"Biden's documents are different from Trump's documents"

[Faun]

What lying?

Again with the spinny dippy spinny, cocksucking, spinny, dipping.

Your lie that they're being treated differently.

 

[hadit]

There is zero evidence of that, confirming your thread is total bs. Stop the fucking lying ass hole. Show us proof he stole documents. NOW! Not tomorrow, NOW.

Did he have the right to have them in his possession after he left office? That's the question you need to answer, one way or the other. Then you need to revisit TRUMP!. If it was wrong for him to have such documents, it's wrong for Quid Pro to have them, and you should condemn him for having them. If it is right for Quid Pro to have them, then it's right for TRUMP! to have them as well. That's the way this works.

 

[WEATHER53]

Damn what some gobbly goo talk that is. Diluted is a thing. LOL!

Children engage in making fun of what they can’t acknowledge. But they generally don’t feel that’s it’s an actual rebuttal. You thought absent lib loons operate entirely from wishes and feelings and the incorrect expectations that the rest of the planet will agree

 

[WEATHER53]

Damn what some gobbly goo talk that is. Diluted is a thing. LOL!

That LOL is just SO wounding rebuttal absent douche babbler.

 

[Marener]

As you know, the documents, hidden in an unsecured location were found the week before the November mid-term election, and only now has that been disclosed.

It really can't be considered hidden since Biden voluntarily turned them over once they were discovered.

 

[hadit]

But Trump’s problem isn’t “taking documents in the first place”. It’s only an equivalent scenario if you ignore the vast majority of the story.

The central point is the same in both. Does a POTUS/VP have the right to take classified documents with him when he leaves office? Until you get past that, there's no sense in going further, unless your entire aim is to provide cover for Quid Pro by pretending he did nothing wrong while condemning TRUMP! because Orange Man Bad, and reasons, and stuff.

 

[Faun]

Objects, not obstructs. Using the legal system is not obstruction.

Providing false information to the FBI is obstruction.

 

[marvin martian]

It really can't be considered hidden since Biden voluntarily turned them over once they were discovered.

No he didn't. His lawyers turned them over, likely to keep themselves out of prison.

 

[hadit]

It really can't be considered hidden since Biden voluntarily turned them over once they were discovered.

Interesting term, that, "discovered". Are we trying to confer innocence to Quid Pro by pretending he didn't KNOW he was taking highly classified documents out of secure storage? If he didn't even know that, what morons would think he should even be VP, much less POTUS?

 

[dudmuck]

This just shows progs can't meme.

Either case wasn't a huge issue until progs MADE it a huge issue to try to "get Trump yet again".

Having it thrown back at you and watching you equivocate is just fucking hilarious.

Hey, if Biden illegally took classified documents from the WH...by all means, investigate and if guilty, prosecute.I gots no problem with that.
You know, because I'm not in a fucking cult.

and, somebody not providing any memes doesnt have any standing to say others cant meme.

 

[Marener]

The central point is the same in both. Does a POTUS/VP have the right to take classified documents with him when he leaves office? Until you get past that, there's no sense in going further, unless your entire aim is to provide cover for Quid Pro by pretending he did nothing wrong while condemning TRUMP! because Orange Man Bad, and reasons, and stuff.

Had Trump given back the classified documents as soon as it was discovered, no one would have cared. Biden did. Trump didn't.

That's not providing cover. That's just an obvious fact.

 

[Faun]

Exactly. So the chance that there are more needs to be investigated.

Nope, that's not how the law works. You have it backwards. You need probable cause to obtain a search warrant -- you can't get a search warrant to hunt for probable cause.

 

[hadit]

No he didn't. His lawyers turned them over, likely to keep themselves out of prison.

They're trying to simultaneously grant Quid Pro cover by pretending he, on his own, turned over the documents AND claiming he was dumb enough to take highly classified documents out of secure storage without even knowing he was doing it.

 

[Marener]

Interesting term, that, "discovered". Are we trying to confer innocence to Quid Pro by pretending he didn't KNOW he was taking highly classified documents out of secure storage? If he didn't even know that, what morons would think he should even be VP, much less POTUS?

What evidence exists to support that Biden had intentionally taken anything? None.

 

[martybegan]

Your lie that they're being treated differently.

They are. By people like you. Purposefully. Politically. Hypocritically.

 

[Marener]

No he didn't. His lawyers turned them over, likely to keep themselves out of prison.

Lawyers act on behalf of their clients. Try to have some knowledge of how the world works.

 

[martybegan]

Providing false information to the FBI is obstruction.

What false information?

So is the Steele Dossier obstruction?

 

[Marener]

Wrong. Do you have the right to hire a lawyer and challenge a government order?

You do!

Trump never challenged the grand jury subpoena.

 

[martybegan]

Hey, if Biden illegally took classified documents from the WH...by all means, investigate and if guilty, prosecute.I gots no problem with that.
You know, because I'm not in a fucking cult.

and, somebody not providing any memes doesnt have any standing to say others cant meme.

No, you are, and like most cult members you don't realize it and don't want to realize it.

Anyone with an avatar like yours is a TDS cultist.

 

[SeaMajor7]

What evidence exists to support that Biden had intentionally taken anything? None.

He was in POSESSION OF THEM!!!!!
Jeeeezus you zombies are pathetic!