Boycott Israel

When chief BDS-hole goes full hypocrite...

McQFmci3nYjk21bJIKJ5-ii4-fMM0GOlB1xpVeq6Ny4.png
 
To resolve a lawsuit targeting the pro-BDS National Lawyers Guild, the organization agreed not boycott Israel and adopt a new non-discrimination policy.

(full article online)

As part of the settlement, NLG has agreed to publish an advertisement for Abrams’ company in its next journal, but it will not include the name of any settlement “nor make any claims that such settlements are part of Israel.”

NLG will also “clarify and reaffirm its policy opposing all forms of discrimination and circulate it to members.”

“We’re pleased to end this time-consuming lawsuit for a payment of zero dollars and get back to our urgent work ensuring that vulnerable populations across the globe have access to housing, healthcare, income and other basic human rights,” said Pooja Gehi, executive director of NLG.

Gehi added that the organization maintains its commitment to Palestinian liberation, including the BDS movement.

 
The story could actually end here: After all, the EU, as a generous donor, can determine the conditions under which it distributes the millions of taxpayers' money - compliance with the anti-terrorism guidelines should be a basic requirement.


But instead of pointing out that the Palestinian NGOs should either stay away from terrorist groups or look for new sponsors, the EU apparently met the Palestinian demands. Several EU representatives assured the PNGO that nothing would change in the current funding practice, as the organization NGO Monitor documented.

(full article online)

 
RE: Boycott Israel
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

BLUF: The EU is, by its very nature, a combine that examines its consequences relative to the ethical theories of the day; YET, is more often than not, motivated to act in its own best economic and political interests. While a half-century ago, most of the nations that make-up the EU would follow America's lead, which is no longer the case. So it doesn't follow anymore → but is its own leader, finding a path that is reflective of their needs.

(COMMENT)

At the end of the day, the EU will have to decide its own course of action. What America wants or does not want simply doesn't play anymore.

1589969410040.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
The story could actually end here: After all, the EU, as a generous donor, can determine the conditions under which it distributes the millions of taxpayers' money - compliance with the anti-terrorism guidelines should be a basic requirement.


But instead of pointing out that the Palestinian NGOs should either stay away from terrorist groups or look for new sponsors, the EU apparently met the Palestinian demands. Several EU representatives assured the PNGO that nothing would change in the current funding practice, as the organization NGO Monitor documented.

(full article online)

I have not seen any proof that these NGOs have passed any money to a so called terrorist group.
 
The story could actually end here: After all, the EU, as a generous donor, can determine the conditions under which it distributes the millions of taxpayers' money - compliance with the anti-terrorism guidelines should be a basic requirement.


But instead of pointing out that the Palestinian NGOs should either stay away from terrorist groups or look for new sponsors, the EU apparently met the Palestinian demands. Several EU representatives assured the PNGO that nothing would change in the current funding practice, as the organization NGO Monitor documented.

(full article online)

I have not seen any proof that these NGOs have passed any money to a so called terrorist group.

No such need, they publish the funding reports themselves.
The founders and staff of these NGO's are members of terrorist groups,
who funnel aid. Funding such organization is illegal under international law.

Read the article.
 
The story could actually end here: After all, the EU, as a generous donor, can determine the conditions under which it distributes the millions of taxpayers' money - compliance with the anti-terrorism guidelines should be a basic requirement.


But instead of pointing out that the Palestinian NGOs should either stay away from terrorist groups or look for new sponsors, the EU apparently met the Palestinian demands. Several EU representatives assured the PNGO that nothing would change in the current funding practice, as the organization NGO Monitor documented.

(full article online)

I have not seen any proof that these NGOs have passed any money to a so called terrorist group.

No such need, they publish the funding reports themselves.
The founders and staff of these NGO's are members of terrorist groups,
who funnel aid. Funding such organization is illegal under international law.

Read the article.
That was not the question.
 

Forum List

Back
Top