they destroyed, Lesh? The obvious answer to that is the same as why the two servers were bleached! The Clinton Camp knew that what they'd been doing...running the State Department through private servers to avoid Congressional oversight...had been exposed and the Congressional investigators were coming! Hillary Clinton destroyed evidence. She did it deliberately and she did it to hide what she'd been doing.Still making shit up?
The phones were destroyed before the FBI asked for evidence.
And oh yea...this is not the "butter emails" thread
Boi, they after 8 Benghazi investigations never laid a glove on her.
What silo do you live in told you they did? WND? Newswacked?
Advice, grow a stem and learn to critically think and retain understanding.
Fucking idiot white bois….