- Moderator
- #41
The thread is based on conspiratorial opinion.I'm not sure what you mean by trolling--I was arguing in just such a thread yesterday, but I didn't see trolls. "Conspiratorial in nature" means there is no evidence, only conjecture, that a thing occurred. This confab of psychologists did occur and they based their OPINION on their professional experience. I agree it's most likely nonsense, but it isn't conspiratorial. Pizzagate was conspiratorial. Wild conjecture about something which NEVER happened. I'm not sure I'm explaining it well, but there's a difference.It is indeed a true story about those doctors. It does not mean that their position isn't conspiratorial in nature and the perfect lead into arbitrary trolling by forum members.Grampa, that was a real story. There were actually 35 doctors, believe it or not, who got together at Harvard and declared Trump mentally unstable and dangerous. Not agreeing with them does not make it fake.35 doctors who HAVE NOT EXAMINED Trump proclaim him mentally unstable.
You're here. Do your fucking job instead of asking me to do it for you. The last time I posted in a CLEAR troll thread as the first response calling it a troll thread you came in pages later whining about the thread being derailed.
You're terrible at your job
Exactly...a thread may be crap, like the psychologist ones, but can still be a legit topic depending on how it's worded and how the OP is. For example of someone threw in a one liner OP with "Trump certified a looney by 35 psychologists" and left it at that, it probably wouldn't fly in Zone 2.
I would disagree...it's based on psycholgists giving their professional opinion based on what they can see externally without ever meeting the man. The validity of that can be argued but it's not "conspiracy" - it's just dumb.