Biological Males in Women's Sports Cannot Be Called 'Males' in Court, Must Be Called 'Transgender Females,' Judge Says

Is there any special reason why there can't be three groups, male, female, and a group with male and female together?

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Thats the more logical approach. I'm all for inclusion but if you were born with male equipment then you shouldnt be competing against women.

Yeah, but that's the bed you've gotten into by sleeping with the SJW types.
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.
 
Leftists are ruining this country. Two genders. Rest is noise.
View attachment 335025


I don't see all these different "genders" as really "mental disorders", but more on the line of Perversions. And the people who practice them are called Perverts or Weirdos.

There is nothing really "new" about any of this. There were always people with alternative ideas on what they wanted to do with the plumbing Almighty God gave them.

The difference in the modern era is that they expect respect and acknowledgement and approval from all of society.

The idea of someone working as a banker from 9 to 5 , then going home , and doing whatever the hell he wants at home but returning to work the next day in men's clothes. those days are past right now. Every sexual deviate expects to be glorified by culture, by the government, by everyone, under force of law.
 
Leftists are ruining this country. Two genders. Rest is noise.
View attachment 335025


I don't see all these different "genders" as really "mental disorders", but more on the line of Perversions. And the people who practice them are called Perverts or Weirdos.

There is nothing really "new" about any of this. There were always people with alternative ideas on what they wanted to do with the plumbing Almighty God gave them.

The difference in the modern era is that they expect respect and acknowledgement and approval from all of society.

The idea of someone working as a banker from 9 to 5 , then going home , and doing whatever the hell he wants at home but returning to work the next day in men's clothes. those days are past right now. Every sexual deviate expects to be glorified by culture, by the government, by everyone, under force of law.
Don't care what you call yourself. 2 genders. Keep trans out of physical competitive sports.
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Even if you cosmetically change the plumbing, you shouldn't be able to compete in a category specifically designed to level the field due to biological differences between the sexes. Even if you cut off the twig and berries, the person still developed as a male, and that confers advantages to their muscle development.
 
Is there any special reason why there can't be three groups, male, female, and a group with male and female together?

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Thats the more logical approach. I'm all for inclusion but if you were born with male equipment then you shouldnt be competing against women.



The same play pretend that they are using to call men, women, is the same shit where you are obviously a violent racist thug and libs pretend you are not.


ALL your political power, comes from that game. You want to keep it, you need to learn to live with the perverts too. And keep in mind, the black trannies, rank higher than you status wise, so mind your betters, or face the mob yourself.


Your black skin won't always get you a pass.
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Candy I am impressed, thank you.
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Candy I am impressed, thank you.
Title 9 was created so female athletes could get the same funding as males, because not as many people watch females compete like they do with males. So now the sorry ass liberal males who couldnt win a competition with REAL males, now realize they can grow tits and then beat women to get the grand prize.

 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Candy I am impressed, thank you.
With what?
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Candy I am impressed, thank you.
Title 9 was created so female athletes could get the same funding as males, because not as many people watch females compete like they do with males. So now the sorry ass liberal males who couldnt win a competition with REAL males, now realize they can grow tits and then beat women to get the grand prize.

Oh brother.
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Candy I am impressed, thank you.
Title 9 was created so female athletes could get the same funding as males, because not as many people watch females compete like they do with males. So now the sorry ass liberal males who couldnt win a competition with REAL males, now realize they can grow tits and then beat women to get the grand prize.

Oh brother.
I see you dont refute the FACTS, but just be the liberal bitch you are....
 
“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”
Absolutely! This judge who refuses to allow biologically male defendants to be referred to as such
should recuse himself immediately!
Alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is "contrary to science"? For that bit of prejudicial b.s.
alone this ruling should be instant grounds for removal from this important matter and possibly removal from his position as judge under any circumstances.

He is obviously unable to overcome his own prejudices and SJW belief system.

Girls ought to be able to compete against other girls on an even playing field. That is an elementary and simple truth.
 
Last edited:
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Candy I am impressed, thank you.
Title 9 was created so female athletes could get the same funding as males, because not as many people watch females compete like they do with males. So now the sorry ass liberal males who couldnt win a competition with REAL males, now realize they can grow tits and then beat women to get the grand prize.

Oh brother.
I see you dont refute the FACTS, but just be the liberal bitch you are....

You reported zero facts fuck stain
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Even if you cosmetically change the plumbing, you shouldn't be able to compete in a category specifically designed to level the field due to biological differences between the sexes. Even if you cut off the twig and berries, the person still developed as a male, and that confers advantages to their muscle development.
It seems the "plumber" makes a lot of money in this also.
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Candy I am impressed, thank you.
Title 9 was created so female athletes could get the same funding as males, because not as many people watch females compete like they do with males. So now the sorry ass liberal males who couldnt win a competition with REAL males, now realize they can grow tits and then beat women to get the grand prize.

Oh brother.
I see you dont refute the FACTS, but just be the liberal bitch you are....

You reported zero facts fuck stain
Only fuck stain is you, worthless piece of welfare shit...
 
Three female high school track athletes are suing the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) over unfair rules that allow biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports. Last month, a district court judge barred the girls’ lawyers from referring to the biological males as “males,” insisting that the lawyers call them “transgender females.” He threatened to retaliate if they refuse to do so. This effective gag order may undermine their case, and it certainly shows bias against their underlying argument. Therefore, the lawyers moved for the judge to recuse himself.



“The Court has now reprimanded Plaintiffs’ counsel and prohibited Plaintiffs from referring to those individuals as ‘male athletes’ because—in the Court’s view— alluding to an individual of the male sex as male is contrary to science, ‘bullying,’ and violates ‘human decency’ if that individual claims a female gender identity,” attorneys Roger Brooks, Kristen Waggoner, and Howard M. Wood III wrote in a motion filed Friday and provided to PJ Media. “A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal.”


But.....but.....but....what about "Science"?

Among the many crazy things that liberals do; this is among the craziest.

Look; it's really simple.

If you have outdoor plumbing, use the gents and compete against gents.
If you have indoor plumbing, use the ladies and compete against ladies.

Every state board of education, UIL, sports federation, business, etc... needs to enact that rule yesterday. How one "feels" on a certain day or year or decade or month or whatever shouldn't have any effect on this.

One of the dumbest things Obama did was getting involved in this gender fluidity issue.

The above case is a symptom of a much larger malady.

Even if you cosmetically change the plumbing, you shouldn't be able to compete in a category specifically designed to level the field due to biological differences between the sexes. Even if you cut off the twig and berries, the person still developed as a male, and that confers advantages to their muscle development.
It seems the "plumber" makes a lot of money in this also.

Cosmetic surgeons make enough on boob/nose jobs and facelifts, i doubt the money is really an incentive.

They may think they are actually helping these people, and in some cases it may be enough. The problem is that they aren't actually changing them into the sex they want to be, just an impersonation of said sex.
 

Forum List

Back
Top