Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Defense presented some very damning evidence, not speculative. Two people saying they were romantic way before she hired him. A gazillion phone records.
Nobody said the affair was illegal. IT WAS ILLEGAL TO LIE ABOUT IT. WHY THE FUCK can't you stupid fucking liberals understand that? Just like the Clinton blow job. Nobody cares about him cheating on his wife, but when he was asked under oath, he lied about it. Thus was impeached.
If a fucking judge asks you under oath if you had an affair with the spec pros and you say no and it can be proven you are lying, YOU HAVE COMMITTED A CRIME, PERJURY.
We will have to see what the judge decides but it's my opinion Fani will stay in the case.You cannot be trusted any longer with cases in that court. YOU ARE DONE. She is not a defendant in a case. The proof doesn't have to be "beyond a reasonable doubt." All the defendants lawyers have to do is show that there is something nefarious going on, and she's done.
Not sure. Where did he say he went?
That isn't illegal.
Not under oath as it hasn't been proven.
Getting caught having an affair isn't illegal.
That is up to the judge.
I will accept their decision.
You have no proof she lied under oath.
You have no proof she lied.
Fani never testified she didn't have an affair.
We will have to see what the judge decides but it's my opinion Fani will stay in the case.
If I'm wrong, I will have no problem accepting their decision.
I don't think evidence that shows they were within 3 or so miles of each other with no context is damning evidence.Defense presented some very damning evidence, not speculative. Two people saying they were romantic way before she hired him. A gazillion phone records.
No it doesn't.The evidence says otherwise.
Link?She benefitted AT LEAST $17,000 from this guy AND LIED ABOUT IT.
You have no proof she didn't.
Now, how about dem apples?
We shall see.Fani is done, dude. LET IT GO.
Her friend testified they were romantic before his hiring.I don't think evidence that shows they were within 3 or so miles of each other with no context is damning evidence.
Again, we will see what the judge says.
Did you watch her and Wade's testimony? Not very believable.No it doesn't.
All of the vacations. Even if she "paid him back" she's obligated by law to report the $$ from a contractor. She signed forms saying she never received anything.Link?
Her friend testified they were romantic before his hiring.
His friend told the defense they were "absolutely" romantic.
Yep. Just like they testified.He was in the area of her condo from 11 pm until 3 am an several occasions.
No. I read the transcript.Did you watch her and Wade's testimony? Not very believable.
Link.All of the vacations. Even if she "paid him back" she's obligated by law to report the $$ from a contractor. She signed forms saying she never received anything.
Link?
www.businessinsider.com
Nope. They testified he never stayed over, ever, and that he was never at the condo before he was hired.Yep. Just like they testified.
You have no proof she lied.
It's absolutely about what the judge believes. If you watched the actual testimony you might think differently. They were evasive and not very believable.No. I read the transcript.
Regardless, it's not about what we believe but what can proven.
100% true!Fani never testified she didn't have an affair.
Ex-partner of Trump's Georgia prosecutor once texted that DA Fani Willis 'absolutely' started dating Nathan Wade before he was hired
Terrence Bradley testified Tuesday that he had no personal knowledge of when Fani Willis and Nathan Wade's relationship began, despite earlier texts.
Nope. They testified he never stayed over, ever, and that he was never at the condo before he was hired.
