Breaking: Special Counsel Finds Mark Zuckerberg’s Election Money Violated Wisconsin Bribery Laws

[C_Clayton_Jones]

He has also called for decertification of the results. He is a WI Special Councel. Fact.

BIG NEWS: Justice Michael Gableman Will Release Results from Wisconsin Election Investigation Today -- Findings Explosive! Expected Allegations of Criminality | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

This morning at 10 AM the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections will hold a much anticipated informational hearing on the leman 2020 Election Report.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Trump lost a fair, honest, accurate election in Wisconsin and everywhere else. Fact.

 

[imawhosure]

Thank You. Does that mean Bezos and others will remain relatively Tax Free in spite of Brandon’s blathering last nite ?

Maybe, maybe not. Taxes are not the key to them, the protection of their monopoly is. Oh sure, they will lobby for tax breaks and workarounds, but better to hold a monopoly making 10 bill a year paying 20% taxes, then to make 2 bill a year paying none because you have competition!

 

[AMart]

Calling this dude a special counsel is a little nutty given he has no ability to prosecute anyone.

The change that this accounts to bribery is absolutely absurd. The money did not induce anyone to vote.

Those are textbook violations of Wisconsin laws and federal as well.

 

[colfax_m]

Those are textbook violations of Wisconsin laws and federal as well.

Yeah I don’t see it. The law they’re quoting is saying it’s illegal to give someone money to vote.

That’s really not what’s happening here, is it?

Zuckerberg gave cities money to provide easier ways to vote. No one was induced to vote.

 

[iceberg]

Unreliable source.

Subjective, wrongheaded rightwing opinion, fake news, and lies.

“Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.”

The Federalist - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

who gives a shit - did it happen and was it illegal?

Mark Zuckerberg donated $419M in 2020

In 2010 the Supreme Court ruled that monetary donations to politicians are covered by the first amendment. In the 2020 election it was a single person donating hundreds of millions of dollars to gain power: Mark Zuckerberg.

news.yahoo.com

Zuckerberg-funded nonprofit's tax returns reveal how donations to Dems helped sway 2020 election

Zuckerberg allegedly bought the 2020 election by funneling billions through non-profit organizations who then gave it to voting districts.

www.bizpacreview.com

"saved the election" - really? how the hell do you do that?

there is zero doubt he did it.

Contribution limits - FEC.gov

The federal contribution limits that apply to contributions made to a federal candidate's campaign for the U.S. House, U.S. Senate or U.S. President. Includes limits that apply to individual donations, as well as to contributions by political action committees (PACs) and party committees to...

www.fec.gov

your list of laws to reference.

it happened, it was illegal, and you're here going NAH NAH THEY ARE RIGHT WING as a normal tool would do vs. researching the actual issue itself.

 

[iceberg]

Yeah I don’t see it. The law they’re quoting is saying it’s illegal to give someone money to vote.

That’s really not what’s happening here, is it?

Zuckerberg gave cities money to provide easier ways to vote. No one was induced to vote.

you being objective and not a troll...

that's really not what's happening here, is it?

 

[whitehall]

Democrats rigged it so that conservative writer and documentary producer, Dinesh DiSouza, went to freaking jail for something like $300 that they determined was an illegal contribution to a candidate. Anybody think the Zuck man will be charged?

 

[colfax_m]

you being objective and not a troll...

that's really not what's happening here, is it?

You are more than welcome to comment on the topic of the thread which is not me.

 

[bripat9643]

Whoever called this guy the "last deadender" had it right.

Which guy?

 

[bripat9643]

Unreliable source.

Subjective, wrongheaded rightwing opinion, fake news, and lies.

“Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.”

The Federalist - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

No one cares what your stupid propaganda rag says, moron..

 

[bripat9643]

Wisconsin is a mess. They declare voting methods used in 2020 as unconstitutional, but they refused to throw out the fraudulent votes.

That's what the progs were counting on when they rigged the election.

 

[USAF 2023]

Yeah I don’t see it. The law they’re quoting is saying it’s illegal to give someone money to vote.

That’s really not what’s happening here, is it?

Zuckerberg gave cities money to provide easier ways to vote. No one was induced to vote.

The Dems are claiming Blacks are “ disenfranchised “ when it comes to Voting and it’s “ Racist “ to demand Voter ID.
If you’re young you have to provide it to buy cigarettes or alcohol.Buying tickets for a upcoming event, putting it on your Credit Card you have to show ID to prove that card yours. So what’s the problem???

 

[Lastamender]

Unreliable source.

Subjective, wrongheaded rightwing opinion, fake news, and lies.

“Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.”

The Federalist - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Again with the source checkers. They are biased and support opinion not fact. FAIL.

 

[Lastamender]

Trump lost a fair, honest, accurate election in Wisconsin and everywhere else. Fact.

Absolute bullshit. There are so many things wrong and illegal in the swing states it is not even debatable. The election had 0 integrity, just like you.

 

[Lastamender]

It just keeps coming. More proof the election had no integrity. Denying these facts is not working for anyone who thinks it is. More are pushing for decertification of this joke of an election.

Wisconsin special counsel bombshell: 91 nursing homes had 95-100% voter turnout in 2020

Election integrity watchdog Phill Kline said: "And now we have videotaped depositions and interviews with their family members saying, 'My loved one hasn't been able to vote for years and has been deemed to be incompetent.'"

justthenews.com

 

[busybee01]

Nearly $9 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. That conclusion represents but one of the many troubling findings detailed in the report submitted today by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

They need to issue a warrant for his arrest.

Report: Zuckerberg’s Election Money Violated Wisconsin Bribery Laws

That's one of the many troubling findings in the report submitted Tuesday by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

thefederalist.com

Anything that says "Breaking" is fake news. He gave his opinion, and it is not based on any fact. This was litigated in court and judges determined the exact opposite. There was no law preventing it.

"THE FACTS: Three lawsuits arguing that the grant funding was illegal under state law have been rejected and a law firm hired by the state elections commission also determined there was no wrongdoing.

U.S. District Judge William Griesbach, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, refused to block the grant money in October 2020 under a lawsuit filed by Kaardal on behalf of the Wisconsin Voters Alliance, in conjunction with the conservative Thomas Moore Society.

The judge said then that there was nothing in state law “that can be fairly construed as prohibiting the defendant Cities from accepting funds from CTCL.”

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on an appeal of that case that those who brought the lawsuit failed to identify any laws that would prohibit the grants.

Kaardal again raised the issue in a federal lawsuit he filed in Washington, D.C., on behalf of the Wisconsin Voters Alliance, two Wisconsin Republican state lawmakers and others. That lawsuit sought to let state lawmakers in Wisconsin and other states allocate their Electoral College votes.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, appointed by President Barack Obama, dismissed the lawsuit and referred Kaardal to a court committee for discipline just for bringing the case. Kaardal has appealed that.

In a third case, the Wisconsin Voters Alliance represented by Kaardal asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to overturn the election results for several reasons, including the grants. The court refused to take the case."

AP FACT CHECK: Wisconsin election probe ignores some facts

 

[busybee01]

so far only "bribery" is on the ticket for being "proven". you have to now prove it produced fraudulent votes.

the money could buy influence that translated into votes as well. don't get me wrong, i do believe there was shenanagins in the election. a lot. but you have to prove it beyond I JUST KNOW IT.

now if his donations broke laws, go after him to the fullest extent these laws allow. best we can do.

Bribery is not on the ticket. This has been litigated in court and was found to be legal.

 

[busybee01]

Again, if there was no fraud in the election there certainly was no integrity either. Many states are finding laws clearly broken and the bogus results that came from it.

That’s one of the many troubling findings in the report submitted Tuesday by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

Report: Zuckerberg’s Election Money Violated Wisconsin Bribery Laws

That's one of the many troubling findings in the report submitted Tuesday by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

thefederalist.com

There are no troubling aspects found. This has been litigated in court and thrown out. He is just a right-wing kook.

 

[busybee01]

Zuckerberg donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the 2020 election from what I hear and was central to the Left's plans to steal the reelection from Trump.

He donated money to encourage voters to vote. Voting is not stealing.

 

[whoisit]

Tell me about it.

Dan O'Donnell and Vicki McKenna were talking about the corruption and fraud taking place here every day on their radio shows, while the election were going on. Vote harvesting, drop boxes, out of state voters... They cheated every which way they could.