I can see a lot of women dressing as binders for Halloween.
Of course, the whole story he told about the binders turned out to be a complete lie, but it is Mitt after all. We've come to expect that.
Prove it liar
he was using an example from his past RW since hes been painted as being a gosh, "woman" hater.......
awkwardly phrased? whats in those binders? resumes, hello...wtf should he have looked at ? a magazine? Playboy? seriously? dude...
I can see a lot of women dressing as binders for Halloween.
Of course, the whole story he told about the binders turned out to be a complete lie, but it is Mitt after all. We've come to expect that.
Prove it liar
Sure thing, douche-nozzle.
Mind The Binder - Talking Politics
he was using an example from his past RW since hes been painted as being a gosh, "woman" hater.......
awkwardly phrased? whats in those binders? resumes, hello...wtf should he have looked at ? a magazine? Playboy? seriously? dude...
The facts are that he had to be taken by the hand and shown how to hire women. Mitts anecdote was essentially.....Golly gee, there are qualified women out there
If it was 1930, it would be a good story. 2012......not so much
I can see a lot of women dressing as binders for Halloween.
Of course, the whole story he told about the binders turned out to be a complete lie, but it is Mitt after all. We've come to expect that.
Prove it liar
Sure thing, douche-nozzle.
Mind The Binder - Talking Politics
he was using an example from his past RW since hes been painted as being a gosh, "woman" hater.......
awkwardly phrased? whats in those binders? resumes, hello...wtf should he have looked at ? a magazine? Playboy? seriously? dude...
The facts are that he had to be taken by the hand and shown how to hire women. Mitts anecdote was essentially.....Golly gee, there are qualified women out there
If it was 1930, it would be a good story. 2012......not so much
You guys have to try to be this stupid... wow!!
That's because it's bs, I know you don't read anything other than the headlines of the NY Times, if you did, you just might get that.
Oh I see, he has not said it?
That's because it's bs, I know you don't read anything other than the headlines of the NY Times, if you did, you just might get that.
Oh I see, he has not said it?
he was asked a fairly simple question about what his position was on the ledbetter law. he went into a diatribe about how he had binders of women brought to him and then went on to talk about women needing flex time.
i'm sorry... what part of that does someone like you actually think means he supports legislation assuring equal pay for equal work?
That's because it's bs, I know you don't read anything other than the headlines of the NY Times, if you did, you just might get that.
Oh I see, he has not said it?
he was asked a fairly simple question about what his position was on the ledbetter law. he went into a diatribe about how he had binders of women brought to him and then went on to talk about women needing flex time.
i'm sorry... what part of that does someone like you actually think means he supports legislation assuring equal pay for equal work?
It really was awkward when he answered that question in that manner...
That's because it's bs, I know you don't read anything other than the headlines of the NY Times, if you did, you just might get that.
Oh I see, he has not said it?
he was asked a fairly simple question about what his position was on the ledbetter law. he went into a diatribe about how he had binders of women brought to him and then went on to talk about women needing flex time.
i'm sorry... what part of that does someone like you actually think means he supports legislation assuring equal pay for equal work?
That's because it's bs, I know you don't read anything other than the headlines of the NY Times, if you did, you just might get that.
Oh I see, he has not said it?
he was asked a fairly simple question about what his position was on the ledbetter law. he went into a diatribe about how he had binders of women brought to him and then went on to talk about women needing flex time.
i'm sorry... what part of that does someone like you actually think means he supports legislation assuring equal pay for equal work?
Oh wait thats what this thread is about?
"Someone like me"?
What's next?
"you people"?
Does Obama sptt. Equal pay?
But data from the Obama White HouseÂ’s 2011 annual report show that female staffers there earn a median salary 18 percent lower than that of men.
And nearly four years ago, at the height of the 2008 election season, Scripps Howard syndicated columnist Deroy Murdock wrote that female staffers in ObamaÂ’s U.S. Senate office, too, were shortchanged.
“Obama’s average male employee earned $54,397,” Murdock determined from online Senate salary records. But the future president’s “30 female employees … [earned] $45,152, on*average.”
By contrast, 2008 Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain paid his female staffers higher average salaries than his male employees at the time, with women earning an average of*$55,878 and men taking home*$53,936.
More at-
Democrats focus on equal pay issue while Obama White House pays women less - Yahoo! News
Maybe, someone should have asked him, then candy could have followed up with this "fact"......
because it really shouldn't have been so difficult for him to say "of course i support equal pay for equal work"
the fact that he couldn't spoke volumes.
Oh wait thats what this thread is about?
"Someone like me"?
What's next?
"you people"?
Does Obama sptt. Equal pay?
But data from the Obama White House’s 2011 annual report show that female staffers there earn a median salary 18 percent lower than that of men.
And nearly four years ago, at the height of the 2008 election season, Scripps Howard syndicated columnist Deroy Murdock wrote that female staffers in Obama’s U.S. Senate office, too, were shortchanged.
“Obama’s average male employee earned $54,397,” Murdock determined from online Senate salary records. But the future president’s “30 female employees … [earned] $45,152, on*average.”
By contrast, 2008 Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain paid his female staffers higher average salaries than his male employees at the time, with women earning an average of*$55,878 and men taking home*$53,936.
More at-
Democrats focus on equal pay issue while Obama White House pays women less - Yahoo! News
Maybe, someone should have asked him, then candy could have followed up with this "fact"......
i'm sorry...an article from the daily caller isn't very compelling to me and shouldn't be to anyone else.
the reality is that the president signed the ledbetter law which was only necessary because the far right judges on the court eviscerated employment laws in the ledbetter case.
and if romney were elected, he'd appoint more judges like that... and if an amendment came to him which would cut the legs off of the ledbetter law, he'd sign it.
and ultimately, that's why he couldn't say that he supports the law.... because all those people telling their employees that they'll lose their jobs if they don't vote against their own interests don't want it.
