Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11

[Denizen]

Donald Trump promised in his election campaign to expose the truth about 9/11 but Trump has since aligned himself with a principal suspect, Saudi Arabia demonstrating again that money talks and bullshit walks.

It is certainly time for all the information and evidence to be publicly exposed to allow analysis and scrutiny by experts and the public.

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11
TOPICS:FBIMatt AgoristSeptember 11th
MARCH 27, 2019
By Matt Agorist
In yet another major move from the great folks over at the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, a joint federal lawsuit has been filed to assess any evidence the FBI may have known about that contributed to the destruction of the towers on 9/11 which they may have kept from Congress.
The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:

1. the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
2. the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
3. terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
4. recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
5. video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
6. cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.

According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts.
As TFTP previously reported, a monumental step forward in the relentless pursuit of 9/11 truth took place last December when a United States Attorney agreed to comply with federal law requiring submission to a Special Grand Jury of evidence that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers. Then, earlier this month, the group behind the submission, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information related to the use of said explosives.
According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.
A names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.
As TFTP reported in December, for the first time since 9/11 the federal government is taking steps to hear evidence that explosives may have been used to destroy the world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry successfully submitted a petition to the federal government demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7).
After waiting months for the reply, the U.S. Attorney responded in a letter, noting that they will comply with the law.
“We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman stated.
According to the petition, dozens of exhibits were presented as evidence that explosives were used to destroy all three world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC Towers on 9/11. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of seeing and hearing explosions at the World Trade Center on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 both prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis and testimony by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of these three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The July 30th Amended Petition included the same evidence but also addressed several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition. ...

 

[sparky]

Did you know the NYFD was under gag order?

hmmmmm.......

~S~

 

[Denizen]

Did you know the NYFD was under gag order?

hmmmmm.......

~S~

By who? Dirty Rudi?

 

[sparky]

Ex-CIA Chief James Woolsey handed down gag-order to 9/11 Firefighters

so ask yourself, what were the NYFD trained to do, especially after witness to an attack?

~S~

 

[candycorn]

Donald Trump promised in his election campaign to expose the truth about 9/11 but Trump has since aligned himself with a principal suspect, Saudi Arabia demonstrating again that money talks and bullshit walks.

It is certainly time for all the information and evidence to be publicly exposed to allow analysis and scrutiny by experts and the public.

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11
TOPICS:FBIMatt AgoristSeptember 11th
MARCH 27, 2019
By Matt Agorist
In yet another major move from the great folks over at the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, a joint federal lawsuit has been filed to assess any evidence the FBI may have known about that contributed to the destruction of the towers on 9/11 which they may have kept from Congress.
The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:

1. the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
2. the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
3. terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
4. recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
5. video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
6. cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.

According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts.
As TFTP previously reported, a monumental step forward in the relentless pursuit of 9/11 truth took place last December when a United States Attorney agreed to comply with federal law requiring submission to a Special Grand Jury of evidence that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers. Then, earlier this month, the group behind the submission, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information related to the use of said explosives.
According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.
A names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.
As TFTP reported in December, for the first time since 9/11 the federal government is taking steps to hear evidence that explosives may have been used to destroy the world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry successfully submitted a petition to the federal government demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7).
After waiting months for the reply, the U.S. Attorney responded in a letter, noting that they will comply with the law.
“We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman stated.
According to the petition, dozens of exhibits were presented as evidence that explosives were used to destroy all three world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC Towers on 9/11. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of seeing and hearing explosions at the World Trade Center on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 both prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis and testimony by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of these three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The July 30th Amended Petition included the same evidence but also addressed several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition. ...

So...they planted explosives....and on the day they were going to detonate them, there were 4 planes hijacked and two of them hit 2 of the buildings?

Its such bullshit. Really dude, try harder.

 

[sparky]

Its such bullshit.

9/11's modus operandi

when the gub'mit finally declassifies it all in 2051, everyone involved will be pushin' up daisies, and nobody will care

~S~

 

[candycorn]

Its such bullshit.

9/11's modus operandi

when the gub'mit finally declassifies it all in 2051, everyone involved will be pushin' up daisies, and nobody will care

~S~

Nobody cares now except to render the obvious assessment; there were no bombs planted.

 

[sparky]

Its such bullshit.

9/11's modus operandi

when the gub'mit finally declassifies it all in 2051, everyone involved will be pushin' up daisies, and nobody will care

~S~

Nobody cares now except to render the obvious assessment; there were no bombs planted.

Because....... the same group who failed using expolosives in the '93 attack wouldn't consider making the same mistake twice Candy?

~S~

 

[candycorn]

Its such bullshit.

9/11's modus operandi

when the gub'mit finally declassifies it all in 2051, everyone involved will be pushin' up daisies, and nobody will care

~S~

Nobody cares now except to render the obvious assessment; there were no bombs planted.

Because....... the same group who failed using expolosives in the '93 attack wouldn't consider making the same mistake twice Candy?

~S~

Probably correct; why use the same method when it failed once already?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The CIA managed to crash the planes into the precise floors that were wired to explode?

Or are we only talking about 7 WTC?

 

[MisterBeale]

The CIA managed to crash the planes into the precise floors that were wired to explode?

Or are we only talking about 7 WTC?

The planes were under computerized control.

Back then, it was hard for folks to comprehend, since drones were in it's infancy. Today, folks would by like. . . duh. . .


Pilots for truth have all said that no human could do those maneuvers.

 

[MisterBeale]

FBI and DOJ Sued for Failure to Report 9/11 Evidence to Congress - PaulCraigRoberts.org

FBI and Department of Justice Sued for Failure To Perform Duties To Report Known 9/11 Attack Evidence To Congress

Breaking: Families, Lawyers, AE911Truth to File Lawsuit against FBI over '9/11 Review Commission Report'

https://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/LC-Press-Release-3-25-2019.pdf

 

[MisterBeale]

Its such bullshit.

9/11's modus operandi

when the gub'mit finally declassifies it all in 2051, everyone involved will be pushin' up daisies, and nobody will care

~S~

Nobody cares now except to render the obvious assessment; there were no bombs planted.

Because....... the same group who failed using expolosives in the '93 attack wouldn't consider making the same mistake twice Candy?

~S~

Probably correct; why use the same method when it failed once already?

Because 19 years of war on a false premise is enough.

 

[candycorn]

Its such bullshit.

9/11's modus operandi

when the gub'mit finally declassifies it all in 2051, everyone involved will be pushin' up daisies, and nobody will care

~S~

Nobody cares now except to render the obvious assessment; there were no bombs planted.

Because....... the same group who failed using expolosives in the '93 attack wouldn't consider making the same mistake twice Candy?

~S~

Probably correct; why use the same method when it failed once already?

Because 19 years of war on a false premise is enough.

One had nothing to do with the other. The mis-management and false narratives of the war by our leaders (Bush, Obama, Trump) does not change the fact that 19 men from the Middle East steered 4 planes into 3 buildings and one field in rural Pennsylvania. There were no bombs in any of the buildings.

 

[MisterBeale]

9/11's modus operandi

when the gub'mit finally declassifies it all in 2051, everyone involved will be pushin' up daisies, and nobody will care

~S~

Nobody cares now except to render the obvious assessment; there were no bombs planted.

Because....... the same group who failed using expolosives in the '93 attack wouldn't consider making the same mistake twice Candy?

~S~

Probably correct; why use the same method when it failed once already?

Because 19 years of war on a false premise is enough.

One had nothing to do with the other. The mis-management and false narratives of the war by our leaders (Bush, Obama, Trump) does not change the fact that 19 men from the Middle East steered 4 planes into 3 buildings and one field in rural Pennsylvania. There were no bombs in any of the buildings.

There is as much proof that there were 19 men that flew those plans as there were explosives in those buildings.

 

[candycorn]

Nobody cares now except to render the obvious assessment; there were no bombs planted.

Because....... the same group who failed using expolosives in the '93 attack wouldn't consider making the same mistake twice Candy?

~S~

Probably correct; why use the same method when it failed once already?

Because 19 years of war on a false premise is enough.

One had nothing to do with the other. The mis-management and false narratives of the war by our leaders (Bush, Obama, Trump) does not change the fact that 19 men from the Middle East steered 4 planes into 3 buildings and one field in rural Pennsylvania. There were no bombs in any of the buildings.

There is as much proof that there were 19 men that flew those plans as there were explosives in those buildings.

Factually incorrect

 

[Crepitus]

Donald Trump promised in his election campaign to expose the truth about 9/11 but Trump has since aligned himself with a principal suspect, Saudi Arabia demonstrating again that money talks and bullshit walks.

It is certainly time for all the information and evidence to be publicly exposed to allow analysis and scrutiny by experts and the public.

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11
TOPICS:FBIMatt AgoristSeptember 11th
MARCH 27, 2019
By Matt Agorist
In yet another major move from the great folks over at the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, a joint federal lawsuit has been filed to assess any evidence the FBI may have known about that contributed to the destruction of the towers on 9/11 which they may have kept from Congress.
The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:

1. the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
2. the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
3. terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
4. recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
5. video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
6. cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.

According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts.
As TFTP previously reported, a monumental step forward in the relentless pursuit of 9/11 truth took place last December when a United States Attorney agreed to comply with federal law requiring submission to a Special Grand Jury of evidence that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers. Then, earlier this month, the group behind the submission, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information related to the use of said explosives.
According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.
A names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.
As TFTP reported in December, for the first time since 9/11 the federal government is taking steps to hear evidence that explosives may have been used to destroy the world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry successfully submitted a petition to the federal government demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7).
After waiting months for the reply, the U.S. Attorney responded in a letter, noting that they will comply with the law.
“We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman stated.
According to the petition, dozens of exhibits were presented as evidence that explosives were used to destroy all three world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC Towers on 9/11. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of seeing and hearing explosions at the World Trade Center on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 both prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis and testimony by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of these three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The July 30th Amended Petition included the same evidence but also addressed several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition. ...

Come on dude, this is so debunked.

Besides there are theories out there that are much more fun and just as believable.

 

[MindWars]

Lawsuit to Force FBI Assessment of WTC Evidence: Interview with Richard Gage, Dave Meiswinkle, and Mick Harrison

 

[MisterBeale]

Donald Trump promised in his election campaign to expose the truth about 9/11 but Trump has since aligned himself with a principal suspect, Saudi Arabia demonstrating again that money talks and bullshit walks.

It is certainly time for all the information and evidence to be publicly exposed to allow analysis and scrutiny by experts and the public.

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11

Bombshell Lawsuit Claims FBI Knowingly Hid Evidence from Congress of Explosives Used on 9/11
TOPICS:FBIMatt AgoristSeptember 11th
MARCH 27, 2019
By Matt Agorist
In yet another major move from the great folks over at the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, a joint federal lawsuit has been filed to assess any evidence the FBI may have known about that contributed to the destruction of the towers on 9/11 which they may have kept from Congress.
The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:

1. the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
2. the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
3. terrorist financing related the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
4. recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
5. video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
6. cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.

According to the press release on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts.
As TFTP previously reported, a monumental step forward in the relentless pursuit of 9/11 truth took place last December when a United States Attorney agreed to comply with federal law requiring submission to a Special Grand Jury of evidence that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers. Then, earlier this month, the group behind the submission, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information related to the use of said explosives.
According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.
A names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.
As TFTP reported in December, for the first time since 9/11 the federal government is taking steps to hear evidence that explosives may have been used to destroy the world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry successfully submitted a petition to the federal government demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7).
After waiting months for the reply, the U.S. Attorney responded in a letter, noting that they will comply with the law.
“We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman stated.
According to the petition, dozens of exhibits were presented as evidence that explosives were used to destroy all three world trade centers.
The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC Towers on 9/11. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of seeing and hearing explosions at the World Trade Center on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 both prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis and testimony by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of these three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition. The July 30th Amended Petition included the same evidence but also addressed several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition. ...

Come on dude, this is so debunked.

Besides there are theories out there that are much more fun and just as believable.

View attachment 253777

Debunked? Bullshit.

Conspiracy "theories out there that are much more fun and just as believable?"

Agreed.

 

[MisterBeale]

Because....... the same group who failed using expolosives in the '93 attack wouldn't consider making the same mistake twice Candy?

~S~

Probably correct; why use the same method when it failed once already?

Because 19 years of war on a false premise is enough.

One had nothing to do with the other. The mis-management and false narratives of the war by our leaders (Bush, Obama, Trump) does not change the fact that 19 men from the Middle East steered 4 planes into 3 buildings and one field in rural Pennsylvania. There were no bombs in any of the buildings.

There is as much proof that there were 19 men that flew those plans as there were explosives in those buildings.

Factually incorrect

You would know facts if they fell out of the sky and grabbed you by the pussy.

You already admitted you don't read, so how would you know what facts are?