Blackburn demands investigation into Justice Jackson over Grammy appearance applauding anti-ICE rhetoric

[Eman623]

You’re just making up numbers.

Being valedictorian at some random school does not automatically make you a better student than someone who isn’t.

By your logic, no one should get into Harvard unless they were a valedictorian and that’s just a stupid idea.

Howsa bout you state your position for a change instead of building strawmen for everyone else.

Do you support using race in admissions? Simple yes or no question. If you do, how do you explain the seeming racism of that?

 

[Lisa558]

So you think Jackson would have gotten into Harvard if she were white?

The odds are she would not have.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What Justice Jackson does can in no way be blamed on or excused by anyone else.

Blame the democrat communists who nominated her incompetency.

 

[Lisa558]

She’s a Harvard grad and can’t define a woman.

 

[Marener]

The odds are she would not have.

You’re much less definitive now than you were earlier.

I guess you got nervous by the racist implications of your baseless claim.

Jackson excelled at Harvard. You can’t take that away from her. Her intellect is far superior to yours.

 

[Bitterhook]

You did say that impeachment would lead to "political overload". It would.

And I went on to suggest that Justice Jackson should take some advice and counsel from her colleagues (all of them) in hopes of tabling the matter more effectively with better results and in a more expedient manner.

 

[Lisa558]

You’re much less definitive now than you were earlier.

But you admit that her being black was most likely the determining factor in her admission, which came at the expense of a superior white student?

I guess you got nervous by the racist implications of your baseless claim.

What’s racist about pointing out that two out of three black students admitted to Harvard would have been rejected if white? Dems the facts. Harvard even admitted it.

And I see you deflect from the fact that you SUPPORT racist policies.

Jackson excelled at Harvard. You can’t take that away from her. Her intellect is far superior to yours.

She did well. Whites (and even more so, Asians) who were rejected for being not black would have done better.

 

[Bitterhook]

Her intellect is far superior to yours.

And far short of what Justice Sotomayor has publicly scolded her for on more than one occasion and concerning her acumen in regard to the law as applied in regard to her position on the Supreme Court.

 

[playtime]

oh, i see - - - not only can a supreme be a private citizen, they must have ESP, so they can determine whether certain free speech or free expression should be allowed inside their bubble.

amiright?

 

[Marener]

But you admit that her being black was most likely the determining factor in her admission, which came at the expense of a superior white student?


What’s racist about pointing out that two out of three black students admitted to Harvard would have been rejected if white? Dems the facts. Harvard even admitted it.

And I see you deflect from the fact that you SUPPORT racist policies.

She did well. Whites (and even more so, Asians) who were rejected for being not black would have done better.

If Jackson did better than the vast majority of white kids who DID make it into Harvard, the. She certainly would have done better than the white miss who DIDNT make it into Harvard.

You’re being emotional. Try being logical.

 

[d0gbreath]

And I went on to suggest that Justice Jackson should take some advice and counsel from her colleagues (all of them) in hopes of tabling the matter more effectively with better results and in a more expedient manner.

What is "the matter"? Cut me some slack.

 

[Bitterhook]

What is "the matter"? Cut me some slack.

What are you here talking about and I didn't make that choice for you.

 

[Lisa558]

If Jackson did better than the vast majority of white kids who DID make it into Harvard, the. She certainly would have done better than the white miss who DIDNT make it into Harvard.

You’re being emotional. Try being logical.

How do YOU know she did better than I would have? You know NOTHING about my academic accomplishments.

And who says Jackson did better than those who were rejected would have done? You think the Asians who had 4.0 GPAs and 1600 SATs - who were rejected for their non-blackness - would not have done better? All those white valedictorians who were rejected would not have done better?

I heard Jackson field questions during her nomination hearing. She was not especially impressive, and came across as a slightly above-average student.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And I went on to suggest that Justice Jackson should take some advice and counsel from her colleagues (all of them) in hopes of tabling the matter more effectively with better results and in a more expedient manner.

Don’t expect her to be that practical or logical.
The mere fact that she accepted the nomination under the conditions of race and gender demonstrated that she lacks the objectivity to qualify for the job in the first place. She should have been DQ’d for that. It should have been considered a trick nomination.

 

[Marener]

How do YOU know she did better than I would have? You know NOTHING about my academic accomplishments.

And who says Jackson did better than those who were rejected would have done? You think the Asians who had 4.0 GPAs and 1600 SATs - who were rejected for their non-blackness - would not have done better? All those white valedictorians who were rejected would not have done better?

I heard Jackson field questions during her nomination hearing. She was not especially impressive, and came across as a slightly above-average student.

I’ve heard you speak about the law and constitution and you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about.

So forgive me if I don’t consider you a judge of intelligence.

Fact remains that Jackson did better than the vast majority of white students at Harvard. If you’re saying that rejected white students would have done better than her, then you’re also saying rejected white students would have done better than the vast majority of accepted white students. How does that fit with your logic?

 

[Lisa558]

Don’t expect her to be that practical or logical.
The mere fact that she accepted the nomination under the conditions of race and gender demonstrated that she lacks the objectivity to qualify for the job in the first place. She should have been DQ’d for that. It should have been considered a trick nomination.

It was a done deal - she was going to get confirmed no matter what. No WAY could they reject a female black.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Madam Justice Brown-Jackson has the first amendment right to go to a showbiz event and clap wildly for third-rate performers who advocate for violating the law and oppose those who enforce the laws passed by our representative democracy.

I have a first amendment right to say that this is what we get when Democrats select senior federal judges on the bases of a combination of skin, gender, and willingness to pretend not to know what the word 'woman' means, in order to avoid upsetting the approximately 1% of the country who think 'i have no way to know, I'm not a biologist' is the right answer.

 

[Marener]

Madam Justice Brown-Jackson has the first amendment right to go to a showbiz event and clap wildly for third-rate performers who advocate for violating the law and oppose those who enforce the laws passed by our representative democracy.

I have a first amendment right to say that this is what we get when Democrats select senior federal judges on the bases of a combination of skin, gender, and willingness to pretend not to know what the word 'woman' means, in order to avoid upsetting the approximately 1% of the country who think 'i have no way to know, I'm not a biologist' is the right answer.

Oh my. She clapped.

Your side has a SCOTUS justice who didn’t clap, but is married to a woman who wanted to overthrow the election.

Spare me your indignation.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It was a done deal - she was going to get confirmed no matter what. No WAY could they reject a female black.

But she should have declined under those conditions. Just because someone is given preferential treatment doesn’t mean they have to accept it.

 

[Lisa558]

But she should have declined under those conditions. Just because someone is given preferential treatment doesn’t mean they have to accept it.

That would have required integrity. She’s used to Black Privilege, and wasn’t about to give it up just as they’re giving her the ultimate prize.