Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In the traditional way. It's when you write terms of the peace treaty (best way - if you do it in the ruins of enemies capital).What do you consider victory?Actually no. Right now we don't have MAD. Nuclear war is possible, survivable and even winnable.The 'other' side reacts to US/Nato efforts at starting another full scale Cold War.
Thank dog we have M.A.D. that almost certainly will keep it from becoming hot.
s
Really?In the traditional way. It's when you write terms of the peace treaty (best way - if you do it in the ruins of enemies capital).What do you consider victory?Actually no. Right now we don't have MAD. Nuclear war is possible, survivable and even winnable.The 'other' side reacts to US/Nato efforts at starting another full scale Cold War.
Thank dog we have M.A.D. that almost certainly will keep it from becoming hot.
s
We found out that as long as it's under a Republican president the acceptable number of dead is at least 500,000.Really?In the traditional way. It's when you write terms of the peace treaty (best way - if you do it in the ruins of enemies capital).
What is traditional about a nuclear war?
How many dead do you consider acceptable?
Or do you care?
Which American cities do you want to sacrifice for your victory?
Calls for a probe grow after a plane was diverted over Belarus with White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki saying, "we demand an immediate, international, transparent and credible investigation of this incident."
sanction!! oil- gas sanctions on Moscow´s thugs
I just read on Google News that there IS a total airline boycott of Belarus, in the sense that planes are since yesterday not flying over that country --- they are re-routing, like when they were shooting planes out of the sky in Ukraine. I'm reading that military jets forced the plane down!The proper response is a total airline boycott of Belarus.
There are two different questions. First: is it legal to land a civilian jet?So, is it OK, when the UK lands civilian planes (for example of the same company, and because of the same excuse)?
BREAKING Royal Air Force fighter jets scrambled to intercept Ryanair flight #FR2145
Two RAF Typhoons from Coningsby have escorted a Ryanair passenger jet into Stansted airport as Quick Reaction Alert. The aircraft was a Ryanair Boeing 737-800 (reg. EI-FZH) flight #FR2145 from Kaunas to London Luton. UPDATE 09:03 UTC Security threat confirmed as hoax. UPDATE 09:01 UTC Sniffer...www.airlive.net
Hypocrisy is a typical British feature.
They didn't bring that plane down to land over a lie.
England brought it down because of a security problem.
No one was arrested and taken away. Much less an opposition leader.
What England did wasn't the same thing.
Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021.I just read on Google News that there IS a total airline boycott of Belarus, in the sense that planes are since yesterday not flying over that country --- they are re-routing, like when they were shooting planes out of the sky in Ukraine. I'm reading that military jets forced the plane down!The proper response is a total airline boycott of Belarus.
It's leading on the news ---- I didn't realize it was such a big deal, but I guess if any nation can force down planes overhead and abduct and kill anyone on board, that could be a problem generally.
Calls for a probe grow after a plane was diverted over Belarus with White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki saying, "we demand an immediate, international, transparent and credible investigation of this incident."
sanction!! oil- gas sanctions on Moscow´s thugs
Actually, I believe, that even death of 100 or 200 millions of Americans is more than acceptable number. Who wants to live under Chinese or Russian heel?We found out that as long as it's under a Republican president the acceptable number of dead is at least 500,000.Really?In the traditional way. It's when you write terms of the peace treaty (best way - if you do it in the ruins of enemies capital).
What is traditional about a nuclear war?
How many dead do you consider acceptable?
Or do you care?
Which American cities do you want to sacrifice for your victory?
That was not as you are trying to imply.Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021
Lukashenko, as well as Putin, Baiden, Obama or Poroshenko abused human rights. Any government do it.No, my friendRussia/China are simply competitors that threaten to cut into US economic fortunes. US aggression has been responsible for roughly 40 wars since the end of WW2.
The issue is not economic fortunes but abuses of human rights in attempting to assassinate or imprison those who speak out against you
A military solution is not always the answer.....an economic solution often is
Oh, yes, sorry. It was not Assange, it was Snowden, who was a reason to ground the Bolivian jet.That was not as you are trying to imply.Obama landed a Bolivian jet in Europe, and tried to abduct Assange. It was not a problem in 2013, and it is not a problem in 2021
Sorry, not buying your “Obama and Biden are as bad as Putin, Lukashenko and Poroshenko”Lukashenko, as well as Putin, Baiden, Obama or Poroshenko abused human rights. Any government do it.No, my friendRussia/China are simply competitors that threaten to cut into US economic fortunes. US aggression has been responsible for roughly 40 wars since the end of WW2.
The issue is not economic fortunes but abuses of human rights in attempting to assassinate or imprison those who speak out against you
A military solution is not always the answer.....an economic solution often is
It is bad, but it is reality.
