The fact that there was never any proof of ANY wrong-doing doesn't seem to bother some people at all since they already "know" what they want to believe anyway.
Remember, this isn't a court of law so the "company," the NFL in this case makes the rules.
What kind of evidence would you want? We know that the balls were deflated, that is fact. Now the only question, and there really isn't a question, who would want those balls deflated? The ball boy or Brady?
The league's evidence against Brady centers on three main points: 1) his reaction to the condition of game balls used in a Week 7 game against the New York Jets in October, 2) how he interacted with McNally and Jastremski following subsequent games, and 3) how he communicated with the two after Deflategate exploded.
The report points to evidence of Brady's interest and knowledge of ball inflation levels as early as October 2014, several months before the AFC Championship game. In
a text message exchange between McNally and Jastremski following a game against the Jets, Brady is portrayed as angry about the condition of the footballs (NSFW language below):
Read more:
NFL evidence against Tom Brady in Deflategate - Business Insider
I can't wait until I see my sons' team, the Steelers, get thrashed on opening day. Should set the tone for the rest of Pittsburghs' season..........
.
Another hater of success of a blue collar team, sad.
But there is hope. EA sports predicted the last super bowl down to the actual score.
'#Madden16' trailer predicts Steelers Super Bowl win over Cardinals
I think they are banking on the popularity of the Steelers. Who know maybe they will be in seventh heaven next year.
