Boulder passes sweeping anti gun bill

[Montrovant]

The Boulder City Council unanimously passed a sweeping gun control ordinance Tuesday night banning “assault weapons” and bump stocks, even as a pro-Second Amendment group threatened to retaliate by suing individual councilmembers.

Boulder Passes Sweeping Anti-Gun Bill
-------------------------------

What you think won't pass don't get on it esp. when you have a state full of pussies who are afraid of guns even if it's a picture of one.

The assault weapon ban is, in fact, unConstitutional.....the Supreme Court ruled on this in D.C v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts and Scalia made it clear that semi automatic rifles, specifically Ar-15s are protected by the 2nd Amendmemt in his dissent in Friedman v Highland Park. You can also check out Miller v United States and Cruickshank v United States....

They can pass it and the left wing circuit can allow it, but the Supreme Court has already ruled on it.....

It's odd to cite a dissent, since that is by definition disagreeing with the ruling of the court.

 

[MindWars]

View attachment 193952

The United Nations knows better than to rile Americans over gun control, but that has not stopped them from quietly discussing how to do an end-run around the U.S. Constitution with crippling rules and regulations. Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, has no room for resistance of self-defense. ⁃ TN Editor
The United Nations’ International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) is finishing up their Global Week of Action Against Gun Violence. According to IANSA, the goal of the week-long meeting is “for us to advocate collectively for an end to illicit trade and misuse of small arms and light weapons.”

We all know what that really means: the United Nations presumes they have authority over every human being on earth, and as such, seeks to ban guns from the slaves they want to control. Of course, they aren’t going to come right out and say it just it. It took liberals decades before they simply admitted what we already knew: they are coming for our guns.

According to Townhall, the week-long initiative took place one month before the Third ......

United Nations Is Quietly Pushing International Gun Control

The United Nations is quietly behind a LOT of things here. I believe they can even send an army here now and arrest a US citizen, etc., for an international crime with no due process through our own courts. Imagine having UN soldiers come to your door arresting you for crimes in another country? One thing I've followed closely is their "Agenda 21" which is an action to put smart-meters on everyone's home allowing them to not only collect data on what you do 24 hours a day (how you live, when you're home) but to turn your power off or limit it at will, without even sending a person to your house.

Keep an eye on agenda 2030 and 2050 too.

 

[Ringel05]

so - boulder outlaws it and they go to denver to get it?

You lost me also. If you are talking about AR-15's you can buy them in any, and every gun shop in Colorado. I don't think there are even any gun shops in Boulder anymore, but if they are I guess they'll have to stop selling them temporarily.

sorry to both - i was saying if i read the statement correctly, boulder could outlaw XYZ guns but Denver would not?

ie - i live in boulder and they outlaw the AR15, can't i just go to denver and get it now then?

Because they're also outlawed in Denver....... Supposedly.

 

[Pilot1]

Because they're also outlawed in Denver....... Supposedly.

It supposedly isn't enforced, just like the 15 round mag capacity limit. I would never advise breaking the law though.

 

[2aguy]

The Boulder City Council unanimously passed a sweeping gun control ordinance Tuesday night banning “assault weapons” and bump stocks, even as a pro-Second Amendment group threatened to retaliate by suing individual councilmembers.

Boulder Passes Sweeping Anti-Gun Bill
-------------------------------

What you think won't pass don't get on it esp. when you have a state full of pussies who are afraid of guns even if it's a picture of one.

The assault weapon ban is, in fact, unConstitutional.....the Supreme Court ruled on this in D.C v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts and Scalia made it clear that semi automatic rifles, specifically Ar-15s are protected by the 2nd Amendmemt in his dissent in Friedman v Highland Park. You can also check out Miller v United States and Cruickshank v United States....

They can pass it and the left wing circuit can allow it, but the Supreme Court has already ruled on it.....

It's odd to cite a dissent, since that is by definition disagreeing with the ruling of the court.

The Dissent was due to the rest of the Supreme Court not granting Cert. on Friedman v Highland Park.....letting the 7th circuits ruling stand, even though it was in violation of the 2nd amendment and the actual rulings of the Supreme Court on the issue....the Dissent stated what Scalia meant in D.C v Heller and the other rulings on which weapons were protected.....he stated this to show that the 7th was wrong, and that the Supreme Court was wrong in not bitch slapping the 7th.

When anti gunners say that Scalia allowed banning AR-15s in Heller, which he did not, he makes it clear he didn't in this dissent....

From Friedman v Highland Park on the AR-15 rifle...and semi automatic rifles in general.....so when you hear calls for banning semi automatic rifles, the Supreme Court already ruled that unConstitutional...

The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes. Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

 

[toobfreak]

View attachment 193952

The United Nations knows better than to rile Americans over gun control, but that has not stopped them from quietly discussing how to do an end-run around the U.S. Constitution with crippling rules and regulations. Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, has no room for resistance of self-defense. ⁃ TN Editor
The United Nations’ International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) is finishing up their Global Week of Action Against Gun Violence. According to IANSA, the goal of the week-long meeting is “for us to advocate collectively for an end to illicit trade and misuse of small arms and light weapons.”

We all know what that really means: the United Nations presumes they have authority over every human being on earth, and as such, seeks to ban guns from the slaves they want to control. Of course, they aren’t going to come right out and say it just it. It took liberals decades before they simply admitted what we already knew: they are coming for our guns.

According to Townhall, the week-long initiative took place one month before the Third ......

United Nations Is Quietly Pushing International Gun Control

The United Nations is quietly behind a LOT of things here. I believe they can even send an army here now and arrest a US citizen, etc., for an international crime with no due process through our own courts. Imagine having UN soldiers come to your door arresting you for crimes in another country? One thing I've followed closely is their "Agenda 21" which is an action to put smart-meters on everyone's home allowing them to not only collect data on what you do 24 hours a day (how you live, when you're home) but to turn your power off or limit it at will, without even sending a person to your house.

Keep an eye on agenda 2030 and 2050 too.

Are you kidding me? These commie assholes produce more bullshit paperwork enough to depopulate the Brazilian rain-forest. End hunger, end poverty? Who do these idiots think they are kidding? I wouldn't trust these moron socialists 5 feet to wipe their own asses much less cure all the ills of my life for me.

 

[2aguy]

[
They can pass it and the left wing circuit can allow it, but the Supreme Court has already ruled on it.....

It should get overturned by the State. Also, if it for whatever reason made it to the SC, they may refuse to hear it, the cowards they are.

The problem with the Supreme Court is you have 4 anti gun, left wing activists....ginsburg, sotomayor, kagan, and breyer and then 4 real Justices....Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and usually Roberts.... and 1 nut who votes depending on how he feels...kennedy.....so the anti gunners and the Constitutional Justices don't think they have a 5th vote to rule one way or the other because of kennedy...and they won't take the risk.....

This is why Trump appointing 2-3, more Justices is vital to protecting the 2nd Amendment.

 

[Montrovant]

The Boulder City Council unanimously passed a sweeping gun control ordinance Tuesday night banning “assault weapons” and bump stocks, even as a pro-Second Amendment group threatened to retaliate by suing individual councilmembers.

Boulder Passes Sweeping Anti-Gun Bill
-------------------------------

What you think won't pass don't get on it esp. when you have a state full of pussies who are afraid of guns even if it's a picture of one.

The assault weapon ban is, in fact, unConstitutional.....the Supreme Court ruled on this in D.C v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts and Scalia made it clear that semi automatic rifles, specifically Ar-15s are protected by the 2nd Amendmemt in his dissent in Friedman v Highland Park. You can also check out Miller v United States and Cruickshank v United States....

They can pass it and the left wing circuit can allow it, but the Supreme Court has already ruled on it.....

It's odd to cite a dissent, since that is by definition disagreeing with the ruling of the court.

The Dissent was due to the rest of the Supreme Court not granting Cert. on Friedman v Highland Park.....letting the 7th circuits ruling stand, even though it was in violation of the 2nd amendment and the actual rulings of the Supreme Court on the issue....the Dissent stated what Scalia meant in D.C v Heller and the other rulings on which weapons were protected.....he stated this to show that the 7th was wrong, and that the Supreme Court was wrong in not bitch slapping the 7th.

When anti gunners say that Scalia allowed banning AR-15s in Heller, which he did not, he makes it clear he didn't in this dissent....

From Friedman v Highland Park on the AR-15 rifle...and semi automatic rifles in general.....so when you hear calls for banning semi automatic rifles, the Supreme Court already ruled that unConstitutional...

The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes. Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

My point is that a person could find all sorts of things they agree with in dissents, but they don't mean all that much because they are dissents.

 

[Pilot1]

The problem with the Supreme Court is you have 4 anti gun, left wing activists....ginsburg, sotomayor, kagan, and breyer and then 4 real Justices....Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and usually Roberts.... and 1 nut who votes depending on how he feels...kennedy.....so the anti gunners and the Constitutional Justices don't think they have a 5th vote to rule one way or the other because of kennedy...and they won't take the risk.....

This is why Trump appointing 2-3, more Justices is vital to protecting the 2nd Amendment.

That makes a lot of sense. You can't tell which way Kennedy will go. He fortunately went the Constitutional way for Heller. I thought I heard Kennedy was making noise about retiring.

 

[2aguy]

The Boulder City Council unanimously passed a sweeping gun control ordinance Tuesday night banning “assault weapons” and bump stocks, even as a pro-Second Amendment group threatened to retaliate by suing individual councilmembers.

Boulder Passes Sweeping Anti-Gun Bill
-------------------------------

What you think won't pass don't get on it esp. when you have a state full of pussies who are afraid of guns even if it's a picture of one.

The assault weapon ban is, in fact, unConstitutional.....the Supreme Court ruled on this in D.C v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts and Scalia made it clear that semi automatic rifles, specifically Ar-15s are protected by the 2nd Amendmemt in his dissent in Friedman v Highland Park. You can also check out Miller v United States and Cruickshank v United States....

They can pass it and the left wing circuit can allow it, but the Supreme Court has already ruled on it.....

It's odd to cite a dissent, since that is by definition disagreeing with the ruling of the court.

The Dissent was due to the rest of the Supreme Court not granting Cert. on Friedman v Highland Park.....letting the 7th circuits ruling stand, even though it was in violation of the 2nd amendment and the actual rulings of the Supreme Court on the issue....the Dissent stated what Scalia meant in D.C v Heller and the other rulings on which weapons were protected.....he stated this to show that the 7th was wrong, and that the Supreme Court was wrong in not bitch slapping the 7th.

When anti gunners say that Scalia allowed banning AR-15s in Heller, which he did not, he makes it clear he didn't in this dissent....

From Friedman v Highland Park on the AR-15 rifle...and semi automatic rifles in general.....so when you hear calls for banning semi automatic rifles, the Supreme Court already ruled that unConstitutional...

The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes. Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

My point is that a person could find all sorts of things they agree with in dissents, but they don't mean all that much because they are dissents.

That would be wrong, since Scalia is using that particular dissent on not hearing the Case to point out exactly what he meant when he wrote the opinion in Heller...this is not a dissent in a case someone lost, it is a dissent on the Court not hearing a case.....Scalia uses it to tell the 7th circuit they are wrong, and why they are wrong.

 

[2aguy]

The problem with the Supreme Court is you have 4 anti gun, left wing activists....ginsburg, sotomayor, kagan, and breyer and then 4 real Justices....Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and usually Roberts.... and 1 nut who votes depending on how he feels...kennedy.....so the anti gunners and the Constitutional Justices don't think they have a 5th vote to rule one way or the other because of kennedy...and they won't take the risk.....

This is why Trump appointing 2-3, more Justices is vital to protecting the 2nd Amendment.

That makes a lot of sense. You can't tell which way Kennedy will go. He fortunately went the Constitutional way for Heller. I thought I heard Kennedy was making noise about retiring.

One can only hope he retires...and that Trump gets to appoint his replacement.....right now the court is just back to where it was before Scalia died...we need 2-3 justices to actual make the Court a real court again..