RE: Boycott Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
BLUF: When we say Illegitimate, which is what Ms Noura Erakat is driving towards in your noted segment, something that is somehow "improper or outside the acceptable protocol." When we talk about Legitimacy, we are talking about "lawfulness." When she says that we are challenging Israel's legitimacy, she is in effect, challenging in an entirely different way from the rather innocent-sounding proposition she expresses.
Yes, of course, the Arab Palestinians want to change the narrative → turning it in their favor. In any argument, that is a legitimate strategy. But in every strategy to reshape the narrative, there is something the orator is trying to hide from view. And no matter how eloquent and skilled public speaker (for which legal eagles are all about), you cannot hide the simple fact that the Arab Palestinians never once, in the last thirty years, tried to use the peaceful conflict resolution processes. Instead, their official policy has been reiterated over and over again:
They are hiding the fact that Hostile Arab Palestinians have a distinct history of criminal activity and pattern of deadly hostile behaviors that have perpetuated the conflict to the point that it might have hit its terminal velocity (irrecoverable). Not only are the Arab Palestinian advocates trying to sugarcoat the fact that the Arab Palestinians have been kidnappers and murders, suicide bombers, aircraft hijackers, pirates aboard MS Achille Lauro, indiscriminate rocket launchers, and those that set aloft incendiary devices; BUT in recent month, the Hostile Arab Palestinians have called upon Arab Palestinians to again start a campaign of bombings.
No matter how reasonable Ms Erakat sounds, the word of mouth out of the Arab Palestinians is a call for violence and the removal of all Jews from their area of control.
Most Respectfully,
R
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
BLUF: When we say Illegitimate, which is what Ms Noura Erakat is driving towards in your noted segment, something that is somehow "improper or outside the acceptable protocol." When we talk about Legitimacy, we are talking about "lawfulness." When she says that we are challenging Israel's legitimacy, she is in effect, challenging in an entirely different way from the rather innocent-sounding proposition she expresses.
(COMMENT)I don't know if you watched this video or not. (probably not) If I can bring to your attention to the segments that start @ 114:30 and 122:00 then we can discuss.
Yes, of course, the Arab Palestinians want to change the narrative → turning it in their favor. In any argument, that is a legitimate strategy. But in every strategy to reshape the narrative, there is something the orator is trying to hide from view. And no matter how eloquent and skilled public speaker (for which legal eagles are all about), you cannot hide the simple fact that the Arab Palestinians never once, in the last thirty years, tried to use the peaceful conflict resolution processes. Instead, their official policy has been reiterated over and over again:
◈ Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.
◈ There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad.
They are hiding the fact that Hostile Arab Palestinians have a distinct history of criminal activity and pattern of deadly hostile behaviors that have perpetuated the conflict to the point that it might have hit its terminal velocity (irrecoverable). Not only are the Arab Palestinian advocates trying to sugarcoat the fact that the Arab Palestinians have been kidnappers and murders, suicide bombers, aircraft hijackers, pirates aboard MS Achille Lauro, indiscriminate rocket launchers, and those that set aloft incendiary devices; BUT in recent month, the Hostile Arab Palestinians have called upon Arab Palestinians to again start a campaign of bombings.
No matter how reasonable Ms Erakat sounds, the word of mouth out of the Arab Palestinians is a call for violence and the removal of all Jews from their area of control.
Most Respectfully,
R