BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Benjamin Netanyahu’s reelection underlines Israel’s apartheid reality

The results of Israel’s elections reveal a stark reality: Not only will Benjamin Netanyahu almost inevitably
form a coalition government even further to the right than the one he already heads, but the country’s Jewish electorate has given its resounding endorsement to the policies for which he stands.

Netanyahu ran a manifestly racist electoral campaign, reaching out to embrace politicians who openly espouse the desire to expel Palestinians from the state and promising to annex parts of the West Bank, dealing probably a final blow to the moribund two-state solution. What Israeli voters want, clearly, is precisely what is on offer: more dispossession of Palestinians, more home demolitions, more indiscriminate bombing campaigns, more shooting of protesters, more settlements, more restrictions on Gaza and on Palestinian life in general, and deeper and deeper inequality between Jews and non-Jews in Israel and in the territories over which it rules.

Benjamin Netanyahu’s reelection underlines Israel’s apartheid reality

Shameless lies.

Relentless demonising of Israel.
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ Mindful, et al,

Rumors, lies, accusations, condemnation and propaganda are tools and the tradecraft for the Hostile Arab Palestinians and other Jihadists, Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Troublemakers, Adherents, Guerrillas and Asymmetric Fighter. You simply must accept it and move on.

Shameless lies.

Relentless demonizing of Israel.
(COMMENT)

The purpose of these activities is to erode the reputation of the Jewish State. The usual solution is to do something spectacular → that captures the imagination of the world and re-establish a favorable view for it to holds → and returns the once strong opinion about the State.

It is a very hard task.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ Mindful, et al,

Rumors, lies, accusations, condemnation and propaganda are tools and the tradecraft for the Hostile Arab Palestinians and other Jihadists, Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Troublemakers, Adherents, Guerrillas and Asymmetric Fighter. You simply must accept it and move on.

Shameless lies.

Relentless demonizing of Israel.
(COMMENT)

The purpose of these activities is to erode the reputation of the Jewish State. The usual solution is to do something spectacular → that captures the imagination of the world and re-establish a favorable view for it to holds → and returns the once strong opinion about the State.

It is a very hard task.

Most Respectfully,
R

Which category does Tinmore fit in to?
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ Mindful, et al,

Rumors, lies, accusations, condemnation and propaganda are tools and the tradecraft for the Hostile Arab Palestinians and other Jihadists, Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Troublemakers, Adherents, Guerrillas and Asymmetric Fighter. You simply must accept it and move on.

Shameless lies.

Relentless demonizing of Israel.
(COMMENT)

The purpose of these activities is to erode the reputation of the Jewish State. The usual solution is to do something spectacular → that captures the imagination of the world and re-establish a favorable view for it to holds → and returns the once strong opinion about the State.

It is a very hard task.

Most Respectfully,
R
Israel has had its "Brand Israel" campaign for many years. Brand Israel is a propaganda campaign aimed at deflecting from Israel's war and touting its business ant technological successes.

We have some brand Israel threads on this board.
 
Benjamin Netanyahu’s reelection underlines Israel’s apartheid reality

The results of Israel’s elections reveal a stark reality: Not only will Benjamin Netanyahu almost inevitably
form a coalition government even further to the right than the one he already heads, but the country’s Jewish electorate has given its resounding endorsement to the policies for which he stands.

Netanyahu ran a manifestly racist electoral campaign, reaching out to embrace politicians who openly espouse the desire to expel Palestinians from the state and promising to annex parts of the West Bank, dealing probably a final blow to the moribund two-state solution. What Israeli voters want, clearly, is precisely what is on offer: more dispossession of Palestinians, more home demolitions, more indiscriminate bombing campaigns, more shooting of protesters, more settlements, more restrictions on Gaza and on Palestinian life in general, and deeper and deeper inequality between Jews and non-Jews in Israel and in the territories over which it rules.

Benjamin Netanyahu’s reelection underlines Israel’s apartheid reality


They have neighbors who want to destroy them, and regularly shell them.


It is odd that you dont' seem to think that that is a factor.
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ Mindful, et al,

Rumors, lies, accusations, condemnation and propaganda are tools and the tradecraft for the Hostile Arab Palestinians and other Jihadists, Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Troublemakers, Adherents, Guerrillas and Asymmetric Fighter. You simply must accept it and move on.

Shameless lies.

Relentless demonizing of Israel.
(COMMENT)

The purpose of these activities is to erode the reputation of the Jewish State. The usual solution is to do something spectacular → that captures the imagination of the world and re-establish a favorable view for it to holds → and returns the once strong opinion about the State.

It is a very hard task.

Most Respectfully,
R
Israel has had its "Brand Israel" campaign for many years. Brand Israel is a propaganda campaign aimed at deflecting from Israel's war and touting its business ant technological successes.

We have some brand Israel threads on this board.

What war are you referring to? This appears to be another of your invented claims / conspiracy theories that you are unable to provide an explanation for.
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ Mindful, et al,

I do not engage in any kind of ad hominem approach on fellow members of the Discussion Group Panel. I respect each members contribution for → what it is or turns out to be.

Which category does Tinmore fit in to?
(COMMENT)

Having said that, each member must beware of inaccurate information presentations (as opposed to personal views and perspectives), especially that which is deliberately intended to mask the truth or deceive some element of the Discussion Group Panel. Our find "P F Tinmore" is a master at misdirection and steering someone to an inaccurate conclusion away from what he believes as some adverse commentary on the Arab Palestinians. An example would be the claim that HAMAS is not a Terrorist Organization. Most every sentient being with a fair knowledge of the recent past and current events knows this not to be true. Why he insists that HAMAS is not a terrorist group is all about its image. By placing HAMAS in the category of terrorist, we suggest that HAMAS is a criminal enterprise directed against the State of Israel → with the intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to the Israeli civilian population, or to inflict serious damage to private property and civil works that are not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a civilian population and to compel the Israeli Government to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that sets the conditions for HAMAS to furthers criminal objectives.

As you can see, the "WHY" is much more complicated than the "HOW" → used by our friend P F Tinmore.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ Mindful, et al,

I do not engage in any kind of ad hominem approach on fellow members of the Discussion Group Panel. I respect each members contribution for → what it is or turns out to be.

Which category does Tinmore fit in to?
(COMMENT)

Having said that, each member must beware of inaccurate information presentations (as opposed to personal views and perspectives), especially that which is deliberately intended to mask the truth or deceive some element of the Discussion Group Panel. Our find "P F Tinmore" is a master at misdirection and steering someone to an inaccurate conclusion away from what he believes as some adverse commentary on the Arab Palestinians. An example would be the claim that HAMAS is not a Terrorist Organization. Most every sentient being with a fair knowledge of the recent past and current events knows this not to be true. Why he insists that HAMAS is not a terrorist group is all about its image. By placing HAMAS in the category of terrorist, we suggest that HAMAS is a criminal enterprise directed against the State of Israel → with the intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to the Israeli civilian population, or to inflict serious damage to private property and civil works that are not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a civilian population and to compel the Israeli Government to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that sets the conditions for HAMAS to furthers criminal objectives.

As you can see, the "WHY" is much more complicated than the "HOW" → used by our friend P F Tinmore.

Most Respectfully,
R
Again, you base your conclusions on false premise.
 
Republicans want to create an apartheid regime here in this country. The honest ones admit it.
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

O yeah. Now how convenient... This is an example manipulation or misdirection of the discussion and a response which is not a response.

Again, you base your conclusions on false premise.
(COMMENT)

What is the "false premise?"

That HAMAS is NOT a terrorist Organization!

◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to the Israeli civilian population!
◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to other person not taking an active part in the hostilitie!
◈ With the purpose of conducting reconnasaince or espionage!
◈ With the purpose of conducting serious acts of sabotage against the Israeli installations!
◈ With the purpose of conducting caused the death of one or more persons!​

Are you suggesting:

◈ That you do not masking the truth!
◈ That you do not deceiving the discussion!
◈ That you do not misdirecting the discussion to an inaccurate conclusion!​

Or → are you implying that I am confused and that the actions of HAMAS:

◈ Are not intended to intimidate the Israeli citizens!
◈ Are not intended to compel the Israeli government into taking or abstain from a certain action!
◈ Are not intended to furthers HAMAS criminal objectives!​

I notice that you attempt to address direct opinions with incomplete objections like:

(POINT of ORDER)

Claiming there is a false premise without identifying which assertion or accusation is false is an → Allegation Based on Unenforceably Vague Standard → OR → which is intrinsically uncertain.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

O yeah. Now how convenient... This is an example manipulation or misdirection of the discussion and a response which is not a response.

Again, you base your conclusions on false premise.
(COMMENT)

What is the "false premise?"

That HAMAS is NOT a terrorist Organization!

◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to the Israeli civilian population!
◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to other person not taking an active part in the hostilitie!
◈ With the purpose of conducting reconnasaince or espionage!
◈ With the purpose of conducting serious acts of sabotage against the Israeli installations!
◈ With the purpose of conducting caused the death of one or more persons!​

Are you suggesting:

◈ That you do not masking the truth!
◈ That you do not deceiving the discussion!
◈ That you do not misdirecting the discussion to an inaccurate conclusion!​

Or → are you implying that I am confused and that the actions of HAMAS:

◈ Are not intended to intimidate the Israeli citizens!
◈ Are not intended to compel the Israeli government into taking or abstain from a certain action!
◈ Are not intended to furthers HAMAS criminal objectives!​

I notice that you attempt to address direct opinions with incomplete objections like:

(POINT of ORDER)

Claiming there is a false premise without identifying which assertion or accusation is false is an → Allegation Based on Unenforceably Vague Standard → OR → which is intrinsically uncertain.

Most Respectfully,
R
All colonial powers call their opposition terrorists. Israel uses the same name calling techniques.
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

O yeah. Now how convenient... This is an example manipulation or misdirection of the discussion and a response which is not a response.

Again, you base your conclusions on false premise.
(COMMENT)

What is the "false premise?"

That HAMAS is NOT a terrorist Organization!

◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to the Israeli civilian population!
◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to other person not taking an active part in the hostilitie!
◈ With the purpose of conducting reconnasaince or espionage!
◈ With the purpose of conducting serious acts of sabotage against the Israeli installations!
◈ With the purpose of conducting caused the death of one or more persons!​

Are you suggesting:

◈ That you do not masking the truth!
◈ That you do not deceiving the discussion!
◈ That you do not misdirecting the discussion to an inaccurate conclusion!​

Or → are you implying that I am confused and that the actions of HAMAS:

◈ Are not intended to intimidate the Israeli citizens!
◈ Are not intended to compel the Israeli government into taking or abstain from a certain action!
◈ Are not intended to furthers HAMAS criminal objectives!​

I notice that you attempt to address direct opinions with incomplete objections like:

(POINT of ORDER)

Claiming there is a false premise without identifying which assertion or accusation is false is an → Allegation Based on Unenforceably Vague Standard → OR → which is intrinsically uncertain.

Most Respectfully,
R
All colonial powers call their opposition terrorists. Israel uses the same name calling techniques.

That doesn't address why many nations have designated Hamas as an islamic terrorist organization.

Indeed, this would be where you launch into a conspiracy theory tirade or cut and paste a YouTube video, something from Press TV perhaps.

Indeed.
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

O yeah. Now how convenient... This is an example manipulation or misdirection of the discussion and a response which is not a response.

Again, you base your conclusions on false premise.
(COMMENT)

What is the "false premise?"

That HAMAS is NOT a terrorist Organization!

◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to the Israeli civilian population!
◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to other person not taking an active part in the hostilitie!
◈ With the purpose of conducting reconnasaince or espionage!
◈ With the purpose of conducting serious acts of sabotage against the Israeli installations!
◈ With the purpose of conducting caused the death of one or more persons!​

Are you suggesting:

◈ That you do not masking the truth!
◈ That you do not deceiving the discussion!
◈ That you do not misdirecting the discussion to an inaccurate conclusion!​

Or → are you implying that I am confused and that the actions of HAMAS:

◈ Are not intended to intimidate the Israeli citizens!
◈ Are not intended to compel the Israeli government into taking or abstain from a certain action!
◈ Are not intended to furthers HAMAS criminal objectives!​

I notice that you attempt to address direct opinions with incomplete objections like:

(POINT of ORDER)

Claiming there is a false premise without identifying which assertion or accusation is false is an → Allegation Based on Unenforceably Vague Standard → OR → which is intrinsically uncertain.

Most Respectfully,
R
All colonial powers call their opposition terrorists. Israel uses the same name calling techniques.

That doesn't address why many nations have designated Hamas as an islamic terrorist organization.

Indeed, this would be where you launch into a conspiracy theory tirade or cut and paste a YouTube video, something from Press TV perhaps.

Indeed.
More haven't than have.
 
The anti-semitism that that the UN has consistently displayed for decades renders such findings as this utterly worthless.

That's why the UN agreed to the predictable eviction of the native Palestinians to allow European Jews to replace the native people and establish the Jewish State.

You need to put that bullshit to rest. Here is the land Britain gave Israel:
upload_2019-5-11_14-3-16.webp



b435209cc71083949192fd1605d816a7.jpg


upload_2019-5-11_14-10-29.webp


Israel was given a bunch of desert that no one gave a shit about until it was given back to the Jews.
Where is this thriving community of Dome worshipers you think were removed?
The Arabs you think were removed were a handful of Arabs that moved to Israel to live and work among the Jews. EGYPT told them to get out, and when the Egyptian invasion failed, they parked them on the Israeli border to be a constant irritant to the Jews. They have since morphed into a terrorist organization.
 
15th post
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

O yeah. Now how convenient... This is an example manipulation or misdirection of the discussion and a response which is not a response.

Again, you base your conclusions on false premise.
(COMMENT)

What is the "false premise?"

That HAMAS is NOT a terrorist Organization!

◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to the Israeli civilian population!
◈ With with intention of - or calculated to - cause death or serious bodily injury to other person not taking an active part in the hostilitie!
◈ With the purpose of conducting reconnasaince or espionage!
◈ With the purpose of conducting serious acts of sabotage against the Israeli installations!
◈ With the purpose of conducting caused the death of one or more persons!​

Are you suggesting:

◈ That you do not masking the truth!
◈ That you do not deceiving the discussion!
◈ That you do not misdirecting the discussion to an inaccurate conclusion!​

Or → are you implying that I am confused and that the actions of HAMAS:

◈ Are not intended to intimidate the Israeli citizens!
◈ Are not intended to compel the Israeli government into taking or abstain from a certain action!
◈ Are not intended to furthers HAMAS criminal objectives!​

I notice that you attempt to address direct opinions with incomplete objections like:

(POINT of ORDER)

Claiming there is a false premise without identifying which assertion or accusation is false is an → Allegation Based on Unenforceably Vague Standard → OR → which is intrinsically uncertain.

Most Respectfully,
R
All colonial powers call their opposition terrorists. Israel uses the same name calling techniques.

That doesn't address why many nations have designated Hamas as an islamic terrorist organization.

Indeed, this would be where you launch into a conspiracy theory tirade or cut and paste a YouTube video, something from Press TV perhaps.

Indeed.
More haven't than have.

I guess that's an endorsement for islamic terrorist enclaves?
 
The anti-semitism that that the UN has consistently displayed for decades renders such findings as this utterly worthless.

That's why the UN agreed to the predictable eviction of the native Palestinians to allow European Jews to replace the native people and establish the Jewish State.

You need to put that bullshit to rest. Here is the land Britain gave Israel:
View attachment 260406


b435209cc71083949192fd1605d816a7.jpg


View attachment 260407

Israel was given a bunch of desert that no one gave a shit about until it was given back to the Jews.
Where is this thriving community of Dome worshipers you think were removed?
The Arabs you think were removed were a handful of Arabs that moved to Israel to live and work among the Jews. EGYPT told them to get out, and when the Egyptian invasion failed, they parked them on the Israeli border to be a constant irritant to the Jews. They have since morphed into a terrorist organization.
Bullshit Israeli talking points.

 
The anti-semitism that that the UN has consistently displayed for decades renders such findings as this utterly worthless.

That's why the UN agreed to the predictable eviction of the native Palestinians to allow European Jews to replace the native people and establish the Jewish State.

You need to put that bullshit to rest. Here is the land Britain gave Israel:
View attachment 260406


b435209cc71083949192fd1605d816a7.jpg


View attachment 260407

Israel was given a bunch of desert that no one gave a shit about until it was given back to the Jews.
Where is this thriving community of Dome worshipers you think were removed?
The Arabs you think were removed were a handful of Arabs that moved to Israel to live and work among the Jews. EGYPT told them to get out, and when the Egyptian invasion failed, they parked them on the Israeli border to be a constant irritant to the Jews. They have since morphed into a terrorist organization.
Bullshit Israeli talking points.



abbas-anti-jew.jpg


The "Apartheid" is the BS talking point, and a racist blood libel by the Arab league members,
the ones who see no problems in demanding a Jew-free Palestine.
Even the UN withdrew that none sense.

UN secretariat distances itself and withdraws "Apartheid" report
 
Last edited:
The anti-semitism that that the UN has consistently displayed for decades renders such findings as this utterly worthless.

That's why the UN agreed to the predictable eviction of the native Palestinians to allow European Jews to replace the native people and establish the Jewish State.

You need to put that bullshit to rest. Here is the land Britain gave Israel:
View attachment 260406


b435209cc71083949192fd1605d816a7.jpg


View attachment 260407

Israel was given a bunch of desert that no one gave a shit about until it was given back to the Jews.
Where is this thriving community of Dome worshipers you think were removed?
The Arabs you think were removed were a handful of Arabs that moved to Israel to live and work among the Jews. EGYPT told them to get out, and when the Egyptian invasion failed, they parked them on the Israeli border to be a constant irritant to the Jews. They have since morphed into a terrorist organization.
Bullshit Israeli talking points.



abbas-anti-jew.jpg


The "Apartheid" is the BS talking point, and a racist blood libel by the Arab league members,
the ones who see no problems in demanding a Jew-free Palestine.
Even the UN withdrew that none sense.

UN secretariat distances itself and withdraws "Apartheid" report


Here, a professor who responded to the lies:

"I am shocked for a simple reason: there is not and has never been a system of apartheid in Israel . That is not my opinion, that is fact that can be tested against reality by any Edinburgh student, should he or she choose to visit Israel to see for themselves. Let me spell this out, since I have the impression that those members of EUSA who voted for this motion are absolutely clueless in matters concerning Israel, and that they are, in all likelihood, the victims of extremely biased propaganda coming from the anti-Israel lobby.

Being anti-Israel is not in itself objectionable. But I’m not talking about ordinary criticism of Israel . I’m speaking of a hatred that permits itself no boundaries in the lies and myths it pours out. Thus, Israel is repeatedly referred to as a “Nazi” state. In what sense is this true, even as a metaphor? Where are the Israeli concentration camps? The einzatsgruppen? The SS? The Nuremberg Laws? The Final Solution? None of these things nor anything remotely resembling them exists in Israel , precisely because the Jews, more than anyone on earth, understand what Nazism stood for."
Scottish Professor Speaks Out Against Boycott of Israel
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom