BREAKING: Federal judge issues order halting deportation of Colorado antisemitic attack suspect’s family

MULTIPLE times courts have ruled that DACA is unlawful, but for some reason you guys continue to call on it.

No, they ruled Trump could over turn it but he had to do it legally but for whatever reason he will not.
 
No, they ruled Trump could over turn it but he had to do it legally but for whatever reason he will not.

Biden appealed the last decision. If it ever gets to the Supremes, it likely will get the final nail in it's coffin.
Like everything else involving deportation of any kind, you people put up road blocks every ******* step of the way.
 
Biden appealed the last decision. If it ever gets to the Supremes, it likely will get the final nail in it's coffin.
Like everything else involving deportation of any kind, you people put up road blocks every ******* step of the way.

It got to the Supreme Court. Look it up. I'm pretty sure I have nothing to do with Supreme Court decisions.
 
Wrong.
Asylum seeker have a right to live in the US because it is the US who caused their home to become unlivable.
Like the economic sanctions we illegally imposed on Venezuela.
They violate the 1906 Geneva Conventions we ratified into US law.

And wrong.
What "due process" means is a judicial review of the law and all the steps leading up to any action.
Deportation in the middle of a legal proceeding is totally illegal.

The reality is that most US citizens are descendants of illegal European invaders, and really have no right to be here at all, except that they were born here.
Thats lib nonsense

The No Borders crowd are full of it
 
{...
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
...}

It says no "person".
It says nothing about citizenship or not.
They never used the word citizenship in those times
 
Libs are going to make a mockery of a well-intentioned law to the determent of truly needy applicants

Harboring the family of an illegal alien firebomber!

You should be ashamed
You can't just pick and choose which laws to follow dumbass
 
Only if they had immediately applied for asylum upon entering the USA under our law. Under international law they don't qualify for political asylum because the USA isn't the nearest safe nation to their home.
That's for the court to decide.
 
It got to the Supreme Court. Look it up. I'm pretty sure I have nothing to do with Supreme Court decisions.

The actual case has not been argued in front of the Supreme Court. The case could move there soon.
 
And yet they are. Every single person in the US has the right to due process whether you want to rant over it or like it or not.

You, like the judge will soon find out, are wrong.
 
15th post
Wrong.
The father likely is just emotionally ill, and that has no reflection on the family at all.

Since Hamas is trying to liberate a country being stolen by Israel, it is impossible for them to be "terrorists".
They are justified in any retaliation they can do, and it is Menachim Begin who practically invented terrorism when he blew up the British peace keepers in the King David Hotel in 1946.
What you claim is like calling the French Resistance "terrorists" in WWII.
The bigger picture changes everything.
Israel is the guilty party.
^^^ This post is dipping B.S. ^^^

Good grief, what a pathetic argument.
 
Wrong.
Asylum seeker have a right to live in the US because it is the US who caused their home to become unlivable.

There you go with your non-existent rights again.

You should stop pulling non-existent rights out of your butt. It only makes you look foolish.

Like the economic sanctions we illegally imposed on Venezuela.
They violate the 1906 Geneva Conventions we ratified into US law.

Venezuela has a long history of expropriating US assets, going back to the mid-50's. They CHOOSE to be leftards, no one forced them to do that.

And wrong.
What "due process" means is a judicial review of the law and all the steps leading up to any action.
Deportation in the middle of a legal proceeding is totally illegal.

Really? Point us to the law.

The reality is that most US citizens are descendants of illegal European invaders, and really have no right to be here at all, except that they were born here.

History belongs to the winners, son. You better hope the US has enough clout to handle the CCP, otherwise you won't be allowed to whine anymore when Chairman Xi becomes your boss.

You obviously take your freedoms for granted. Maybe you should be forced to fight for them, then you'll be singing a different tune.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom