so because they get elected they are good at their jobs?
That's not the point, idiot. The point is that third party candidates don't win. Stay focused if you can.
you ******* elected Bush....a half-assed leader and president.....
I voted for Bush 1, not W. Even so, both of them were better than the alternative, and we all know how well the 2 kooks Ross Perot and Ralph Nader did.
and since you live in California.....how many of your candidates have been elected chump?....
What does where I live have to do with it? We're talking about presidential elections, not state. If you put the joint down you might be able to stay focused.
SJ im not going to have a pissing contest with you,i have always seemed to have gotten along with you,you are a party person im not....i will leave it at that....our disagreement on this aint worth beating each other up especially over the turds running....
That's just it, I'm not a party person. I often vote Libertarian (
in the primaries but not in the general because it's a wasted vote). A third party has to gain credibility and establish a track record before they can be a viable party. They can't possibly win in the general for several reasons. They have to be on all the ballots, they have to be able to win a state, and they need to have at least some of their own party in Congress to support their agenda, just to name a few. They need to start at the bottom. I don't like having to vote for the lesser of the two evils either but shit man, a protest vote isn't gonna do anything but give us the worst of the three and it's not gonna bring anyone to that party. They need to do it the right way and get elected to statewide offices, get some numbers behind them, then Congress, THEN the presidency. Nobody starts at the top.
