'Botched': Arizona GOP's ballot count ends, troubles persist

Because it's a bullshit audit by "stop the steal" trumplicans. Arizona's already done a recount and held two other audits. Those weren't good enough for rightards because they didn't find fraud. So how many audits do they need to do? How long do they need to drag this on? When is enough, enough?
LOL!! Your whining reminds me of the constant democrat claims of Russian Collusion and Russian Interference in the 2016 election. From low-IQ Maxine's "not my president", to Schiff's lies about seeing evidence, to Comey's saying Hillary lacked "intent" for her illegal server, to two bullshit impeachments, to the "resist" movement, to Pelosi's raw hatred, to the FBI's Operations Crossfire-Hurricane and Razor, to deep state "whistleblowers", to Rosenstein offering to wear a wire, to the Mueller "Investigation", I could go on and on, but Trump endured a lot of partisan bullshit, so if Xiden needs to wait out a few audits, just tough it out like Trump did.
 
There's nothing to hide. There's been no fraud found beyond typical sporadic cases. Alk Republicans are doing is injecting doubt into our election process to make it more difficult for people to vote.

They are trying to seize power in this country. For example, in Texas, areas that support the regime gets more polling places while areas that don't support the regime get fewer polling places.
 
Like the Russia collusion Hoax?
Like two impeachments without crimes?
Like FBI operations Crossfire and Razor?
Like the faux Mueller "Investigation"?
Like the MSM's constant 95% negative coverage and "fake news"?

The AZ audit findings have NOT even been published yet, we'll see if they can prove voter fraud or not.
And the answer to all that is to have your own hoax? How is that a reasonable stance?
 
Rosenstein is no Republican, he's either "deep state" or a Never-Trumper, either way it was the DOJ/FBI that setup Operations Crossfire & Razor to illegally spy on Trump. Also remember it was Rosenstein that offered to wear a wire to 25th Trump's ass. Some kinda "Republican", huh?

Mueller was also no "Republican", he and his team of democrats only looked into Trump and totally ignored Hillary's obvious collusion with Russia for the Steele Dossier. He didn't even know who FusionGPS was. Some "investigation".

As far as democrat voter fraud. I have two examples for you:

In your first article:


Murren said the GOP legislators "have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge." The spokeswoman for Boockvar said it was unclear what data was cited by the Republicans, insisting that the "only way" to determine the number of active voters from the SURE system is through the vote histories, which she stressed were not fully up to date.

"At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler, and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters," Murren said. "The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary."


On the issue of whether there were fewer votes cast in the presidential race than for the election at-large, Murren said it is "quite common to have significant 'undervotes' for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn't a U.S. Senate race on the ballot." She pointed to the 2000 election when Rick Santorum received 200,000 more votes in his Senate race than George W. Bush got in the presidential contest, but the Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.

"This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis," she added
 
Please define "sham" audit.

You failed to do so in your last useless reply.
I would refer you to the points raised in the OP.
Overall the lack of credibility undermines everything that they do.
If they actually find anything they would need to send in a competent team to examine it.

Above all auditors are supposed to be fair and open minded. These people are the opposite of that.
 
I would refer you to the points raised in the OP.
Overall the lack of credibility undermines everything that they do.
If they actually find anything they would need to send in a competent team to examine it.
Above all auditors are supposed to be fair and open minded. These people are the opposite of that.
This is simply Kabuki Theater. It keeps the rubes engaged, angry and tithing to Trump, who's swimming in cash from conning the flock again. He's the master.

And when it goes into the shitter, they're going to claim victimhood there too, blaming the Deep State or the Chinese or the RINOs or the Dems or whatever. It doesn't matter.

And right on cue, the rubes are as fired up and engaged as ever. You have to admit, it's a pretty smart plan. If you're not worried about that whole "American democracy as a beacon for the free world" thing.
 
Last edited:
And the answer to all that is to have your own hoax? How is that a reasonable stance?
Slinging shit at the political opposition is the "new normal", thanks to the democrats' raw hatred for Trump.
Vast amounts of voter fraud might be true, who knows.
After all of the shit the dems threw at Trump the last 4-years, whining about a few audits sounds infantile.
 
In your first article:


Murren said the GOP legislators "have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge." The spokeswoman for Boockvar said it was unclear what data was cited by the Republicans, insisting that the "only way" to determine the number of active voters from the SURE system is through the vote histories, which she stressed were not fully up to date.

"At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler, and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters," Murren said. "The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary."


On the issue of whether there were fewer votes cast in the presidential race than for the election at-large, Murren said it is "quite common to have significant 'undervotes' for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn't a U.S. Senate race on the ballot." She pointed to the 2000 election when Rick Santorum received 200,000 more votes in his Senate race than George W. Bush got in the presidential contest, but the Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.

"This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis," she added
My take away from that excerpt is that the cities of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh have not uploaded their vote records into the SURE system yet, why not?
Saying that its normal for presidential votes without down ballot votes is total bullshit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top