Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
And so is this.What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
Dream on.....What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
now we get to listen about how much trouble Clinton is in until she whips every Republicans in her path and wins the 2016 general election ... then we get to listen what a sleeze she is for eight years ... Clinton fluffers = Rw's
Different issues, so it doesn't applyAnd so is this.What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
Yup, they all claimed the National Enquirer was lying about John Edwards too. But of course every bit of it was proven to be true. The Enquirer proved Edwards was a lying degenerate. This one is much worse though. An 'Underage Sex Slave Island?' My God, how can these sick bastards get away with that?
This awful scandal involves some very very powerful Globalist Elites. I mean, there's even an English Prince involved. So they'll probably skate in the end. They have all the power & wealth. I don't expect to see justice for any of those poor girls. In fact, many have probably already been disappeared and suicided by now. These Elites are pure evil. And Bill Clinton is a very powerful member of the Elite Club. So i'm not counting on justice.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
now we get to listen about how much trouble Clinton is in until she whips every Republicans in her path and wins the 2016 general election ... then we get to listen what a sleeze she is for eight years ... Clinton fluffers = Rw's
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
Yup, they all claimed the National Enquirer was lying about John Edwards too. But of course every bit of it was proven to be true. The Enquirer proved Edwards was a lying degenerate. This one is much worse though. An 'Underage Sex Slave Island?' My God, how can these sick bastards get away with that?
This awful scandal involves some very very powerful Globalist Elites. I mean, there's even an English Prince involved. So they'll probably skate in the end. They have all the power & wealth. I don't expect to see justice for any of those poor girls. In fact, many have probably already been disappeared and suicided by now. These Elites are pure evil. And Bill Clinton is a very powerful member of the Elite Club. So i'm not counting on justice.
I wouldn't feel too sorry for the girls. I doubt they are actual slaves. I suspect they are under-age prostitutes who are paid handsomely for their services. They are probably earning far more than they could earn in their home countries.
Still, only a despicable perv would have sex with girls of that age.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
you post a link in the OP later to say your link IS NOT where you got the story you were reporting . then call someone else a sleezeball for not being in context.
Let me remind you what a douchebag you really are. I'll even add YOU'RE AN IDIOT !!
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
Yup, they all claimed the National Enquirer was lying about John Edwards too. But of course every bit of it was proven to be true. The Enquirer proved Edwards was a lying degenerate. This one is much worse though. An 'Underage Sex Slave Island?' My God, how can these sick bastards get away with that?
This awful scandal involves some very very powerful Globalist Elites. I mean, there's even an English Prince involved. So they'll probably skate in the end. They have all the power & wealth. I don't expect to see justice for any of those poor girls. In fact, many have probably already been disappeared and suicided by now. These Elites are pure evil. And Bill Clinton is a very powerful member of the Elite Club. So i'm not counting on justice.
I wouldn't feel too sorry for the girls. I doubt they are actual slaves. I suspect they are under-age prostitutes who are paid handsomely for their services. They are probably earning far more than they could earn in their home countries.
Still, only a despicable perv would have sex with girls of that age.
Well, some reports are claiming some of the girls were actually abducted and brought to the island. So at least some of the girls were there against their will. But regardless, many of em were underage. They're not necessarily old enough to understand the implications of their decisions. These assholes are evil predators. But they're also very very powerful Global Elites. So i won't be counting on any real justice.
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
now we get to listen about how much trouble Clinton is in until she whips every Republicans in her path and wins the 2016 general election ... then we get to listen what a sleeze she is for eight years ... Clinton fluffers = Rw's
The other Dems might in passing mention Bill's serial visits to Lolita Island where his BFF kept 16 year old sex slaves.
It's not really a War on Women if they're not yet women, amiright?
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
you post a link in the OP later to say your link IS NOT where you got the story you were reporting . then call someone else a sleezeball for not being in context.
Let me remind you what a douchebag you really are. I'll even add YOU'RE AN IDIOT !!
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
you post a link in the OP later to say your link IS NOT where you got the story you were reporting . then call someone else a sleezeball for not being in context.
Let me remind you what a douchebag you really are. I'll even add YOU'RE AN IDIOT !!
you lefties claimed the story came from Fox, it didn't. you are the douchbag here, douchbag
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
Clinton is in trouble
Clinton Fulffers -- to the kneepads!!!
now we get to listen about how much trouble Clinton is in until she whips every Republicans in her path and wins the 2016 general election ... then we get to listen what a sleeze she is for eight years ... Clinton fluffers = Rw's
The other Dems might in passing mention Bill's serial visits to Lolita Island where his BFF kept 16 year old sex slaves.
It's not really a War on Women if they're not yet women, amiright?
no you're an idiot
What happened in the past is irrelevant. It's history.
Out of context, sleaze ball. That was in reference to a specific issue.
you post a link in the OP later to say your link IS NOT where you got the story you were reporting . then call someone else a sleezeball for not being in context.
Let me remind you what a douchebag you really are. I'll even add YOU'RE AN IDIOT !!
I said "NOTE" the link in the OP. FOX is not where I got the story.