Biden speech: The SCOTUS decision limited to OFFICIAL ACTS ONLY means a President is a KING and can do ANYTHING HE WANTS.

Biden and his HELL team will also use most of this to their advantage. I saw on tic toc one girl "suggested" they should just kill Trump and Biden won't be punished. Lots of nuts coming out of the woodwork here. Trump needs double duty protection from these nutcase Libs that act on their fantasies.
 
Wah wah wah
If they won’t do as I wish then they can do all kinds of bad things
This is a CHILDs lament, not fit for POTUS
 
Last edited:
Nowhere in that article is there any indication he was targeted.
Sounds like voluntary manslaughter. Criminal, jailable. Why didn’t xiden try to prosecute Obama for that?
 
Wah wah wah
If they won’t do as I wish then they can do all kinds of bad things
Thus is a CHILDs lament, not fit for POTUS
This sounds like what Trump was whining about in the first place.

Wah wah wah. If you don’t give me immunity the president will get prosecuted for breaking the law and that’s a bad thing.
 
Yes. This is a well known fact. It was Anwar al Awlaki, someone who was clearly and irrefutably engaging in terrorism against our country.
So what gives an american the right to murder him?
 
This sounds like what Trump was whining about in the first place.

Wah wah wah. If you don’t give me immunity the president will get prosecuted for breaking the law and that’s a bad thing.
TDS noted
Stay on topic
 
This sounds like what Trump was whining about in the first place.

Wah wah wah. If you don’t give me immunity the president will get prosecuted for breaking the law and that’s a bad thing.
Yes trump was arguing for the rule of law and constitutional normals against president the demafacist regime

He was right, and the response by your senile lead party highlights that
 
No he didn’t. The 16 year old was collateral damage during a military strike against enemy combatants. They didn’t know he was there until afterwards.
That is a false statement.
 
Didn’t he say he was going to do that in 2016 too?
He was nice enough to continue the tradition of not going after your predecessors, but now that Democrats have broken that tradition, its game on. :dunno:
 
15th post
He was nice enough to continue the tradition of not going after your predecessors, but now that Democrats have broken that tradition, it’s game on. :dunno:
Was he wrong to say he was going to do so in 2016?

The tradition is presidents don’t commit crimes. Not giving free passes to former presidents who do.
 
Was he wrong to say he was going to do so in 2016?

The tradition is presidents don’t commit crimes. Not giving free passes to former presidents who do.
When did he say that?
 
Was he wrong to say he was going to do so in 2016?
No, "You'd be in jail" is the most famous line in presidential debate history. That line alone may have been enough to swing the presidency over to him.

I dont remember you complaining when Trump was being accused of being a Russian agent in the 2016 AND 2020 debates, so spare me your fake outrage.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom