Do you ever think of the term, 'broken record' whenever Smith is in a thread?
Murf didn't try to "change the argument.
Murf said outright and straight up that your "point" is pointless.
It doesn't matter when Obama used a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens. He's still a giant hypocrite for doing it.
The adolescent preoccupation with the word "teabagger" is one thing, when it comes from actual adolescents. It's something entirely different when it's the President of the United States.
Now, this guy has been nattering on about "civility" since he started taking flak. It's easy enough to find plenty of examples of it on the web if you bother to look. Here's one such, article dated January 20, 2009. Bear in mind that his "teabagger" quote was from November 30, 2009.
Hell, even Warren's prayer at his inauguration called for "civility". It's a word that Obama, himself, has used frequently. So, it didn't matter if the original article said that the book had been released "just three days after Obama's call for civility". It's been an ongoing situation in which Obama has consistently set one standard for himself and his administration, and another for his critics. Or have we forgotten him snickering like a 10 year-old as he intimated that Sarah Palin was pig in lipstick way back during the campaign?
The issue isn't timing. It's that the guy is a total hypocrite, utterly lacking in self-control.
Link?
Don't expect any evidence. Just sayin'
Murf didn't try to "change the argument.
Murf said outright and straight up that your "point" is pointless.
It doesn't matter when Obama used a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens. He's still a giant hypocrite for doing it.
The adolescent preoccupation with the word "teabagger" is one thing, when it comes from actual adolescents. It's something entirely different when it's the President of the United States.
Now, this guy has been nattering on about "civility" since he started taking flak. It's easy enough to find plenty of examples of it on the web if you bother to look. Here's one such, article dated January 20, 2009. Bear in mind that his "teabagger" quote was from November 30, 2009.
Hell, even Warren's prayer at his inauguration called for "civility". It's a word that Obama, himself, has used frequently. So, it didn't matter if the original article said that the book had been released "just three days after Obama's call for civility". It's been an ongoing situation in which Obama has consistently set one standard for himself and his administration, and another for his critics. Or have we forgotten him snickering like a 10 year-old as he intimated that Sarah Palin was pig in lipstick way back during the campaign?
The issue isn't timing. It's that the guy is a total hypocrite, utterly lacking in self-control.
Do you ever think of the term, 'broken record' whenever Smith is in a thread?
Murf didn't try to "change the argument.
Murf said outright and straight up that your "point" is pointless.
It doesn't matter when Obama used a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens. He's still a giant hypocrite for doing it.
The adolescent preoccupation with the word "teabagger" is one thing, when it comes from actual adolescents. It's something entirely different when it's the President of the United States.
Now, this guy has been nattering on about "civility" since he started taking flak. It's easy enough to find plenty of examples of it on the web if you bother to look. Here's one such, article dated January 20, 2009. Bear in mind that his "teabagger" quote was from November 30, 2009.
Hell, even Warren's prayer at his inauguration called for "civility". It's a word that Obama, himself, has used frequently. So, it didn't matter if the original article said that the book had been released "just three days after Obama's call for civility". It's been an ongoing situation in which Obama has consistently set one standard for himself and his administration, and another for his critics. Or have we forgotten him snickering like a 10 year-old as he intimated that Sarah Palin was pig in lipstick way back during the campaign?
The issue isn't timing. It's that the guy is a total hypocrite, utterly lacking in self-control.
I know this is at least the second time you've said this to him.
(He's not too bright, eh.)
Murf didn't try to "change the argument.
Murf said outright and straight up that your "point" is pointless.
It doesn't matter when Obama used a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens. He's still a giant hypocrite for doing it.
The adolescent preoccupation with the word "teabagger" is one thing, when it comes from actual adolescents. It's something entirely different when it's the President of the United States.
Now, this guy has been nattering on about "civility" since he started taking flak. It's easy enough to find plenty of examples of it on the web if you bother to look. Here's one such, article dated January 20, 2009. Bear in mind that his "teabagger" quote was from November 30, 2009.
Hell, even Warren's prayer at his inauguration called for "civility". It's a word that Obama, himself, has used frequently. So, it didn't matter if the original article said that the book had been released "just three days after Obama's call for civility". It's been an ongoing situation in which Obama has consistently set one standard for himself and his administration, and another for his critics. Or have we forgotten him snickering like a 10 year-old as he intimated that Sarah Palin was pig in lipstick way back during the campaign?
The issue isn't timing. It's that the guy is a total hypocrite, utterly lacking in self-control.
and yet you did try to change the argument.
here is where this thread began
and then after I presented my argument exposing how the timeline didn't fit you tried to argue that the timeline doesn't matter AFTER it showed that the original argument was based on a LIE.
Furthermore, i am still waiting on you to PROVE that obama's intent was to use "a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens." I have asked you this already but your only defense is that you BELIEVE that he is using that form.
Oh and the only ones who seem to have an "adolescent preoccupation" with the term "tea-baggers" are posters like you who are trying to make something out of NOTHING as you try to denegrate anoyone who mentions the term no matter what context it is used in.
The sad thing for you is that the core of your argument is the ASSUMPTION that you claim to know what obama's intent was when he made that comment when the reality is that you have no clue. There in lies your "adolescent preoccupation" with the word as you try to define what others were and are thinking based on your own obsession with the sexual form of the word.
Then in the end you run with more assumption based hypocritical propaganda that is based on more your spin. LOL
I think it's sad based on what mccain and palin were saying about obama DURING THE CAMPAIGN that you would even think about him replying in kind with a few counters of his own. If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. LOL
BTW I think it's hilarious that in one instance you claim he has self control because he hasn't used "tea-bagger" publically and then in another that he has no self control all so you could attack him. Your contradictions show that you are spinning desperately.
Don't expect any evidence. Just sayin'
boedicca is a liar, pure and simple.
Murf didn't try to "change the argument.
Murf said outright and straight up that your "point" is pointless.
It doesn't matter when Obama used a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens. He's still a giant hypocrite for doing it.
The adolescent preoccupation with the word "teabagger" is one thing, when it comes from actual adolescents. It's something entirely different when it's the President of the United States.
Now, this guy has been nattering on about "civility" since he started taking flak. It's easy enough to find plenty of examples of it on the web if you bother to look. Here's one such, article dated January 20, 2009. Bear in mind that his "teabagger" quote was from November 30, 2009.
Hell, even Warren's prayer at his inauguration called for "civility". It's a word that Obama, himself, has used frequently. So, it didn't matter if the original article said that the book had been released "just three days after Obama's call for civility". It's been an ongoing situation in which Obama has consistently set one standard for himself and his administration, and another for his critics. Or have we forgotten him snickering like a 10 year-old as he intimated that Sarah Palin was pig in lipstick way back during the campaign?
The issue isn't timing. It's that the guy is a total hypocrite, utterly lacking in self-control.
and yet you did try to change the argument.
here is where this thread began
and then after I presented my argument exposing how the timeline didn't fit you tried to argue that the timeline doesn't matter AFTER it showed that the original argument was based on a LIE.
Furthermore, i am still waiting on you to PROVE that obama's intent was to use "a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens." I have asked you this already but your only defense is that you BELIEVE that he is using that form.
Oh and the only ones who seem to have an "adolescent preoccupation" with the term "tea-baggers" are posters like you who are trying to make something out of NOTHING as you try to denegrate anoyone who mentions the term no matter what context it is used in.
The sad thing for you is that the core of your argument is the ASSUMPTION that you claim to know what obama's intent was when he made that comment when the reality is that you have no clue. There in lies your "adolescent preoccupation" with the word as you try to define what others were and are thinking based on your own obsession with the sexual form of the word.
Then in the end you run with more assumption based hypocritical propaganda that is based on more your spin. LOL
I think it's sad based on what mccain and palin were saying about obama DURING THE CAMPAIGN that you would even think about him replying in kind with a few counters of his own. If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. LOL
BTW I think it's hilarious that in one instance you claim he has self control because he hasn't used "tea-bagger" publically and then in another that he has no self control all so you could attack him. Your contradictions show that you are spinning desperately.
good grief.
talk about baffling you with BS.
Nice bumper sticker mentality. Not that I am surprised, after all that is typcially what is expected when trolls enter a thread and offer nothing to the debate. LOL
oh brother.
Nice bumper sticker mentality. Not that I am surprised, after all that is typcially what is expected when trolls enter a thread and offer nothing to the debate. LOL
what is with lefties, everyone they don't like they call trolls?
and honey, all that crap that you spewed is not even worth being "debated".
Do you ever think of the term, 'broken record' whenever Smith is in a thread?Murf didn't try to "change the argument.
Murf said outright and straight up that your "point" is pointless.
It doesn't matter when Obama used a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens. He's still a giant hypocrite for doing it.
The adolescent preoccupation with the word "teabagger" is one thing, when it comes from actual adolescents. It's something entirely different when it's the President of the United States.
Now, this guy has been nattering on about "civility" since he started taking flak. It's easy enough to find plenty of examples of it on the web if you bother to look. Here's one such, article dated January 20, 2009. Bear in mind that his "teabagger" quote was from November 30, 2009.
Hell, even Warren's prayer at his inauguration called for "civility". It's a word that Obama, himself, has used frequently. So, it didn't matter if the original article said that the book had been released "just three days after Obama's call for civility". It's been an ongoing situation in which Obama has consistently set one standard for himself and his administration, and another for his critics. Or have we forgotten him snickering like a 10 year-old as he intimated that Sarah Palin was pig in lipstick way back during the campaign?
The issue isn't timing. It's that the guy is a total hypocrite, utterly lacking in self-control.
I know this is at least the second time you've said this to him.
(He's not too bright, eh.)
aww imagine that, you still can't prove your accusation against me so you have to jump on someone elses coat tails to attack me personally in a desperate attempt to CYA and avoid admitting that you were and are WRONG. LOL
The sad thing is that you try to call me a broken record and then call out murf for repeating the same baseless argument like a broken record. LOL
