Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
snyder.substack.com
Do want to say, that it is better to live like an Uighur in a Chinese reeducation camp, than die like an American with the weapon in your hands? Pax Americana is better than Pax Sinica, victory is better than defeat, even if the price of the victory is terrible, price of defeat is much worse. From another point of view, destruction of "Biden's America" may be good by itself.I’m a bit worried about this Silver Clown.Sorry, not buying your “Obama and Biden are as bad as Putin, Lukashenko and Poroshenko”Lukashenko, as well as Putin, Baiden, Obama or Poroshenko abused human rights. Any government do it.No, my friendRussia/China are simply competitors that threaten to cut into US economic fortunes. US aggression has been responsible for roughly 40 wars since the end of WW2.
The issue is not economic fortunes but abuses of human rights in attempting to assassinate or imprison those who speak out against you
A military solution is not always the answer.....an economic solution often is
It is bad, but it is reality.
Makes you look like a fool
Nuclear war is winnable and 100-200 million dead Americans is acceptable?
Lord Jesus this forum attracts a lotta crazies.
She is a Russian citizen, don't worry.Yea, I’m worried about this young lady tooRoman´s friend Safia Sapeha was arrested as well Safia Sapeha was arrested (kidnapped) as well
Aren't you worried about the Chief of Stratcom, Adm. Charles Richard?I’m a bit worried about this Silver Clown.Sorry, not buying your “Obama and Biden are as bad as Putin, Lukashenko and Poroshenko”Lukashenko, as well as Putin, Baiden, Obama or Poroshenko abused human rights. Any government do it.No, my friendRussia/China are simply competitors that threaten to cut into US economic fortunes. US aggression has been responsible for roughly 40 wars since the end of WW2.
The issue is not economic fortunes but abuses of human rights in attempting to assassinate or imprison those who speak out against you
A military solution is not always the answer.....an economic solution often is
It is bad, but it is reality.
Makes you look like a fool
Nuclear war is winnable and 100-200 million dead Americans is acceptable?
Lord Jesus this forum attracts a lotta crazies.
m.washingtontimes.com
Do you remember, how exactly this "strategy" (a treat of massive oil&gas sanctions) worked with the Japans in 1941?"So what are you suggesting?"1) BELORUSSIAN | Definition of BELORUSSIAN by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BELORUSSIAN1) Belarusians
Belarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says
Nations demand the dissident's release, after a MiG-29 escorts the Greece-Lithuania flight to Minsk.www.bbc.com
BREAKING : Ryanair sent a Belarusian journalist Raman Pratasevich to certain death.
Looks like pro - Moscow strap Lukasenka (having Moscow behiand ) moves up in this crimes against civil society
"
A Belarusian journalist who is wanted by the government of Alyaksandr Lukashenka was arrested after the plane he was traveling on made an unscheduled landing in Minsk on May 23 after what appears to have been a false bomb threat.
Raman Pratasevich was taken away by police shortly after the Ryanair flight, which was on a scheduled route from Athens to Vilnius, landed in the Belarusian capital.
It wasn't Ryanair. They have to obey the laws of the countries they're flying through.
It was the Belorussians who did this.
2) Flight tracker sites indicated the plane was about 10 kilometers (six miles) from the Lithuanian border when it was diverted. and 150 kilometers to Miensk 2
2) So what are you suggesting? That it was flying over Belarus at the time?
oil, gas , bank Iranian style sanction on Moscow, Lukasenka is pro- Moscow strap without Moscow´s support L.´ll not survive a day
Well, it might work. But then the EU will be without gas.
Once again, the pilots themselves requested landing in Austria. Except of that, comparing Snowden with Protasevich (and the reasons why they are prosecuted) is ridiculous.Yes. They forced it to ground, and only after examination of the plane - allowed to continue its flight. No difference.Read thoroughly what you copy and past. The pilots requested landing in Austria after a number of European countries denied passage for the plane.Oh, yes, sorry. It was not Assange, it was Snowden, who was a reason to ground the Bolivian jet.That was not as you are trying to imply.Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021
Evo Morales grounding incident - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
According to Bolivia, the flight was rerouted to Austria when France, Spain, Portugal and Italy[3] reportedly denied access to their airspace, allegedly due to suspicions that Snowden was on board.[4]
Austria's deputy chancellor, Michael Spindelegger, said that the plane was searched, although the Bolivian Defense Minister denied a search took place, saying Morales had denied entry to his plane.[5][6] The refusals for entry into French, Spanish, and Italian airspace ostensibly for "technical reasons", strongly denounced by Bolivia, Ecuador, and other South American nations, were attributed to rumors disseminated allegedly by the US that Snowden was on board.[7][8] Spanish Minister of Foreign Affairs, José García-Margallo, publicly stated that they were told he was on board but did not specify as to who had informed them.[4]
The President of Austria, Heinz Fischer, went to greet President Morales in his plane and shared breakfast with him.[9]
The plane took off again after Austrian officials confirmed that Edward Snowden was not on board.[10]
France apologized for the incident immediately.[11] The Spanish ambassador to Bolivia apologized two weeks later, citing inappropriate procedures.[12] The Italians and Portuguese sent official explanations to the Bolivian Government.[13]
On 3 July, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State, acknowledged that the U.S. had been "in contact with a range of countries across the world who had any chance of having Mr. Snowden land or even transit through their countries".[14][15]
There is an article 1 of Chicago convention.Once again, the pilots themselves requested landing in Austria. Except of that, comparing Snowden with Protasevich (and the reasons why they are prosecuted) is ridiculous.Yes. They forced it to ground, and only after examination of the plane - allowed to continue its flight. No difference.Read thoroughly what you copy and past. The pilots requested landing in Austria after a number of European countries denied passage for the plane.Oh, yes, sorry. It was not Assange, it was Snowden, who was a reason to ground the Bolivian jet.That was not as you are trying to imply.Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021
Evo Morales grounding incident - Wikipedia
According to Bolivia, the flight was rerouted to Austria when France, Spain, Portugal and Italy[3] reportedly denied access to their airspace, allegedly due to suspicions that Snowden was on board.[4]
Austria's deputy chancellor, Michael Spindelegger, said that the plane was searched, although the Bolivian Defense Minister denied a search took place, saying Morales had denied entry to his plane.[5][6] The refusals for entry into French, Spanish, and Italian airspace ostensibly for "technical reasons", strongly denounced by Bolivia, Ecuador, and other South American nations, were attributed to rumors disseminated allegedly by the US that Snowden was on board.[7][8] Spanish Minister of Foreign Affairs, José García-Margallo, publicly stated that they were told he was on board but did not specify as to who had informed them.[4]
The President of Austria, Heinz Fischer, went to greet President Morales in his plane and shared breakfast with him.[9]
The plane took off again after Austrian officials confirmed that Edward Snowden was not on board.[10]
France apologized for the incident immediately.[11] The Spanish ambassador to Bolivia apologized two weeks later, citing inappropriate procedures.[12] The Italians and Portuguese sent official explanations to the Bolivian Government.[13]
On 3 July, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State, acknowledged that the U.S. had been "in contact with a range of countries across the world who had any chance of having Mr. Snowden land or even transit through their countries".[14][15]
The main issue is not Belarus ordering the plane to land on its territory per se. It is about landing a plane on a false reason to arrest some guy who is considered a threat by the Belorussian dictator.There is an article 1 of Chicago convention.Once again, the pilots themselves requested landing in Austria. Except of that, comparing Snowden with Protasevich (and the reasons why they are prosecuted) is ridiculous.Yes. They forced it to ground, and only after examination of the plane - allowed to continue its flight. No difference.Read thoroughly what you copy and past. The pilots requested landing in Austria after a number of European countries denied passage for the plane.Oh, yes, sorry. It was not Assange, it was Snowden, who was a reason to ground the Bolivian jet.That was not as you are trying to imply.Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021
Evo Morales grounding incident - Wikipedia
According to Bolivia, the flight was rerouted to Austria when France, Spain, Portugal and Italy[3] reportedly denied access to their airspace, allegedly due to suspicions that Snowden was on board.[4]
Austria's deputy chancellor, Michael Spindelegger, said that the plane was searched, although the Bolivian Defense Minister denied a search took place, saying Morales had denied entry to his plane.[5][6] The refusals for entry into French, Spanish, and Italian airspace ostensibly for "technical reasons", strongly denounced by Bolivia, Ecuador, and other South American nations, were attributed to rumors disseminated allegedly by the US that Snowden was on board.[7][8] Spanish Minister of Foreign Affairs, José García-Margallo, publicly stated that they were told he was on board but did not specify as to who had informed them.[4]
The President of Austria, Heinz Fischer, went to greet President Morales in his plane and shared breakfast with him.[9]
The plane took off again after Austrian officials confirmed that Edward Snowden was not on board.[10]
France apologized for the incident immediately.[11] The Spanish ambassador to Bolivia apologized two weeks later, citing inappropriate procedures.[12] The Italians and Portuguese sent official explanations to the Bolivian Government.[13]
On 3 July, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State, acknowledged that the U.S. had been "in contact with a range of countries across the world who had any chance of having Mr. Snowden land or even transit through their countries".[14][15]
View attachment 493286
The States can ground any plane or even all of them simultaneously (as it was in the USA in 9.11) if it required by their interests.
The USA grounded jets, the UK grounded jets, Ukraine grounded jets, Turkey grounded jets. It is normal, and it is allowed.
And comparing Snowden and Protasevich is absolutely correct. Both of them are traitors or both of them are "freedom fighters".
You see, you think, that Obama, Poroshenko, Erdogan and Protasevich are "good" , and Snowden, Martirosyan, Lukashenko and Putin are "bad". And what allowed for "good guys" is not allowed for "bad guys". But there are no such terms in the international laws.The main issue is not Belarus ordering the plane to land on its territory per se. It is about landing a plane on a false reason to arrest some guy who is considered a threat by the Belorussian dictator.There is an article 1 of Chicago convention.Once again, the pilots themselves requested landing in Austria. Except of that, comparing Snowden with Protasevich (and the reasons why they are prosecuted) is ridiculous.Yes. They forced it to ground, and only after examination of the plane - allowed to continue its flight. No difference.Read thoroughly what you copy and past. The pilots requested landing in Austria after a number of European countries denied passage for the plane.Oh, yes, sorry. It was not Assange, it was Snowden, who was a reason to ground the Bolivian jet.That was not as you are trying to imply.Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021
Evo Morales grounding incident - Wikipedia
According to Bolivia, the flight was rerouted to Austria when France, Spain, Portugal and Italy[3] reportedly denied access to their airspace, allegedly due to suspicions that Snowden was on board.[4]
Austria's deputy chancellor, Michael Spindelegger, said that the plane was searched, although the Bolivian Defense Minister denied a search took place, saying Morales had denied entry to his plane.[5][6] The refusals for entry into French, Spanish, and Italian airspace ostensibly for "technical reasons", strongly denounced by Bolivia, Ecuador, and other South American nations, were attributed to rumors disseminated allegedly by the US that Snowden was on board.[7][8] Spanish Minister of Foreign Affairs, José García-Margallo, publicly stated that they were told he was on board but did not specify as to who had informed them.[4]
The President of Austria, Heinz Fischer, went to greet President Morales in his plane and shared breakfast with him.[9]
The plane took off again after Austrian officials confirmed that Edward Snowden was not on board.[10]
France apologized for the incident immediately.[11] The Spanish ambassador to Bolivia apologized two weeks later, citing inappropriate procedures.[12] The Italians and Portuguese sent official explanations to the Bolivian Government.[13]
On 3 July, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State, acknowledged that the U.S. had been "in contact with a range of countries across the world who had any chance of having Mr. Snowden land or even transit through their countries".[14][15]
View attachment 493286
The States can ground any plane or even all of them simultaneously (as it was in the USA in 9.11) if it required by their interests.
The USA grounded jets, the UK grounded jets, Ukraine grounded jets, Turkey grounded jets. It is normal, and it is allowed.
And comparing Snowden and Protasevich is absolutely correct. Both of them are traitors or both of them are "freedom fighters".
As I said above, comparing Snowden and Protasevich is ridiculous. I think every sane person with a grain of common sense would admit that. Try this stuff on some Russian forum from where you brought it here.
No, I dont. And certainly, Erdogan and Poroshenko (both for different reasons) won't be 'good' in my scale and neither Snowden be 'bad'.You see, you think, that Obama, Poroshenko, Erdogan and Protasevich are "good" , and Snowden, Martirosyan, Lukashenko and Putin are "bad". And what allowed for "good guys" is not allowed for "bad guys". But there are no such terms in the international laws.The main issue is not Belarus ordering the plane to land on its territory per se. It is about landing a plane on a false reason to arrest some guy who is considered a threat by the Belorussian dictator.There is an article 1 of Chicago convention.Once again, the pilots themselves requested landing in Austria. Except of that, comparing Snowden with Protasevich (and the reasons why they are prosecuted) is ridiculous.Yes. They forced it to ground, and only after examination of the plane - allowed to continue its flight. No difference.Read thoroughly what you copy and past. The pilots requested landing in Austria after a number of European countries denied passage for the plane.Oh, yes, sorry. It was not Assange, it was Snowden, who was a reason to ground the Bolivian jet.That was not as you are trying to imply.Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021
Evo Morales grounding incident - Wikipedia
According to Bolivia, the flight was rerouted to Austria when France, Spain, Portugal and Italy[3] reportedly denied access to their airspace, allegedly due to suspicions that Snowden was on board.[4]
Austria's deputy chancellor, Michael Spindelegger, said that the plane was searched, although the Bolivian Defense Minister denied a search took place, saying Morales had denied entry to his plane.[5][6] The refusals for entry into French, Spanish, and Italian airspace ostensibly for "technical reasons", strongly denounced by Bolivia, Ecuador, and other South American nations, were attributed to rumors disseminated allegedly by the US that Snowden was on board.[7][8] Spanish Minister of Foreign Affairs, José García-Margallo, publicly stated that they were told he was on board but did not specify as to who had informed them.[4]
The President of Austria, Heinz Fischer, went to greet President Morales in his plane and shared breakfast with him.[9]
The plane took off again after Austrian officials confirmed that Edward Snowden was not on board.[10]
France apologized for the incident immediately.[11] The Spanish ambassador to Bolivia apologized two weeks later, citing inappropriate procedures.[12] The Italians and Portuguese sent official explanations to the Bolivian Government.[13]
On 3 July, Jen Psaki, spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State, acknowledged that the U.S. had been "in contact with a range of countries across the world who had any chance of having Mr. Snowden land or even transit through their countries".[14][15]
View attachment 493286
The States can ground any plane or even all of them simultaneously (as it was in the USA in 9.11) if it required by their interests.
The USA grounded jets, the UK grounded jets, Ukraine grounded jets, Turkey grounded jets. It is normal, and it is allowed.
And comparing Snowden and Protasevich is absolutely correct. Both of them are traitors or both of them are "freedom fighters".
As I said above, comparing Snowden and Protasevich is ridiculous. I think every sane person with a grain of common sense would admit that. Try this stuff on some Russian forum from where you brought it here.
It was Belorussian air, and Belorussian laws. And according Belorussian laws KGB can lie when it is required to arrest a criminal.
Do you remember, how exactly this "strategy" (a treat of massive oil&gas sanctions) worked with the Japans in 1941?"So what are you suggesting?"1) BELORUSSIAN | Definition of BELORUSSIAN by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BELORUSSIAN1) BelarusiansBelarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says
Nations demand the dissident's release, after a MiG-29 escorts the Greece-Lithuania flight to Minsk.
BREAKING : Ryanair sent a Belarusian journalist Raman Pratasevich to certain death.
Looks like pro - Moscow strap Lukasenka (having Moscow behiand ) moves up in this crimes against civil society
"
A Belarusian journalist who is wanted by the government of Alyaksandr Lukashenka was arrested after the plane he was traveling on made an unscheduled landing in Minsk on May 23 after what appears to have been a false bomb threat.
Raman Pratasevich was taken away by police shortly after the Ryanair flight, which was on a scheduled route from Athens to Vilnius, landed in the Belarusian capital.
It wasn't Ryanair. They have to obey the laws of the countries they're flying through.
It was the Belorussians who did this.
2) Flight tracker sites indicated the plane was about 10 kilometers (six miles) from the Lithuanian border when it was diverted. and 150 kilometers to Miensk 2
2) So what are you suggesting? That it was flying over Belarus at the time?
oil, gas , bank Iranian style sanction on Moscow, Lukasenka is pro- Moscow strap without Moscow´s support L.´ll not survive a day
Well, it might work. But then the EU will be without gas.
Belarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says
Nations demand the dissident's release, after a MiG-29 escorts the Greece-Lithuania flight to Minsk.
BREAKING : Ryanair sent a Belarusian journalist Raman Pratasevich to certain death.
Looks like pro - Moscow strap Lukasenka (having Moscow behiand ) moves up in this crimes against civil society
"
A Belarusian journalist who is wanted by the government of Alyaksandr Lukashenka was arrested after the plane he was traveling on made an unscheduled landing in Minsk on May 23 after what appears to have been a false bomb threat.
Raman Pratasevich was taken away by police shortly after the Ryanair flight, which was on a scheduled route from Athens to Vilnius, landed in the Belarusian capital.
They are not rich, and they can risk with war, if they decide that "peace" is more dangerous.Do you remember, how exactly this "strategy" (a treat of massive oil&gas sanctions) worked with the Japans in 1941?"So what are you suggesting?"1) BELORUSSIAN | Definition of BELORUSSIAN by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BELORUSSIAN1) BelarusiansBelarus 'diverts Ryanair flight to arrest journalist', opposition says
Nations demand the dissident's release, after a MiG-29 escorts the Greece-Lithuania flight to Minsk.
BREAKING : Ryanair sent a Belarusian journalist Raman Pratasevich to certain death.
Looks like pro - Moscow strap Lukasenka (having Moscow behiand ) moves up in this crimes against civil society
"
A Belarusian journalist who is wanted by the government of Alyaksandr Lukashenka was arrested after the plane he was traveling on made an unscheduled landing in Minsk on May 23 after what appears to have been a false bomb threat.
Raman Pratasevich was taken away by police shortly after the Ryanair flight, which was on a scheduled route from Athens to Vilnius, landed in the Belarusian capital.
It wasn't Ryanair. They have to obey the laws of the countries they're flying through.
It was the Belorussians who did this.
2) Flight tracker sites indicated the plane was about 10 kilometers (six miles) from the Lithuanian border when it was diverted. and 150 kilometers to Miensk 2
2) So what are you suggesting? That it was flying over Belarus at the time?
oil, gas , bank Iranian style sanction on Moscow, Lukasenka is pro- Moscow strap without Moscow´s support L.´ll not survive a day
Well, it might work. But then the EU will be without gas.
Yeah, well, different times. Belarus can't go to war, they'd lose in minutes.
Russia could try, but they'd also find it difficult. They're not as rich as they pretend to be. They do a lot of things on the cheap.
assholeSo much for peace in Europa.
Calling a fake bomb threat is tantamount to air terrorism.
The people of Belarus fight with their fists against tanks, because an army of crimonal traitors hwo torture and kill their own people protects this god damned asshole Lukashenko. How to help the people of Belarus - and to elim,iante the tyrant Lukashenko and his followers?Belarus needs to be isolated
Belarus plane: What impact could tougher action against Belarus have?
What further sanctions are in place against Belarus and what impact might they have?
The people of Belarus fight with their fists against tanks, because an army of crimonal traitors hwo torture and kill their own people protects this god damned asshole Lukashenko. How to help the people of Belarus - and to elim,iante the tyrant Lukashenko and his followers?Belarus needs to be isolatedBelarus plane: What impact could tougher action against Belarus have?
What further sanctions are in place against Belarus and what impact might they have?
As a first restriction aeroplanes from Belarus lost the right to use the air space over Europe.
They should release the young journalist. Immediately!
