BLOCKBUSTER! Syrian Rebels Take Responsibility For Chemical Attack...

[TakeAStepBack]

the Pauliticians and the bigrebncs are on the same of Assad, the b'aathists, and the communists who support them.

No question now exists that the b'aathists gassed their own people.

I think BHO is going to make GWB look like a wuss in comparison.

Cruise missiles will be used, I think; the only question will be 'what targets?'

Wow, that's just absurd. Assad & Syria have done nothing to our Nation. Why do you personally want War and hate Assad so much? Just curious?

Narco-libertarians are clearly revealing that they could not govern in a modern world.

Fake Starkey's mental instability once again forces him to speak on behalf of (and now this is funny) "the modern world."

 

[JakeStarkey]

Wow, that's just absurd. Assad & Syria have done nothing to our Nation. Why do you personally want War and hate Assad so much? Just curious?

Narco-libertarians are clearly revealing that they could not govern in a modern world.

Fake Starkey's mental instability once again forces him to speak on behalf of (and now this is funny) "the modern world."

You clearly underline my point, TASB, about the libertarians' inability to govern.

We live in an interconnected global community, not Sierra Vista, AZ, and what happens in the ME affects us here.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

You have no proof, Fake. I appreciate the admission.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You have no point, TASB.

The political philosophy of libertarians is not developed enough to govern in the modern age.

Perhaps it would be so when villages were forming on the banks of the Euphrates six thousand years ago.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Your ideeological attacks are noted (although I dont give a **** about a mentally unstable dullard's opinion). Still, and most important of all here, you have no proof that Assad's regime is guilty of CW use.

I appreciate you admitting that. Even if one of your alter-egos had to resort to changing the subject.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Narco-libertarians are clearly revealing that they could not govern in a modern world.

Fake Starkey's mental instability once again forces him to speak on behalf of (and now this is funny) "the modern world."

You clearly underline my point, TASB, about the libertarians' inability to govern.

We live in an interconnected global community, not Sierra Vista, AZ, and what happens in the ME affects us here.

Right, if it weren't for all our threats, we would be hearing only the occasional story on Syria, instead of this massive campaign.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

You have no point, TASB.

The political philosophy of libertarians is not developed enough to govern in the modern age.

Perhaps it would be so when villages were forming on the banks of the Euphrates six thousand years ago.

How is who used CW a libertarian issue on either side of the debate?

 

[JakeStarkey]

You have no point, TASB.

The political philosophy of libertarians is not developed enough to govern in the modern age.

Perhaps it would be so when villages were forming on the banks of the Euphrates six thousand years ago.

How is who used CW a libertarian issue on either side of the debate?

Wrong question. Right question: how is libertarianism a viable political philosophy for government in the 21st century

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Still missing that proof, I see. Come on back to the thread after you find it. Take your meds too.

 

[Contumacious]

We live in an interconnected global community, not Sierra Vista, AZ, and what happens in the ME affects us here.

So you and your ilk will force u to be our brothers keepers. I hope that they will help you with the blowback including $10.00 for a gallon of gas.

.

.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We live in an interconnected global community, not Sierra Vista, AZ, and what happens in the ME affects us here.

So you and your ilk will force u to be our brothers keepers. I hope that they will help you with the blowback including $10.00 for a gallon of gas.

I have always thought harboring our resources and developing energy independence were the answers our energy problems.

 

[georgephillip]

The reporter had no corroborative evidence. It is merely her reporting what someone told someone.

That's the end of it.

"More than a dozen rebels interviewed reported that their salaries came from the Saudi government.

EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack

However, Juan Cole has some surprising news out of Iran on his blog:

"Former Iranian president Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani has roiled Iranian politics by admitting that the Syrian government gassed its own people at Ghuta in the eastern suburbs of Damascus.

"He was lamenting the calamities that are befalling the hapless Syrian people. He attacked the regime of President Bashar al-Assad for filling what he called 'football stadiums' full of political prisoners, as well as for using gas on the rebels.

"This sign of division in the Iranian elite would ideally be used by Washington to put diplomatic pressure on that country. However, the American fixation with gunboat diplomacy will probably forestall that diplomatic approach."

Informed Comment: Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion

"Football stadiums full of political prisoners"...think it might happen here someday?

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTUcvKO3js8]Leaked Documents: US Framed Syria in Chemical Weapons Attack - YouTube[/ame]

Hagel: Chemical weapons use poses huge risk to U.S. allies [UPDATE2] - UPI.com

"Forcing Assad to change his calculation about his ability to act with impunity can contribute to his realization that he cannot gas or shoot his way out of his predicament," Kerry said...

"We need to send to Syria and to the world, to dictators and to terrorists, to allies and to civilians alike the unmistakable message that when the United States of America and the world say, never again, we do not mean sometimes.

"We do not mean the somewhere. Never means never."

Even if the above video that gives an excellent case that the rebels used Sarin gas isn't true, does Kerry's warning of "never" mean that any faction around the world, which is able to get CW then stage an uprising, can now use it (like in the video) and expect the U.S. will invade their country? The cat is out of the bag, and the world is brimming with CW. This kind of ultimatum seems like it could backfire and make CW commonplace.

 

[jgarden]

Voice of Russia (Russian: Голос Росси&#1080 is the Russian government's international radio broadcasting service. Its predecessor Radio Moscow was the official international broadcasting station of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_of_Russia

The OP's source is the Voice of Russia an internet "news" source operated by the Russian government - and we all know how objective it is!

Why would the OP waste our time with Russian propaganda?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

No, it's not. The original publication is from the Mint Times. If you had more than two lonely brain cells, you may actually have a point. But unfortunately, your research abilities are on par with Fake Starkey. Nonexistent.

 

[JoeB131]

Meet our new Allies folks.....

WARNING: VIDEO VERY GRAPHIC!

This is an article and you don't have to view the video

*WATCH* US backed Syrian rebels behead Christian bishop (NSFW)

This is ugly.

But I don't think we can avoid it. AIPAC has just gotten behind striking Assad and the GOP is falling into line.

Maybe if we can get AIPAC to endorse fixing the American Economy, we might be on to something.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, it's not. The original publication is from the Mint Times. If you had more than two lonely brain cells, you may actually have a point. But unfortunately, your research abilities are on par with Fake Starkey. Nonexistent.

I was the one who pointed out the Mint Press, which is a lopsided unreliable news source from the reactionary and libertarian side.

If one is criticized by TASB, then one knows one is on the right path.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Unreliable according to the mentally unstable, Fake Starkey. Sure.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

BTW, you have that proof of Assad's guilt yet? Or are you still moving goal posts any chance one of your alter-egos gets?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Unreliable according to the mentally unstable, Fake Starkey. Sure.

When I am criticized by a nut like TASB, I know I am on the right track.

Unreliable news source, unreliable reactionary TASB.