BREAKING: Jan. 6 Committee Cancels Thursday Hearing After Steve Bannon Says He Will Only Testify Live and In Person

NO he did not. The statement was that HE did not cooberate anything, but he did not discount things he had no information on. That is very different than cooberating... Your Yahoo news is lying... But that is not a surprise. Helps to actually read what is quoted. I wonder who is pushing this lie?

View attachment 669318
And you proof is........
 
So, you can't name them.

I'm educated that her testimony to the committee remains unchallenged.
No, you are ignorant.

The SS says her version of what happened isn't correct, and the letter she claims to have written to Trump was written by her boss, according to him.

That's just two.

None of her gossip has been corroborated, by anyone.
 
Ha! Schiff and Cheney caved and threw in the towel. They're not wanting Bannon to tell the truth on live TV and expose them, especially Chris Wray.




You have to be the gullible Cultist yet.

The cancellation of the Thursday Hearing is because of the volume of information revealed in the Cippolone testimony on Friday. All of the witnesses who have come forward in the wake of Cassady Hutchison's testimony have overwhelmed the Committee with new information.

Steve Bannon isn't getting any deal and the judge basically said he has no defence. No one cares about Steve Bannon.
 
No, you are ignorant.

The SS says her version of what happened isn't correct, and the letter she claims to have written to Trump was written by her boss, according to him.

That's just two.

None of her gossip has been corroborated, by anyone.

You are both stupid and gullible. ALL of the witnesses who have come forward since she testified have corroborated her testimony. No one has refuted ANYTHING she said, outside of the right wing media.

This wasn't gossip at all. The harder YOU work to discredit this witness, the more credible she obviously is. You wouldn't working THIS hard to make her out to be a liar, if her testimony wasn't very damaging, and so far, everything she said has held up.
 
Ha! Schiff and Cheney caved and threw in the towel. They're not wanting Bannon to tell the truth on live TV and expose them, especially Chris Wray.



Democrats are so shallow.
 
gotcha the dems don’t want public testimony they can’t control…gotcha
It's not a court of law, there are no cross examinations. Of course they want to know, what he knows, and be able to continue investigating without showing their hand.
 
You have to be the gullible Cultist yet.

The cancellation of the Thursday Hearing is because of the volume of information revealed in the Cippolone testimony on Friday. All of the witnesses who have come forward in the wake of Cassady Hutchison's testimony have overwhelmed the Committee with new information.

Steve Bannon isn't getting any deal and the judge basically said he has no defence. No one cares about Steve Bannon.
What new info did Cippolone give? Be specific and provide links, Simp.
 
You are both stupid and gullible. ALL of the witnesses who have come forward since she testified have corroborated her testimony. No one has refuted ANYTHING she said, outside of the right wing media.

This wasn't gossip at all. The harder YOU work to discredit this witness, the more credible she obviously is. You wouldn't working THIS hard to make her out to be a liar, if her testimony wasn't very damaging, and so far, everything she said has held up.
Link to this corroboration? Transcripts please, Simp.
 
Link to this corroboration? Transcripts please, Simp.

The transcripts have not been published, but the interviews with the Committee members about the postponement have all indicated that this is the case.

The corroboration will be coming the in Hearing which would have been held on Thursday.

You should be watching the Hearings and then we wouldn't be constantly correcting your misinformation, FuckBoi. As always, you continue to be wilfully uninformed.
 
You are both stupid and gullible. ALL of the witnesses who have come forward since she testified have corroborated her testimony. No one has refuted ANYTHING she said, outside of the right wing media.

This wasn't gossip at all. The harder YOU work to discredit this witness, the more credible she obviously is. You wouldn't working THIS hard to make her out to be a liar, if her testimony wasn't very damaging, and so far, everything she said has held up.


:link:
 
It's not a court of law, there are no cross examinations. Of course they want to know, what he knows, and be able to continue investigating without showing their hand.
I never said anything about cross examination. But yes, in Congressional hearings there is often cross examination.

Thanks for highlighting you don't know what that is.
 
How did the gas line affect NATO?

How has missile thing affected NATO?

Ukraine isn't a NATO member.

Do you think putin invaded Ukraine because they were a NATO member or trying to become one?
1) really? You don't understand how Putin running massive amounts of energy to Eastern Europe undermines NATO?
2) Well, soon after the plans were withdrew, Putin invaded Europe. So, defense makes a difference.
3) never said they were, but they are in Europe, and were working towards potentially joining....and a war in Europe, has a drastic impact on NATO.
4) I think he invaded because he wants to recreate the Soviet/Russian Empire, and wants Moscow to continue to have massive influance on Eastern Europe...he found Obama and Xiden to be weak, and realize it was his best options to invade...in particular since they were his puppets
 
No, you are ignorant.

The SS says her version of what happened isn't correct, and the letter she claims to have written to Trump was written by her boss, according to him.

That's just two.

None of her gossip has been corroborated, by anyone.
And where can I find this testimony under oath?

Or anything under oath refute her testimony.
 
The transcripts have not been published, but the interviews with the Committee members about the postponement have all indicated that this is the case.

The corroboration will be coming the in Hearing which would have been held on Thursday.

You should be watching the Hearings and then we wouldn't be constantly correcting your misinformation, FuckBoi. As always, you continue to be wilfully uninformed.
Oh, so you are so stupid you believe the hack members if this Shit Show.

What a dumbass.
 
1) really? You don't understand how Putin running massive amounts of energy to Eastern Europe undermines NATO?
2) Well, soon after the plans were withdrew, Putin invaded Europe. So, defense makes a difference.
3) never said they were, but they are in Europe, and were working towards potentially joining....and a war in Europe, has a drastic impact on NATO.
4) I think he invaded because he wants to recreate the Soviet/Russian Empire, and wants Moscow to continue to have massive influance on Eastern Europe...he found Obama and Xiden to be weak, and realize it was his best options to invade...in particular since they were his puppets
1) my position is that it didn’t affect NATOs response to the Putin invasion of Ukraine. Putin has been forced on the black and China to sell oil & gas at probably less than favorable terms.

2) The didn’t invade Ukraine because of the pipeline or gas sales to Eupore. He thought it might divide NATO and that failed.

3) Putin believes the Ukraine is part of Russia. He was told again that it is not.

4) and he was wrong? He invaded because he lost his useful idiot in the WH with trump. He made the calculation that Ukraine would continue to move to NATO application and deemed now or never.


Russia will suffer for a long time from the invasion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top