Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No he was a black man that got in front of predominately white audiences and put down black folks, if he was sincere in his speeches about some black folks he would have gone and talked to the folks he was talking about. Cosby has always been a coward and will always be a coward.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
No just another boot licker who tried to take profit off of white racism.just another african american that was targeted by the oppressive govt
No it was black folks that were pissed off and I am one of them.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
Do you even any know any black folks.Hmmmm okay. I don't know many blacks that aren't liberals.One is a subset of the other.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
i've talked to blacks that did not care or even agreed. Liberals are teh one that cared.
huh? how so? he was a leader of civil rights! many owe their careers to his trailblazing careerNo just another boot licker who tried to take profit off of white racism.just another african american that was targeted by the oppressive govt
No more so than Republicans who don't have a clue about the issues other than they know they don't want folks of color to have anything.Hmmmm okay. I don't know many blacks that aren't liberals.One is a subset of the other.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
i've talked to blacks that did not care or even agreed. Liberals are teh one that cared.
Many are not that political. They might show up and vote as their leaders tell them on election day, but they are not liberal.
And they didn't give a damn about Cosby talking about the stupid young people.
But liberals? Liberals care. They understand that if you accept that the behavior might be even PART of hte problem, that you are inviting a conversation that they DO NOT WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN.
what a stupid post as democrats on cater to people of color around election timeNo more so than Republicans who don't have a clue about the issues other than they know they don't want folks of color to have anything.Hmmmm okay. I don't know many blacks that aren't liberals.One is a subset of the other.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
i've talked to blacks that did not care or even agreed. Liberals are teh one that cared.
Many are not that political. They might show up and vote as their leaders tell them on election day, but they are not liberal.
And they didn't give a damn about Cosby talking about the stupid young people.
But liberals? Liberals care. They understand that if you accept that the behavior might be even PART of hte problem, that you are inviting a conversation that they DO NOT WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN.
No just another boot licker who tried to take profit off of white racism.just another african american that was targeted by the oppressive govthuh? how so? he was a leader of civil rights! many owe their careers to his trailblazing career.
you just don’t like that he called folks like you out for being losers and playing the victim card.
What is stupid if folks like you, I guess I have to hip your dumbass like I do other fools. Do you realize in the last 40yrs black folks do better under a Democrat president than we do a Republican president. Financially, educationally, etc.what a stupid post as democrats on cater to people of color around election timeNo more so than Republicans who don't have a clue about the issues other than they know they don't want folks of color to have anything.Hmmmm okay. I don't know many blacks that aren't liberals.One is a subset of the other.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
i've talked to blacks that did not care or even agreed. Liberals are teh one that cared.
Many are not that political. They might show up and vote as their leaders tell them on election day, but they are not liberal.
And they didn't give a damn about Cosby talking about the stupid young people.
But liberals? Liberals care. They understand that if you accept that the behavior might be even PART of hte problem, that you are inviting a conversation that they DO NOT WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN.
Idiot.He only raped white women. He was repulsed by raping black women.
that is a damn lie, minority unemployment was the lowest under the last administration. Blacks that want to sit at home on their asses while drawing welfare and food stamps do better under democrats. Democrats need a huge dependent base turnout to win.What is stupid if folks like you, I guess I have to hip your dumbass like I do other fools. Do you realize in the last 40yrs black folks do better under a Democrat president than we do a Republican president. Financially, educationally, etc.what a stupid post as democrats on cater to people of color around election timeNo more so than Republicans who don't have a clue about the issues other than they know they don't want folks of color to have anything.Hmmmm okay. I don't know many blacks that aren't liberals.One is a subset of the other.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
i've talked to blacks that did not care or even agreed. Liberals are teh one that cared.
Many are not that political. They might show up and vote as their leaders tell them on election day, but they are not liberal.
And they didn't give a damn about Cosby talking about the stupid young people.
But liberals? Liberals care. They understand that if you accept that the behavior might be even PART of hte problem, that you are inviting a conversation that they DO NOT WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN.
What is stupid if folks like you, I guess I have to hip your dumbass like I do other fools. Do you realize in the last 40yrs black folks do better under a Democrat president than we do a Republican president. Financially, educationally, etc.what a stupid post as democrats on cater to people of color around election timeNo more so than Republicans who don't have a clue about the issues other than they know they don't want folks of color to have anything.Hmmmm okay. I don't know many blacks that aren't liberals.One is a subset of the other.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
i've talked to blacks that did not care or even agreed. Liberals are teh one that cared.
Many are not that political. They might show up and vote as their leaders tell them on election day, but they are not liberal.
And they didn't give a damn about Cosby talking about the stupid young people.
But liberals? Liberals care. They understand that if you accept that the behavior might be even PART of hte problem, that you are inviting a conversation that they DO NOT WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN.that is a damn lie, minority unemployment was the lowest under the last administration.
Blacks that want to sit at home on their asses while drawing welfare and food stamps do better under democrats. Democrats need a huge dependent base turnout to win.
Yeah if he only raped black women he would have not been busted.Idiot.He only raped white women. He was repulsed by raping black women.
What is stupid if folks like you, I guess I have to hip your dumbass like I do other fools. Do you realize in the last 40yrs black folks do better under a Democrat president than we do a Republican president. Financially, educationally, etc.what a stupid post as democrats on cater to people of color around election timeNo more so than Republicans who don't have a clue about the issues other than they know they don't want folks of color to have anything.Hmmmm okay. I don't know many blacks that aren't liberals.One is a subset of the other.No, he was a black man who talked out about things that blacks didn;t want him to talk about. He had to be made an example of.You never see 60 women randomly accuse a guy of rape though. Cosby is literally one of the most prolific serial rapists our country has ever seen. His numbers are staggering.It makes a huge difference in today's culture, everyone wants the spotlight and everyone likes getting paid. Juries today love punishing successful people, it's the culture we live in. If someone waited 40 years to pipe up in my opinion, whatever happened to a person must have not been that serious to begin withDoes saying it 40 years later make it less true? I agree that its not the best time to do it, and those claims should be met with some skepticism, but when there are a million fucking girls saying it, there is clearly a problem.Did they say that the next morning and report the incident or did they decide to do it 40 years later?So how about the women who say they woke up screwedWhats the trurh? What did he actually say?They didnt lie. Cosby admitted it.Yea because over 60 women lied on a man who has admitted he drugged and raped women.Guilt aside, he never should've been tried.
He should be compensated...
No, he didn't. It's silly leftard word games.
He "gave it to the women" in that he handed it to them, so that they could, of their own free will, get fucked up, before they had sex.
Whether it was just something that hollywood girls were enjoying at the time, or if it was what they needed to do, to have sex with a man in exchange for help with their careers,
he did not "Drug" them, as implied, but just provided them with the drugs they wanted.
I was caught up in the emotion of it all and thought this too, but the facts dictated otherwise. Yes, they're all lying.Yea all those women are lying.
Might (the number of women saying something) doesn't make right (the truth.)A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to his prison sentence
The almost five-dozen women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault are celebrating his sentencing. Here are their stories.amp.usatoday.com
From your link.
"
6. Barbara Bowman
She told The Cut magazine she was introduced to Cosby as a 17-year-old aspiring actress and model in 1985. For the next two years, she says Cosby flew her to events, moved her to New York and repeatedly drugged and raped her until she wriggled out of his grasp and he wrote her off. "
Two years? Multiple events? "MOVED HER TO NEW YORK"?
ANd finally, "repeatedly drugged and raped"?
Ok. This was not a rape. She was an aspiring actress, who, for a while was a mistress of a very successful and connected actor, who would provide drugs to her, so she could get high, before they had consensual sex.
Question, was he PAYING FOR HER APARTMENT IN NEW YORK?
Question: Was he setting her up with acting roles?
Wasn't blacks that were pissed by what he said. It was liberals.
i've talked to blacks that did not care or even agreed. Liberals are teh one that cared.
Many are not that political. They might show up and vote as their leaders tell them on election day, but they are not liberal.
And they didn't give a damn about Cosby talking about the stupid young people.
But liberals? Liberals care. They understand that if you accept that the behavior might be even PART of hte problem, that you are inviting a conversation that they DO NOT WANT TO HAVE HAPPEN.that is a damn lie, minority unemployment was the lowest under the last administration.
This is why you are such a fool.
View attachment 513568
Blacks that want to sit at home on their asses while drawing welfare and food stamps do better under democrats. Democrats need a huge dependent base turnout to win.
Post your numbers fool to prove your point.
You're right, because white folks in the prosecutors office wouldn't care.Yeah if he only raped black women he would have not been busted.Idiot.He only raped white women. He was repulsed by raping black women.
And people wonder why certain races are more misrepresentedYou're right, because white folks in the prosecutors office wouldn't care.Yeah if he only raped black women he would have not been busted.Idiot.He only raped white women. He was repulsed by raping black women.
haha he was on national television during the civil rights movement…one of the first african americans on network tvNo just another boot licker who tried to take profit off of white racism.just another african american that was targeted by the oppressive govthuh? how so? he was a leader of civil rights! many owe their careers to his trailblazing career.
Bullshit, he was hiding during the Civil Rights Movement and then in the 1980s he came out like he was this big Civil Rights Advocate.
you just don’t like that he called folks like you out for being losers and playing the victim card.
You like the fact that he attacked black folks and said the things your racist ass wants to say. You can call me a loser, victim and any other right wing catch word you like. Ask me if I give 2 F*cks.