Breaking! Here is the phone transcript word for word between Trump and Ukraine President

[toomuchtime_]

Javelins and the favor were mutually exclusive.

Yea it was just a "coincidence"

Right

Exactly right. Zelensky thanked the President for all the aid the US has been providing and said he would soon like to order more Javelins, and President Trump thanked him for buying US products asked the "favor" of cooperating with ongoing US Justice Department investigations of Crowdstrike.

 

[edthecynic]

Biden's son was NOT being investigated, so your lie falls apart from jump!

but he was connected to who and what was being investigated

So you admit it wasn't Biden who was being investigated
The investigation into the other players began and ended BEFORE Biden came on the scene.

is that what I said???or what you interpreted

Those are the facts, what Biden was "connected" to was investigated and the investigation was stopped BEFORE Biden became "connected." So yes when you say the connection to who and what was investigated you are unconsciously saying it wasn't Biden who was being investigated because he came on the scene after the fact. Unless you are implying the TRAMP lie that Biden was being investigated all along.

LIAR!
It is right there in black and white at the bottom of page 2 and the top of page three, where Zelensky asks for more Javelins and Tramp says he needs a favor. QUID PRO QUO!

Zelensky: We are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the US

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though

It says the following:

"We. are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps. specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from ·_ the United· States for defense purposes .."
​

That paragraph has nothing to do with investigating Biden. It hasn't even been mentioned yet. That isn't even mentioned until a couple of pages later.

But it has everything to do with the QUID in Quid Pro Quo.

Wrong. The "cooperation" referred to has nothing to do with Biden.

It doesn't matter, it is STILL a Quid Pro Quo access to purchase Javelins for a favor.

Hmmm, no, there is no tangible connection between the javelins and investigating Biden. They are discussed in totally separate parts of the phone call.

Everything that came after the word "favor" was the Quo of Quid Pro Quo.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

HAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!

Democrats, are now trying to push the narrative that by Trump merely asking the Ukraine President to look into what information they have is "a thing of value"... and therefore is against the law.
These people have lost their collective minds.
And BTW, under that same opinion, the DNC and the Clinton campaign broke numerous laws therefore.

 

[Lesh]

Exactly right. Zelensky thanked the President for all the aid the US has been providing and said he would soon like to order more Javelins, and President Trump thanked him for buying US products asked the "favor" of cooperating with ongoing US Justice Department investigations of Crowdstrike.

And to "look into" Biden.

BOTH show a quid pro quo where none is actually required.

The mere ASK is an abuse of power and a breach of campaign finance laws.

 

[progressive hunter]

but he was connected to who and what was being investigated

So you admit it wasn't Biden who was being investigated
The investigation into the other players began and ended BEFORE Biden came on the scene.

is that what I said???or what you interpreted

Those are the facts, what Biden was "connected" to was investigated and the investigation was stopped BEFORE Biden became "connected." So yes when you say the connection to who and what was investigated you are unconsciously saying it wasn't Biden who was being investigated because he came on the scene after the fact. Unless you are implying the TRAMP lie that Biden was being investigated all along.

It says the following:

"We. are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps. specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from ·_ the United· States for defense purposes .."
​

That paragraph has nothing to do with investigating Biden. It hasn't even been mentioned yet. That isn't even mentioned until a couple of pages later.

But it has everything to do with the QUID in Quid Pro Quo.

Wrong. The "cooperation" referred to has nothing to do with Biden.

It doesn't matter, it is STILL a Quid Pro Quo access to purchase Javelins for a favor.

Hmmm, no, there is no tangible connection between the javelins and investigating Biden. They are discussed in totally separate parts of the phone call.

Everything that came after the word "favor" was the Quo of Quid Pro Quo.

only according to you,,,

 

[toomuchtime_]

President Trump thanked him for buying US goods and then asked him the favor of cooperating with the US Justice Department's ongoing investigation of Crowdstrike.

BULLSHIT!
Looks like the investigation was over long before Tramp's favor to make up some dirt on Hillary.
DOJ: Government has independently verified CrowdStrike report blaming Russian hackers for DNC breach
By Andrew Blake - The Washington Times - Friday, June 21, 2019
The Department of Justice has corroborated a report by CrowdStrike, a private security firm hired by the Democratic National Committee, that concluded Russian hackers were responsible for breaching the DNC prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential race, federal prosecutors revealed Thursday.

Attorneys prosecuting the government’s case against Roger Stone, President Trump’s former campaign adviser, made the admission in a court filing entered in response to defense lawyers recently claiming that the Justice Department has failed to “independently verify” CrowdStrike’s findings.

“That statement is incorrect,” replied Jessie K. Liu, the U.S. Attorney for D.C.

“The government produced the CrowdStrike reports because the Indictment in this case referenced, as background, CrowdStrike’s statements about the DNC hack,” she wrote. “Stone’s statement that the government has no other evidence is not only irrelevant to this proceeding but is also mistaken. The government accordingly wishes to correct any misimpression.”

Right, Jesse Liu is the lawyer who waived several conflict of interest issues concerning Mueller's appointment on the grounds she thought him too honorable a man to allow personal interests to effect his judgement. However, if you believe she is right, you should have no objection to the Justice Department taking a second look.

 

[edthecynic]

Well this is going to get embarrassing......

Ukraine President released statement that Trump did not pressure him about Biden on call.

he is trying to protect his country by kissing Tramp's fat ass.

 

[progressive hunter]

Exactly right. Zelensky thanked the President for all the aid the US has been providing and said he would soon like to order more Javelins, and President Trump thanked him for buying US products asked the "favor" of cooperating with ongoing US Justice Department investigations of Crowdstrike.

And to "look into" Biden.

BOTH show a quid pro quo where none is actually required.

The mere ASK is an abuse of power and a breach of campaign finance laws.

not if it concerns the criminal act of a vice president and the loss of 1.8 billion dollars of US tax money

 

[Lesh]

View attachment 281008

I see you found another unknown dick to quote. Congratulations.

Eric Erickson? The main guy on redstate.com?

Erick Woods Erickson (born June 3, 1975) is a conservative evangelical American blogger and radio host. He hosts the radio show Atlanta's Evening News with Erick Erickson, broadcast on 750 WSB (AM), and runs the blog The Resurgent. Previously, he served as the editor-in-chief and the CEO of the conservative political blog RedState[1] and was a political contributor for CNN.

 

[edthecynic]

President Trump thanked him for buying US goods and then asked him the favor of cooperating with the US Justice Department's ongoing investigation of Crowdstrike.

BULLSHIT!
Looks like the investigation was over long before Tramp's favor to make up some dirt on Hillary.
DOJ: Government has independently verified CrowdStrike report blaming Russian hackers for DNC breach
By Andrew Blake - The Washington Times - Friday, June 21, 2019
The Department of Justice has corroborated a report by CrowdStrike, a private security firm hired by the Democratic National Committee, that concluded Russian hackers were responsible for breaching the DNC prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential race, federal prosecutors revealed Thursday.

Attorneys prosecuting the government’s case against Roger Stone, President Trump’s former campaign adviser, made the admission in a court filing entered in response to defense lawyers recently claiming that the Justice Department has failed to “independently verify” CrowdStrike’s findings.

“That statement is incorrect,” replied Jessie K. Liu, the U.S. Attorney for D.C.

“The government produced the CrowdStrike reports because the Indictment in this case referenced, as background, CrowdStrike’s statements about the DNC hack,” she wrote. “Stone’s statement that the government has no other evidence is not only irrelevant to this proceeding but is also mistaken. The government accordingly wishes to correct any misimpression.”

Right, Jesse Liu is the lawyer who waived several conflict of interest issues concerning Mueller's appointment on the grounds she thought him too honorable a man to allow personal interests to effect his judgement. However, if you believe she is right, you should have no objection to the Justice Department taking a second look.

So you admit there is no CURRENT "ongoing" investigation for Ukraine to "cooperate" with!

 

[edthecynic]

So you admit it wasn't Biden who was being investigated
The investigation into the other players began and ended BEFORE Biden came on the scene.

is that what I said???or what you interpreted

Those are the facts, what Biden was "connected" to was investigated and the investigation was stopped BEFORE Biden became "connected." So yes when you say the connection to who and what was investigated you are unconsciously saying it wasn't Biden who was being investigated because he came on the scene after the fact. Unless you are implying the TRAMP lie that Biden was being investigated all along.

But it has everything to do with the QUID in Quid Pro Quo.

Wrong. The "cooperation" referred to has nothing to do with Biden.

It doesn't matter, it is STILL a Quid Pro Quo access to purchase Javelins for a favor.

Hmmm, no, there is no tangible connection between the javelins and investigating Biden. They are discussed in totally separate parts of the phone call.

Everything that came after the word "favor" was the Quo of Quid Pro Quo.

only according to you,,,

And ALL other honest people.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Exactly right. Zelensky thanked the President for all the aid the US has been providing and said he would soon like to order more Javelins, and President Trump thanked him for buying US products asked the "favor" of cooperating with ongoing US Justice Department investigations of Crowdstrike.

And to "look into" Biden.

BOTH show a quid pro quo where none is actually required.

The mere ASK is an abuse of power and a breach of campaign finance laws.

Nonsense, the US "asks" foreign governments to cooperate with US Justice Department investigations all the time. Biden clearly stated that he was demanding a quid pro quo by threatening to withhold $1 billion in Us aid if Ukraine did not immediately fire its chief prosecutor but there is absolutely no evidence that President Trump made any threats or offered any bribes.

 

[Lesh]

So you admit there is no CURRENT "ongoing" investigation for Ukraine to "cooperate" with!

And there was none when Biden pushed to get the corrupt prosecutor Shokin fired

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

In today’s politics everything is partisan. amazing

 

[OldLady]

But it has everything to do with the QUID in Quid Pro Quo.

Wrong. The "cooperation" referred to has nothing to do with Biden.

It doesn't matter, it is STILL a Quid Pro Quo access to purchase Javelins for a favor.

lol Not even close. Zelensky asked for the Javelins before Trump said anything about Crowdstrike or the Bidens.

And IMMEDIATELY after Zelensky asked to buy Javelins Tramp asked for his favor. QUID PRO QUO!

Again, not true. President Trump thanked him for buying US goods and then asked him the favor of cooperating with the US Justice Department's ongoing investigation of Crowdstrike. It is downright anti American of you to object to foreign leaders cooperating with criminal investigations by the US Justice Department.

What does Crowdstrike have to do with Biden & Son?

 

[edthecynic]

Exactly right. Zelensky thanked the President for all the aid the US has been providing and said he would soon like to order more Javelins, and President Trump thanked him for buying US products asked the "favor" of cooperating with ongoing US Justice Department investigations of Crowdstrike.

And to "look into" Biden.

BOTH show a quid pro quo where none is actually required.

The mere ASK is an abuse of power and a breach of campaign finance laws.

Nonsense, the US "asks" foreign governments to cooperate with US Justice Department investigations all the time. Biden clearly stated that he was demanding a quid pro quo by threatening to withhold $1 billion in Us aid if Ukraine did not immediately fire its chief prosecutor but there is absolutely no evidence that President Trump made any threats or offered any bribes.

Tramp didn't need to threaten, he ALREADY blocked the funds!

 

[edthecynic]

Wrong. The "cooperation" referred to has nothing to do with Biden.

It doesn't matter, it is STILL a Quid Pro Quo access to purchase Javelins for a favor.

lol Not even close. Zelensky asked for the Javelins before Trump said anything about Crowdstrike or the Bidens.

And IMMEDIATELY after Zelensky asked to buy Javelins Tramp asked for his favor. QUID PRO QUO!

Again, not true. President Trump thanked him for buying US goods and then asked him the favor of cooperating with the US Justice Department's ongoing investigation of Crowdstrike. It is downright anti American of you to object to foreign leaders cooperating with criminal investigations by the US Justice Department.

What does Crowdstrike have to do with Biden & Son?

It has to do with Tramp wanting favors from Zelenski, he didn't just want dirt on Biden, he wanted dirt on Hillary too. She still lives rent free in Tramp's fat head.

 

[progressive hunter]

So you admit there is no CURRENT "ongoing" investigation for Ukraine to "cooperate" with!

And there was none when Biden pushed to get the corrupt prosecutor Shokin fired

according to bidens own words there was a ONE BILLION DOLLAR quid pro quo

 

[toomuchtime_]

President Trump thanked him for buying US goods and then asked him the favor of cooperating with the US Justice Department's ongoing investigation of Crowdstrike.

BULLSHIT!
Looks like the investigation was over long before Tramp's favor to make up some dirt on Hillary.
DOJ: Government has independently verified CrowdStrike report blaming Russian hackers for DNC breach
By Andrew Blake - The Washington Times - Friday, June 21, 2019
The Department of Justice has corroborated a report by CrowdStrike, a private security firm hired by the Democratic National Committee, that concluded Russian hackers were responsible for breaching the DNC prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential race, federal prosecutors revealed Thursday.

Attorneys prosecuting the government’s case against Roger Stone, President Trump’s former campaign adviser, made the admission in a court filing entered in response to defense lawyers recently claiming that the Justice Department has failed to “independently verify” CrowdStrike’s findings.

“That statement is incorrect,” replied Jessie K. Liu, the U.S. Attorney for D.C.

“The government produced the CrowdStrike reports because the Indictment in this case referenced, as background, CrowdStrike’s statements about the DNC hack,” she wrote. “Stone’s statement that the government has no other evidence is not only irrelevant to this proceeding but is also mistaken. The government accordingly wishes to correct any misimpression.”

Right, Jesse Liu is the lawyer who waived several conflict of interest issues concerning Mueller's appointment on the grounds she thought him too honorable a man to allow personal interests to effect his judgement. However, if you believe she is right, you should have no objection to the Justice Department taking a second look.

So you admit there is no CURRENT "ongoing" investigation for Ukraine to "cooperate" with!

If course there is. Don't you read the news? Barr has announced that the Justice Department is examining all the people and all the actions related to the Trump-Russia hoax promulgated by the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign and widely supported by nearly all Democrats. Crowdstrike is certainly part of that.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Is it too soon to send Ms Pelosi a thank you card for giving Trump 2020?