Breaking: Sean Hannity Now Being Accused Of Sexual Harassment By Jewess Debbie Schlussel

[Indeependent]

What is a Jewess? Is that sort of like the N word for black people?

It is a synonym for Kikess.

Know what we mean?

You mean the type of educated woman whi would never go out on a date with you.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

What is a Jewess? Is that sort of like the N word for black people?

It is a synonym for Kikess.

Know what we mean?

You mean the type of educated woman whi would never go out on a date with you.

I doubt someone who uses the word 'kikess' to refer to Jews, actually wants to date one.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Breaking News Update:

Schlussel backtracks! Denies Hannity sexually harassed her.

www.dailywire.com/news/15675/woman-accused-hannity-sexual-harassment-within-48-ben-shapiro

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'm a Fascist, a Fascist is basically just a Conservative who's aware that Jews, and Capitalists push for Liberalism.

There you go. Youre just another version of SOCIALISM.

Don't confuse AMERICAN Conservatism with what Europeans call "Conservatism."

Europe only knows big government. American Conservatism respect the Individual over the State.

I definitely see more eye to eye with Europe's right wing, rather than America's right wing.

How are you going to combat issues like Hollywood, and Media promoting Liberalism, or Capitalists hiring millions of illegal immigrants, or millions of jobs outsourced to China?

You combat it by cracking down on them with a managed economy.

The Individualist just say let them have their individual rights, a big mistake.

Individualism is weak, and has no answers except do NOTHING, or else it inhibits individual freedom.

So, you get a decadent Liberal society, with absolutely nothing to stop it.

The problem here is you know next to nothing about our country. How it was founded and why. We are citizens, not subjects. Individualism is extremely important to constitutional minded citizens. The government is there to ensure our freedoms with constitutional powers and its' limits. That's why we still have guns.

The only economy that can work in our system is capitalism. Once you go socialist those powers must be stripped from the people so central government can decide who gets what. And I'm not seeing any lack of decadence in european society.

Actually during the time of the Founding Fathers there were more regulations on Corporations.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now. That is hardly proof that the founding fathers supported corporations. In fact its quite the opposite. The corporate entity was so restrictive that many of America’s corporate giants set up their entities to avoid the corporate restrictions. For example, Andrew Carnegie set up his steel company as a limited partnership and John D. Rockefeller set up his Standard Oil company as a trust which would later be rightfully busted up into smaller companies by Theodore Roosevelt.

For those who need more evidence, how about statements from the founding fathers themselves. As we all know, big banks are also considered corporations and here is what Thomas Jefferson thought about them. In an 1802 letter to Secretary of State Albert Gallatin, Jefferson said,

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Thomas Jefferson, one of the most prominent founding fathers, also said this in 1816,

“I hope that we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”

Jefferson wasn’t the only one of the founding fathers to make statements about corporations. John Adams also had an opinion.

“Banks have done more injury to the religion, morality, tranquility, prosperity, and even wealth of the nation than they can have done or ever will do good.”

 

[Iceweasel]

I'm a Fascist, a Fascist is basically just a Conservative who's aware that Jews, and Capitalists push for Liberalism.

There you go. Youre just another version of SOCIALISM.

Don't confuse AMERICAN Conservatism with what Europeans call "Conservatism."

Europe only knows big government. American Conservatism respect the Individual over the State.

I definitely see more eye to eye with Europe's right wing, rather than America's right wing.

How are you going to combat issues like Hollywood, and Media promoting Liberalism, or Capitalists hiring millions of illegal immigrants, or millions of jobs outsourced to China?

You combat it by cracking down on them with a managed economy.

The Individualist just say let them have their individual rights, a big mistake.

Individualism is weak, and has no answers except do NOTHING, or else it inhibits individual freedom.

So, you get a decadent Liberal society, with absolutely nothing to stop it.

The problem here is you know next to nothing about our country. How it was founded and why. We are citizens, not subjects. Individualism is extremely important to constitutional minded citizens. The government is there to ensure our freedoms with constitutional powers and its' limits. That's why we still have guns.

The only economy that can work in our system is capitalism. Once you go socialist those powers must be stripped from the people so central government can decide who gets what. And I'm not seeing any lack of decadence in european society.

Actually during the time of the Founding Fathers there were more regulations on Corporations.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now. That is hardly proof that the founding fathers supported corporations. In fact its quite the opposite. The corporate entity was so restrictive that many of America’s corporate giants set up their entities to avoid the corporate restrictions. For example, Andrew Carnegie set up his steel company as a limited partnership and John D. Rockefeller set up his Standard Oil company as a trust which would later be rightfully busted up into smaller companies by Theodore Roosevelt.

For those who need more evidence, how about statements from the founding fathers themselves. As we all know, big banks are also considered corporations and here is what Thomas Jefferson thought about them. In an 1802 letter to Secretary of State Albert Gallatin, Jefferson said,

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Thomas Jefferson, one of the most prominent founding fathers, also said this in 1816,

“I hope that we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”

Jefferson wasn’t the only one of the founding fathers to make statements about corporations. John Adams also had an opinion.

“Banks have done more injury to the religion, morality, tranquility, prosperity, and even wealth of the nation than they can have done or ever will do good.”

Many were wealthy business owners but you are confused about what capitalism is. It's the private ownership of business. The marriage between big business and government is crony capitalism or a fascist economic system. I'm a free market conservative, like our founders. Show us your best evidence they were socialist.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'm a Fascist, a Fascist is basically just a Conservative who's aware that Jews, and Capitalists push for Liberalism.

There you go. Youre just another version of SOCIALISM.

Don't confuse AMERICAN Conservatism with what Europeans call "Conservatism."

Europe only knows big government. American Conservatism respect the Individual over the State.

I definitely see more eye to eye with Europe's right wing, rather than America's right wing.

How are you going to combat issues like Hollywood, and Media promoting Liberalism, or Capitalists hiring millions of illegal immigrants, or millions of jobs outsourced to China?

You combat it by cracking down on them with a managed economy.

The Individualist just say let them have their individual rights, a big mistake.

Individualism is weak, and has no answers except do NOTHING, or else it inhibits individual freedom.

So, you get a decadent Liberal society, with absolutely nothing to stop it.

The problem here is you know next to nothing about our country. How it was founded and why. We are citizens, not subjects. Individualism is extremely important to constitutional minded citizens. The government is there to ensure our freedoms with constitutional powers and its' limits. That's why we still have guns.

The only economy that can work in our system is capitalism. Once you go socialist those powers must be stripped from the people so central government can decide who gets what. And I'm not seeing any lack of decadence in european society.

I understand the founding of the U.S.A, it's by a rabble of Brits who abandoned their homelands, and who thought it was awesome to steal land from Natives, and enslave Blacks.

Certainly nothing I would call a Nationalist, they bought in 100's of thousands of Blacks, just to profit off of them.
Both a moral outrage, and a downright problem.

At the core of America has always been a hyper-greedy streak, to do anything to muster profits, the same holds true in importing illegal Mexicans today.

They care not about our well being, but about mega profits.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'm a Fascist, a Fascist is basically just a Conservative who's aware that Jews, and Capitalists push for Liberalism.

There you go. Youre just another version of SOCIALISM.

Don't confuse AMERICAN Conservatism with what Europeans call "Conservatism."

Europe only knows big government. American Conservatism respect the Individual over the State.

I definitely see more eye to eye with Europe's right wing, rather than America's right wing.

How are you going to combat issues like Hollywood, and Media promoting Liberalism, or Capitalists hiring millions of illegal immigrants, or millions of jobs outsourced to China?

You combat it by cracking down on them with a managed economy.

The Individualist just say let them have their individual rights, a big mistake.

Individualism is weak, and has no answers except do NOTHING, or else it inhibits individual freedom.

So, you get a decadent Liberal society, with absolutely nothing to stop it.

The problem here is you know next to nothing about our country. How it was founded and why. We are citizens, not subjects. Individualism is extremely important to constitutional minded citizens. The government is there to ensure our freedoms with constitutional powers and its' limits. That's why we still have guns.

The only economy that can work in our system is capitalism. Once you go socialist those powers must be stripped from the people so central government can decide who gets what. And I'm not seeing any lack of decadence in european society.

Actually during the time of the Founding Fathers there were more regulations on Corporations.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now. That is hardly proof that the founding fathers supported corporations. In fact its quite the opposite. The corporate entity was so restrictive that many of America’s corporate giants set up their entities to avoid the corporate restrictions. For example, Andrew Carnegie set up his steel company as a limited partnership and John D. Rockefeller set up his Standard Oil company as a trust which would later be rightfully busted up into smaller companies by Theodore Roosevelt.

For those who need more evidence, how about statements from the founding fathers themselves. As we all know, big banks are also considered corporations and here is what Thomas Jefferson thought about them. In an 1802 letter to Secretary of State Albert Gallatin, Jefferson said,

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Thomas Jefferson, one of the most prominent founding fathers, also said this in 1816,

“I hope that we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”

Jefferson wasn’t the only one of the founding fathers to make statements about corporations. John Adams also had an opinion.

“Banks have done more injury to the religion, morality, tranquility, prosperity, and even wealth of the nation than they can have done or ever will do good.”

Many were wealthy business owners but you are confused about what capitalism is. It's the private ownership of business. The marriage between big business and government is crony capitalism or a fascist economic system. I'm a free market conservative, like our founders. Show us your best evidence they were socialist.

I wouldn't call the Founding Fathers America, free market Capitalism, but rather Capitalism with regulations.

The article I bought up proves it.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

You just can't make this up. This is a treacherous organized scheme to rid Fox New of all it's top rated Conservative hosts. First Bill O'Reilly, now Sean.

www.1170kfaq.com/shows/pat-campbell/sean-hannity-the-latest-fox-news-host-to-be-accused-of-sexual-harassment

Was Ivanka Trump behind this accusation seeing she is also a Jewess?

 

[Iceweasel]

There you go. Youre just another version of SOCIALISM.

Don't confuse AMERICAN Conservatism with what Europeans call "Conservatism."

Europe only knows big government. American Conservatism respect the Individual over the State.

I definitely see more eye to eye with Europe's right wing, rather than America's right wing.

How are you going to combat issues like Hollywood, and Media promoting Liberalism, or Capitalists hiring millions of illegal immigrants, or millions of jobs outsourced to China?

You combat it by cracking down on them with a managed economy.

The Individualist just say let them have their individual rights, a big mistake.

Individualism is weak, and has no answers except do NOTHING, or else it inhibits individual freedom.

So, you get a decadent Liberal society, with absolutely nothing to stop it.

The problem here is you know next to nothing about our country. How it was founded and why. We are citizens, not subjects. Individualism is extremely important to constitutional minded citizens. The government is there to ensure our freedoms with constitutional powers and its' limits. That's why we still have guns.

The only economy that can work in our system is capitalism. Once you go socialist those powers must be stripped from the people so central government can decide who gets what. And I'm not seeing any lack of decadence in european society.

Actually during the time of the Founding Fathers there were more regulations on Corporations.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now. That is hardly proof that the founding fathers supported corporations. In fact its quite the opposite. The corporate entity was so restrictive that many of America’s corporate giants set up their entities to avoid the corporate restrictions. For example, Andrew Carnegie set up his steel company as a limited partnership and John D. Rockefeller set up his Standard Oil company as a trust which would later be rightfully busted up into smaller companies by Theodore Roosevelt.

For those who need more evidence, how about statements from the founding fathers themselves. As we all know, big banks are also considered corporations and here is what Thomas Jefferson thought about them. In an 1802 letter to Secretary of State Albert Gallatin, Jefferson said,

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Thomas Jefferson, one of the most prominent founding fathers, also said this in 1816,

“I hope that we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”

Jefferson wasn’t the only one of the founding fathers to make statements about corporations. John Adams also had an opinion.

“Banks have done more injury to the religion, morality, tranquility, prosperity, and even wealth of the nation than they can have done or ever will do good.”

Many were wealthy business owners but you are confused about what capitalism is. It's the private ownership of business. The marriage between big business and government is crony capitalism or a fascist economic system. I'm a free market conservative, like our founders. Show us your best evidence they were socialist.

I wouldn't call the Founding Fathers America, free market Capitalism, but rather Capitalism with regulations.

The article I bought up proves it.

Your article was unsourced so it's meaningless. However, capitalism is always regulated. It has to be to function. How much is a dollar worth? Unregulated economies are anarchy not capitalism.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Breaking News Update:

Schlussel backtracks! Denies Hannity sexually harassed her.

www.dailywire.com/news/15675/woman-accused-hannity-sexual-harassment-within-48-ben-shapiro

So, all the screeching Chimp fits for nothing?

Seems someone wanted attention.

Poor Debbie Struddel didn't get enough views.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

What is a Jewess? Is that sort of like the N word for black people?

Jew•ess
a Jewish woman or girl.

Yes, in the same vein that ni##$r is black man or woman. The words carry the same connotation. But with a racist asshole like you, I am not telling you anything you do not already know.

You're wise, my sensitive Golfing Gator! Steve McGarrett does know everything. Nevertheless, Debbie Schlussel is what she is.

Well Steve I am going to write that I believe you are a sock to one of those Progressive Liberals and most likely a black gay Jew male that want to hide the reality of your down-low lifestyle that is sometimes a drag!

Now seeing you like one Jewish person tell me you are full of shit with your Jewess comment and just want to make Conservative look like assholes because you are what I wrote above!

 

[Iceweasel]

I'm a Fascist, a Fascist is basically just a Conservative who's aware that Jews, and Capitalists push for Liberalism.

There you go. Youre just another version of SOCIALISM.

Don't confuse AMERICAN Conservatism with what Europeans call "Conservatism."

Europe only knows big government. American Conservatism respect the Individual over the State.

I definitely see more eye to eye with Europe's right wing, rather than America's right wing.

How are you going to combat issues like Hollywood, and Media promoting Liberalism, or Capitalists hiring millions of illegal immigrants, or millions of jobs outsourced to China?

You combat it by cracking down on them with a managed economy.

The Individualist just say let them have their individual rights, a big mistake.

Individualism is weak, and has no answers except do NOTHING, or else it inhibits individual freedom.

So, you get a decadent Liberal society, with absolutely nothing to stop it.

The problem here is you know next to nothing about our country. How it was founded and why. We are citizens, not subjects. Individualism is extremely important to constitutional minded citizens. The government is there to ensure our freedoms with constitutional powers and its' limits. That's why we still have guns.

The only economy that can work in our system is capitalism. Once you go socialist those powers must be stripped from the people so central government can decide who gets what. And I'm not seeing any lack of decadence in european society.

I understand the founding of the U.S.A, it's by a rabble of Brits who abandoned their homelands, and who thought it was awesome to steal land from Natives, and enslave Blacks.

Certainly nothing I would call a Nationalist, they bought in 100's of thousands of Blacks, just to profit off of them.
Both a moral outrage, and a downright problem.

At the core of America has always been a hyper-greedy streak, to do anything to muster profits, the same holds true in importing illegal Mexicans today.

They care not about our well being, but about mega profits.

LOL, boy that didn't take long. Out comes the loony leftist shit. First off, the founders were born here. Subjects of the Crown but considered colonials. They didn't come here and they couldn't steal what wasn't owned. There was no country here. Like every other square inch on Earth man came and conquered. It wasn't unique by any means.

Slavery was always hotly debated. Illegal from day one in many northern states. But slavery isn't a defining aspect of capitalism. You're off on a tangent.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

What is a Jewess? Is that sort of like the N word for black people?

Jew•ess
a Jewish woman or girl.

Yes, in the same vein that ni##$r is black man or woman. The words carry the same connotation. But with a racist asshole like you, I am not telling you anything you do not already know.

You're wise, my sensitive Golfing Gator! Steve McGarrett does know everything. Nevertheless, Debbie Schlussel is what she is.

Well Steve I am going to write that I believe you are a sock to one of those Progressive Liberals and most likely a black gay Jew male that want to hide the reality of your down-low lifestyle that is sometimes a drag!

Now seeing you like one Jewish person tell me you are full of shit with your Jewess comment and just want to make Conservative look like assholes because you are what I wrote above!

All the mods know I'm not a sock but rather a genuine Southern Baptist Christian conservative American patriot. If you don't believe me, send them a PM.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'm a Fascist, a Fascist is basically just a Conservative who's aware that Jews, and Capitalists push for Liberalism.

There you go. Youre just another version of SOCIALISM.

Don't confuse AMERICAN Conservatism with what Europeans call "Conservatism."

Europe only knows big government. American Conservatism respect the Individual over the State.

I definitely see more eye to eye with Europe's right wing, rather than America's right wing.

How are you going to combat issues like Hollywood, and Media promoting Liberalism, or Capitalists hiring millions of illegal immigrants, or millions of jobs outsourced to China?

You combat it by cracking down on them with a managed economy.

The Individualist just say let them have their individual rights, a big mistake.

Individualism is weak, and has no answers except do NOTHING, or else it inhibits individual freedom.

So, you get a decadent Liberal society, with absolutely nothing to stop it.

The problem here is you know next to nothing about our country. How it was founded and why. We are citizens, not subjects. Individualism is extremely important to constitutional minded citizens. The government is there to ensure our freedoms with constitutional powers and its' limits. That's why we still have guns.

The only economy that can work in our system is capitalism. Once you go socialist those powers must be stripped from the people so central government can decide who gets what. And I'm not seeing any lack of decadence in european society.

I understand the founding of the U.S.A, it's by a rabble of Brits who abandoned their homelands, and who thought it was awesome to steal land from Natives, and enslave Blacks.

Certainly nothing I would call a Nationalist, they bought in 100's of thousands of Blacks, just to profit off of them.
Both a moral outrage, and a downright problem.

At the core of America has always been a hyper-greedy streak, to do anything to muster profits, the same holds true in importing illegal Mexicans today.

They care not about our well being, but about mega profits.

LOL, boy that didn't take long. Out comes the loony leftist shit. First off, the founders were born here. Subjects of the Crown but considered colonials. They didn't come here and they couldn't steal what wasn't owned. There was no country here. Like every other square inch on Earth man came and conquered. It wasn't unique by any means.

Slavery was always hotly debated. Illegal from day one in many northern states. But slavery isn't a defining aspect of capitalism. You're off on a tangent.

To call me a Leftist is ridiculous, I'm a huge supporter of race realism, and eugenics for goodness sake.

But, that doesn't mean that I support degeneracy of stealing from people, no matter how inferior they might be, I happen to think people have a right to live in their own homelands.

Most of the early Americans were born here but of rather recent colonist roots, or even immigrated from Britain directly to the U.S.A.

No doubt, degeneracy greed was the prime motivator of them being here, to muster profits off of stealing land from Natives, and enslaving Blacks.

 

[Steelfoot]

[QUOTE="Steelfoot, post: 1

I doubt someone who uses the word 'kikess' to refer to Jews, actually wants to date one.

How about 'Yidsow," huh? HUH?

Know what we mean?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

What is a Jewess? Is that sort of like the N word for black people?

Jew•ess
a Jewish woman or girl.

Yes, in the same vein that ni##$r is black man or woman. The words carry the same connotation. But with a racist asshole like you, I am not telling you anything you do not already know.

You're wise, my sensitive Golfing Gator! Steve McGarrett does know everything. Nevertheless, Debbie Schlussel is what she is.

Well Steve I am going to write that I believe you are a sock to one of those Progressive Liberals and most likely a black gay Jew male that want to hide the reality of your down-low lifestyle that is sometimes a drag!

Now seeing you like one Jewish person tell me you are full of shit with your Jewess comment and just want to make Conservative look like assholes because you are what I wrote above!

All the mods know I'm not a sock but rather a genuine Southern Baptist Christian conservative American patriot. If you don't believe me, send them a PM.

Why would I?

1. You comparing yourself to any patriot in the history of the world is a massive insult to real heroic men and women that were patriotic for their country!

2. If you are what you wrote subtracting the patriot part, well then you are the type that believe Blacks are the Mark of Cain which make you stupid!

3. Remember Ivanka Trump is Jewish and her husband is close to Donald, and if you hate Jews then you can bot excuse what Donald and his daughter have done to taint Donald bloodline...

No, you are a big fat phony like David Duke!

 

[WEATHER53]

So yet more lies
Russians fading so gotta bring up the slighted babes to fuel the lib false outrage

Really, it's not fake news it's just lies

 

[Dragonlady]

It is funny how these filthy ass Moon Bats get on their high horse whenever a Conservative is accused of something but totally disregarded Slick Willy's world class sexual predator harassment and his slimebsll wife who defended him and also the rapists of a 12year old girl.

You do know that Trump was accused of raping a 13 year old girl, And doing so in the company of a known and convicted pedophile.

I didn't vote for Trump so go ask somebody that gives a shit.

Slick Willy was accused of sexually harassing dozen of women (some had to be litigated in court) and his filthy ass wife defended him just like she defended the rapist of a 12 year old girl. You didn't vote for either that asshole Slick Willy or that scum Crooked Hillary, did you? Because if you did that either makes you a hypocrite or a scumbag yourself, doesn't it?

No he wasn't. The only woman who took him to court was Paula Jones and her case was dismissed "with prejudice", for lack of evidence meaning she had to pay Clinton's lawyers and she could never refile.

 

[TheDude]

Check out Obama.

Speak of sexual harassment, how come this wasn't major news?

 

[Flash]

[QU


No he wasn't. The only woman who took him to court was Paula Jones and her case was dismissed "with prejudice", for lack of evidence meaning she had to pay Clinton's lawyers and she could never refile.

How about the dozen of other women that said that the asshole harassed them? Slick Willy was a sexual predator scumbag that got caught with Paula Jones and a young intern and exposed by many other women. He was the king of "***** grabbers" and his filthy ass wife supported him just like she supported the rapist of a 12 year old girl.

.