Breaking News - NYTimes

[miketx]

Court ruled the grand jury testimonies had to be blacked out.

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Who would have though libstain judges would rule against the law?

It's actually the conservitard judges who are ruling against the law.

Liar. Can't prove you just spew.

Once again you accuse me of what you are doing.

You aren't all that bright, are you.

Thanks Goebbels.

 

[iceberg]

You know, Mueller actually knew what he was doing and foresaw something like this that he tried to avoid.

At the beginning of each section of the report, Mueller wrote a summary that was unclassified and could be released immediately. Matter of fact, that is one of the reasons that Mueller's people are upset with the report that Barr released, because they knew that the summaries were not classified, as that is how Mueller wanted it written.

They must be scared of something if they are refusing to release unclassified parts of the report.

ah hell ll yea. something has to be up cause.

well, cause.

 

[Crepitus]

Here it is because all Americans have been waiting with bated breath!

Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report
Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report

Yeah … all the news that's fit to print.

Court ruled the grand jury testimonies had to be blacked out.

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Please quote the rulings by the "2 or 3 other courts" that have ruled that classified grand jury testimony did not have to be redacted.

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

 

[Crepitus]

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Who would have though libstain judges would rule against the law?

It's actually the conservitard judges who are ruling against the law.

Liar. Can't prove you just spew.

Once again you accuse me of what you are doing.

You aren't all that bright, are you.

Thanks Goebbels.

You're welcome Squidward.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Here it is because all Americans have been waiting with bated breath!

Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report
Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report

Yeah … all the news that's fit to print.

Court ruled the grand jury testimonies had to be blacked out.

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Please quote the rulings by the "2 or 3 other courts" that have ruled that classified grand jury testimony did not have to be redacted.

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

 

[Crepitus]

Here it is because all Americans have been waiting with bated breath!

Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report
Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report

Yeah … all the news that's fit to print.

Court ruled the grand jury testimonies had to be blacked out.

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Please quote the rulings by the "2 or 3 other courts" that have ruled that classified grand jury testimony did not have to be redacted.

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Court ruled the grand jury testimonies had to be blacked out.

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Please quote the rulings by the "2 or 3 other courts" that have ruled that classified grand jury testimony did not have to be redacted.

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

One more chance. Quote the court rulings that you said existed that say that grand jury testimony can be released to the public. If you don't this time I'm calling you out as a ******* liar. You got one more shot bubba. Make it count.

 

[Crepitus]

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Please quote the rulings by the "2 or 3 other courts" that have ruled that classified grand jury testimony did not have to be redacted.

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

One more chance. Quote the court rulings that you said existed that say that grand jury testimony can be released to the public. If you don't this time I'm calling you out as a ******* liar. You got one more shot bubba. Make it count.

Lol, Google is your friend.

Michael Brown's family to see full grand jury testimony

Would you like me to come over and read it to you as well?

 

[airplanemechanic]

Please quote the rulings by the "2 or 3 other courts" that have ruled that classified grand jury testimony did not have to be redacted.

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

One more chance. Quote the court rulings that you said existed that say that grand jury testimony can be released to the public. If you don't this time I'm calling you out as a ******* liar. You got one more shot bubba. Make it count.

Lol, Google is your friend.

Michael Brown's family to see full grand jury testimony

Would you like me to come over and read it to you as well?

From your own ******* link:

The order bars the attorneys designated to see the grand jury items from making any of them public, lest they be jailed for contempt.

So you are a ******* LIAR. Yea, read them to me. Then maybe you can show me where it says that the public has a right to see grand jury testimony. Because what YOU used as a source SURE THE **** DOESN'T SAY THAT. In fact, it says just the opposite you dick sucking fuckhead liar.

Here, let me teach you something dumbfuck.

That was an actual case with an actual judge. There is NO JUDGE AND NO CASE with the grand jury testimony with Trump. They found no collusion and no obstruction. So you can't compare apples and seatbelts. They have nothing in common.

And even then the judge stated that none of it be made public or else they would be held in contempt.

Grand juries in the United States - Wikipedia

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 US 677 (1958), permitted the disclosure of grand jury transcripts under certain restrictions: "a private party seeking to obtain grand jury transcripts must demonstrate that 'without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'" and must make its requests "with particularity".[1

The only instance where grand jury testimony can be made "unsecret" is ONLY for the defense and ONLY in the case where it states "without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'."

There is no "defense" where there is no prosecution and no case. Thus grand jury testimony by LAW is kept secret. PERIOD.

 

[Crepitus]

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

One more chance. Quote the court rulings that you said existed that say that grand jury testimony can be released to the public. If you don't this time I'm calling you out as a ******* liar. You got one more shot bubba. Make it count.

Lol, Google is your friend.

Michael Brown's family to see full grand jury testimony

Would you like me to come over and read it to you as well?

From your own ******* link:

The order bars the attorneys designated to see the grand jury items from making any of them public, lest they be jailed for contempt.

So you are a ******* LIAR. Yea, read them to me. Then maybe you can show me where it says that the public has a right to see grand jury testimony. Because what YOU used as a source SURE THE **** DOESN'T SAY THAT. In fact, it says just the opposite you dick sucking fuckhead liar.

Here, let me teach you something dumbfuck.

That was an actual case with an actual judge. There is NO JUDGE AND NO CASE with the grand jury testimony with Trump. They found no collusion and no obstruction. So you can't compare apples and seatbelts. They have nothing in common.

And even then the judge stated that none of it be made public or else they would be held in contempt.

Grand juries in the United States - Wikipedia

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 US 677 (1958), permitted the disclosure of grand jury transcripts under certain restrictions: "a private party seeking to obtain grand jury transcripts must demonstrate that 'without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'" and must make its requests "with particularity".[1

The only instance where grand jury testimony can be made "unsecret" is ONLY for the defense and ONLY in the case where it states "without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'."

There is no "defense" where there is no prosecution and no case. Thus grand jury testimony by LAW is kept secret. PERIOD.

Then go back to Watergate you foul-mouthed moron.

Now **** off, eat shit, and live dumbass.

 

[iceberg]

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

One more chance. Quote the court rulings that you said existed that say that grand jury testimony can be released to the public. If you don't this time I'm calling you out as a ******* liar. You got one more shot bubba. Make it count.

Lol, Google is your friend.

Michael Brown's family to see full grand jury testimony

Would you like me to come over and read it to you as well?

From your own ******* link:

The order bars the attorneys designated to see the grand jury items from making any of them public, lest they be jailed for contempt.

So you are a ******* LIAR. Yea, read them to me. Then maybe you can show me where it says that the public has a right to see grand jury testimony. Because what YOU used as a source SURE THE **** DOESN'T SAY THAT. In fact, it says just the opposite you dick sucking fuckhead liar.

Here, let me teach you something dumbfuck.

That was an actual case with an actual judge. There is NO JUDGE AND NO CASE with the grand jury testimony with Trump. They found no collusion and no obstruction. So you can't compare apples and seatbelts. They have nothing in common.

And even then the judge stated that none of it be made public or else they would be held in contempt.

Grand juries in the United States - Wikipedia

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 US 677 (1958), permitted the disclosure of grand jury transcripts under certain restrictions: "a private party seeking to obtain grand jury transcripts must demonstrate that 'without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'" and must make its requests "with particularity".[1

The only instance where grand jury testimony can be made "unsecret" is ONLY for the defense and ONLY in the case where it states "without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'."

There is no "defense" where there is no prosecution and no case. Thus grand jury testimony by LAW is kept secret. PERIOD.

Then go back to Watergate you foul-mouthed moron.

Now **** off, eat shit, and live dumbass.

^^^

the reaction of the pwned.

 

[iceberg]

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

One more chance. Quote the court rulings that you said existed that say that grand jury testimony can be released to the public. If you don't this time I'm calling you out as a ******* liar. You got one more shot bubba. Make it count.

Lol, Google is your friend.

Michael Brown's family to see full grand jury testimony

Would you like me to come over and read it to you as well?

From your own ******* link:

The order bars the attorneys designated to see the grand jury items from making any of them public, lest they be jailed for contempt.

So you are a ******* LIAR. Yea, read them to me. Then maybe you can show me where it says that the public has a right to see grand jury testimony. Because what YOU used as a source SURE THE **** DOESN'T SAY THAT. In fact, it says just the opposite you dick sucking fuckhead liar.

Here, let me teach you something dumbfuck.

That was an actual case with an actual judge. There is NO JUDGE AND NO CASE with the grand jury testimony with Trump. They found no collusion and no obstruction. So you can't compare apples and seatbelts. They have nothing in common.

And even then the judge stated that none of it be made public or else they would be held in contempt.

Grand juries in the United States - Wikipedia

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 US 677 (1958), permitted the disclosure of grand jury transcripts under certain restrictions: "a private party seeking to obtain grand jury transcripts must demonstrate that 'without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'" and must make its requests "with particularity".[1

The only instance where grand jury testimony can be made "unsecret" is ONLY for the defense and ONLY in the case where it states "without the transcript a defense would be greatly prejudiced or that without reference to it an injustice would be done'."

There is no "defense" where there is no prosecution and no case. Thus grand jury testimony by LAW is kept secret. PERIOD.

Then go back to Watergate you foul-mouthed moron.

Now **** off, eat shit, and live dumbass.

"live dumbass" - anyone got a translator?

 

[SAYIT]

Then go back to Watergate you foul-mouthed moron. Now **** off, eat shit, and live dumbass.

^^^ the reaction of the pwned.

TDS is very real and has taken a toll on many like Creepitus

Then go back to Watergate you foul-mouthed moron. Now **** off, eat shit, and live dumbass.

"live dumbass" - anyone got a translator?

To those like Creepitus who for 29 months have cried themselves to sleep every ******* night, awakened on the angry, bitter, confused left side of the bed every ******* morning and obsessed all day long, that is their reality. No shit. They think you have no life because you don't do as they do.

It's been all too painful for the snowflakes to cope.

Is "Trump Derangement Syndrome" a Real Mental Condition?
"Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and distressed by the policies, speech, behavior and tweets of President Trump, so much so that it has affected their cognitive, affective and behavioral functioning. Such people may need mental health support." - Rob Whitley, Ph.D.

Chelsea Handler says she went into therapy after Trump's win
Comedian Chelsea Handler said Friday that she began seeing a therapist after President Trump's 2016 election win, and said she turned to marijuana to deal with the shock.

Handler appeared on Friday's episode of "Real Time with Bill Maher," where she told Maher that Trump's election victory made her feel "unhinged" and violently angry.

 

[Ame®icano]

Here it is because all Americans have been waiting with bated breath!

Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report
Congress Waits as Barr Blacks Out Parts of Mueller Report

Yeah … all the news that's fit to print.

Court ruled the grand jury testimonies had to be blacked out.

Was court ruling necessary to know that?

 

[Ame®icano]

Why do they need the Mueller report when Schiff has so much "compelling" evidence?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

So much for clarity & transparency of governance.....~S~

Tell it to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, whiny little boy. McKeever v Barr.

 

[Oldstyle]

Please quote the rulings by the "2 or 3 other courts" that have ruled that classified grand jury testimony did not have to be redacted.

Look at the Micheal Brown case. Ferguson.

I said to quote the rulings that you said multiple courts have issued that said that grand jury testimony does not or should not be redacted from public view. The Michael Brown case didn't have an appointed special prosecutor and neither did Ferguson so try again.

If you CANNOT come up with this information retract your statement or I will call you out as a liar. I'm tired of you making up shit and NOBODY holding you to it. I'm holding your feet to the fire now you lying little shithead. Back up your statement or retract it and say you were wrong.

Grand jury testimony doesn't care if it's a special counsel or not.

One more chance. Quote the court rulings that you said existed that say that grand jury testimony can be released to the public. If you don't this time I'm calling you out as a ******* liar. You got one more shot bubba. Make it count.

Lol, Google is your friend.

Michael Brown's family to see full grand jury testimony

Would you like me to come over and read it to you as well?

Did you even read what you cited? The judge let the attorney's for Brown see the full grand jury testimony with the very explicit warning that if they leaked ANY of that to the public they would be held in contempt! Once again...I don't think many of you far left liberals have a clue what the law is on this subject! You're letting liars like Shiff walk you down the garden path AGAIN!

 

[Oldstyle]

By the way...if I were a judge in this case I wouldn't allow House Democrats anywhere NEAR that Grand Jury testimony because they have demonstrated time and time again that they have no problem whatsoever leaking things they shouldn't to the media!

 

[dannyboys]

You know, Mueller actually knew what he was doing and foresaw something like this that he tried to avoid.

At the beginning of each section of the report, Mueller wrote a summary that was unclassified and could be released immediately. Matter of fact, that is one of the reasons that Mueller's people are upset with the report that Barr released, because they knew that the summaries were not classified, as that is how Mueller wanted it written.

They must be scared of something if they are refusing to release unclassified parts of the report.

Mueller's people? You mean the 'second hand' sources used by the NYT?

 

[Meister]

Court ruled the grand jury testimonies had to be blacked out.

Two or three other courts have ruled the opposite. It will go to the next stage of appeals.

Who would have though libstain judges would rule against the law?

It's actually the conservitard judges who are ruling against the law.

Liar. Can't prove you just spew.

Once again you accuse me of what you are doing.

You aren't all that bright, are you.

I'm kind of curious, which judges are you referring to?