Breaking! E. Jean Carroll plagiarized her Trump’s rape story from an episode of Law &Order!

[schmidlap]

Yep! Manhattan voted 603,040 to 85,185 against Trump in 2020, so the chances are that all the jurors voted against Trump. If any Trump voter happened to be in the jury pool he was probably excluded from the jury. The goal may be to get a conviction on the flimsiest of grounds, knowing that it will be reversed on appeal, but allowing the Democrats to run against Trump as a "convicted rapist." Was the recent New York law suspending the statute of limitations adopted for the sole purpose of allowing this trial? It's starting to seem so. At least in this case Trump knows what he is being accused of. Bragg won't reveal what the other crime is for which he has indicted Trump.

Trump's bum kissers will merely supercharge their paranoia when he is found guilty of rape.

They are repulsed by a judicial system that allows a victim the opportunity to redress her having been victimized.

"When you’re a star,
they let you do it. You can do anything...
Grab 'em by the pussy!"​

 

[AMart]

Breaking! E. Jean Carroll plagiarized her Trump’s rape story from an episode of Law &Order!​

Let me make sure I have this straight. Carroll claims Trump assaulted her in the mid-90's, she told friends about it at the time. Those friends have submitted sworn affidavits to that effect and (I'm assuming will be testifying in court) that Carroll told them about the assault in the mid-90's.

So the claim is she plagiarized an episode of Law and Order that aired in 2012 when she confided in friends in the mid-90's.

How did Carroll watch the episode in 2012, then travel back in time to tell her younger self about it to concoct the scheme about Trump, so that she could tell the friends about it in the mid-90's so they could confirm her story from that time?

WW

Maybe they are lying?

 

[Blaster]

Trump's bum kissers will merely supercharge their paranoia when he is found guilty of rape.

​

Where is the proof?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Maybe they are lying?

And possibly not, that will be for the Jury to weigh.

WW

 

[Lesh]

Again…. Carroll told people about this rape in the 90s and they have signed affidavits to that effect.

The episode in question was written after 2000.

Must have used a Time Machine

 

[schmidlap]

Where is the proof?

Under America's system of jurisprudence, a jury of disinterested peers assesses the evidence and makes its determination.

Some don't like it, but that's the best advanced democracies have been able to achieve.

 

[The Duke]

Pick a lane, jack.

basque always picks the hammer lane and goes 50 mph in it.

 

[The Duke]

Trump's bum kissers will merely supercharge their paranoia when he is found guilty of rape.

They are repulsed by a judicial system that allows a victim the opportunity to redress her having been victimized.

View attachment 781504
"When you’re a star,
they let you do it. You can do anything...
Grab 'em by the pussy!"​

That's nice, honey. Odd how things like this happen early in every election and it's always the opposition

to Democrats that are accused of the most scandalous thing possible that could be cooked up, no?

 

[johngaltshrugged]

This woman needs to be committed or jailed.

Truth Social

Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.

truthsocial.com

Pedo Biden plagiarized his life from an episode of Mr. Magoo so anything goes now

 

[Blaster]

Under America's system of jurisprudence, a jury of disinterested peers assesses the evidence and makes its determination.

Some don't like it, but that's the best advanced democracies have been able to achieve.

What evidence?

 

[WorldWatcher]

What evidence?

Testimony.

WW

 

[Blaster]

Testimony.

WW

He said, she said.

 

[WorldWatcher]

He said, she said.

Which will be up to the jury to weigh.

WW

 

[schmidlap]

That's nice, honey. Odd how things like this happen early in every election and it's always the opposition

to Democrats that are accused of the most scandalous thing possible that could be cooked up, no?

You can indulge your paranoia up the ying-yang if you need to.

If your anointed one is being subjected to our legal system in several diverse venues and his legal counsel is impotent in mounting a credible defense, it must be because everyone is just being mean to him.

"WHAAAA!"​

 

[schmidlap]

What evidence?

If there is no evidence to present to the jury, a case is summarily dismissed.

 

[The Duke]

You can indulge your paranoia up the ying-yang if you need to.

If your anointed one is being subjected to our legal system in several diverse venues and his legal counsel is impotent in mounting a credible defense, it must be because everyone is just being mean to him.

View attachment 781507
"WHAAAA!"​

It's not paranoia when Democrats try to do it every chance they get for years and years.

It's called a worn out tactic.

 

[Blaster]

If there is no evidence to present to the jury, a case is summarily dismissed.

Not always.

 

[WorldWatcher]

A jury will decide if there is no real evidence?

#1 Testimony is real evidence. (Maybe the terms you are looking for is "forensic evidence" or "documentary evidence"?)

#2 Yes, the jury will decide based on the evidence presented (incriminating and exculpatory).

WW

 

[Blaster]

#1 Testimony is real evidence.

#2 Yes, the jury will decide based on the evidence presented (incriminating and exculpatory).

WW

Fundamental flaws within the jury system make the US criminal justice…

Fundamental flaws within the jury system make the US criminal justice system unfair.

www.kialo.com

 

[WorldWatcher]

Fundamental flaws within the jury system make the US criminal justice…

Fundamental flaws within the jury system make the US criminal justice system unfair.

www.kialo.com

OK, replace the system. Reality though is that the case is in court right now under the current system.

WW