BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Police Lieutenant Who Shot and Killed Ashli Babbitt

Babbitt was entirely unarmed. So I'll put you down as also advocating for cops killing unarmed protesters. You DemoKKKrats are an incredibly brutal lot.
If those unarmed protesters are breaching a restricted area, and threatening the lives of multiple elected officials?

So you believe that warrants a lethal response? Think carefully...
 
The cop was doing his job.

Killing unarmed protesters is a cop's job? That's what you're going with? I'll be holding you to that, like, forever...
Many came with lead pipes, bats and other items useful for a violent assault and killing. The unarmed comment is disengenius when your patriot scum are ransacking the Capital looming for congress members and the VP to lynch.

Babbitt was entirely unarmed. So I'll put you down as also advocating for cops killing unarmed protesters. You DemoKKKrats are an incredibly brutal lot.
LOLOL

Suuure ... uh-huh ...



So which one is Babbitt and what weapon was she armed with?


She was armed with a Trump flag.
 
This ordeal involved the orange man bad, so people say she deserved it. And you know that im right.
Imagine if one of the people that broke into congress during the kavanaugh hearing got shot. Just imagine.... especially if it was a white cop shooting a black woman.
You conflate a single individual, who could have been stopped by other means, from the sprearhead of a mob, that by intelligence reports brought weapons into Washington DC for the purpose of breaching the capitol, and doing harm to the VP and other members of congress.
 
Excessive force was used.....no doubt about that. No excuse at all for using lethal force in that situation..

The cop that killed her was not even in the same room as his victim....he had to shoot through a window to kill her.
He shot her to stop her from breaching the gallery where the congressmen were behind sheltered from the mob. Had she gained further entry, she would have opened the door from the inside, thereby letting the mob into the gallery, before they could safely evacuate the members of congress.
 
This ordeal involved the orange man bad, so people say she deserved it. And you know that im right.
Imagine if one of the people that broke into congress during the kavanaugh hearing got shot. Just imagine.... especially if it was a white cop shooting a black woman.
You conflate a single individual, who could have been stopped by other means, from the sprearhead of a mob, that by intelligence reports brought weapons into Washington DC for the purpose of breaching the capitol, and doing harm to the VP and other members of congress.
No weapons fake news
 
Again, why was the Missouri couple arrested?

Brandishing.
How’s defending one’s property now brandishing?
I actually answered that question last year on the thread dedicated to it. Explained in detail and specificity. You're just TROLLING at this point.
Can’t wave castle doctrine then claim brandishing
Dumbfuck, the castle doctrine involves intruders in or on someone's personal property. The protesters they brandished guns at, while on private property, were not on the McClownskis private property.
 
Babbitt was entirely unarmed. So I'll put you down as also advocating for cops killing unarmed protesters. You DemoKKKrats are an incredibly brutal lot.
If those unarmed protesters are breaching a restricted area, and threatening the lives of multiple elected officials?
Congress was brandishing
d445b99984c06f24e63036ac81e7501a.gif
 
Ah, another Democrat advocating for cops shooting unarmed protesters. Where were you guys over last summer?

LOL
You leave out the important differences. Such as the rioters chanting their intention to kill a member of congress.
And then trying to break into restricted areas of the building to get that that member, and other members.
 
Just because it's a public building doesn't mean anyone can enter any area at any time. Case in point, the Oval Office is a public building -- try entering it uninvited. See how far you get before you're shot Ashli style.
So much for an open democratic government working for the people. The police state rolls on and some Americans have no problem with it.

Congress is a unique building. It is both a public building, that has within it Top Secret restricted areas. Which means entry into those restricted areas can be repelled by the force necessary to prevent entry.

In addition the area was an area being used to protect the members of congress from outside harm. Making it not just restricted by statute, but restricted by order of the secret service.
Murder was unnecessary. Don’t you think?
Not according to the preliminary investigation.
Yeah an investigation done by a corrupt government to protect government. Wake up.
 
The cop was doing his job.

Killing unarmed protesters is a cop's job? That's what you're going with? I'll be holding you to that, like, forever...
Many came with lead pipes, bats and other items useful for a violent assault and killing. The unarmed comment is disengenius when your patriot scum are ransacking the Capital looming for congress members and the VP to lynch.

Babbitt was entirely unarmed. So I'll put you down as also advocating for cops killing unarmed protesters. You DemoKKKrats are an incredibly brutal lot.
LOLOL

Suuure ... uh-huh ...



So which one is Babbitt and what weapon was she armed with?


She was armed with a Trump flag.

She didn't even have a flag--in the photo I saw, she was taking photos.
 
If those unarmed protesters are breaching a restricted area, and threatening the lives of multiple elected officials?
So you believe that warrants a lethal response? Think carefully...
Let me think. A mob, who by intelligence reports were armed and dangerous. Threatening the lives of multiple elected officials?

Lethal force was not only justified, but fully warranted. In fact, they should have shot more of them, to prevent them not just in the protection of congress members, but in security of their offices that contained classified materials.
 
In addition the area was an area being used to protect the members of congress from outside harm. Making it not just restricted by statute, but restricted by order of the secret service.
Murder was unnecessary. Don’t you think?
What do you think the crowd would have done if they got their hands on VP Mike Pence?

They already set up a gallows, and chanted "Hang Mike Pence"

What do you think they would have done had they been able to get inside in time to get to the Vice President?
Oh brother are you propagandized. You really think they would have murdered Pence? Yet, no one else got murdered by the demonstrators. Don’t be a dupe for a corrupt government and media.
 
Dumbfuck, the castle doctrine involves intruders in or on someone's personal property. The protesters they brandished guns at, while on private property, were not on the McClownskis private property.
The McClowskies were OUTSIDE of their castle.

The rule applies to people trying to get INSIDE the castle.
 
The cop was doing his job.
You just admited the months of violent and destructive riots were regarding media and politician incitement of "selective events" regarding "police officers doing their job" and making bad choices all creating a new twisted narrative for political tactical means.
Did any of those Dems get removed from office or from their news host jobs?-enough said.
They were "mostly peaceful" riots according to MSM.
 
The cop was doing his job.
You just admited the months of violent and destructive riots were regarding media and politician incitement of "selective events" regarding "police officers doing their job" and making bad choices all creating a new twisted narrative for political tactical means.
Did any of those Dems get removed from office or from their news host jobs?-enough said.
They were "mostly peaceful" riots according to MSM.
And that mob "mostly" survived.
 

Forum List

Back
Top