Breaking news rep King is calling for investigation into...

At what point do the propaganda films rate as campaign contributions? Open campaigning isn't protected by Citizens United. The "Hate Bush" movies are, but not the "All Praise Our Lord Obama" films.

Acadamy Award winning director, big budget, topical content, big potential for profit

I see why Republicans hate it

I see you skipped my question, Ill ask again....

How did that Wisconsin thrashing go that you predicted?

:dig:

Thrashing? :eusa_eh:
 
I see you skipped my question, Ill ask again....

How did that Wisconsin thrashing go that you predicted?

:dig:

It ended with two Republicans being recalled for incompetence

Hahaha nice spin buddy. 4 retained their seats. 1 lost because he was a douche that couldnt keep his dick in his pants. The other was a close race. Now you have to defend two dems against recall. 35 million spent for maybe a gain of 2 which nets the dems what? NOTHING LOL

Two less republicans to worry about in Wisconsin
 
I ifnd it interesting how you are addressing all BUT the actual reason why people are upset about this.

Must you spin becuase you really have no explanation for the hypocricy?

OK...you want to get real...lets get real

People are upset because they know this movie will put Obama into a good light and they want him to lose. Any film, no matter how historically accurate is being labeled as propaganda

It is simply sour grapes from the right who would rather see the worlds greatest terrorist threat remain free than for Obama to receive any credit for it

Correct.

But lets get even more real....

Obama changed his position on sensationalizing the event becuase he knew the movie will paint him in a good light and enhance his campaign.

Now...that being said.....the right is doing what the right does (as does the left when the tables are turned).

However...

The President compromised his integrity by flip flopping for political expediency.

NOW THAT IS BEING HONEST AND REAL.....am I correct?

No response RW?
 
I ifnd it interesting how you are addressing all BUT the actual reason why people are upset about this.

Must you spin becuase you really have no explanation for the hypocricy?

OK...you want to get real...lets get real

People are upset because they know this movie will put Obama into a good light and they want him to lose. Any film, no matter how historically accurate is being labeled as propaganda

It is simply sour grapes from the right who would rather see the worlds greatest terrorist threat remain free than for Obama to receive any credit for it

Correct.

But lets get even more real....

Obama changed his position on sensationalizing the event becuase he knew the movie will paint him in a good light and enhance his campaign.

Now...that being said.....the right is doing what the right does (as does the left when the tables are turned).

However...

The President compromised his integrity by flip flopping for political expediency.

NOW THAT IS BEING HONEST AND REAL.....am I correct?


How is making a film about a major historical event sensationalized? I didn't see Obama posing with pictures of a dead bin Laden, I didn't see him in open celebration...that is sensationalizing

How can a film nobody has seen be propaganda?

Republicans are just having a hissy fit because Obama got the guy when they couldn't.
 
I'm not real surprised at the move though by this admin to propagandize this. The desperation will be very transparent in the coming months.
 
HAHAHAHAHA. I hear the President is also a secret Muslim.
 
OK...you want to get real...lets get real

People are upset because they know this movie will put Obama into a good light and they want him to lose. Any film, no matter how historically accurate is being labeled as propaganda

It is simply sour grapes from the right who would rather see the worlds greatest terrorist threat remain free than for Obama to receive any credit for it

Correct.

But lets get even more real....

Obama changed his position on sensationalizing the event becuase he knew the movie will paint him in a good light and enhance his campaign.

Now...that being said.....the right is doing what the right does (as does the left when the tables are turned).

However...

The President compromised his integrity by flip flopping for political expediency.

NOW THAT IS BEING HONEST AND REAL.....am I correct?


How is making a film about a major historical event sensationalized? I didn't see Obama posing with pictures of a dead bin Laden, I didn't see him in open celebration...that is sensationalizing

How can a film nobody has seen be propaganda?

Republicans are just having a hissy fit because Obama got the guy when they couldn't.

you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.
 
Correct.

But lets get even more real....

Obama changed his position on sensationalizing the event becuase he knew the movie will paint him in a good light and enhance his campaign.

Now...that being said.....the right is doing what the right does (as does the left when the tables are turned).

However...

The President compromised his integrity by flip flopping for political expediency.

NOW THAT IS BEING HONEST AND REAL.....am I correct?


How is making a film about a major historical event sensationalized? I didn't see Obama posing with pictures of a dead bin Laden, I didn't see him in open celebration...that is sensationalizing

How can a film nobody has seen be propaganda?

Republicans are just having a hissy fit because Obama got the guy when they couldn't.

you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.

Rightwinger had any credibility to begin with? :cuckoo:
 
How is making a film about a major historical event sensationalized? I didn't see Obama posing with pictures of a dead bin Laden, I didn't see him in open celebration...that is sensationalizing

How can a film nobody has seen be propaganda?

Republicans are just having a hissy fit because Obama got the guy when they couldn't.

you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.

Rightwinger had any credibility to begin with? :cuckoo:

Actually, with me he does....I see how and why he posts. He likes to stir the pot and heat up the debates.

But I can also read between the lines with him...and I know he knows the truth as it pertains to the conservative ideology...he does not agree with it....but he understands it.

But as I do with the left, he loves to point out the hypocirsy of the right...and there is plenty to point out.

However, this latest exchange was disappointing for me. He seems to want to ignore the fact that Sony is not making a documentary...they are making a big screen, high profit, full length movie...and it will senationalize the event....they will do all they can to sensationalize it as that is what attracts high ticket receipts.

And the WH is aware of this...and for an administration who, RIGHTFULLY SO, asked that we NOT sensationalize the event to turn around and assist the writers....it can be for only one reason...becuase it will help the image of the President.

And RW wishes to ignore this......and thus why I am disappointed.
 
Correct.

But lets get even more real....

Obama changed his position on sensationalizing the event becuase he knew the movie will paint him in a good light and enhance his campaign.

Now...that being said.....the right is doing what the right does (as does the left when the tables are turned).

However...

The President compromised his integrity by flip flopping for political expediency.

NOW THAT IS BEING HONEST AND REAL.....am I correct?


How is making a film about a major historical event sensationalized? I didn't see Obama posing with pictures of a dead bin Laden, I didn't see him in open celebration...that is sensationalizing

How can a film nobody has seen be propaganda?

Republicans are just having a hissy fit because Obama got the guy when they couldn't.

you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.

Not at all

First of all, Obama never said there should be no movies made or books written about the bin Laden raid. He has no control over what SONY can film. All he can do is make sure it is accurate as possible

By sensationalism. he was talking specifically about releasing pictures of a dead bin Laden. That is what the right wing wanted
 
Last edited:
How is making a film about a major historical event sensationalized? I didn't see Obama posing with pictures of a dead bin Laden, I didn't see him in open celebration...that is sensationalizing

How can a film nobody has seen be propaganda?

Republicans are just having a hissy fit because Obama got the guy when they couldn't.

you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.

Not at all

First of all, Obama never said there should be no movies made or books written about the bin Laden raid. He has no control over what can be reported

By sensationalism. he was talking specifically about releasing pictures of a dead bin Laden. That is what the right wing wanted

spin.

No one is saying the movie should not be made.

You disappoint me RW.

You are more of a phony than I realized.
 
you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.

Not at all

First of all, Obama never said there should be no movies made or books written about the bin Laden raid. He has no control over what can be reported

By sensationalism. he was talking specifically about releasing pictures of a dead bin Laden. That is what the right wing wanted

spin.

No one is saying the movie should not be made.

You disappoint me RW.

You are more of a phony than I realized.

Obama is already influencing the movie

Last week, more details on the actual raid and what went on inside the house were released. Hollywood can try to sensationalize the subject matter. But if key facts are already public knowledge, then it ties them into what they can show

Gripping subject matter....I intend to go see it
 
you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.

Not at all

First of all, Obama never said there should be no movies made or books written about the bin Laden raid. He has no control over what can be reported

By sensationalism. he was talking specifically about releasing pictures of a dead bin Laden. That is what the right wing wanted

spin.

No one is saying the movie should not be made.

You disappoint me RW.

You are more of a phony than I realized.

No. What people in this thread are saying is that it's wrong for the government to "capitalize" on the movie.

Which is weird to me, honestly. If the movie's going to get made...and possibly made horribly wrong, why not correct the errors and put the cash to work for the people of the country? Maybe we can all agree to a fun little fiction that the money will be earmarked for veteran's benefits.
 
Come on Republicans.....quit whining like little bitches

Where is your support of a free marketplace? You are free to make movies about Ron Paul or Sarah Palin and open them the same weekend

You afraid of a little competition?
 
15th post
How is making a film about a major historical event sensationalized? I didn't see Obama posing with pictures of a dead bin Laden, I didn't see him in open celebration...that is sensationalizing

How can a film nobody has seen be propaganda?

Republicans are just having a hissy fit because Obama got the guy when they couldn't.

you lied.

You said you wanted to be real.

Instead you opted to be partisan.

You have lost a notch of credibility with me.

Not at all

First of all, Obama never said there should be no movies made or books written about the bin Laden raid. He has no control over what SONY can film. All he can do is make sure it is accurate as possible

By sensationalism. he was talking specifically about releasing pictures of a dead bin Laden. That is what the right wing wanted

I was laughing my ass off reading him proclaiming you've lost credibility.
I pictured him waving his hand at the screen like a Jedi after he posted that and saying
"You have lost a notch of credibility".

First it was the bus tour. His source was a discredited religious nutjob. So he was misinformed about that. Now it's a film that he's convinced constitutes a breach of national security. Most people would have too much self-respect even think of the things he does, most less say them out loud. He posts them on a public forum. Then gets his panties in a twist when he's called on it.
 
The GOP has put out several plans that have died in the senate. Where's the dem's plans?.........Where's Obama's plans.....In fact, where the hell is Obama on the issue, period?

That's my point. The GOP House has passed bills that can't get through the Senate. And they keep doing it. They control ONE house of Congress. They have to do more than pass far-right bills that they know won't make it through the Senate. At some point you'd think they would figure it out. In order to get anything done in a divided gov't you have to come to some sort of compromise. The GOP saying, "Hey, we can work with you on some infrastructure or tax reform", is compromise. "We won't agree to anything less than everything", or, "Here's our bill to privatize Medicare", is not compromise.
the senate didn't even vote on the 3 bills that were passed by the house!!Dirty Harry and the traitors on the left tabled the bills.....DUMB ASS!!!:lol:

Hey, ass-wipe. Again, that's my point. The House can pass all of the right-wing bills they want. But if the bills won't make it through the Senate, what's the point? At some point, the House GOP will have to craft a bill that will get some Dem support. Simply passing far-right bills is not governing.
 
The GOP has put out several plans that have died in the senate. Where's the dem's plans?.........Where's Obama's plans.....In fact, where the hell is Obama on the issue, period?

That's my point. The GOP House has passed bills that can't get through the Senate. And they keep doing it. They control ONE house of Congress. They have to do more than pass far-right bills that they know won't make it through the Senate. At some point you'd think they would figure it out. In order to get anything done in a divided gov't you have to come to some sort of compromise. The GOP saying, "Hey, we can work with you on some infrastructure or tax reform", is compromise. "We won't agree to anything less than everything", or, "Here's our bill to privatize Medicare", is not compromise.
we are broke and OBAMA is to blame...and you want more???the left is insane!!

Riiigghht, it's all Obama's fault. Except for the fact that Obama inherited 10 trillion of the 14 trillion debt, you're right on. :confused: Congrats, you're clueless.
 
Back
Top Bottom