Blacks that White Racists Don't Like

[IM2]

"Blacks are threatened by the intelligence and abilities of whites. They compensate with violence."



Talk about psychosis! Nobody black made laws to deny whites equal opportunity. Whites did it because they were scared. Whites have been so intimidated they used violence to enforce their laws and still do so. Everything this white idiot said in his post has been done only by whites in America.

 

[IM2]

"White people are the only people on the planet who have devised a system to mistreat people based on skin color alone. This system embraces every aspect of human existence — education, economic, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war."

Preach Brother Essen!

 

[BS Filter]

"White people are the only people on the planet who have devised a system to mistreat people based on skin color alone. This system embraces every aspect of human existence — education, economic, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war."

Preach Brother Essen!

You're insane.

 

[IM2]

You're insane.

That I didn't write, but it is true.

 

[IM2]

The Casual Killing Act​

In 1669, an act was passed in Virginia called the casual killing Act so they could kill a black person without consequences. The law established so that “if any slave resists his master and by the extremity of the correction should chance to die, that his death should not be a felony or punishable offense.

" Be it enacted and declared by this grand assembly, if any slave resist his master (or others by his masters order correcting him) and by the extremity of the correction should chance to die, that his death shall not be considered a felony, but the master (or that other person appointed by the master to punish him) be acquitted from molestation, since it cannot be presumed that malice existed(which alone makes murder a felony) [or that anything] should induce any man to destroy his own estate."

The Fugitive Slave Act

The Fugitive Slave Act or Fugitive Slave Law was passed by the United States Congress on September 18, 1850,[1] as part of the Compromise of 1850 between Southern interests in slavery and Northern Free-Soilers.

The Act was one of the most controversial elements of the 1850 compromise and heightened Northern fears of a slave power conspiracy. It required that all escaped slaves, upon capture, be returned to the slaver and that officials and citizens of free states had to cooperate. Abolitionists nicknamed it the "Bloodhound Bill", after the dogs that were used to track down fugitives from slavery.[2]

Black Codes​

Black Codes: Restricting Freedom of ex-slaves ***

Discover facts about the Black Codes for kids. Reconstruction Era and the Black Codes. Information about the Black Codes for kids, children, homework and schools.

www.american-historama.org

Vagrancy Act of 1866​

Vagrancy Act of 1866 - Encyclopedia Virginia

Background Virginia laws and practices, derived in part from English precedent, had long distinguished vagrants, or vagabonds, from poor people in general. In legislation and then , the General Assembly established local boards to find paying work for poor people and provide minimal essential...

encyclopediavirginia.org

Dred Scott v. Sandford
Plessy v. Ferguson
Redlining
Restrictive covenants...

Just a few ways that:

"White people devised a system to mistreat people based on skin color alone. This system embraces every aspect of human existence — education, economic, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war."

 

[James Price]

Because racism is global problem. And America is proof of that. Even in WW2. My grandfather when they used capture German POW's and put them on on ships. That didn't matter. They were still (The Germans - Their supposed enemy) allowed to eat in the same mess hall section as the white US soldiers but the black GI's were who fighting for the US were not.

When black people are around white people get on code. They drop their swords and come together.

Bullshit. Hundreds of thousands of white people DIED at the hands of other white people to free you ungrateful dimwits from slavery.

It doesn't matter whether it France, Sweden, UK, Germany, The same dog that bites black people in America is the same dog that bites black people in Spain, is the same dog that bites black people in brazil, is the same dog that bites black people in Argentina.

It has nothing to do with global systemic racism. The Sentinelese have completely evaded white influence, and they're still living like fucking animals.

So the Civil War was never about freeing enslaved Black Americans.

Then why did the North oppose slavery?

Lincoln made it clear, at the on-set of war that, if he could maintain the union with slavery intact, he would. Lincoln was trying to preserve the Union because the South was getting too rich & powerful off of slavery that they were trying to exit from the Union accordingly.

That doesn't explain why the North was opposed to slavery in the first place. It doesn't explain why 360,000+ whites in the North were willing to die to free blacks.

So whites did not end slavery. The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t end slavery, the 13th Amendment did that.

Whites passed the 13th Amendment which ended slavery, so yes, whites ended slavery.

And none too soon. The Union was losing badly until Blacks joined the effort.

Blacks comprised around 10% of the total number of enlistees for the North, and a large number of black enlistees performed non-combat, support duties as cooks, laborers, carpenters, etc.. Their support was helpful but hardly crucial to the North's victory.

Also, keep in mind that according to the 13th Amendment, if you’re in prison, you can still be enslaved.

This is why you shouldn't ask blacks to explain history. Because they'll skew the shit out of it. Unlike slavery, prison labor applied to whites, and it wasn't some novel concept cooked up after the Civil War. It existed from the very beginning of American history. It goes as far back as the post-Revolutionary War.

Once slavery ended, former slaves and their descendants were then subjected to black codes, "legalized" segregation, lynchings, and being terrorized by the KKK. Not to mention slavery robbed black Americans and their enslaved ancestors of their sovereignty.

And what experience do YOU, PERSONALLY, have with segregation or being terrorized by the KKK? None. Zero. Zilch. You, as a black man living in 2021, have all of the luxuries and amenities that your ancestors never had, yet you sit in a nice climate-controlled dwelling and spew the same, tired victimization bullshit that every other black racist like you regurgitates.

And its funny White people like you have a problem with slave reparations but they didn’t have a problem getting paid hundreds or dollars for every slave they owned that was freed.

I never owned slaves, you fucking idiot. No white man living today has received one red cent as compensation for freed slaves because none of them owned slaves.

I need to answer this question in five ways because this "We whites are so great. Look at what we have done. We are just so smart" is a point I've heard from white supremacist over years too many times.

Well if you look at the last 300 years and base success on inventions (as that's what I think you're thinking) then sure white people have invented some good things

But at the same time 99.99% of white people have invented nothing. Entire cultures (and not just black ones) come up short in such an analysis.

Iceland has lots of white folks but they have hardly made a huge mark in the worlds of science, technology, or literature; so too for any number of Central European nations.

What you think of as European Civilization is really quite limited: composed of the historic, scientific and artistic achievements of only a handful of nations, and even then, involving only a small fraction of the persons of those states, most of whose citizens have been little more than peasants for the bulk of recorded history.

So called western contributions are not because white people are so much smarter than everyone else but because progress in science and invention is built on what has gone before.

The more science you know. The more science you can discover. The more inventions you have at hand. The more new inventions you can come up with. That is why the progress is exponential. It comes from the nature of science and technology, not from the nature of white intelligence.

The latest inventions tend to seem to be the greatest. Since we live in a period where whites are on top, most inventions will be coming from them. That does not prove that whites are better – just that we live in a period of history where they are on top.

If whites were truly better than everyone else, then they would be on top all the time or almost all the time. But they are not. Instead the lead is constantly changing hands.

Also keep in mind that there are few inventions that are “purely” white. Take this comment for example. It depends on the Internet and computers – white inventions. But it also depends on the alphabet, a Phoenician invention, and the idea of writing itself, which in the West comes from Egypt.

None of that addressed the point.

Let's look at what Europe actually was. The stench of medieval Europe still echoes today. The Middle Ages smelt of sewage and decaying bodies. The Queen of Spain Isabel of Castle (the end of the 15th century) confessed that she had taken a bath only twice in a lifetime when born and married.

French kings died of lice. People emptied chamber pots right out of their windows making streets look like cesspools. Fleas, lice and bugs swarmed in rich and poor houses of London and Paris.

Unsanitary conditions, diseases and starvation were what early Europe was. Stop deluding yourself. Noble families were happy if at best two or three of ten children survived. A third of women died in labor. They had no street illumination. In Ancient Rome they sold even the urine from latrines to wool dyers and leather tanners.

Rain was the only street cleaner in those times.

The black plague almost killed all of white Europe in the 13th, due to UNSANITARY conditions.

The average life expectancy for a male child born in the 13th or 14th Century was higher (ie. between 30 and 35 years old) than the average life expectancy of Sub-Saharan Africans 100 years ago(ie. 30 years old).

During that same time, in Spain, the Moors had over 300 public baths. While 1% of Europe was literate, there were over 90 universities in the Moorish Empire.

Please list all 90 universities.

These blacks are responsible for the white boy 'renaissance' where they had a refocus on science, learning and math. BLACK MOORS are the ones who inspired this reawakening.

No, translations of ancient Greek and Roman texts were largely responsible for the reintroduction of classical wisdom and knowedge.

For example, gunpowder was invented by the ancient Egyptians and Nigerians who used the cola nut to make gunpowder. The Chinese reinvented it and used it in fireworks and explosives.

Bullshit. Gunpowder was invented during the Tang dynasty (9th century) and wasn't acquired by Muslims until around the mid 13th century. Some of Hasan al-Rammah's formulas for it were written between 1240 and 1280.

Steel work and iron smelting was invented by Africans in ancient Tanzania

No, it was invented by Indians around 400BC:

The Entire History of Steel

From hunks of iron streaking through the sky, to the construction of skyscrapers and megastructures, this is the history of the world's greatest alloy.

www.popularmechanics.com

You see, SERIOUS White historians know these facts very well they also know that to tell the truth would reveal the dominate position of the Blackman in the bronze-age.

SERIOUS white historians know they were barbarians when the foundation of world civilization was built by black men but few western historians will tell the full story of man's racial history to do so would challenge the Aryan model of history.

Any serious historian would know you're full of shit, and that your "facts" are nothing more than black propaganda. Blacks will try to take credit for just about anything if you let them.

Here are some brilliant moments in black aviation history:

But black people (as a group) have invented more things beneficial to the progress of mankind than whites. It's not even close. We have been on the planet a lot longer.

Black Africans were the original inventors of the disciplines that helped bring the world into the modern age.

Mathematics, Physics, Astronomy, Building in stone and bricks, Writing Languages like Edo Script, Nsibidi are three African writing systems that pre-date the arrival of Europeans on the continent.

Calendars, irrigation, mining , metal block printing, fountain pen, astrolabic quadrant, hand cannon and an emphasis of the kind of tools used in architecture. Many ancient formulas in trigonometry, calculus and physics as well as chemistry (Khem mysteries)

All of these were begun by Blacks in Egypt, Nubia-Kush.

So even if people of European origins have made improvements in ancient technologies and ancient inventions, such as rocketry, computer technology, aerodynamics and others, the basic mathematical formulas and ancient prototypes were invented by Africans

In fact Africans invented the binary system which is still used in the Yoruba oracle and was copied by German scientists and applied to computer programming

Leave it to blacks to concoct such wild fantasies to assuage their inferiority complex. If you read the following blurb about an African by the name of Edward Makuka Nkoloso, you'd be lead to think he pioneered a space program in Africa:

"Edward Makuka Nkoloso was a founder of the Zambia National Academy of Science, Space Research and Philosophy. From 1960 until sometime after 1969, Nkoloso's space program sought to accomplish the launching of a rocket that would send one girl, 17-year-old Matha Mwambwa, and two cats to the Moon. There were also plans for a trip to Mars. Nkoloso hoped to beat the United States and Soviet Union's respective space programs at the height of the Space Race."

So, was Edward Makuka Nkoloso actually a genuine black space pioneer? You decide:




Black ingenuity in action:

The most importance inventions have came from blk ppl.

Agriculture and Iron Smelting

Agriculture and metallurgy were both developed, independently in West Africa. Humans spent 10s of thousands of years as hunter gatherers before somebody figured out that if you plant seeds in the ground, irrigate and take care of them, you can settle in one area and not have to wander about looking for food.

Seems pretty axiomatic since someone already told you that, but if nobody explained it to you,
you’d have no idea how it works.

Iron industry, in both smelting and forging for tools and weapons, appeared in Sub-Saharan Africa by 1200 BCE. This led to improved weaponry and enabled farmers to expand agricultural productivity and produce surplus crops, which together supported the growth of urban city-states into empires.

Agriculture and Iron Smelting were two of the most important things man ever discovered.

They created a foundation for so many other things

I could spend several thousand words referring you to more evidence on this subject, compiled by African and European scholars alike, which demonstrates both the racism and absurdity of your arguments.

But if you are truly interested in this material you would be better served to seek out the information yourself, seeing as how it will be far more adequately presented by me than I could do here.

You can begin by googling the books of Cheikh Anta Diop, Molefi Asante, Walter Rodney and Ivan Van Sertima among others; and for you whose racism will most likely lead you to dismiss black scholars on these subjects, you can always examine the writings of Basil Davidson: one of the most respected Africa scholars in modern history, who is decidedly both white and British.

I spent too much time responding to and debunking your previous claims. I'm not going to dignify the rest of these delusions with a rebuttal. They're full of more lies and propaganda than an ISIS training video. Again, if blacks were smart, Africa wouldn't be a shithole.

Look - Call me intellectually inferior all day. I don't give a crap about that. What I want to know from people like who are always running around trying to prove how stupid black people are is this.

What do you do with race of black people who you claim are stupid?

You're saying I'm stupid? OK. sh*t. I'll take that. Yes I am. Now what?

I don't care what you think about black ppl. Tell me what should be done?

The first thing we should do is accept the reality that unequal outcomes aren't necessarily the result of systemic racism. If we, as a society, can accept the role that IQ plays in outcomes, a lot of the "what" would take care of itself. Rather than assume lower black SAT scores are the result of systemic discrimination, we would see them much the same way we view white vs. Asian SAT scores.

In neurology no one takes IQ seriously.

Of course, they do:

Neuroanatomical Correlates of Intelligence

With the advancement of image acquisition and analysis methods in recent decades, unique opportunities have emerged to study the neuroanatomical correlates of intelligence. Traditional approaches examining global measures have been complemented by insights ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Beyond a bigger brain: Multivariable structural brain imaging and intelligence

People with larger brains tend to score higher on tests of general intelligence (g). It is unclear, however, how much variance in intelligence other brain measurements would account for if included together with brain volume in a multivariable model. ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics - Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Human mental abilities, such as intelligence, are complex and profoundly important, both in a practical sense and for what they imply about the human condition. Understanding these abilities in mechanistic terms has the potential to facilitate their enhancement. There is strong evidence that the...

www.nature.com

News Bureau | ILLINOIS

news.illinois.edu

The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core

The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence - Volume 30 Issue 2

www.cambridge.org

Like it or not, IQ is correlated with success and wealth. Look up the average IQ of a doctor, lawyer, or another high-skill professional.

Well if you think science can settle moral questions

Straw man after straw man. No one claimed science can settle moral questions.

So you theorize that “Whiteness” simply makes all Whites just as capable, and all Blacks equally disadvantaged

No one theorizes any such thing. There are some very stupid whites and blacks in the world and vice versa. Likewise, there are some very intelligent whites and blacks. No one theorizes that all whites are equally capable and all blacks are equally stupid. I'm not going to try and educate you on the relevance of "average" IQ, but that's the concept you either aren't aware of or don't understand.

We don't cry. We stand strong and fight. Out history shows that. What's crying going to do ? White people have heart of stone when it comes to black people.

But you assuming that black people think like you. We don't.

Black people don't consider killing white people, killing white women and children, subjugating white people. oppressing white people, denying white people rights and freedom, putting white people in Zoos, going into their countries enforcing system black rule and systems of apartheid as act of genius

Black people still enslave their own people in Africa, and they spend a lot of effort killing each other here in the US. Nevermind that North African pirates abducted and enslaved more than 1 million Europeans between 1530 and 1780.

Black people have not done a thing to whites. Don't even try and compare black racism to white racism and if I'm wrong then

Name one thing that black people (as a group) have stopped white people (as a group) from doing that they had a right to do?

You completely missed the point, again. This is the post I was originally responding to:

"White and non blk ppl have sites dedicated to talking sh*t about black people. Niggermania, Chimpout. Then you sites like vdare, American renaissance, stormfront. Fox news hired Mark Furham as their chief crime analyst. This guy was a hard core white supremacist."

You have white ppl like Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Tomi Lahren, Richard Spencer, Ben Shapiro who try to be subtle and try to act deep and intellectualise there white supremacy.

Go on yahoo answers, 4chan, twitter, Reddit, youtube. That's all many whites do. Just lie awake talking shit about black people."

You're implying that blacks are targeted for hate speech by practically every outlet, internet or otherwise, when the reality is, social and mass media are completely biased in favor of blacks. That was the point of comparing the content of both phrases, "I hate blacks" vs. "I hate whites". The vast majority of links containing the phrase "I hate black people" are sympathetic to blacks and/or critical of whites.

For example, denying them the right to work, own a home, live in a certain area, get a just trial, an education, or use any public facility.

Plenty of blacks own homes, get a fair trial, get an education, use public facilities, and no one denies blacks employment for being black. Of course, you'll claim that whites are sneaky and find surreptitious ways to deny blacks opportunities, but it's nothing more than an assumption. And even when you find a few examples to support your argument, a few examples don't count as a representative sample.

Yeah sure. A black person can come up to a white person and bash their skull with a rock because he doesn’t like white people but that is not racism, that is an one individual acting as one individual and there is no system in place that will support his right to harm you.

Racism is a belief system, and actions are based on beliefs. If your actions result in physical harm to someone of another race and those actions are based on prejudices about the person's race, then the attack would be racist. If we inverted the races in your example, you'd obviously label it racism:

"A white person can come up to a black person and bash their skull with a rock because he doesn’t like black people but that is not racism, that is an one individual acting as one individual and there is no system in place that will support his right to harm you."

The system doesn't support a white person's right to harm a black person. Even if you believe law enforcement are often adjudicated for killing blacks, everyday white people who don't hold government positions aren't.

So how can black people practice black supremacy when they are other people who will slap you down if you try and practice it?

Black / white supremacy is a BELIEF system. It's the belief that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. Carrying out an attack on someone based on that belief IS putting it into PRACTICE, regardless of whether it's on an individual or systemic basis.

So policeman can murder black people and get away with it because there is a system in place that allows them to do it. (the courts, the police, the judge, the prison systems).

Okay, so, let me see if I understand your fucked up logic. If someone who hates black people kills a black person, gets caught, and is convicted, they're not a racist, right?

White people are the only people on the planet who have devised a system to mistreat people based on skin color alone. This system embraces every aspect of human existence — education, economic, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war.

That is why black can't be racist. We do not have a system — the power or the institutions– that allows us to mistreat people based on color.

You don't have to DO anything to be a racist. It's a belief system. All actions stem from beliefs, and racist policies stem from people who hold racist beliefs. Hitler was a racist before he ever had the power to enact the holocaust. Racist systems don't fall out of the sky. They're the result of racist beliefs, and a person can commit a racist act independent of whether the system is racist.

Yes - Black people can be prejudiced (meaning to pre-judge) someone based on color but that prejudice is limited to what that INDIVIDUAL can do to another INDIVIDUAL.

Racism isn't only systemic oppression of a racial group. It's also racial prejudice, which is what you described; preconceived judgment about someone's race.

 

[James Price]

Nobody black made laws to deny whites equal opportunity.

Blacks denied their own people equal opportunities by enslaving them, and on any given day 9 million African's are still living in modern day slavery.

Whites did it because they were scared.

No, it's because whites obviously viewed blacks as inferior.

Whites have been so intimidated they used violence to enforce their laws and still do so.

Name a country that doesn't use violence to enforce laws, you fucking idiot.

 

[IM2]

Bullshit. Hundreds of thousands of white people DIED at the hands of other white people to free you ungrateful dimwits from slavery.

Look white boy, nobody white died to free us. Furthermore we do not owe your white asses any gratitude to ending a practice that was unconstitutional according to the words you crackers wrote on parchment. When slavery ended, Jim Crpq began. So yoi didn't fight to free us and you really need to seek psychiatric help.

Blacks denied their own people equal opportunities by enslaving them, and on any given day 9 million African's are still living in modern day slavery.

No junior, that's not how it happened since Africans did not mvake American law. Now just try to remember that we don't live in Africa and there are about the same numbers of people in Europe living in modern day slavery.

No, it's because whites obviously viewed blacks as inferior.

No, they were scared. You apparently haven't read much on how things went down.

Price, you are basically an idiot. You run your mouth lacking knowledge. Now I am going to let you slide this time, but the next time you get uppity, I'm going to make an example out of your miseducated white ass.

 

[BS Filter]

The Casual Killing Act​

In 1669, an act was passed in Virginia called the casual killing Act so they could kill a black person without consequences. The law established so that “if any slave resists his master and by the extremity of the correction should chance to die, that his death should not be a felony or punishable offense.

" Be it enacted and declared by this grand assembly, if any slave resist his master (or others by his masters order correcting him) and by the extremity of the correction should chance to die, that his death shall not be considered a felony, but the master (or that other person appointed by the master to punish him) be acquitted from molestation, since it cannot be presumed that malice existed(which alone makes murder a felony) [or that anything] should induce any man to destroy his own estate."

The Fugitive Slave Act

The Fugitive Slave Act or Fugitive Slave Law was passed by the United States Congress on September 18, 1850,[1] as part of the Compromise of 1850 between Southern interests in slavery and Northern Free-Soilers.

The Act was one of the most controversial elements of the 1850 compromise and heightened Northern fears of a slave power conspiracy. It required that all escaped slaves, upon capture, be returned to the slaver and that officials and citizens of free states had to cooperate. Abolitionists nicknamed it the "Bloodhound Bill", after the dogs that were used to track down fugitives from slavery.[2]

Black Codes​

Black Codes: Restricting Freedom of ex-slaves ***

Discover facts about the Black Codes for kids. Reconstruction Era and the Black Codes. Information about the Black Codes for kids, children, homework and schools.

www.american-historama.org

Vagrancy Act of 1866​

Vagrancy Act of 1866 - Encyclopedia Virginia

Background Virginia laws and practices, derived in part from English precedent, had long distinguished vagrants, or vagabonds, from poor people in general. In legislation and then , the General Assembly established local boards to find paying work for poor people and provide minimal essential...

encyclopediavirginia.org

Dred Scott v. Sandford
Plessy v. Ferguson
Redlining
Restrictive covenants...

Just a few ways that:

"White people devised a system to mistreat people based on skin color alone. This system embraces every aspect of human existence — education, economic, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war."

Thanks for the history lesson. We're all rejoicing that those days are long gone. Thank God for the White abolitionists.

 

[Paul Essien]

James Price
Like it or not, IQ is correlated with success and wealth. Look up the average IQ of a doctor, lawyer, or another high-skill professional.

This disproves your argument because doctors or Lawyers are not the most wealthy people in any country you can name.

Steven Spielberg was a C student in college and couldn't get into the top film school (USC). Aristotle Onassis who was the richest man in the world at one point and didn't have a formal education. Secondly most wealth is inherited so that kinda blows your high IQ = high wealth theory out the water.

American wealth is generational. One generation picks up where the other left off. Nothing to do with IQ. Good luck with becoming the next Sam Walton, Conrad Hilton, JD Rockefeller, ET AL.. It will not happen because the laws have changed.

These people are lucky and have connections. The more connections you have and the better you are at talking, the less education you need.

It is constantly stated that Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard - however, this item of information has no relevance to Gates tremendous success. Gates tremendous success had to do with the private school he attended giving him access to computer in high school that were not available to most CS professors nationwide.

Bill Gate's father was/is a very prominent attorney in Washington state. He invested a few hundred thousand in his son ideas of computer software.

Mark Zuckerberg, (Facebook) parents paid for his computer classes when he was six years old.

Wealth is not accidental! Saying high IQ = wealth and success is like all you need to do to make the NBA is to be tall

It's all connected, how you were raised, who you know and who can teach you the skills needed. Being at the right time at the right place in your life. Drive, determination and education are not major contributors to success.

This is true for sports and entertainment. IMHO I have known folks who are at the genius level of aptitude who end up in penal institutions because of the dysfunctional environment in which they were raised.

About half the world’s 7 billion people live on less than $2.50 a day. Buying a computer or being an inventor or business whizz to them would be like you trying to buy a Bugatti Veyron. Access to knowledge and education on this planet is very limited.

It might seem widely available because you were born in the USA so that’s all you know but if you were born in rural Burma or rural Angola you’d find your options for learning and bettering yourself to be extremely limited.

There is virtually no social mobility in many countries. You're either born into wealth through luck or you are born into the majority of impoverished people and will remain stuck there for life.

But these are the same people who you claim are stupid - right ?

James Price
I spent too much time responding to and debunking your previous claims. I'm not going to dignify the rest of these delusions with a rebuttal.

James Price
Again, if blacks were smart, Africa wouldn't be a shithole

If Africa was a shithole then why did Africans have to fight wars to get whites to leave ?

Did you know that 35% of Whites are born with tails?

They cut them off at birth. Whites share DNA w/the Rhesus Monkey.

They love calling Black people monkeys & 3/5th of a human.

It’s a tactic that Whites have used for centuries-they project onto others the truth about themselves.

James Price
The first thing we should do is accept the reality that unequal outcomes aren't necessarily the result of systemic racism. If we, as a society, can accept the role that IQ plays in outcomes, a lot of the "what" would take care of itself. Rather than assume lower black SAT scores are the result of systemic discrimination, we would see them much the same way we view white vs. Asian SAT scores

So what do you do with all these dumb black people ?

And as I said before.

What I can not understand is this : Why can’t you be just a racist ? Why do you need these pseudos scientifical explanations? What is wrong with racism? You do promote it, so why be a shame of it? Why you just can not say; “N****s are stupid.”? Why do you feel the need to have “scientifical crutches”?

That is mystery to me.

It's like in the bell curve were they basically suggests that we might as well stop making progress in further research for finding the true factors and blindly accept them as a natural law.

Like you they think they have found the ultimate explanation of “everything” and any other research can halt now. But then, at the same time, they take a nostalgic look backwards to philosophies of long gone centuries where the unwashed masses of dumb sheep are at the mercy of an elite. An elite who alone have the power to choose when they are generous and when they are punitive.

James Price
No one theorizes any such thing. There are some very stupid whites and blacks in the world and vice versa. Likewise, there are some very intelligent whites and blacks. No one theorizes that all whites are equally capable and all blacks are equally stupid. I'm not going to try and educate you on the relevance of "average" IQ, but that's the concept you either aren't aware of or don't understand.

Statistics can only give us data, before we draw any inference from these data we need to be sure all the factors contributing to what we are collecting data on has been taken into account. Statistics based inferences have their flaws, being a member of the ‘superior race’ you should know this. Right ?

Intelligence itself is very hard to define, whether IQ tests are a good measure of intelligence is hotly debated, the definition of race is unclear, there is no genetic proof as of yet that indicates the existence of traits unique to what we call a particular race(based on their appearance and known ancestry),

A person of the white master race should know better. No ? lol

So what you are saying is this : A black cat and a white cat are not both cats. They are different species. So are you saying that there is no single human race ? There are just different races which just happen to look little bit alike.

I think you are just scared. A more ballsy guy would’ve said already that science proves that blacks are dumb. But since you and your kind are too scared, you try to find some sort of pseudo-scientifical dress which you can wear in the racist ballroom gala

In many way it's a waste of time even debating with you as you can’t argue facts against beliefs. People believe what they want and they will always use confirmation bias to justify what they want to be true.

Even when you look at the main people running around trying to prove how stupid black ppl are you get

• Steve Sailer, journalist/computer salesman.
• J. Philippe Rushton, psychologist.
• Francis Fukuyama, political economist.
• Richard Herrnstein, psychologist (Bell Curve Author)
• Charles Murray, political scientist (Bell Curve Author)
• Arthur Jensen, psychology professor.

You notice anything strange? No biologists or anthropologists, much less geneticists in sight. All in the soft sciences. But yet these are the same people that will insist black people have this dumb gene ? And race is biological ?

Why trust these people over biologists and anthropologists, the very people who study these things for a living? To leave no stone unturned, some biologists and anthropologists have even written books about race for the general public:

You are trying to hijack science in the same way that people hijack religion.............. to promote their agenda.

The problem is: unlike in religion, science is far less open to interpretation. Which is why you're failing so often.

Define “race” in humans in scientific terms first. That is, unambiguously and universal throughout the world, not only the USA

James Price
You don't have to DO anything to be a racist. It's a belief system. All actions stem from beliefs, and racist policies stem from people who hold racist beliefs. Hitler was a racist before he ever had the power to enact the holocaust. Racist systems don't fall out of the sky. They're the result of racist beliefs, and a person can commit a racist act independent of whether the system is racist.

That's like saying you don't have to murder someone to be a murderer. You just have to believe in murdering someone

James Price
You're implying that blacks are targeted for hate speech by practically every outlet, internet or otherwise, when the reality is, social and mass media are completely biased in favor of blacks. That was the point of comparing the content of both phrases, "I hate blacks" vs. "I hate whites". The vast majority of links containing the phrase "I hate black people" are sympathetic to blacks and/or critical of whites.

In situation, guys like you think whites are the ones getting mistreated. “Those mean blacks, calling us racists when we do racist things. How dare they !!”

You value victim status because people like you are a cult, and that’s how cults work.

A cult can never be the oppressor, it always has to be oppressed.

That’s what keeps the members insular, they have to stay in the cult because they’re being attacked by forces from outside.

Every bunch of bad guys has to think they’re the good guys. The Ku Klux Klan thought they were the heroes. The Nazis thought they were the good guys.

It’s twisted, but it’s how whites like you think.

Despite the world of outrageous privilege white people in America generally live in, guys like you think whites are getting the short end of everything. It’s mind-boggling that you could think that, but, it’s really how you and ppl who think like you see the world.

James Price
Blacks obviously feel intellectually inferior, hence the compensation by referring to male masculinity.

It's you who feels inferior to black men.

Whites fear black men because we are seen and thought of as so physical we can hurt you.

You can talk forever about Asian IQ but black men threaten White men in a way that Hispanic, Asian and Arab men don't.

This fear is ancient and you can trace it to its origins in the first Indo-Aryan invasions of Black civilization.

• Is it because the Black-man built the world’s first civilizations?
• Is it because the Black-man is the only man to surpass White men in every field of human achievement?
• Is it the White-man’s sexual inferiority complex they feel regarding the Black Man?

This comes back to the black physical; the black potency, the black strength. That fear partly sexual goes back a long way, and that comes down to the fact that white men regard black men as better sexual performers than they are.

They don't say this publicly, but they say, 'gee they're so natural' and u begin to wonder. 'Our women could they not be attracted to that?"

Therefore all whites efforts to de-man black men.

The most graphic was lynching but now they put blk men in cages, called prisons, again to de-male them.

Whites can't call us 'boy' but they still somehow can make sure black men don’t have jobs, make sure we don't threaten them in other ways.

James Price
Okay, so, let me see if I understand your fucked up logic. If someone who hates black people kills a black person, gets caught, and is convicted, they're not a racist, right?

All white people are racist whether they kill a black person or not........ I didn't say all white people hate black people.

All white people raised in a society where racism has been (and still is) so prevalent, will have internalized elements of racist thinking: certain beliefs, stereotypes, assumptions, and judgments about others and themselves. So in countries where beliefs in European/white superiority and domination have been historically placed, then every white person in such places will have soaked up some of that conditioning.

James Price
Hitler was a racist before he ever had the power to enact the holocaust. Racist systems don't fall out of the sky. They're the result of racist beliefs, and a person can commit a racist act independent of whether the system is racist.

Hitler was a white extremist.

White supremacists are normal everyday people on the surface.

They teachers, fireman, your next door neighbour, they are people who may well be in relationship with a non white person.

The media has done a great job of presenting white supremacists in this over the top, almost cartoonish way

 

[IM2]

Thanks for the history lesson. We're all rejoicing that those days are long gone. Thank God for the White abolitionists.

Racists like you is what this has evolved into. Now the casual killing is done by police.

 

[BS Filter]

Racists like you is what this has evolved into. Now the casual killing is done by police.

Hopefully, your day isn't too far away.

 

[IM2]

Minister Louis Farrakhan

Any black person who is blunt and uncompromising in their criticism of white culture and what that culture has done to blacks is hated by white racists. It is delusional to believe that you can mistreat a group of people terribly generation after generation without creating within those you mistreat, individuals who will hate the fact that you exist. Blacks such as Farrakhan are the consequences of racist white culture.

 

[IM2]

Hopefully, your day isn't too far away.

It's not wise to wish death on another person. But then again, you're a racist, so wise has nothing to do with you.

 

[BS Filter]

It's not wise to wish death on another person. But then again, you're a racist, so wise has nothing to do with you.

Race hustlers aren't people. They're devils.

 

[IM2]

The Honorable Dr. Frances Cress Welsing.

White racists hate a powerful sister even more.

Frances Luella Welsing (née Cress; March 18, 1935 – January 2, 2016) was an American psychiatrist. While Welsing was an assistant professor at Howard University she formulated her first body of work in 1969, The Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and self published it in 1970. The paper subsequently appeared in the May 1974 edition of the Black Scholar. This was an introduction to her thoughts that would be developed in The Isis Papers. In 1992, Welsing published The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors. The book is a compilation of essays that she had written over 18 years.

In this book she talks about the genocide of people of color globally, along with issues black people in the United States face. According to Welsing, the genocide of people of color is caused by white people's inability to produce melanin. The minority status of whites has caused what she calls a preoccupation with white genetic survival.

She believed that injustice caused by racism will end when "non-white people worldwide recognize, analyze, understand and discuss openly the genocidal dynamic." She also tackled issues such as drug use, murder, teen pregnancy, infant mortality, incarceration, and unemployment, in the black community. According to Welsing, the cause of these issues is her definition of racism (white supremacy).

 

[IM2]

Race hustlers aren't people. They're devils.

Therefore when somebody black calls white people devils they must be right since whites are the ones race hustling.

 

[IM2]

Jean did what you are always on here crying like a little bitch about. "white people did this" "white people did that"
Its not the violence those people did that you hate. Its simply their skin color. OBVIOUSLY. Because you are one of the most racist people I have ever seen or heard of. Its disturbing how hateful you are.
Genocide and rape of innocent white children gives your racist ass a smile, donit? You sick mother fucker.

You apparently missed what whites were doing to blacks is what was then Saint Domingue.

 

[IM2]

Khalid Muhammad

The Honorable Khalid Muhammad was feared by racists. Because the knew this brother didn't mind coming to arms whith them.

 

[IM2]

The Honorable John Fitzgerald Johnson

This great American Descendant of Slaves is the founder of the NFAC, a armed organization dedicated to the self defense of blacks in America.