BREAKING NEWS: Biden pardons his son

Well, yeah, he used it to go after Hunter Biden... that's why we are here.


Weiss was appointed special counsel by garland, they didn't even start investigating the crackhead till late 2019. Weiss tried to give the crackhead a sweetheart plea deal that the judge rejected.


.
 
Hunter is his own punishment
We got bigger shitheads to fry and flush
 
Then decline your parents' pardon. And, by the way, you are a liar. You would pardon your child.

My children never did anything like what you and your heroes like the Bidens did routinely. You commie stoner faggots are in a class by yourselves.
 
As a general rule yes, but am a realist above all else. It is a done deal, whining about it will do nothing, especially since Joe will not be running for President again, and like I said, if it were my son and I had the power, the taxes, and penalties already paid and the weapons charge(s) all remaining, I would have pardoned him to, while having the power. Good luck to you and yours try to get some rest. Not a thing you can do about it, but ***** and moan, though totally impotent of affect.

Oh no honey, we can do a lot more than that.

Remember:

Your game

Your rules

You will hate it
 
Genocide Joe pardoning his criminal son is yet another example proving the US is a banana republic. Dumb Americans still think it’s the indispensable nation and the world’s greatest democracy.
 
Although we know in reality that the fifth is easily replaced by “I don’t recall” “I don’t know” and “I smoked so much crack that my brain doesn’t work anymore”.

 
You're right... I don't... but I have a sufficient understanding of human behavior to speculate about behavior under duress...
No, you don't but often times people here are legends in their own mind.
 
You asked and it was answered. Now you’re dodging. You’re a hack.

Except it wasn't a good answer. Most of those people never admitted fault and paid back their back taxes until they were convicted. Most of them were involved in other illegal activity. (Gambling for Rose, Embezzlement in the case of Hemsley)

One of them never went to jail at all.

So your answer was pretty weak sauce.

How does one become a hack at your level?

By actually doing research... you should try it some time.
 
No, you don't but often times people here are legends in their own mind.
This automatic gainsay is getting us nowhere... I stand by what I've said about how most people would react in such circumstances.

An old-geezer politician with Pardon Power kept his own child from going to jail before he leaves office...

Golly-gosh gee-whiz, Emmy Lou... how extraordinary and beyond human understanding... who'd-a-thunk-it ? :itsok:

I'm not excusing it... it's disgraceful and unethical... but I'd probably do the same thing if faced with similar circumstances.

And so would most people... here, or out in the Real World.

I CAN think of ONE thing that I would do differently.

I would not have SAID that I would NOT pardon him earlier.

In the final analysis... either Old Joe lied in the first place or he changed his mind as departure time nears... whatever...

In the final analysis... it's a fly-speck... a pimple... a flea.. a nit... a Nothing-Burger after a week or so has passed.
 
Last edited:
Or, there's actually something he's worried about. You have to admit, there's something fishy about all of that. He gets this very lucrative job with not really any experience, where he was paid a lot of money, some say so burisma could have access to Joe. The suspicious emails, 10% for the big guy, and now we're almost 140 billion into a war with Russia on Ukraine behalf.

Some might think zelensky has the receipts on biden, and that's why we are knee deep into that war.

Well, your first premise is flawed. Hunter had a LOT of experience. He had spent nearly 20 years working for major banks, lobbying firms and even the government. Graduated from Georgetown and Yale, Worked for MNBA, Amtrak, Seneca Partners, before starting his own consulting firm.

We are in a war with Ukraine because we promised Ukraine to protect her sovereignty.

You see, back in the 1990's, when the USSR broke up, Ukraine found itself in possession of the worlds third-largest nuclear arsenal. They agreed to give them up if the West and Russia guaranteed their borders.

Also, your argument makes no sense. If Zelensky had the goods on Biden, he would have given those to Trump in 2019 when Trump foolishly tried to shake him down.
 
the left were all aboard and full steam ahead in "get trump", money didn't matter, now that the arrow is pointed toward democrats, it's all "the money!"

It was said awhile back, one day this would all come back on democrats one day, but they didn't care. They spent 9 years of lawfare, turning over every rock they could find to get something on trump. Money was of no concern then. Now, when it's all turned around, the left are crying foul.

This tit for tat is probably not a good thing, but, it has to happen, because if the repubs were to let it go and say "let's all just focus in the future and not on these petty squabbles", the next time democrats are back in control, they WILL do all of this again to the next opponent they don't like.

this is where we are at, for while I'm afraid.

Hunter Biden is a private citizen, that's why this "Lawfare" against him is unacceptable.

The only guy who got Trump in trouble was Trump.
 
15th post
That's a ******* commie lie. Comey spent 16 minutes laying out a prima facie case for the gross negligence in handling classified material. Any prosecutor could have taken those facts to trial. Comey wasn't a prosecutor and had no authority to let the ***** off the hook.
.

Yeah, good luck getting a conviction for that in DC, where 96% of the population voted for her.

you see, the point of taking anything to trial is actually being able to win.

Given what a non-event this was (she got emails that SOMEONE ELSE had failed to vet for classified info, most of which wasn't classified when it was sent.)

Also, the absurdity of some of it. For instance, if someone sent her a link to a NYT story about drone strikes in Pakistan, that was considered classified information. Why? Because officially, we weren't doing drone strikes in Pakistan. Of course, the NYT knew it, Pakistan Knew it, the Al Qaeda twats we were bombing knew it when they were explaining it to their 76 virgins.
 
Weiss was appointed special counsel by garland, they didn't even start investigating the crackhead till late 2019. Weiss tried to give the crackhead a sweetheart plea deal that the judge rejected.

Weiss started his bullshit investigation in 2019.

A TRUMP judge tanked the sensible deal that Weiss agreed to because he realized that his evidence was kind of weak. Seriously, all the things Biden was accused of, and all they came up with was a tax charge and a gun charge, that are almost never prosecuted?
 
Genocide Joe pardoning his criminal son is yet another example proving the US is a banana republic. Dumb Americans still think it’s the indispensable nation and the world’s greatest democracy.

Well, decent people know we are.

People like you just come for a free lunch and complain about the food.
 
Back
Top Bottom