Bin Laden is DEAD, thread from Hell

What do you think about the government's released information?

  • I believe all of it, of course some stuff is withheld for security's sake

    Votes: 39 39.4%
  • I believe none of it, seems like b-s to me

    Votes: 13 13.1%
  • I'm not sure yet

    Votes: 17 17.2%
  • I believe most of it, some stuff fabricated for political reasons

    Votes: 30 30.3%

  • Total voters
    99
Considering we did this litter operation a few days ago, giving the US time to DNA test..

I find it VERY interesting the timing of the osama announcement, considering he is on oprah today.

Its all about campaigning.

OK, the whole "Timing" thing? That's just a bunch of horsehockey.

If there were to be any "Timing" of this, as in using it for political gain, it would have been done in September of next year.

It would be UTTERLY moronic for anyone to pull this out a year-and-a-half before the election. Anything can and does happen during an election season.

George H W Bush, for instance, went from an 89% Approval rating to a 29% approval rating from 2/28/91 to 7/28/91.

So Puh-Lease, enough with the "timing is convenient" thing.

You can call Barack Obama a lot of things, but he certainly is not stupid, especially when it comes to politics.

*coughs* primaries. obama had sunken so low he wasn't even garanteed the democratic nod to run in 201
 
Considering we did this litter operation a few days ago, giving the US time to DNA test..

I find it VERY interesting the timing of the osama announcement, considering he is on oprah today.

Its all about campaigning.

OK, the whole "Timing" thing? That's just a bunch of horsehockey.

If there were to be any "Timing" of this, as in using it for political gain, it would have been done in September of next year.

It would be UTTERLY moronic for anyone to pull this out a year-and-a-half before the election. Anything can and does happen during an election season.

George H W Bush, for instance, went from an 89% Approval rating to a 29% approval rating from 2/28/91 to 7/28/91.

So Puh-Lease, enough with the "timing is convenient" thing.

You can call Barack Obama a lot of things, but he certainly is not stupid, especially when it comes to politics.

*coughs* primaries. obama had sunken so low he wasn't even garanteed the democratic nod to run in 201

*cough* brain dead *cough*
 
Considering we did this litter operation a few days ago, giving the US time to DNA test..

I find it VERY interesting the timing of the osama announcement, considering he is on oprah today.

Its all about campaigning.

OK, the whole "Timing" thing? That's just a bunch of horsehockey.

If there were to be any "Timing" of this, as in using it for political gain, it would have been done in September of next year.

It would be UTTERLY moronic for anyone to pull this out a year-and-a-half before the election. Anything can and does happen during an election season.

George H W Bush, for instance, went from an 89% Approval rating to a 29% approval rating from 2/28/91 to 7/28/91.

So Puh-Lease, enough with the "timing is convenient" thing.

You can call Barack Obama a lot of things, but he certainly is not stupid, especially when it comes to politics.


he is going to need a year and a half to catch up. Yes he needs this now.

Ive never called him stupid. I think he is as smart as a fox, and this is a good showing of it timing wise.
 
no, atually he is a really shitty president. that isn't crap

That's your opinion, and everyone has one.

To paraphrase Booooosh, history will be the judge of that.

But Rabbi's statements were in fact a load of utter crap.
 
I don't think he should have released it and given in to the idiotic racists, but I have to admit he slaughtered Trump in that roast, hilarious, Trump is such a joke.


You ass, this is about killing Bin Laden, not Trump you moron. You're on the wrong thread...be gone you liberal nit wit.:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
and he just happens to release his birth certifiate at the same time

And? He had already made the birthers look like a bunch of conspiracy-crazed jackasses.

Do you think he would have staged a fake Osama killing just to put icing on that cake?

No, this was not "convenient timing", this was the real deal.
 
OK, the whole "Timing" thing? That's just a bunch of horsehockey.

If there were to be any "Timing" of this, as in using it for political gain, it would have been done in September of next year.

It would be UTTERLY moronic for anyone to pull this out a year-and-a-half before the election. Anything can and does happen during an election season.

George H W Bush, for instance, went from an 89% Approval rating to a 29% approval rating from 2/28/91 to 7/28/91.

So Puh-Lease, enough with the "timing is convenient" thing.

You can call Barack Obama a lot of things, but he certainly is not stupid, especially when it comes to politics.

*coughs* primaries. obama had sunken so low he wasn't even garanteed the democratic nod to run in 201

*cough* brain dead *cough*

i see the obvious escapes you
 
No matter what the Republicans try to say, Obama got him, Bush didn't...there is no way to spin that!!!

Kind of the same way those responsible for the first World Trade Center bombing were captured, tried and convicted under Clinton.

Wow, look at that would you...seems the Democrats have the better record when it come to fighting terrorists.
And who was in office when the most important figure was captured, Kaleid Sheik Mohammed. The mastermind of 9/11, and Al Qaedas top mission planner. You know, the one who gave up the info and thwarted an attack on Los Angeles?

Still want to make that claim?

KSM is the most important? Where were the parades when that oh so important terrorist was captured?

Seems like you're saying Obama deserves your support
Tactically, yes he was the most important.........Any troop on the ground who benefited from the info they obtained from his sorry ass will tell you the same thing.

Without KSM, 9/11 would not have happened. He was responsible for the plan. Moving money. Moving personnel. Etc.....He was responsible for the planning of many bombings overseas.....He was responsible for planning the thwarted attack on L.A........He was Al Qaedas top guy when it came to inflicting damage......Bin Laden had the money, and the aura. KSM knew how to get it done.

If Bin Laden was so tactically important, we would have tried everything to take him alive...According to reports coming from within in the WH, reported by CNN, Bin Laden never reached for a gun. He was shot dead on site.....As i'm quite sure the orders were. Shoot him dead on site.......He was shot first in the chest, and then the head.
 
*coughs* primaries. obama had sunken so low he wasn't even garanteed the democratic nod to run in 201

He had absolutely no chance of losing a primary.

His approval ratings are, and have been in the high 40's and steady there for months, which is 12 points above Reagan at this point in his presidency, and the economy is on the upswing.

He beats any named Republican opponent handily. More handily than any other Democrat would.

So, no, that's not true at all.
 
This whole "USA, USA, USA" flag waving, rah rah bullshit is disgraceful. These fools have the red, white and blue blinds pulled over their eyes without realizing that Osama's death doesn't change a ******* thing.

What does his death change? Will it miraculously win the bogus War on Terror? Will it bring outsourced jobs back? Will pay off the fifty trillion dollar debt? Will it prevent the abuses that the DHS, TSA, FBI, CIA, NSA, ATF, DEA, local police perpetrate on a daily basis? Will it repair America's crumbling infrastructure? Will it revitalize the omnipotent blight in cities across the nation?

No, it won't because what Americans need to realize is that the biggest terrorists live in skyscraper penthouses, bank headquarters and 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, all of which are on American soil. Wake up and smell the ******* roses.
 
Last edited:
*coughs* primaries. obama had sunken so low he wasn't even garanteed the democratic nod to run in 201

He had absolutely no chance of losing a primary.

His approval ratings are, and have been in the high 40's and steady there for months, which is 12 points above Reagan at this point in his presidency, and the economy is on the upswing.

He beats any named Republican opponent handily. More handily than any other Democrat would.

So, no, that's not true at all.


the economy is on the upswing? :eusa_eh:
 
he is going to need a year and a half to catch up. Yes he needs this now.

Ive never called him stupid. I think he is as smart as a fox, and this is a good showing of it timing wise.

I'm sorry, but that's just not how it works.

The American attention span has been proven to not be anywhere near that long when it comes to politics.

In a modern political face off, the most this kind of effect would last for would be, an absolute max of about 6 months, until the next issue comes along to distract everyone.

George HW is the perfect example of this effect, but there are plenty of others.
 
*coughs* primaries. obama had sunken so low he wasn't even garanteed the democratic nod to run in 201

He had absolutely no chance of losing a primary.

His approval ratings are, and have been in the high 40's and steady there for months, which is 12 points above Reagan at this point in his presidency, and the economy is on the upswing.

He beats any named Republican opponent handily. More handily than any other Democrat would.

So, no, that's not true at all.

yea, yea , yea. and he had absolutely no chance of losing control of congress. after all the republicans were done for decades after bush right. obama found a way to change that in record time
 
And who was in office when the most important figure was captured, Kaleid Sheik Mohammed. The mastermind of 9/11, and Al Qaedas top mission planner. You know, the one who gave up the info and thwarted an attack on Los Angeles?

Still want to make that claim?

Ahh, so now Osama Bin Laden isn't even the most important figure?

LOL. Way to change the goalposts there Jester.
In a symbolic sense, somewhat.

In a tactical sense, not even close.

Christ man, the man had no cell phone or internet service, for obvious reasons. He was reduced to age old courier tactics, which are not foolproof, and hold little weight in war against the mightiest......In fact, it led to his sorry ass taking a bullet to the brain.

In a Symbolic sense, this is a great day.....In a tactical sense, it means very little.

Come on man, you know how battle works.
 
*coughs* primaries. obama had sunken so low he wasn't even garanteed the democratic nod to run in 201

He had absolutely no chance of losing a primary.

His approval ratings are, and have been in the high 40's and steady there for months, which is 12 points above Reagan at this point in his presidency, and the economy is on the upswing.

He beats any named Republican opponent handily. More handily than any other Democrat would.

So, no, that's not true at all.

the economy is on the upswing? wtf? that statement just blew any credibility you might have had to hell
 
15th post
Tactically, yes he was the most important.........Any troop on the ground who benefited from the info they obtained from his sorry ass will tell you the same thing.

Without KSM, 9/11 would not have happened. He was responsible for the plan. Moving money. Moving personnel. Etc.....He was responsible for the planning of many bombings overseas.....He was responsible for planning the thwarted attack on L.A........He was Al Qaedas top guy when it came to inflicting damage......Bin Laden had the money, and the aura. KSM knew how to get it done.

If Bin Laden was so tactically important, we would have tried everything to take him alive...According to reports coming from within in the WH, reported by CNN, Bin Laden never reached for a gun. He was shot dead on site.....As i'm quite sure the orders were. Shoot him dead on site.......He was shot first in the chest, and then the head.

That's like saying Peter was tactically more important than Jesus....

In a fanatical movement, it's a cult of personality that keeps the troops doing the suicide bombings. There are lots of people who can plan tactics and strategies, but there's only one Bin Laden.

A fanatical terrorist organization is not a military organization, though I can see how you might make that mistake. You're just thinking too logically. Crazy extremists are not logical.
 
Back
Top Bottom