Crixus
Gold Member
Big Tobacco. I remember when i was a child when my grand parents would come visit i remembe the ciggretts they smoked had these little coupons in them. With these little coupons you would save up and use them to get zippo lighters, ash trays and other schwag. years later we had Marlboro miles and Camel bucks, and even a cool little mascot called Joe Camel. i remember smoking the crap out of camels so i could get the pool table. so it came ro pass that americans went at big tobacxo hard. they pointed out the t-shirts, the lighters, the schwag was directed right at children. in the end lobbiest gotnit set up so big tobaccos supreamly addictive product could still be directed at kids, just no cool schwag.
Now its big Pharma's turn in the barrel, but like big tobacco, they are tossing lots of money at law makers in an attempt to continue selling the pills. In my opinion, law makers have only increased the demand for the drugs, as well as bumping the street price some. maybe more happened, but just wasnt covered like when Big Tobacco was hit.
then there is big weed. in my opinion big weed has gotten and continues to get a huge break. You had the whole thing with vape pens killing people that were largely illicetly sold weed vapes, yet Juul got the blame for all that. they target children with their products, google it and notice all the flavors thay are verry similer to the tobacco and vape flavers. and there is also the fact that smoking pot is a process of inhaling a carcinogin, which just like smokeing tobacco causes extensive damage to the throat and lungs. edibles may be a good answer, bitbno one knows what the long term affects of using weed from the time one is a teen to adulthood.
so the question is, should the people who are big weed be called up to the hill for a Q and A? if so, why, if no, why not? and do they target children with their advertising?
full disclosure, i am a full fleged stoner and im pro legal pot. thanks.
Now its big Pharma's turn in the barrel, but like big tobacco, they are tossing lots of money at law makers in an attempt to continue selling the pills. In my opinion, law makers have only increased the demand for the drugs, as well as bumping the street price some. maybe more happened, but just wasnt covered like when Big Tobacco was hit.
then there is big weed. in my opinion big weed has gotten and continues to get a huge break. You had the whole thing with vape pens killing people that were largely illicetly sold weed vapes, yet Juul got the blame for all that. they target children with their products, google it and notice all the flavors thay are verry similer to the tobacco and vape flavers. and there is also the fact that smoking pot is a process of inhaling a carcinogin, which just like smokeing tobacco causes extensive damage to the throat and lungs. edibles may be a good answer, bitbno one knows what the long term affects of using weed from the time one is a teen to adulthood.
so the question is, should the people who are big weed be called up to the hill for a Q and A? if so, why, if no, why not? and do they target children with their advertising?
full disclosure, i am a full fleged stoner and im pro legal pot. thanks.